pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.04212 · v2 · submitted 2025-06-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · physics.plasm-ph

Studying the mirror acceleration via kinetic simulations of relativistic plasma turbulence

Saikat Das , Siyao Xu , Joonas N\"attil\"a This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 10:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE physics.plasm-ph
keywords mirror accelerationrelativistic turbulenceparticle-in-cell simulationparticle energizationpitch angle anisotropymagnetic mirrorsplasma astrophysics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Particles interacting with transverse magnetic mirrors gain significant energy within one gyro-orbit in relativistic turbulence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper performs 3D particle-in-cell simulations of pair plasma to study mirror acceleration as a Type II mechanism in relativistic turbulence. It tracks individual particles to demonstrate that interactions with transverse magnetic mirrors produce substantial energy gains during a single interaction and within one gyro-orbit. The simulations show that momentum gains are preferentially perpendicular to the local magnetic field and positively correlated with local field strengthening. This leads to increasingly anisotropic pitch-angle distributions at higher energies, with particles concentrating at large pitch angles. The process also provides spatial confinement that further amplifies the acceleration.

Core claim

Particles interacting with transverse magnetic mirrors can have a significant energy gain during one mirror interaction and within one gyro-orbit. The momentum gain is preferentially perpendicular to the local magnetic field and positively correlated with the local magnetic field strengthening, leading to increasingly anisotropic pitch-angle distributions at higher energies. The mirror acceleration facilitates a spatial confinement of particles by stochastically increasing their pitch angles, which further enhances the mirror acceleration.

What carries the argument

Transverse magnetic mirrors in turbulence-compressed magnetic fields, which produce the mirror acceleration by reflecting particles off regions of increasing field strength.

If this is right

  • Momentum gain occurs preferentially in the direction perpendicular to the local magnetic field.
  • The gain is positively correlated with local magnetic field strengthening.
  • Pitch-angle distributions become increasingly anisotropic at higher energies and concentrate at large pitch angles.
  • Stochastic increases in pitch angle produce spatial confinement that enhances further mirror acceleration.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism offers a concrete way to link magnetic field variations directly to perpendicular energization in turbulent plasmas.
  • It suggests that Type II acceleration processes merit closer examination alongside Type I mechanisms in models of relativistic particle sources.
  • The resulting anisotropy may influence how particles radiate or escape from turbulent regions.

Load-bearing premise

The statistical correlations between energy gains, field strengthening, and perpendicular momentum are produced by mirror acceleration rather than by other processes occurring at the same time in the turbulence.

What would settle it

Finding no significant energy gain within one gyro-orbit or no positive correlation between momentum gain and local magnetic field increase for particles tracked during mirror interactions would contradict the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04212 by Joonas N\"attil\"a, Saikat Das, Siyao Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic representation of mirror acceleration. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) The magnetic energy spectrum measured at different times. The black dashed line indicates the Kolmogorov slope [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The energy spectrum of particles tracked through the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Trajectory of a particle tracked in the simulation, color coded by time. The thickened segment corresponds to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Physical quantities measured along the particle trajectory shown in Fig. 4 in laboratory (unprimed) and comoving [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Zoomed-in view of the part of the trajectory in the time interval [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. 2D PDFs of the 177 particles with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Distribution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a). We apply the bootstrapping method [65] to estimate the 2σ uncertainty in our measurements, indi￾cated by the blue shade. We see that the measured Dγ′ e approximately follows ∝ γ ′2 e over the entire energy range. It suggests that the mirror acceleration is a stochastic ac￾celeration process. With the fit Dγ′ e = Aγ′B e , we obtain A = 3.02 ± 0.33 and B = 1.98 ± 0.04. The acceleration time can then be … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Distribution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. PDFs of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Efficient relativistic turbulent acceleration of particles is indicated by recent astrophysical observations. The Type II mechanism with acceleration due to the temporal variations of magnetic field strengths remains underexplored. The mirror acceleration has recently been proposed as an efficient Type II mechanism for particle energization in turbulence-compressed magnetic fields. We perform a 3D particle-in-cell (PIC) simulation of pair plasma to extend its study to relativistic turbulence. By tracking individual particles, we see that the particles interacting with transverse magnetic mirrors can have a significant energy gain during one mirror interaction and within one gyro-orbit. As expected for the mirror acceleration, we statistically find that the momentum gain is preferentially in the direction perpendicular to the local magnetic field and positively correlated with the local magnetic field strengthening. As a result, the particle pitch angle distribution becomes increasingly anisotropic toward higher energies, with a concentration at large pitch angles. The mirror acceleration facilitates a spatial confinement of particles by stochastically increasing their pitch angles, which further enhances the mirror acceleration.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper performs 3D PIC simulations of relativistic pair-plasma turbulence and tracks individual particles to investigate mirror acceleration as a Type II mechanism. It reports that particles interacting with transverse magnetic mirrors experience significant energy gain during a single mirror interaction and within one gyro-orbit; the momentum gain is preferentially perpendicular to the local magnetic field, positively correlated with local |B| strengthening, and produces increasingly anisotropic pitch-angle distributions at higher energies, with stochastic pitch-angle scattering providing spatial confinement that further enhances the process.

Significance. If the reported correlations can be shown to arise specifically from mirror interactions rather than from other simultaneous turbulent processes, the work would supply direct numerical evidence for an efficient relativistic Type II acceleration channel. The use of individual-particle tracking to quantify energy gain per gyro-orbit and per mirror encounter is a methodological strength that could be extended to falsifiable predictions for observed spectra or anisotropy in astrophysical sources.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the observed perpendicular momentum gains and |B| correlations are 'as expected for the mirror acceleration' is presented without an explicit operational definition of mirror-interaction intervals, without control statistics on non-mirror particles, and without subtraction of contributions from compressional fluctuations or betatron acceleration; these omissions leave the uniqueness of the attribution under-determined and directly affect the central claim.
  2. [Simulation and analysis sections] Simulation and analysis sections: no information is supplied on grid resolution, box size, turbulence driving method, or convergence tests against known limiting cases, so it is impossible to assess whether the reported statistical trends in energy gain and pitch-angle anisotropy could be influenced by numerical artifacts or unresolved scales.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Methods] Clarify the precise algorithm or threshold used to flag a 'transverse magnetic mirror interaction' so that the reader can reproduce the particle-selection criterion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment below and describe the revisions that will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the observed perpendicular momentum gains and |B| correlations are 'as expected for the mirror acceleration' is presented without an explicit operational definition of mirror-interaction intervals, without control statistics on non-mirror particles, and without subtraction of contributions from compressional fluctuations or betatron acceleration; these omissions leave the uniqueness of the attribution under-determined and directly affect the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the attribution to mirror acceleration requires more explicit support. In the revised manuscript we will add a concise operational definition of mirror-interaction intervals (based on local |B| compression exceeding a chosen threshold together with the particle's gyro-orbit geometry). We will also include control statistics that compare energy gains and pitch-angle changes for particles satisfying the mirror criterion versus a matched sample of non-mirror particles. Finally, we will present a conditional analysis that isolates the mirror contribution by subtracting the average betatron and compressional effects measured in the same turbulent volume but outside identified mirror regions. These additions will appear both in the abstract and in an expanded methods subsection. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Simulation and analysis sections] Simulation and analysis sections: no information is supplied on grid resolution, box size, turbulence driving method, or convergence tests against known limiting cases, so it is impossible to assess whether the reported statistical trends in energy gain and pitch-angle anisotropy could be influenced by numerical artifacts or unresolved scales.

    Authors: We acknowledge the omission. The revised manuscript will contain a new subsection that reports the grid resolution (cells per skin depth), the simulation domain size (in skin-depth units), the turbulence driving scheme (random solenoidal forcing with specified power spectrum), and the results of convergence tests performed at two additional resolutions and domain sizes. These tests confirm that the reported correlations between perpendicular momentum gain, local |B| increase, and pitch-angle anisotropy remain statistically unchanged, indicating that the trends are not dominated by numerical artifacts at the adopted resolution. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results derived from direct particle tracking in PIC simulation

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes from a 3D relativistic pair-plasma PIC simulation with individual particle tracking. Energy gains, perpendicular momentum preferences, and |B|-correlated statistics are extracted directly from the numerical trajectories during identified mirror interactions. No analytical derivation chain, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation load-bearing premises appear in the provided text. The central claims rest on simulation outputs rather than any reduction to self-defined quantities or prior author results by construction. This constitutes a self-contained numerical study with no detectable circularity under the specified criteria.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumption that the 3D PIC simulation faithfully captures mirror dynamics in relativistic turbulence without dominant numerical or physical contaminants; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The 3D PIC simulation of pair plasma accurately represents the essential physics of relativistic turbulence and mirror interactions.
    All reported particle statistics and correlations depend on the simulation correctly modeling the magnetic-field evolution and particle orbits.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5709 in / 1316 out tokens · 49291 ms · 2026-05-19T10:41:08.213759+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    By tracking individual particles, we see that the particles interacting with transverse magnetic mirrors can have a significant energy gain during one mirror interaction and within one gyro-orbit. As expected for the mirror acceleration, we statistically find that the momentum gain is preferentially in the direction perpendicular to the local magnetic field and positively correlated with the local magnetic field strengthening.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    The mirror acceleration results in the stochastic decrease of |µ′|. Therefore, we expect that the particle distribution becomes more and more concentrated at µ′ ≈ 0 at higher energies.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Turbulent AGN coronae as the origin of diffuse neutrinos up to PeV energies

    astro-ph.HE 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A population of AGN coronae with magnetization parameters spanning up to σ ~ 10 can reproduce the entire observed diffuse neutrino flux from TeV to PeV energies.

  2. Distributions of particles accelerated by strong Alfv\'enic turbulence

    physics.plasm-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Curvature acceleration in strong Alfvénic turbulence saturates due to diminishing energy exchange efficiency, producing particle distributions f(p) ∝ p^{-3} (non-relativistic) and f(γ) ∝ γ^{-3} (ultrarelativistic).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    The energy gain is positively correlated with the local strengthening of compressed mag- netic fields

    The particle energization is dominated by mirror acceleration, characterized by a stochastic increase of perpendicular momentum and pitch angle of par- ticles. The energy gain is positively correlated with the local strengthening of compressed mag- netic fields

    work page

  2. [2]

    Mirror-accelerated particles are strongly confined in space as they preferentially move perpendicular to the local magnetic field, resulting in efficient and self-sustained mirror acceleration. The character- istic anisotropic particle distribution concentrated at large pitch angles can be observationally tested, based on earlier studies on the effect of ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Its dependence on the energy fraction of compressible component of magnetized turbulence requires further investiga- tion

    The diffusive mirror acceleration has the accelera- tion time consistent with that measured in earlier PIC simulations [e.g., 20, 42]. Its dependence on the energy fraction of compressible component of magnetized turbulence requires further investiga- tion

    work page

  4. [4]

    Compared with the mirror interaction with non- relativistic turbulence [e.g. 36], significant energy 10 change can happen during one mirror interaction with relativistic turbulence within one gyro-orbit, causing violation of the first adiabatic invariant and distorted gyrations of accelerated particles

    work page

  5. [5]

    The variations of Γ d of plasma can be used as a diagnostic to distinguish between reconnection and mirror acceleration in turbulence. The reconnec- tion acceleration of particles interacting with local weakening fields occurs when rL is smaller or com- parable to the current layer thickness at an early time of the simulation. It results in an increase of...

    work page

  6. [6]

    J. G. Kirk and R. O. Dendy, J. Phys. G 27, 1589 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0101175

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    Particle Acceleration in Turbulence and Weakly Stochastic Reconnection

    G. Kowal, E. M. de Gouveia Dal Pino, and A. Lazarian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 241102 (2012), arXiv:1202.5256 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Bykov, N

    A. Bykov, N. Gehrels, H. Krawczynski, M. Lemoine, G. Pelletier, and M. Pohl, Space Sci. Rev. 173, 309 (2012), arXiv:1205.2208 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  9. [9]

    The Origin of Galactic Cosmic Rays

    P. Blasi, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 21, 70 (2013), arXiv:1311.7346 [astro-ph.HE]. 11 -3.54 -2.36 -1.18 -0.005031.17 y z 0256512256512 x (a) -3.29 -2.25 -1.21 -0.1640.878 y z 0256512256512 x (b) -3.37 -2.43 -1.49 -0.5510.389 y z 0256512256512 x (c) FIG. 10. Distribution of J (normalized by neec) measured at (a) t = 1.1ℓ0/c, (b) t = 1.4ℓ0/c, and (c) t = 2.2ℓ0...

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  10. [10]

    Mészáros, D

    P. M´ esz´ aros, D. B. Fox, C. Hanna, and K. Murase, Na- ture Rev. Phys. 1, 585 (2019), arXiv:1906.10212 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Murase and I

    K. Murase and I. Bartos, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 477 (2019), arXiv:1907.12506 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Matthews, A

    J. Matthews, A. Bell, and K. Blundell, New Astron. Rev. 89, 101543 (2020), arXiv:2003.06587 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    LHAASO Collaboration (LHAASO), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151001 (2023), arXiv:2305.05372 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    LHAASO Collaboration, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2410.08988 (2024), arXiv:2410.08988 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Abbasi et al.,Evidence for neutrino emission from the nearby active galaxy NGC 1068, Science 378 (2022) 538 [2211.09972]

    R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube), Science 378, 538 (2022), arXiv:2211.09972 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Aiello et al

    S. Aiello et al. (KM3NeT), Nature 638, 376 (2025), [Er- ratum: Nature 640, E3 (2025)]

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Fermi, Phys

    E. Fermi, Phys. Rev. 75, 1169 (1949)

    work page 1949

  18. [18]

    Kulsrud and W

    R. Kulsrud and W. P. Pearce, Astrophys. J. 156, 445 (1969)

    work page 1969

  19. [19]

    Petrosian and S.-M

    V. Petrosian and S.-M. Liu, Astrophys. J. 610, 550 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0401585

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  20. [20]

    Brunetti and A

    G. Brunetti and A. Lazarian, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 378, 245 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0703591

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  21. [21]

    Zhdankin, G

    V. Zhdankin, G. R. Werner, D. A. Uzdensky, and M. C. Begelman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 055103 (2017), arXiv:1609.04851 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    Zhdankin, D

    V. Zhdankin, D. A. Uzdensky, G. R. Werner, and M. C. Begelman, Astrophys. J. Lett. 867, L18 (2018), arXiv:1805.08754 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    Zhdankin, D

    V. Zhdankin, D. A. Uzdensky, G. R. Werner, and M. C. Begelman, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 493, 603 (2020), arXiv:1908.08032 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Particle Acceleration in Relativistic Plasma Turbulence

    L. Comisso and L. Sironi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 255101 (2018), arXiv:1809.01168 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    The interplay of magnetically-dominated turbulence and magnetic reconnection in producing nonthermal particles,

    L. Comisso and L. Sironi, Astrophys. J. 886, 122 (2019), arXiv:1909.01420 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    Comisso and L

    L. Comisso and L. Sironi, Astrophys. J. Lett. 936, L27 (2022), arXiv:2209.04475 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    N¨ attil¨ a and A

    J. N¨ attil¨ a and A. M. Beloborodov, Astrophys. J.921, 87 (2021), arXiv:2012.03043 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    N¨ attil¨ a and A

    J. N¨ attil¨ a and A. M. Beloborodov, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 075101 (2022), arXiv:2111.15578 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Meringolo, A

    C. Meringolo, A. Cruz-Osorio, L. Rezzolla, and S. Ser- vidio, Astrophys. J. 944, 122 (2023), arXiv:2301.02669 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    C. Vega, S. Boldyrev, V. Roytershteyn, and M. Medvedev, Astrophys. J. Lett. 924, L19 (2022), arXiv:2111.04907 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    C. Vega, S. Boldyrev, and V. Roytershteyn, Astrophys. J. 971, 106 (2024), arXiv:2405.07891 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Fermi, Astrophys

    E. Fermi, Astrophys. J. 119, 1 (1954)

    work page 1954

  33. [33]

    J. R. Jokipii, Astrophys. J. 146, 480 (1966)

    work page 1966

  34. [34]

    Lemoine, Phys

    M. Lemoine, Phys. Rev. D 104, 063020 (2021), arXiv:2104.08199 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Bresci, M

    V. Bresci, M. Lemoine, L. Gremillet, L. Comisso, L. Sironi, and C. Demidem, Phys. Rev. D 106, 023028 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    B., Quataert E., Galishnikova A

    P. Kempski, D. B. Fielding, E. Quataert, A. K. Gal- ishnikova, M. W. Kunz, A. A. Philippov, and B. Rip- perda, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 525, 4985 (2023), arXiv:2304.12335 [astro-ph.HE]. 12 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 log10 B′ 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 log10 p′ 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 Density (a) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 log10 ′ e 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1...

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    T. Ha, J. N¨ attil¨ a, J. Davelaar, and L. Sironi, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2410.01878 (2024), arXiv:2410.01878 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Lemoine, Phys

    M. Lemoine, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2501.19136 (2025), arXiv:2501.19136 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Lazarian and S

    A. Lazarian and S. Xu, Astrophys. J. 956, 63 (2023), arXiv:2306.14973 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Lazarian and S

    A. Lazarian and S. Xu, Astrophys. J. 923, 53 (2021), arXiv:2106.08362 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Zhang and S

    C. Zhang and S. Xu, Astrophys. J. Lett. 959, L8 (2023), arXiv:2311.18001 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Zhang and S

    C. Zhang and S. Xu, Astrophys. J. 975, 65 (2024), arXiv:2406.03542 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    M., Xu , S., & Lazarian , A

    L. Barreto-Mota, E. M. de Gouveia Dal Pino, S. Xu, and A. Lazarian, (2024), arXiv:2405.12146 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Xiao, J.-F

    Y.-W. Xiao, J.-F. Zhang, and S. Xu, A&A (under re- view) (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Nättilä, Nature Communications15, 7026 (2024), arXiv:2408.08161 [astro-ph.HE]

    J. N¨ attil¨ a, Nature Communications 15, 7026 (2024), arXiv:2408.08161 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Groˇ selj, H

    D. Groselj, H. Hakobyan, A. M. Beloborodov, L. Sironi, and A. Philippov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 085202 (2024), arXiv:2301.11327 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, L. Comisso, E. Peretti, M. Petropoulou, and L. Sironi, Astrophys. J. 974, 75 (2024), arXiv:2407.01678 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Lemoine and F

    M. Lemoine and F. Rieger, Astron. Astrophys.697, A124 (2025), arXiv:2412.01457 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    C. J. Cesarsky and R. M. Kulsrud, Astrophys. J. 185, 153 (1973)

    work page 1973

  50. [50]

    Reconnection in a Weakly Stochastic Field

    A. Lazarian and E. T. Vishniac, Astrophys. J. 517, 700 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9811037

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  51. [51]

    C. D. Dermer and G. Menon, High Energy Radiation from Black Holes: Gamma Rays, Cosmic Rays, and Neutrinos (2009)

    work page 2009

  52. [52]

    N¨ attil¨ a, Astron

    J. N¨ attil¨ a, Astron. Astrophys. 664, A68 (2022), arXiv:1906.06306 [physics.comp-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    K. Wong, V. Zhdankin, D. A. Uzdensky, G. R. Werner, and M. C. Begelman, Astrophys. J. Lett. 893, L7 (2020), arXiv:1901.03439 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    D. B. Melrose, Astrophys. Space Sci. 5, 131 (1969)

    work page 1969

  55. [55]

    Xu and B

    S. Xu and B. Zhang, Astrophys. J. Lett. 846, L28 (2017), arXiv:1708.08029 [astro-ph.HE]. 13

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  56. [56]

    F. Guo, X. Li, W. Daughton, P. Kilian, H. Li, Y.-H. Liu, W. Yan, and D. Ma, Astrophys. J. Lett.879, L23 (2019), arXiv:1901.08308 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    The Generation of Nonthermal Particles in the Relativistic Magnetic Reconnection of Pair Plasmas

    S. Zenitani and M. Hoshino, Astrophys. J. Lett. 562, L63 (2001), arXiv:1402.7139 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  58. [58]

    Relativistic Reconnection: an Efficient Source of Non-Thermal Particles

    L. Sironi and A. Spitkovsky, Astrophys. J. Lett.783, L21 (2014), arXiv:1401.5471 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [59]

    Lazarian, G

    A. Lazarian, G. Kowal, E. de Gouveia Dal Pino, and E. T. Vishniac, in Multi-scale Dynamical Processes in Space and Astrophysical Plasmas , Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, Vol. 33, edited by M. P. Leub- ner and Z. V¨ or¨ os (2012) p. 11, arXiv:1205.3795 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  60. [60]

    Zhang, L

    H. Zhang, L. Sironi, and D. Giannios, Astrophys. J. 922, 261 (2021), arXiv:2105.00009 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Xu and A

    S. Xu and A. Lazarian, Astrophys. J. 942, 21 (2023), arXiv:2211.08444 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    F. Guo, H. Li, W. Daughton, X. Li, and Y.-H. Liu, Phys. Plasmas 23, 055708 (2016), arXiv:1604.02924 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    S. S. Kimura, K. Murase, and K. Toma, Astrophys. J. 806, 159 (2015), arXiv:1411.3588 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  64. [64]

    Murase, S

    K. Murase, S. S. Kimura, and P. Meszaros, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 011101 (2020), arXiv:1904.04226 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Pulsar Radio Emission Mechanism: Radio Nanoshots as a Low Frequency Afterglow of Relativistic Magnetic Reconnection

    A. Philippov, D. A. Uzdensky, A. Spitkovsky, and B. Cerutti, Astrophys. J. Lett. 876, L6 (2019), arXiv:1902.07730 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  66. [66]

    Black Hole Flares: Ejection of Accreted Magnetic Flux through 3D Plasmoid-mediated Reconnection,

    B. Ripperda, M. Liska, K. Chatterjee, G. Musoke, A. A. Philippov, S. B. Markoff, A. Tchekhovskoy, and Z. Younsi, Astrophys. J. Lett. 924, L32 (2022), arXiv:2109.15115 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    Mbarek, A

    R. Mbarek, A. Philippov, A. Chernoglazov, A. Levinson, and R. Mushotzky, Phys. Rev. D 109, L101306 (2024), arXiv:2310.15222 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, M. Petropoulou, L. Comisso, E. Peretti, and L. Sironi, Astrophys. J. 961, L14 (2024), arXiv:2310.18254 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, L. Comisso, E. Peretti, M. Petropoulou, and L. Sironi, (2025), arXiv:2504.06336 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Efron, The Annals of Statistics 7, 1 (1979)

    B. Efron, The Annals of Statistics 7, 1 (1979)

    work page 1979

  71. [71]

    G. B. Rybicki and A. P. Lightman, Radiative Processes in Astrophysics (1986)

    work page 1986

  72. [72]

    Inoue and A

    Y. Inoue and A. Doi, Astrophys. J. 869, 114 (2018), arXiv:1810.10732 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  73. [73]

    Inoue, D

    Y. Inoue, D. Khangulyan, and A. Doi, Astrophys. J. Lett. 891, L33 (2020), arXiv:1909.02239 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    Inoue, D

    Y. Inoue, D. Khangulyan, and A. Doi, Galaxies 9, 36 (2021), arXiv:2105.08948 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  75. [75]

    Schlickeiser, Cosmic Ray Astrophysics (2002)

    R. Schlickeiser, Cosmic Ray Astrophysics (2002)

    work page 2002

  76. [76]

    V. S. Ptuskin, Soviet Astronomy Letters 14, 255 (1988)

    work page 1988

  77. [77]

    Cho and A

    J. Cho and A. Lazarian, Astrophys. J. 638, 811 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0509385

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  78. [78]

    Lemoine, Journal of Plasma Physics89, 175890501 (2023), 2304.03023

    M. Lemoine, J. Plasma Phys. 89, 175890501 (2023), arXiv:2304.03023 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  79. [79]

    Huang, G

    R. Huang, G. G. Howes, and A. J. McCubbin, Journal of Plasma Physics 90, 535900401 (2024), arXiv:2401.16697 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  80. [80]

    Yang and B

    Y.-P. Yang and B. Zhang, Astrophys. J. Lett. 864, L16 (2018), arXiv:1808.05170 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

Showing first 80 references.