Recognition: unknown
Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methods
read the original abstract
We introduce a new benchmark, WinoBias, for coreference resolution focused on gender bias. Our corpus contains Winograd-schema style sentences with entities corresponding to people referred by their occupation (e.g. the nurse, the doctor, the carpenter). We demonstrate that a rule-based, a feature-rich, and a neural coreference system all link gendered pronouns to pro-stereotypical entities with higher accuracy than anti-stereotypical entities, by an average difference of 21.1 in F1 score. Finally, we demonstrate a data-augmentation approach that, in combination with existing word-embedding debiasing techniques, removes the bias demonstrated by these systems in WinoBias without significantly affecting their performance on existing coreference benchmark datasets. Our dataset and code are available at http://winobias.org.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
GKnow: Measuring the Entanglement of Gender Bias and Factual Gender
Gender bias and factual gender knowledge are severely entangled in language model circuits and neurons, making neuron ablation an unreliable method for debiasing.
-
StereoTales: A Multilingual Framework for Open-Ended Stereotype Discovery in LLMs
StereoTales shows that LLMs produce harmful, culturally adapted stereotypes in open-ended multilingual stories, with patterns consistent across providers and aligned human-LLM harm judgments.
-
StereoTales: A Multilingual Framework for Open-Ended Stereotype Discovery in LLMs
StereoTales shows that all tested LLMs emit harmful stereotypes in open-ended stories, with associations adapting to prompt language and targeting locally salient groups rather than transferring uniformly across languages.
-
Social Bias in LLM-Generated Code: Benchmark and Mitigation
LLMs show up to 60.58% social bias in generated code; a new Fairness Monitor Agent cuts bias by 65.1% and raises functional correctness from 75.80% to 83.97%.
-
SCOPE: A Dataset of Stereotyped Prompts for Counterfactual Fairness Assessment of LLMs
SCOPE is a new large-scale dataset of counterfactual prompt pairs for evaluating fairness and stereotype sensitivity in LLMs across 1,438 topics, nine bias dimensions, 1,536 groups, and four communicative intents.
-
Navigating the Sea of LLM Evaluation: Investigating Bias in Toxicity Benchmarks
Toxicity benchmarks for LLMs produce inconsistent results when task type, input domain, or model changes, revealing intrinsic evaluation biases.
-
Representational Harms in LLM-Generated Narratives Against Global Majority Nationalities
LLMs generate narratives containing persistent stereotypes, erasure, and one-dimensional portrayals of Global Majority national identities, with minoritized groups overrepresented in subordinated roles by more than fi...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.