pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1604.00981 · v3 · submitted 2016-04-04 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.DC· cs.NE

Recognition: unknown

Revisiting Distributed Synchronous SGD

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.LG cs.DCcs.NE
keywords approachsynchronousasynchronousdistributednoiseoptimizationtrainingworkers
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Distributed training of deep learning models on large-scale training data is typically conducted with asynchronous stochastic optimization to maximize the rate of updates, at the cost of additional noise introduced from asynchrony. In contrast, the synchronous approach is often thought to be impractical due to idle time wasted on waiting for straggling workers. We revisit these conventional beliefs in this paper, and examine the weaknesses of both approaches. We demonstrate that a third approach, synchronous optimization with backup workers, can avoid asynchronous noise while mitigating for the worst stragglers. Our approach is empirically validated and shown to converge faster and to better test accuracies.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Scalable Distributed Stochastic Optimization via Bidirectional Compression: Beyond Pessimistic Limits

    math.OC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Inkheart SGD and M4 use bidirectional compression to achieve time complexities in distributed SGD that improve with worker count n and surpass prior lower bounds under a necessary structural assumption.

  2. Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hour

    cs.CV 2017-06 accept novelty 6.0

    Linear learning-rate scaling plus warmup lets minibatch size 8192 train ResNet-50 on ImageNet in one hour at full small-batch accuracy.