REVIEW 2 cited by
CMOT: Cross-modal Mixup via Optimal Transport for Speech Translation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
End-to-end speech translation (ST) is the task of translating speech signals in the source language into text in the target language. As a cross-modal task, end-to-end ST is difficult to train with limited data. Existing methods often try to transfer knowledge from machine translation (MT), but their performances are restricted by the modality gap between speech and text. In this paper, we propose Cross-modal Mixup via Optimal Transport CMOT to overcome the modality gap. We find the alignment between speech and text sequences via optimal transport and then mix up the sequences from different modalities at a token level using the alignment. Experiments on the MuST-C ST benchmark demonstrate that CMOT achieves an average BLEU of 30.0 in 8 translation directions, outperforming previous methods. Further analysis shows CMOT can adaptively find the alignment between modalities, which helps alleviate the modality gap between speech and text. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/ictnlp/CMOT.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Cross-modal Knowledge Transfer Learning as Graph Matching Based on Optimal Transport for ASR
GM-OT, a fused Wasserstein and Gromov-Wasserstein graph-matching alignment for BERT-to-acoustic knowledge transfer, reports 3.98% CER on AISHELL-1 test versus 5.76% for a Conformer+CTC baseline.
-
PBVS 2024 Solution: Self-Supervised Learning and Sampling Strategies for SAR Classification in Extreme Long-Tail Distribution
A PBVS 2024 solution report combining DINOv2, Lee filtering, SAR-to-EO translation, and undersampling achieves 9th place (21.45% accuracy) without ablations or code.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.