pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.02869 · v2 · pith:EWZZWY3Anew · submitted 2025-06-03 · 💱 q-fin.TR · q-fin.MF

Optimal Dynamic Fees in Automated Market Makers

classification 💱 q-fin.TR q-fin.MF
keywords feesoptimaldynamicmarketammsautomatedfindmakers
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Automated Market Makers (AMMs) are emerging as a popular decentralised trading platform. In this work, we determine the optimal dynamic fees in a constant function market maker. We find approximate closed-form solutions to the control problem and study the optimal fee structure. We find that there are two distinct fee regimes: one in which the AMM imposes higher fees to deter arbitrageurs, and another where fees are lowered to increase volatility and attract noise traders. Our results also show that dynamic fees that are linear in inventory and are sensitive to changes in the external price are a good approximation of the optimal fee structure and thus constitute suitable candidates when designing fees for AMMs.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Optimal Dynamic Fees for Automated Market Makers: A Stochastic Control Approach to Loss-Versus-Rebalancing

    q-fin.MF 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives a pro-cyclical optimal dynamic fee for AMM LPs via ergodic control that is independent of wealth and risk aversion and improves growth rate over static fees.

  2. Characterizing Path-Independent Fees: A Route to Zero Impermanent Loss in CPMMs

    cs.DC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Fee structures in CPMMs that depend only on the invariant k=xy ensure path independence, enabling a parametric family that achieves zero impermanent loss for specific initial states but not universally.

  3. From Impermanent Loss to Sustainable Gain: Quantifying Profitability Zones for Liquidity Providers on DEX

    cs.DC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A model for AMM liquidity pools derives joint revenue bounds for providers and arbitrageurs, estimates blocks until impermanent loss, and gives a lower bound on pool fees to achieve a target probability of impermanent...