Collaborative Expert LLMs Guided Multi-Objective Molecular Optimization
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:Z7Y64NSSrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Molecular optimization is a crucial yet complex and time-intensive process that often acts as a bottleneck for drug development. Traditional methods rely heavily on trial and error, making multi-objective optimization both time-consuming and resource-intensive. Current AI-based methods have shown limited success in handling multi-objective optimization tasks, hampering their practical utilization. To address this challenge, we present MultiMol, a collaborative large language model (LLM) system designed to guide multi-objective molecular optimization. MultiMol comprises two agents, including a data-driven worker agent and a literature-guided research agent. The data-driven worker agent is a large language model being fine-tuned to learn how to generate optimized molecules considering multiple objectives, while the literature-guided research agent is responsible for searching task-related literature to find useful prior knowledge that facilitates identifying the most promising optimized candidates. In evaluations across six multi-objective optimization tasks, MultiMol significantly outperforms existing methods, achieving a 82.30% success rate, in sharp contrast to the 27.50% success rate of current strongest methods. To further validate its practical impact, we tested MultiMol on two real-world challenges. First, we enhanced the selectivity of Xanthine Amine Congener (XAC), a promiscuous ligand that binds both A1R and A2AR, successfully biasing it towards A1R. Second, we improved the bioavailability of Saquinavir, an HIV-1 protease inhibitor with known bioavailability limitations. Overall, these results indicate that MultiMol represents a highly promising approach for multi-objective molecular optimization, holding great potential to accelerate the drug development process and contribute to the advancement of pharmaceutical research.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
UniField: RBF-Guided Electron Density Fusion for Enhanced Molecular Representations
UniField fuses discrete atomic graphs with continuous electron density fields via RBF guidance in an SE(3)-equivariant multimodal model, reporting new SOTA results on QM9-ED, QMugs-ED, and ED5-OE benchmarks with gains...
-
When Molecular Similarity Works: Property Cliffs Reveal Hidden Errors
CliffSplit exposes at least 15% higher errors in cliff-heavy regions of QM9 while CliffLoss narrows the cliff-to-smooth error gap by up to 30% and improves overall MAE by 9.7% across several molecular tasks and backbones.
-
MolDeTox: Evaluating Language Model's Stepwise Fragment Editing for Molecular Detoxification
MolDeTox is a new benchmark that shows fragment-level stepwise editing by LLMs and VLMs improves structural validity and detoxification quality over prior toxicity-focused evaluations.
-
Mol-Debate: Multi-Agent Debate Improves Structural Reasoning in Molecular Design
Mol-Debate applies multi-agent debate in an iterative loop with perspective orchestration to achieve state-of-the-art text-guided molecular design, scoring 59.82% exact match on ChEBI-20 and 50.52% weighted success on...
-
From Single-Step Edit Response to Multi-Step Molecular Optimization
A new method decomposes property differences between weakly related molecules into minimal chemical edits to train a directional evaluator that guides multi-step optimization with less oracle querying.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.