pith. sign in

arxiv: 2406.09458 · v2 · pith:SHZRHGZ7new · submitted 2024-06-12 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI· cs.CL

Updating CLIP to Prefer Descriptions Over Captions

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL
keywords imagecaptionsclipdescriptionsmeantmodelupdatingaccessibility
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Although CLIPScore is a powerful generic metric that captures the similarity between a text and an image, it fails to distinguish between a caption that is meant to complement the information in an image and a description that is meant to replace an image entirely, e.g., for accessibility. We address this shortcoming by updating the CLIP model with the Concadia dataset to assign higher scores to descriptions than captions using parameter efficient fine-tuning and a loss objective derived from work on causal interpretability. This model correlates with the judgements of blind and low-vision people while preserving transfer capabilities and has interpretable structure that sheds light on the caption--description distinction.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Do Image-Text Metrics Respect Semantic Invariances?

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Five image-text metrics exhibit non-semantic sensitivities to spatial, object, and socio-linguistic perturbations, shifting scores by 6-9% on average and flipping rankings in up to 37% of cases, with a proposed post-h...