The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2504.12718 · v1 · pith:RPHDDRWE · submitted 2025-04-17 · eess.IV · cs.AI· cs.CV

TUMLS: Trustful Fully Unsupervised Multi-Level Segmentation for Whole Slide Images of Histology

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:RPHDDRWErecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification eess.IV cs.AIcs.CV
keywords segmentationtumlsunsupervisedwholedatasetdigitalfullyimages
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Digital pathology, augmented by artificial intelligence (AI), holds significant promise for improving the workflow of pathologists. However, challenges such as the labor-intensive annotation of whole slide images (WSIs), high computational demands, and trust concerns arising from the absence of uncertainty estimation in predictions hinder the practical application of current AI methodologies in histopathology. To address these issues, we present a novel trustful fully unsupervised multi-level segmentation methodology (TUMLS) for WSIs. TUMLS adopts an autoencoder (AE) as a feature extractor to identify the different tissue types within low-resolution training data. It selects representative patches from each identified group based on an uncertainty measure and then does unsupervised nuclei segmentation in their respective higher-resolution space without using any ML algorithms. Crucially, this solution integrates seamlessly into clinicians workflows, transforming the examination of a whole WSI into a review of concise, interpretable cross-level insights. This integration significantly enhances and accelerates the workflow while ensuring transparency. We evaluated our approach using the UPENN-GBM dataset, where the AE achieved a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.0016. Additionally, nucleus segmentation is assessed on the MoNuSeg dataset, outperforming all unsupervised approaches with an F1 score of 77.46% and a Jaccard score of 63.35%. These results demonstrate the efficacy of TUMLS in advancing the field of digital pathology.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.