REVIEW 1 cited by
Programming Is Hard -- Or at Least It Used to Be: Educational Opportunities And Challenges of AI Code Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The introductory programming sequence has been the focus of much research in computing education. The recent advent of several viable and freely-available AI-driven code generation tools present several immediate opportunities and challenges in this domain. In this position paper we argue that the community needs to act quickly in deciding what possible opportunities can and should be leveraged and how, while also working on how to overcome or otherwise mitigate the possible challenges. Assuming that the effectiveness and proliferation of these tools will continue to progress rapidly, without quick, deliberate, and concerted efforts, educators will lose advantage in helping shape what opportunities come to be, and what challenges will endure. With this paper we aim to seed this discussion within the computing education community.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
From Generation to Adaptation: Comparing AI-Assisted Strategies in High School Programming Education
Adapting small working code examples with AI coding assistants helped five novice students build functional mini-programs, while generating code from scratch mostly failed.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.