Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

FLAME: Financial Large-Language Model Assessment and Metrics Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.06211 v1 pith:QFRIRP7U submitted 2025-01-03 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CE

FLAME: Financial Large-Language Model Assessment and Metrics Evaluation

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.CE
keywords financialevaluationllmsflamecomprehensivetasksbaichuan4-financebeen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

LLMs have revolutionized NLP and demonstrated potential across diverse domains. More and more financial LLMs have been introduced for finance-specific tasks, yet comprehensively assessing their value is still challenging. In this paper, we introduce FLAME, a comprehensive financial LLMs evaluation system in Chinese, which includes two core evaluation benchmarks: FLAME-Cer and FLAME-Sce. FLAME-Cer covers 14 types of authoritative financial certifications, including CPA, CFA, and FRM, with a total of approximately 16,000 carefully selected questions. All questions have been manually reviewed to ensure accuracy and representativeness. FLAME-Sce consists of 10 primary core financial business scenarios, 21 secondary financial business scenarios, and a comprehensive evaluation set of nearly 100 tertiary financial application tasks. We evaluate 6 representative LLMs, including GPT-4o, GLM-4, ERNIE-4.0, Qwen2.5, XuanYuan3, and the latest Baichuan4-Finance, revealing Baichuan4-Finance excels other LLMs in most tasks. By establishing a comprehensive and professional evaluation system, FLAME facilitates the advancement of financial LLMs in Chinese contexts. Instructions for participating in the evaluation are available on GitHub: https://github.com/FLAME-ruc/FLAME.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FinToolBench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Real-World Financial Tool Use

    cs.AI 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    FinToolBench couples 760 executable financial APIs with 295 tool-required queries and scores agents on execution success plus timeliness, intent, and domain compliance, with a finance-aware retrieval baseline (FATR).

  2. MetaGraph: A Large-Scale Meta-Analysis of GenAI in Financial NLP (2022-2025)

    cs.CL 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MetaGraph uses ontology-guided LLM extraction to build knowledge graphs from 681 papers on GenAI in financial NLP, identifying three distinct phases of development from 2022 to 2025.