REVIEW 5 cited by
Large Language Models Empowered Agent-based Modeling and Simulation: A Survey and Perspectives
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Agent-based modeling and simulation has evolved as a powerful tool for modeling complex systems, offering insights into emergent behaviors and interactions among diverse agents. Integrating large language models into agent-based modeling and simulation presents a promising avenue for enhancing simulation capabilities. This paper surveys the landscape of utilizing large language models in agent-based modeling and simulation, examining their challenges and promising future directions. In this survey, since this is an interdisciplinary field, we first introduce the background of agent-based modeling and simulation and large language model-empowered agents. We then discuss the motivation for applying large language models to agent-based simulation and systematically analyze the challenges in environment perception, human alignment, action generation, and evaluation. Most importantly, we provide a comprehensive overview of the recent works of large language model-empowered agent-based modeling and simulation in multiple scenarios, which can be divided into four domains: cyber, physical, social, and hybrid, covering simulation of both real-world and virtual environments. Finally, since this area is new and quickly evolving, we discuss the open problems and promising future directions.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
The Energy Society: A Simulation Environment for Studying Agent Cooperation under Survival Pressure
A new multi-agent simulation ties token-generation cost to survival, showing larger models are less efficient, shared objectives induce donations, and recommendation and memory mechanisms shape coordination.
-
Validating Generative Agent-Based Models for Logistics and Supply Chain Management Research
Six LLMs show an equivalence-versus-process paradox: some match human surface behaviors but few replicate human decision pathways, so GABMs need dual-level validation before use in logistics research.
-
G-Memory: Tracing Hierarchical Memory for Multi-Agent Systems
G-Memory stores past multi-agent teamwork in a three-tier graph and retrieves it to boost performance on five benchmarks.
-
Evaluating Investment Logic in Large Language Models: A Real-World Benchmark Towards Personalzied Financial Agents
A 201,247-decision benchmark shows LLMs produce plausible investment logic (~4/5) but weak event grounding (0.8-2.8/5), gaps that outcome-only metrics hide.
-
FinRobot: Generative Business Process AI Agents for Enterprise Resource Planning in Finance
A generative multi-agent framework for ERP dynamically orchestrates financial workflows and claims 40% time and 94% error reductions in two bank case studies, with limited public evidence.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.