Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The Earth is Flat because...: Investigating LLMs' Belief towards Misinformation via Persuasive Conversation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.09085 v5 pith:RI5XAFGN submitted 2023-12-14 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CRcs.CY

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CRcs.CY
keywords persuasivellmsbelieffactualmisinformationconversationknowledgequestions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) encapsulate vast amounts of knowledge but still remain vulnerable to external misinformation. Existing research mainly studied this susceptibility behavior in a single-turn setting. However, belief can change during a multi-turn conversation, especially a persuasive one. Therefore, in this study, we delve into LLMs' susceptibility to persuasive conversations, particularly on factual questions that they can answer correctly. We first curate the Farm (i.e., Fact to Misinform) dataset, which contains factual questions paired with systematically generated persuasive misinformation. Then, we develop a testing framework to track LLMs' belief changes in a persuasive dialogue. Through extensive experiments, we find that LLMs' correct beliefs on factual knowledge can be easily manipulated by various persuasive strategies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Information Discernment in Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    LLMs update their stated numeric beliefs almost regardless of source reliability or whether a claim moves them closer to the truth, performing near chance on both dimensions.

  2. Helpful Agent Meets Deceptive Judge: Understanding Vulnerabilities in Agentic Workflows

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM agents frequently switch correct answers after one round of misleading feedback, and the new WAFER-QA benchmark measures this with web-backed critiques.

  3. Exploring Multimodal Challenges in Toxic Chinese Detection: Taxonomy, Benchmark, and Findings

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new taxonomy and dataset of 8 types of perturbed toxic Chinese show nine top LLMs often miss these obfuscated insults, and small-sample ICL or fine-tuning causes overcorrection.

Pith tools