Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Boosting Search Engines with Interactive Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.00527 v3 pith:5CAZHNNH submitted 2021-09-01 cs.CL cs.AIcs.IRcs.LG

Boosting Search Engines with Interactive Agents

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.IRcs.LG
keywords searchagentsactionsinteractivelearningrefinementresultsagent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents first successful steps in designing search agents that learn meta-strategies for iterative query refinement in information-seeking tasks. Our approach uses machine reading to guide the selection of refinement terms from aggregated search results. Agents are then empowered with simple but effective search operators to exert fine-grained and transparent control over queries and search results. We develop a novel way of generating synthetic search sessions, which leverages the power of transformer-based language models through (self-)supervised learning. We also present a reinforcement learning agent with dynamically constrained actions that learns interactive search strategies from scratch. Our search agents obtain retrieval and answer quality performance comparable to recent neural methods, using only a traditional term-based BM25 ranking function and interpretable discrete reranking and filtering actions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DeLIVeR: Decomposed Learning for Information-grounded Veracity Recognition via Reinforced Knowledge Graph Exploration

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    DeLIVeR uses GRPO-trained question planning over knowledge graphs to report F1 83.7/84.6/79.7 on LIAR/FEVER/PolitiFact, claiming ~10-15% relative gains over HippoRAG2.