Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Leveraging Uncertainty in Deep Learning for Selective Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.09509 v1 pith:YXNQJZQG submitted 2019-05-23 cs.LG cs.AImath.OCstat.MLstat.OT

Leveraging Uncertainty in Deep Learning for Selective Classification

classification cs.LG cs.AImath.OCstat.MLstat.OT
keywords classificationuncertaintydeepframeworklearningmethodsoptimalrejection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The wide and rapid adoption of deep learning by practitioners brought unintended consequences in many situations such as in the infamous case of Google Photos' racist image recognition algorithm; thus, necessitated the utilization of the quantified uncertainty for each prediction. There have been recent efforts towards quantifying uncertainty in conventional deep learning methods (e.g., dropout as Bayesian approximation); however, their optimal use in decision making is often overlooked and understudied. In this study, we propose a mixed-integer programming framework for classification with reject option (also known as selective classification), that investigates and combines model uncertainty and predictive mean to identify optimal classification and rejection regions. Our results indicate superior performance of our framework both in non-rejected accuracy and rejection quality on several publicly available datasets. Moreover, we extend our framework to cost-sensitive settings and show that our approach outperforms industry standard methods significantly for online fraud management in real-world settings.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Confidence-Gated Vision-Only Heading Alignment for UAV-UGV Cooperative Systems

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    Under identical gate decisions, a bounded-blend fallback during holds reduces issued-command error from 3.22° to 0.50° at the strongest centroid perturbation, versus freeze-hold.