The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2108.02403 · v2 · pith:QZ626PPT · submitted 2021-08-05 · cs.RO · cs.SE

Criticality Metrics for Automated Driving: A Review and Suitability Analysis of the State of the Art

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:QZ626PPTrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.RO cs.SE
keywords automatedcriticalitymetricsreviewanalysisapplicationsdrivingsafety
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The large-scale deployment of automated vehicles on public roads has the potential to vastly change the transportation modalities of today's society. Although this pursuit has been initiated decades ago, there still exist open challenges in reliably ensuring that such vehicles operate safely in open contexts. While functional safety is a well-established concept, the question of measuring the behavioral safety of a vehicle remains subject to research. One way to both objectively and computationally analyze traffic conflicts is the development and utilization of so-called criticality metrics. Contemporary approaches have leveraged the potential of criticality metrics in various applications related to automated driving, e.g. for computationally assessing the dynamic risk or filtering large data sets to build scenario catalogs. As a prerequisite to systematically choose adequate criticality metrics for such applications, we extensively review the state of the art of criticality metrics, their properties, and their applications in the context of automated driving. Based on this review, we propose a suitability analysis as a methodical tool to be used by practitioners. Both the proposed method and the state of the art review can then be harnessed to select well-suited measurement tools that cover an application's requirements, as demonstrated by an exemplary execution of the analysis. Ultimately, efficient, valid, and reliable measurements of an automated vehicle's safety performance are a key requirement for demonstrating its trustworthiness.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CooperDrive: Enhancing Driving Decisions Through Cooperative Perception

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    CooperDrive augments autonomous vehicle perception by sharing object-level data from BEV features, enabling earlier conflict anticipation and safer planning with 90 kbps bandwidth and 89 ms latency in real-world NLOS tests.