Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.06373 v4 pith:OLVCE22V submitted 2024-05-10 cs.CL cs.AI

LLM Discussion: Enhancing the Creativity of Large Language Models via Discussion Framework and Role-Play

Li-Chun Lu , Shou-Jen Chen , Tsung-Min Pai , Chan-Hung Yu , Hung-yi Lee , Shao-Hua Sun This is my paper
classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords creativitydiscussionframeworktestlanguagellmscreativehuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have shown exceptional proficiency in natural language processing but often fall short of generating creative and original responses to open-ended questions. To enhance LLM creativity, our key insight is to emulate the human process of inducing collective creativity through engaging discussions with participants from diverse backgrounds and perspectives. To this end, we propose LLM Discussion, a three-phase discussion framework that facilitates vigorous and diverging idea exchanges and ensures convergence to creative answers. Moreover, we adopt a role-playing technique by assigning distinct roles to LLMs to combat the homogeneity of LLMs. We evaluate the efficacy of the proposed framework with the Alternative Uses Test, Similarities Test, Instances Test, and Scientific Creativity Test through both LLM evaluation and human study. The results show that our proposed framework outperforms single-LLM approaches and existing multi-LLM frameworks across various creativity metrics. The code is available at https://github.com/lawraa/LLM-Discussion.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DICE: Entropy-Regularized Equilibrium Selection for Stable Multi-Agent LLM Coordination

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DICE formalizes multi-agent LLM coordination as discounted incomplete-information Markov games and introduces Heterogeneous Quantal Response Equilibrium (HQRE) to achieve unique stable equilibria with bounded regret, ...

  2. Context Learning for Multi-Agent Discussion

    cs.AI 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    M2CL trains per-agent context generators with a self-adaptive mechanism to maintain coherence and reduce output discrepancies in multi-LLM discussions, yielding 20-50% gains on reasoning, embodied, and mobile control tasks.

  3. Emotion Profiling in LLM-Based Literary Translation: Systematic Shifts Across MT and Post-Editing

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LLM translations introduce model-specific statistically significant emotional fingerprints that limit preservation of author voice, with post-editing providing partial alignment to human norms.

  4. Chinese Short-Form Creative Content Generation via Explanation-Oriented Multi-Objective Optimization

    cs.CL 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MAGIC-HMO is a multi-agent framework that treats Chinese short-form creative NLG as heterogeneous multi-objective optimization over personalized constraints plus explanation reliability and outperforms baselines on a ...

  5. Fairness Testing of Large Language Models in Role-Playing

    cs.CY 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Generates 550 roles and 33,000 questions to evaluate 10 LLMs in role-playing, finding 107,580 biased responses.