Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

OmniACT: A Dataset and Benchmark for Enabling Multimodal Generalist Autonomous Agents for Desktop and Web

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.17553 v3 pith:SLYYAOPB submitted 2024-02-27 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CVcs.HC

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.CVcs.HC
keywords agentscomputertasksbenchmarklanguagetaskdatasethuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

For decades, human-computer interaction has fundamentally been manual. Even today, almost all productive work done on the computer necessitates human input at every step. Autonomous virtual agents represent an exciting step in automating many of these menial tasks. Virtual agents would empower users with limited technical proficiency to harness the full possibilities of computer systems. They could also enable the efficient streamlining of numerous computer tasks, ranging from calendar management to complex travel bookings, with minimal human intervention. In this paper, we introduce OmniACT, the first-of-a-kind dataset and benchmark for assessing an agent's capability to generate executable programs to accomplish computer tasks. Our scope extends beyond traditional web automation, covering a diverse range of desktop applications. The dataset consists of fundamental tasks such as "Play the next song", as well as longer horizon tasks such as "Send an email to John Doe mentioning the time and place to meet". Specifically, given a pair of screen image and a visually-grounded natural language task, the goal is to generate a script capable of fully executing the task. We run several strong baseline language model agents on our benchmark. The strongest baseline, GPT-4, performs the best on our benchmark However, its performance level still reaches only 15% of the human proficiency in generating executable scripts capable of completing the task, demonstrating the challenge of our task for conventional web agents. Our benchmark provides a platform to measure and evaluate the progress of language model agents in automating computer tasks and motivates future work towards building multimodal models that bridge large language models and the visual grounding of computer screens.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. R-VLM: Region-Aware Vision Language Model for Precise GUI Grounding

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    R-VLM improves GUI grounding by combining two-stage zoom-in proposals with an IoU-weighted training loss, raising accuracy by up to 13 absolute points over SeeClick.

  2. Desktop-Delta Bench: Do Computer-Use Models Understand Desktop GUI Transitions?

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 2,013-sample Linux desktop benchmark shows frontier VLMs are far from solving temporal ordering and single-action reconstruction, with best ordering exact-match near 65%.

  3. MobiAgent: A Systematic Framework for Customizable Mobile Agents

    cs.MA 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A full-stack mobile agent framework reports state-of-the-art task completion on its own DAG-based benchmark and 2-3x speedups from replaying recorded trajectories.

  4. ARPO:End-to-End Policy Optimization for GUI Agents with Experience Replay

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ARPO combines GRPO reinforcement learning with a replay buffer of successful GUI trajectories and task filtering, improving UI-Tars to 29.9% on OSWorld.

  5. GUI-G$^2$: Gaussian Reward Modeling for GUI Grounding

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Modeling GUI elements as Gaussian distributions instead of binary targets yields 92.0% (ScreenSpot), 93.3% (ScreenSpot-v2), and 47.5% (ScreenSpot-Pro) for a 7B model, outperforming UI-TARS-72B by a relative 24.7% on t...

  6. Evolutionary Perspectives on the Evaluation of LLM-Based AI Agents: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that classifies AI agent evaluation benchmarks along environment and capability axes, and proposes five traits that distinguish agents from chatbots.

Pith tools