Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Evolution of Multimodal Model Architectures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.17927 v1 pith:YQJRKA5L submitted 2024-05-28 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CVcs.LGeess.AS

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.CVcs.LGeess.AS
keywords multimodalmodelarchitecturetypestypeany-to-anyarchitecturallayers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This work uniquely identifies and characterizes four prevalent multimodal model architectural patterns in the contemporary multimodal landscape. Systematically categorizing models by architecture type facilitates monitoring of developments in the multimodal domain. Distinct from recent survey papers that present general information on multimodal architectures, this research conducts a comprehensive exploration of architectural details and identifies four specific architectural types. The types are distinguished by their respective methodologies for integrating multimodal inputs into the deep neural network model. The first two types (Type A and B) deeply fuses multimodal inputs within the internal layers of the model, whereas the following two types (Type C and D) facilitate early fusion at the input stage. Type-A employs standard cross-attention, whereas Type-B utilizes custom-designed layers for modality fusion within the internal layers. On the other hand, Type-C utilizes modality-specific encoders, while Type-D leverages tokenizers to process the modalities at the model's input stage. The identified architecture types aid the monitoring of any-to-any multimodal model development. Notably, Type-C and Type-D are currently favored in the construction of any-to-any multimodal models. Type-C, distinguished by its non-tokenizing multimodal model architecture, is emerging as a viable alternative to Type-D, which utilizes input-tokenizing techniques. To assist in model selection, this work highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each architecture type based on data and compute requirements, architecture complexity, scalability, simplification of adding modalities, training objectives, and any-to-any multimodal generation capability.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Granite Vision: a lightweight, open-source multimodal model for enterprise Intelligence

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Granite Vision is a ~3B parameter open-weights vision-language model that reaches state-of-the-art scores on document understanding benchmarks despite its small size.

  2. ViFusion: In-Network Tensor Fusion for Scalable Video Feature Indexing

    cs.MM 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    ViFusion combines dynamic tensor fusion with hierarchical AllReduce to speed up distributed video feature indexing, but the 8-22x throughput claim is an overstatement of bandwidth gains over a self-defined baseline.

Pith tools