Pith. sign in

REVIEW 12 cited by

A Survey on Robotics with Foundation Models: toward Embodied AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.02385 v1 pith:PQICLB7L submitted 2024-02-04 cs.RO cs.AI

classification cs.ROcs.AI
keywords embodiedfoundationlearningmodelscapabilitiescontrolroboticssurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While the exploration for embodied AI has spanned multiple decades, it remains a persistent challenge to endow agents with human-level intelligence, including perception, learning, reasoning, decision-making, control, and generalization capabilities, so that they can perform general-purpose tasks in open, unstructured, and dynamic environments. Recent advances in computer vision, natural language processing, and multi-modality learning have shown that the foundation models have superhuman capabilities for specific tasks. They not only provide a solid cornerstone for integrating basic modules into embodied AI systems but also shed light on how to scale up robot learning from a methodological perspective. This survey aims to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of foundation models in robotics, focusing on autonomous manipulation and encompassing high-level planning and low-level control. Moreover, we showcase their commonly used datasets, simulators, and benchmarks. Importantly, we emphasize the critical challenges intrinsic to this field and delineate potential avenues for future research, contributing to advancing the frontier of academic and industrial discourse.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 12 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SafeRelBench: A Spatial-Relation-Aware Benchmark for Process-Level Safety in VLM-Driven Embodied Agents

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    VLM-driven embodied agents complete household tasks but routinely violate spatial-relation safety preconditions, according to the new 507-sample SafeRelBench evaluation.

  2. ACE-Brain-0.5: A Unified Embodied Foundational Model for Physical Agentic AI

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A single 8B backbone unifies spatial perception, decision making, navigation/manipulation, and progress estimation with SSR+ merging, reporting gains on most spatial benchmarks and competitive action/progress results.

  3. Self-Evolving Just-In-Time Memory for Proactive Embodied Safety

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Just-In-Time Memory framework with graph-based state tracking and self-evolving safety skills improves safe task completion in household robots by up to 30 percentage points on IS-Bench.

  4. From Video to Control: A Survey of Learning Manipulation Interfaces from Temporal Visual Data

    cs.RO 2026-04 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Video-to-robot control methods cluster into three interface families, and the field’s main bottleneck is grounding video-derived predictions into dependable closed-loop robot behavior.

  5. ANNIE: Be Careful of Your Robots

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors build a safety-centered benchmark and attack method that induces vision-language-action robot policies to violate ISO-based safety rules in a majority of tested episodes.

  6. Disrupting Vision-Language Model-Driven Navigation Services via Adversarial Object Fusion

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AdvOF crafts 3D adversarial objects that mislead VLM perception across multiple views and degrade VLN agent navigation success in simulation.

  7. Reinforced Reasoning for Embodied Planning

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An SFT-plus-GRPO recipe lifts a 7B VLM to 35.6 percent success on EB-ALFRED versus 22.0 for GPT-4o-mini and 33.7 for Qwen2.5-VL-72B, with smaller but consistent gains on unseen EB-Habitat.

  8. RoboGPT-R1: Enhancing Robot Task Planning with Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 3B VLM trained with SFT plus GRPO and an LCS-based reward reaches 55.3% on EmbodiedBench's EB-ALFRED, beating GPT-4o-mini and the 7B REBP planner.

  9. FlashDP: Private Training Large Language Models with Efficient DP-SGD

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    FlashDP fuses per-sample gradient computation, norm calculation, clipping, and noise addition into a cache-friendly block-wise all-reduce workflow that avoids explicit per-sample gradient storage and redundant recomputation.

  10. Towards Dual-Brain Minimal Sufficient Representation for Vision-Language Navigation

    cs.CV 2026-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A CP-decomposed, instruction-conditioned latent bottleneck (CompactNav) improves VLN-CE success rate by about 2% over prior state of the art on two benchmarks.

  11. Foundation Models in Robotics: A Comprehensive Review of Methods, Models, Datasets, Challenges and Future Research Directions

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Foundation models are enabling a shift in robotics toward general-purpose agents, and this review maps the methods, models, datasets, challenges, and future directions across the field.

  12. Large Model Empowered Embodied AI: A Survey on Decision-Making and Embodied Learning

    cs.RO 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A review that categorizes large-model-empowered embodied AI into hierarchical and end-to-end decision-making, imitation and reinforcement learning, and world models.

Pith tools