The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2310.15100 · v1 · pith:ONGTOAKY · submitted 2023-10-23 · cs.CL

LLM-in-the-loop: Leveraging Large Language Model for Thematic Analysis

Reviewed by Pithpith:ONGTOAKYopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL
keywords analysisframeworkllmscodersdatahumancodinglanguage
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Thematic analysis (TA) has been widely used for analyzing qualitative data in many disciplines and fields. To ensure reliable analysis, the same piece of data is typically assigned to at least two human coders. Moreover, to produce meaningful and useful analysis, human coders develop and deepen their data interpretation and coding over multiple iterations, making TA labor-intensive and time-consuming. Recently the emerging field of large language models (LLMs) research has shown that LLMs have the potential replicate human-like behavior in various tasks: in particular, LLMs outperform crowd workers on text-annotation tasks, suggesting an opportunity to leverage LLMs on TA. We propose a human-LLM collaboration framework (i.e., LLM-in-the-loop) to conduct TA with in-context learning (ICL). This framework provides the prompt to frame discussions with a LLM (e.g., GPT-3.5) to generate the final codebook for TA. We demonstrate the utility of this framework using survey datasets on the aspects of the music listening experience and the usage of a password manager. Results of the two case studies show that the proposed framework yields similar coding quality to that of human coders but reduces TA's labor and time demands.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Whose Story Gets Told? Positionality and Bias in LLM Summaries of Life Narratives

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A proposed pipeline shows LLMs introduce detectable race and gender biases when summarizing life narratives, creating potential for representational harm in research.

  2. LLMs for Qualitative Data Analysis Fail on Security-specificComments in Human Experiments

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLMs improve with detailed code descriptions but remain insufficient to replace human annotators for security-specific qualitative coding.

  3. Reasoning-Based Refinement of Unsupervised Text Clusters with LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLM reasoning refines unsupervised text clusters via coherence checks, redundancy removal, and label grounding, yielding better coherence and human-aligned labels on social media data.

  4. VIDEE: Visual and Interactive Decomposition, Execution, and Evaluation of Text Analytics with Intelligent Agents

    cs.CL 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    VIDEE introduces a human-in-the-loop system using Monte-Carlo Tree Search for task decomposition, executable pipeline generation, and LLM-based evaluation with visualizations to support non-expert text analytics.