Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Socratic Planner: Self-QA-Based Zero-Shot Planning for Embodied Instruction Following

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.15190 v2 pith:SG3F6M4R submitted 2024-04-21 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CVcs.RO

Socratic Planner: Self-QA-Based Zero-Shot Planning for Embodied Instruction Following

classification cs.AI cs.CLcs.CVcs.RO
keywords plannersocraticplanningembodieddemonstrateexecutingfollowingfurther
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Embodied Instruction Following (EIF) is the task of executing natural language instructions by navigating and interacting with objects in interactive environments. A key challenge in EIF is compositional task planning, typically addressed through supervised learning or few-shot in-context learning with labeled data. To this end, we introduce the Socratic Planner, a self-QA-based zero-shot planning method that infers an appropriate plan without any further training. The Socratic Planner first facilitates self-questioning and answering by the Large Language Model (LLM), which in turn helps generate a sequence of subgoals. While executing the subgoals, an embodied agent may encounter unexpected situations, such as unforeseen obstacles. The Socratic Planner then adjusts plans based on dense visual feedback through a visually-grounded re-planning mechanism. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the Socratic Planner, outperforming current state-of-the-art planning models on the ALFRED benchmark across all metrics, particularly excelling in long-horizon tasks that demand complex inference. We further demonstrate its real-world applicability through deployment on a physical robot for long-horizon tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. RoboGPT-R1: Enhancing Robot Task Planning with Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0

    A 3B VLM trained with SFT plus GRPO and an LCS-based reward reaches 55.3% on EmbodiedBench's EB-ALFRED, beating GPT-4o-mini and the 7B REBP planner.