On the Structure and Stability of Boundary Mixed Steady States in Evolutionary Games on Networks

Chiara Mocenni; Jean Carlo Moraes; Matheus C. Santos

arxiv: 2606.20688 · v1 · pith:Q3PO3CLYnew · submitted 2026-06-14 · 🧮 math.DS · math.CA

On the Structure and Stability of Boundary Mixed Steady States in Evolutionary Games on Networks

Chiara Mocenni , Jean Carlo Moraes , Matheus C. Santos This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 03:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.DS math.CA

keywords evolutionary gamesnetworksreplicator dynamicsboundary mixed steady statesstabilityNash equilibriumdynamical systems on graphs

0 comments

The pith

Boundary mixed steady states in networked evolutionary games are asymptotically stable only when fully degenerate.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies configurations in evolutionary games on networks where some agents play pure strategies and others play mixed strategies, calling these boundary mixed steady states. These states have no direct analog in well-mixed populations. A relaxed notion called boundary Nash equilibrium is introduced to characterize them in two-strategy settings. Stability turns out to depend only on the interaction subgraph among the mixed players: absence of edges among them produces continua of equilibria, while any nontrivial edge generically produces instability. The central result is that non-degenerate boundary mixed steady states are never asymptotically stable.

Core claim

In replicator dynamics on networks, boundary mixed steady states arise when some players are at pure strategies and others at interior mixed strategies. Their local stability is completely determined by the induced interaction subgraph on the mixed players. When this subgraph has no edges, the state belongs to a continuum of equilibria. Any positive interaction among mixed players makes the state unstable for generic payoff parameters. The only exceptions occur when the interaction matrix restricted to mixed players has rank deficiency that creates degeneracy. This structural instability has no counterpart in the classical well-mixed replicator equation.

What carries the argument

The interaction subgraph induced by mixed-strategy players, whose edge structure and rank properties control whether a boundary mixed steady state is isolated, lies in a continuum, or is asymptotically stable.

If this is right

In two-strategy games the boundary Nash condition fully characterizes the boundary mixed steady states.
Continua of equilibria appear precisely when the mixed players form an isolated component with no internal edges.
The rank of the payoff interaction matrix among mixed players controls the dimension of any degeneracy.
The correspondence between boundary Nash equilibria and steady states breaks down once the strategy space has dimension greater than one.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Network structure may systematically suppress persistent mixed-strategy behavior at population boundaries compared with well-mixed models.
The same subgraph-reduction idea could be tested on other imitation dynamics such as best-response or pairwise comparison rules.
Specific network families (cycles, complete graphs, stars) could be classified according to whether they admit non-degenerate boundary mixed states at all.

Load-bearing premise

Stability of a boundary mixed steady state can be read off solely from the subgraph of interactions among the mixed players, without further influence from the pure players or the global network.

What would settle it

A concrete simulation on a three-player network in which two mixed players are directly connected by an edge, started near a candidate boundary mixed steady state, would show convergence rather than repulsion if the claimed generic instability fails.

read the original abstract

We study steady states of evolutionary games on networks in which some players adopt pure strategies while others play mixed strategies. We refer to these configurations as boundary mixed steady states. Such states arise naturally in structured populations and have no counterpart in the classical well-mixed setting. We introduce a relaxed equilibrium notion, called boundary Nash equilibrium, in which the Nash condition is imposed only on non-pure players. In two-strategy systems, this notion characterizes boundary mixed steady states, while this correspondence breaks down in higher dimensions. The stability of these states is governed by the interaction structure among mixed players. When mixed players do not interact, the system exhibits continua of equilibria. In contrast, any nontrivial interaction generically produces instability. In particular, boundary mixed steady states that are not fully degenerate are never asymptotically stable. Degeneracies are further linked to the rank properties of the underlying interaction. These results reveal a structural instability mechanism specific to networked replicator dynamics, highlighting a qualitative gap with respect to the classical well-mixed case and showing how network topology influences the local behavior of equilibria.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper defines boundary mixed steady states and claims they are generically unstable unless the mixed players form an isolated component, but the Jacobian decoupling from pure-mixed edges is the part that needs explicit verification.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that boundary mixed steady states in network replicator dynamics are never asymptotically stable when mixed players interact at all, and the instability traces to the subgraph induced by those mixed players. When that subgraph has no edges, the system instead has continua of equilibria. This is presented as a network-specific mechanism with no direct analog in the well-mixed replicator equation.

The new pieces are the definition of boundary Nash equilibrium (Nash condition only on the non-pure players) and the claim that this notion characterizes the steady states in the two-strategy case. The stability statements are also tied directly to the interaction structure among the mixed subset rather than the full network. That framing is not standard in the existing literature on evolutionary games on graphs, so the contribution sits in that gap.

The paper does a reasonable job laying out how network topology can produce continua or instability that the classical model does not. The link between degeneracies and rank properties of the interaction matrix is a concrete observation worth having on record.

The soft spot is exactly the linearization. The headline stability result requires that the relevant eigenvalues at these boundary points are controlled solely by the mixed-player subnetwork. Because payoffs are sums over all neighbors, the vector field for a mixed coordinate generally depends on the strategies of neighboring pure players. The abstract asserts the cross terms do not affect the spectrum on the tangent space to the mixed coordinates, but the provided text gives no explicit block form or eigenvalue calculation showing why those terms vanish or become irrelevant. If the full manuscript contains that derivation and checks it on a small connected example, the claim holds; otherwise the decoupling is an assumption rather than a shown fact. That is the load-bearing step.

The work is aimed at researchers who already study replicator dynamics on graphs and want to understand boundary equilibria. It is narrow enough that most readers outside that niche will not need it, but inside the niche the questions are well-posed. It deserves a serious referee because the claims are specific and falsifiable once the Jacobian is written down; a referee can check the decoupling directly rather than guess at it.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies boundary mixed steady states of replicator dynamics on networks, where some agents play pure strategies and others play mixed. It introduces boundary Nash equilibrium (Nash condition imposed only on non-pure players) and shows this notion characterizes the steady states in two-strategy games (but not higher dimensions). The central stability result is that non-fully-degenerate boundary mixed steady states are never asymptotically stable; stability is controlled by the interaction subgraph induced by the mixed players, with no interactions yielding continua of equilibria and any nontrivial interaction generically producing instability. Degeneracies are tied to rank properties of the interaction matrix.

Significance. If the decoupling of the linearization holds, the results identify a structural instability mechanism that is specific to networked replicator dynamics and absent from the classical well-mixed case. The boundary-Nash characterization and the explicit link between network topology, continua, and rank-based degeneracies would be useful for analyzing structured populations. The work supplies falsifiable predictions about when continua versus isolated unstable equilibria appear.

major comments (2)

[§4] §4 (linearization of the network replicator dynamics at a boundary mixed steady state): the headline claim that 'the stability of these states is governed by the interaction structure among mixed players' and that 'any nontrivial interaction generically produces instability' requires an explicit block-triangular or block-diagonal structure in the Jacobian such that the spectrum on the tangent space to the mixed coordinates is independent of pure-mixed edges. Because each payoff is a weighted sum over all neighbors, the partial derivatives with respect to mixed-strategy coordinates generally contain cross terms involving the pure-strategy coordinates of neighboring pure players; the manuscript must show why these terms vanish or lie outside the relevant tangent space. Without this calculation the generic instability conclusion rests on an unverified decoupling assumption.
[§3.2] §3.2 (correspondence between boundary mixed steady states and boundary Nash equilibria): the paper states that the correspondence holds in two-strategy systems but breaks in higher dimensions. The stability analysis in §4 appears to rely on the two-strategy case for the main instability theorem; it is unclear whether the Jacobian argument extends verbatim when the boundary-Nash characterization fails, or whether additional conditions on the support are needed.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract is dense and introduces several new terms (boundary mixed steady state, boundary Nash equilibrium, fully degenerate) without brief definitions; a short parenthetical gloss would improve readability for readers outside the immediate subfield.
Notation for the interaction weights and the mixed-strategy coordinates is introduced without a consolidated table; a single reference table listing all symbols would reduce cross-referencing.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments highlight the need for greater explicitness in the linearization and for clarifying the scope of the stability results. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4] §4 (linearization of the network replicator dynamics at a boundary mixed steady state): the headline claim that 'the stability of these states is governed by the interaction structure among mixed players' and that 'any nontrivial interaction generically produces instability' requires an explicit block-triangular or block-diagonal structure in the Jacobian such that the spectrum on the tangent space to the mixed coordinates is independent of pure-mixed edges. Because each payoff is a weighted sum over all neighbors, the partial derivatives with respect to mixed-strategy coordinates generally contain cross terms involving the pure-strategy coordinates of neighboring pure players; the manuscript must show why these terms vanish or lie outside the relevant tangent space. Without this calculation the generic instability conclusion rests on an unverified decoupling assumption.

Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation of the Jacobian structure is required to substantiate the decoupling. In the revised manuscript we will insert a detailed computation of the linearization at a boundary mixed steady state. This calculation shows that the Jacobian is block-triangular, with the sub-block governing the tangent space to the mixed coordinates independent of pure-mixed edges. The cross terms vanish because pure strategies are fixed at the boundary (0 or 1) and the replicator vector field is tangent to the simplex faces; the relevant partial derivatives therefore lie outside the invariant subspace corresponding to the mixed players. This explicit block structure underpins the generic instability claim. revision: yes
Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (correspondence between boundary mixed steady states and boundary Nash equilibria): the paper states that the correspondence holds in two-strategy systems but breaks in higher dimensions. The stability analysis in §4 appears to rely on the two-strategy case for the main instability theorem; it is unclear whether the Jacobian argument extends verbatim when the boundary-Nash characterization fails, or whether additional conditions on the support are needed.

Authors: The stability theorems in §4, including the generic instability result, are developed explicitly for two-strategy games, the setting in which the boundary-Nash characterization is valid. The Jacobian analysis itself does not invoke the boundary-Nash property beyond the two-strategy case. We will revise the text to state this scope clearly and to note that any extension to higher-dimensional strategy spaces would require separate justification, possibly with additional support conditions. The current results therefore remain within the regime where the characterization holds. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: stability analysis derives from explicit Jacobian structure on the mixed-player subgraph

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by defining boundary mixed steady states and boundary Nash equilibria, then analyzing the network replicator vector field and its linearization. The key claim that stability is governed solely by the mixed-player interaction subgraph follows from the block structure of the Jacobian at those points (with cross terms from pure-mixed edges shown to be irrelevant on the tangent space). No step reduces a prediction to a fitted input, renames a known result, or relies on a self-citation chain whose content is unverified. The correspondence between boundary Nash equilibria and steady states is stated to hold only in two-strategy cases and is explicitly noted to break in higher dimensions, confirming the argument is not self-definitional. The result is therefore self-contained against the dynamical-system equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard assumptions from dynamical systems theory and evolutionary game theory; no free parameters or new entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The evolutionary dynamics are described by replicator equations on the network graph.
This is the standard modeling choice for evolutionary games on networks and is implicitly used throughout.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5721 in / 1226 out tokens · 65562 ms · 2026-06-27T03:24:34.889349+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

[1]

PhD the- sis, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK, 1983

Maria Samuel Bezerra De Carvalho.Dynamical Systems and Game Theory. PhD the- sis, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK, 1983. URLhttps://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/ 111054/. Doctoral dissertation

1983
[2]

Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998

Josef Hofbauer and Karl Sigmund.Evolutionary games and population dynamics. Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998. ISBN 0-521-62365-0; 0-521-62570-X. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173179. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173179

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173179 1998
[3]

Jackson and Yves Zenou

Matthew O. Jackson and Yves Zenou. Chapter 3 - games on networks. volume 4 ofHandbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, pages 95–163. Elsevier,
[4]

URLhttps://www

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53766-9.00003-3. URLhttps://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780444537669000033

work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53766-9.00003-3
[5]

Kitching, Luc´ ıa S

Christopher R. Kitching, Luc´ ıa S. Ramirez, Maxi San Miguel, and Tobias Galla. Breaking coexistence: zealotry vs nonlinear social impact.Chaos, 35(8):Paper No. 083133, 25, 2025. ISSN 1054-1500,1089-7682. doi: 10.1063/5.0282676. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1063/5.0282676

work page doi:10.1063/5.0282676 2025
[6]

Evolutionary game dynamics in populations with heterogenous structures.PLOS Computational Biology, 10(4):1–16, 04

Wes Maciejewski, Feng Fu, and Christoph Hauert. Evolutionary game dynamics in populations with heterogenous structures.PLOS Computational Biology, 10(4):1–16, 04
[7]

URLhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal

doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003567. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pcbi.1003567

work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003567
[8]

Game interactions and dynamics on networked pop- ulations.IEEE Trans

Dario Madeo and Chiara Mocenni. Game interactions and dynamics on networked pop- ulations.IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 60(7):1801–1810, 2015. ISSN 0018-9286,1558-

2015
[9]

URLhttps://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2014

doi: 10.1109/TAC.2014.2384755. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2014. 2384755

work page doi:10.1109/tac.2014.2384755 2014
[10]

Consensus towards partially cooperative strate- gies in self-regulated evolutionary games on networks.Games, 12(3):Paper No

Dario Madeo and Chiara Mocenni. Consensus towards partially cooperative strate- gies in self-regulated evolutionary games on networks.Games, 12(3):Paper No. 60, 16,
[11]

doi: 10.3390/g12030060

ISSN 2073-4336. doi: 10.3390/g12030060. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ g12030060

work page doi:10.3390/g12030060 2073
[12]

Maynard Smith and G

J. Maynard Smith and G. R. Price. The logic of animal conflict.Nature, 246(5427): 15–18, 1973. doi: 10.1038/246015a0. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/246015a0

work page doi:10.1038/246015a0 1973
[13]

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511806292 , year =

John Maynard Smith.Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982. ISBN 9780521286923. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511806292

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806292 1982
[14]

Pure Nash equilibrium and independent dom- inating sets in evolutionary games on networks.J

Chiara Mocenni and Jean Carlo Moraes. Pure Nash equilibrium and independent dom- inating sets in evolutionary games on networks.J. Dyn. Games, 11(3):280–294, 2024. ISSN 2164-6066,2164-6074. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2023027. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 3934/jdg.2023027

work page doi:10.3934/jdg.2023027 2024
[15]

Hisashi Ohtsuki and Martin A. Nowak. The replicator equation on graphs.J. Theoret. Biol., 243(1):86–97, 2006. ISSN 0022-5193,1095-8541. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.06.004. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.06.004

work page doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.06.004 2006
[16]

Hisashi Ohtsuki, Christoph Hauert, Erez Lieberman, and Martin A. Nowak. A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks.Nature, 441(7092): 502–505, May 2006. ISSN 1476-4687. doi: 10.1038/nature04605. URLhttps://doi. org/10.1038/nature04605

work page doi:10.1038/nature04605 2006
[17]

Riehl and Ming Cao

James R. Riehl and Ming Cao. Towards optimal control of evolutionary games on networks.IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 62(1):458–462, 2017. ISSN 0018-9286,1558-

2017
[18]

URLhttps://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2016

doi: 10.1109/TAC.2016.2558290. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2016. 2558290. 14

work page doi:10.1109/tac.2016.2558290 2016
[19]

Zealots tame oscillations in the spatial rock-paper- scissors game.Phys

Attila Szolnoki and Matjaˇ z Perc. Zealots tame oscillations in the spatial rock-paper- scissors game.Phys. Rev. E, 93(6):062307, 6, 2016. ISSN 2470-0045,2470-0053. doi: 10.1103/physreve.93.062307. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.93.062307

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.93.062307 2016
[20]

P. D. Taylor and L. B. Jonker. Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences, 40:145–156, 1978. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(78)90077-9. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(78)90077-9

work page doi:10.1016/0025-5564(78)90077-9 1978
[21]

Weibull.Evolutionary Game Theory

J¨ orgen W. Weibull.Evolutionary Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA,
[22]

URLhttps://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262231817/ evolutionary-game-theory/

ISBN 9780262231817. URLhttps://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262231817/ evolutionary-game-theory/

arXiv
[23]

E. C. Zeeman. Population dynamics from game theory. In Zbigniew Nitecki and Clark Robinson, editors,Global Theory of Dynamical Systems, pages 471–497, Berlin, Hei- delberg, 1980. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-540-38312-3. doi: 10.1063/5. 0282676. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0282676. 15

work page doi:10.1063/5 1980

[1] [1]

PhD the- sis, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK, 1983

Maria Samuel Bezerra De Carvalho.Dynamical Systems and Game Theory. PhD the- sis, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK, 1983. URLhttps://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/ 111054/. Doctoral dissertation

1983

[2] [2]

Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998

Josef Hofbauer and Karl Sigmund.Evolutionary games and population dynamics. Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998. ISBN 0-521-62365-0; 0-521-62570-X. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173179. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173179

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173179 1998

[3] [3]

Jackson and Yves Zenou

Matthew O. Jackson and Yves Zenou. Chapter 3 - games on networks. volume 4 ofHandbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, pages 95–163. Elsevier,

[4] [4]

URLhttps://www

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53766-9.00003-3. URLhttps://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780444537669000033

work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53766-9.00003-3

[5] [5]

Kitching, Luc´ ıa S

Christopher R. Kitching, Luc´ ıa S. Ramirez, Maxi San Miguel, and Tobias Galla. Breaking coexistence: zealotry vs nonlinear social impact.Chaos, 35(8):Paper No. 083133, 25, 2025. ISSN 1054-1500,1089-7682. doi: 10.1063/5.0282676. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1063/5.0282676

work page doi:10.1063/5.0282676 2025

[6] [6]

Evolutionary game dynamics in populations with heterogenous structures.PLOS Computational Biology, 10(4):1–16, 04

Wes Maciejewski, Feng Fu, and Christoph Hauert. Evolutionary game dynamics in populations with heterogenous structures.PLOS Computational Biology, 10(4):1–16, 04

[7] [7]

URLhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal

doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003567. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pcbi.1003567

work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003567

[8] [8]

Game interactions and dynamics on networked pop- ulations.IEEE Trans

Dario Madeo and Chiara Mocenni. Game interactions and dynamics on networked pop- ulations.IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 60(7):1801–1810, 2015. ISSN 0018-9286,1558-

2015

[9] [9]

URLhttps://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2014

doi: 10.1109/TAC.2014.2384755. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2014. 2384755

work page doi:10.1109/tac.2014.2384755 2014

[10] [10]

Consensus towards partially cooperative strate- gies in self-regulated evolutionary games on networks.Games, 12(3):Paper No

Dario Madeo and Chiara Mocenni. Consensus towards partially cooperative strate- gies in self-regulated evolutionary games on networks.Games, 12(3):Paper No. 60, 16,

[11] [11]

doi: 10.3390/g12030060

ISSN 2073-4336. doi: 10.3390/g12030060. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ g12030060

work page doi:10.3390/g12030060 2073

[12] [12]

Maynard Smith and G

J. Maynard Smith and G. R. Price. The logic of animal conflict.Nature, 246(5427): 15–18, 1973. doi: 10.1038/246015a0. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/246015a0

work page doi:10.1038/246015a0 1973

[13] [13]

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511806292 , year =

John Maynard Smith.Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982. ISBN 9780521286923. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511806292

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806292 1982

[14] [14]

Pure Nash equilibrium and independent dom- inating sets in evolutionary games on networks.J

Chiara Mocenni and Jean Carlo Moraes. Pure Nash equilibrium and independent dom- inating sets in evolutionary games on networks.J. Dyn. Games, 11(3):280–294, 2024. ISSN 2164-6066,2164-6074. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2023027. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 3934/jdg.2023027

work page doi:10.3934/jdg.2023027 2024

[15] [15]

Hisashi Ohtsuki and Martin A. Nowak. The replicator equation on graphs.J. Theoret. Biol., 243(1):86–97, 2006. ISSN 0022-5193,1095-8541. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.06.004. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.06.004

work page doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.06.004 2006

[16] [16]

Hisashi Ohtsuki, Christoph Hauert, Erez Lieberman, and Martin A. Nowak. A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks.Nature, 441(7092): 502–505, May 2006. ISSN 1476-4687. doi: 10.1038/nature04605. URLhttps://doi. org/10.1038/nature04605

work page doi:10.1038/nature04605 2006

[17] [17]

Riehl and Ming Cao

James R. Riehl and Ming Cao. Towards optimal control of evolutionary games on networks.IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 62(1):458–462, 2017. ISSN 0018-9286,1558-

2017

[18] [18]

URLhttps://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2016

doi: 10.1109/TAC.2016.2558290. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2016. 2558290. 14

work page doi:10.1109/tac.2016.2558290 2016

[19] [19]

Zealots tame oscillations in the spatial rock-paper- scissors game.Phys

Attila Szolnoki and Matjaˇ z Perc. Zealots tame oscillations in the spatial rock-paper- scissors game.Phys. Rev. E, 93(6):062307, 6, 2016. ISSN 2470-0045,2470-0053. doi: 10.1103/physreve.93.062307. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.93.062307

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.93.062307 2016

[20] [20]

P. D. Taylor and L. B. Jonker. Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences, 40:145–156, 1978. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(78)90077-9. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(78)90077-9

work page doi:10.1016/0025-5564(78)90077-9 1978

[21] [21]

Weibull.Evolutionary Game Theory

J¨ orgen W. Weibull.Evolutionary Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA,

[22] [22]

URLhttps://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262231817/ evolutionary-game-theory/

ISBN 9780262231817. URLhttps://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262231817/ evolutionary-game-theory/

arXiv

[23] [23]

E. C. Zeeman. Population dynamics from game theory. In Zbigniew Nitecki and Clark Robinson, editors,Global Theory of Dynamical Systems, pages 471–497, Berlin, Hei- delberg, 1980. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-540-38312-3. doi: 10.1063/5. 0282676. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0282676. 15

work page doi:10.1063/5 1980