Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Visually Grounded Reasoning across Languages and Cultures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.13238 v2 pith:Y5GOPMZF submitted 2021-09-28 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CV
keywords imagesconceptslanguagesculturesenglishgroundedmodelsmultilingual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The design of widespread vision-and-language datasets and pre-trained encoders directly adopts, or draws inspiration from, the concepts and images of ImageNet. While one can hardly overestimate how much this benchmark contributed to progress in computer vision, it is mostly derived from lexical databases and image queries in English, resulting in source material with a North American or Western European bias. Therefore, we devise a new protocol to construct an ImageNet-style hierarchy representative of more languages and cultures. In particular, we let the selection of both concepts and images be entirely driven by native speakers, rather than scraping them automatically. Specifically, we focus on a typologically diverse set of languages, namely, Indonesian, Mandarin Chinese, Swahili, Tamil, and Turkish. On top of the concepts and images obtained through this new protocol, we create a multilingual dataset for {M}ulticultur{a}l {R}easoning over {V}ision and {L}anguage (MaRVL) by eliciting statements from native speaker annotators about pairs of images. The task consists of discriminating whether each grounded statement is true or false. We establish a series of baselines using state-of-the-art models and find that their cross-lingual transfer performance lags dramatically behind supervised performance in English. These results invite us to reassess the robustness and accuracy of current state-of-the-art models beyond a narrow domain, but also open up new exciting challenges for the development of truly multilingual and multicultural systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Centurio: On Drivers of Multilingual Ability of Large Vision-Language Model

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Systematic experiments show that training a vision-language model on 100 languages with only 25 to 50 percent non-English data yields strong multilingual gains, and synthetic OCR data is key for non-Latin scripts.

  2. Bridging the Gap: Enhancing LLM Performance for Low-Resource African Languages with New Benchmarks, Fine-Tuning, and Cultural Adjustments

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Human-translated benchmarks in eight African languages show GPT-4o accuracy is 12 to 20 percentage points below English, and fine-tuning on translated data recovers part of the gap.

  3. All Languages Matter: Evaluating LMMs on Culturally Diverse 100 Languages

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ALM-bench is a 100-language, 19-domain cultural visual QA benchmark on which GPT-4o reaches 78.8% and the best open model, GLM-4V-9B, reaches 51.9%.

  4. Benchmarking Large and Small MLLMs

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A broad benchmark of four multimodal models shows small models can match large ones on specific recognition tasks but lag sharply on reasoning, multilingual, and complex multimodal tasks.

Pith tools