pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.06947 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-09 · ✦ hep-ex

Search for light pseudoscalar boson pairs produced from Higgs boson decays using the 4τ and 2μ2τ final states in proton-proton collisions at sqrt{s} = 13 TeV

CMS Collaboration This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 00:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords light pseudoscalar bosonsHiggs boson decaystau leptonsCMS experimentproton-proton collisionsbranching fraction limitstwo Higgs doublet model13 TeV
0
0 comments X

The pith

No excess above standard model expectations is observed for light pseudoscalar boson pairs from Higgs decays.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The CMS experiment searched for pairs of light pseudoscalar a1 bosons produced in the decay of the 125 GeV Higgs boson. The analysis examined the 4 tau lepton final state and the two muon plus two tau final state in proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV with an integrated luminosity of 138 inverse femtobarns. No signal excess was found over standard model background predictions. Upper limits were placed on the Higgs boson branching fraction to a1 pairs, assuming the a1 has Yukawa-like couplings to fermions. This work tests extensions of the Higgs sector that predict additional light pseudoscalar particles.

Core claim

No excess above standard model expectations is observed. The observed upper limits on the product of the Higgs boson production cross section and the branching fraction to the 4 tau final state, relative to the standard model prediction, range between 0.007 and 0.079 across the a1 mass range from 4 to 15 GeV. In the interpretation with two Higgs doublets and an additional complex singlet field, the tightest constraints exclude branching ratios for the Higgs decay into a pair of a1 bosons exceeding 16% at 95% confidence level for a1 masses between 5 and 15 GeV and tan beta greater than 2, except in scenarios with mixing with charm or bottom quark bound states.

What carries the argument

The combined analysis of the 4 tau and 2 muon 2 tau final states under the assumption of Yukawa-like couplings for the a1 boson to fermions.

If this is right

  • Upper limits on the relative branching fraction to the 4 tau final state range from 0.007 to 0.079 at 95% CL.
  • In the Type III two Higgs doublet plus singlet model, Higgs branching ratios to a1 pairs above 16% are excluded for tan beta greater than 2 and a1 masses from 5 to 15 GeV except mixing cases.
  • The results assume the Higgs production cross section equals the standard model prediction.
  • These constraints are the tightest obtained for the Type III model in the mass range considered.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Additional data from future LHC runs could probe even smaller branching fractions in the same channels.
  • Searches in other a1 decay modes such as bottom quark pairs could provide complementary constraints on the same models.
  • The analysis framework could be applied to similar light boson searches at different center-of-mass energies.

Load-bearing premise

The a1 boson is assumed to have Yukawa-like couplings to fermions with strengths proportional to the respective fermion masses.

What would settle it

A statistically significant excess of events in the signal regions of the 4 tau or 2 muon 2 tau selections above the expected standard model background would indicate the presence of the signal.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.06947 by CMS Collaboration.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the signal topology. The Higgs boson decays into two a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Binning of the 2D (m1 , m2 ) distribution. Each bin is labeled (i, j), where i is the bin index along m1 (x axis) and j is the bin index along m2 (y axis). Bins (i, 6) with i = 1, ..., 5 include all events with m2 > 5.2 GeV, while bin (6, 6) contains all events with m1 and m2 > 5.2 GeV. • f1D(i) is the content of bin i in the one-dimensional (1D) muon+track invariant mass distribution, normalized to unity.… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The observed invariant mass distribution, normalized to unity, of the first muon and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Invariant mass distribution of the muon+track pair, normalized to unity, for events [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The correlation factors C(i, j) CR data with their statistical uncertainties. The correlation factors in data in the SR, C(i, j) SR data, are then computed as C(i, j) SR data = C(i, j) CR data C(i, j) SR MC C(i, j) CR MC , (6) Finally, the C(i, j) CR data values are multiplied by a common scale factor of 1.02 to ensure that the f2D(i, j) terms in the SR add up to unity, according to Eq. (3). This scale fac… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The correlation factors C(i, j) CR MC (top) and C(i, j) CR MC (bottom) with their statistical uncertainties. are normalized assuming the SM Higgs boson production rate and B(H → a1 a1 )B 2 (a1 → ττ) = 0.05. 9 Systematic uncertainties Several sources of uncertainty of both statistical and systematic origins are considered in the analysis. A summary of the uncertainties is provided in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figur… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The simulated signal (m1 , m2 ) distribution, converted into a 1D array, for ma1 val￾ues of 5 (upper left), 8 (upper right), 12 (lower left), and 15 GeV (lower right). The contri￾butions of the H → a1 a1 → 4τ (red histograms) and 2µ2τ (blue histograms) decays are shown. The distributions are normalized assuming SM Higgs production cross section and B(H → a1 a1 )B 2 (a1 → ττ) = 0.05. The bin notation follow… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The unrolled (m1 , m2 ) distribution used to extract the signal. The observed number of events in data is represented by the points, with the vertical bars giving the statistical un￾certainty. The background is shown as the blue histogram, with its uncertainty depicted by the shaded grey band. The normalization for the background is obtained by fitting the ob￾served data under the background-only hypothesi… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The observed (points) and expected (red line) 95% CL upper limits on the product of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The observed (points) and expected (red line) 95% CL upper limits on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The observed (points) and expected (red line) 95% CL upper limits on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The observed (points) and expected (red line) 95% CL upper limits on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A search for a pair of light pseudoscalar bosons (a$_1$) produced in the decay of the 125 GeV Higgs boson is presented. The analysis examines decay modes where one a$_1$ decays into a pair of tau leptons and the other decays into either another pair of tau leptons or a pair of muons. The a$_1$ boson mass probed in this study ranges from 4 to 15 GeV. The data sample was recorded by the CMS experiment in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. No excess above standard model (SM) expectations is observed. The study combines the 4$\tau$ and 2$\mu$2$\tau$ channels to set upper limits at 95% confidence level (CL) on the product of the Higgs boson production cross section and the branching fraction to the 4$\tau$ final state, relative to the Higgs boson production cross section predicted by the SM. In this interpretation, the a$_1$ boson is assumed to have Yukawa-like couplings to fermions, with coupling strengths proportional to the respective fermion masses. The observed (expected) upper limits range between 0.007 (0.011) and 0.079 (0.066) across the mass range considered. The results are also interpreted in the context of models with two Higgs doublets and an additional complex singlet field (2HD+S). The tightest constraints are obtained for the Type III 2HD+S model. In this case, assuming the Higgs boson production cross section equals the SM prediction, values of the branching ratio for the Higgs boson decay into a pair of a$_1$ bosons exceeding 16% are excluded at 95% CL for a$_1$ boson masses between 5 and 15 GeV and $\tan\beta$ $\gt$ 2, with the exception of scenarios in which the a$_1$ boson mixes with charm or bottom quark-antiquark bound states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports a search by the CMS experiment for pairs of light pseudoscalar bosons a1 (mass 4–15 GeV) produced in 125 GeV Higgs decays, using the 4τ and 2μ2τ final states in 138 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV pp data. No excess above SM expectations is observed. Upper limits at 95% CL are set on σ(pp→H) × BR(H→a1a1→4τ) / σ_SM, ranging from 0.007 (observed) to 0.079, and interpreted in the 2HD+S framework where the tightest exclusions (BR(H→a1a1) > 16% excluded for tanβ > 2) occur in the Type-III model under the assumption of Yukawa-like a1 couplings to fermions.

Significance. This is a standard null-result search that adds constraints on light pseudoscalars in extended Higgs sectors. The combination of 4τ and 2μ2τ channels, data-driven background estimation, and asymptotic CLs limit setting are conventional and appropriate for the luminosity. The results are competitive in the 2HD+S Type-III scenario and provide falsifiable exclusions that can be tested by future data or other experiments. The explicit statement of the Yukawa-coupling assumption for signal acceptance and interpretation is a strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / Interpretation section] Abstract and interpretation section: the reported limits are on the effective branching fraction to the 4τ final state, but the 2μ2τ channel is used to constrain the same a1a1 production; the translation between channels relies on the assumed Yukawa couplings and a1 branching ratios, which should be quantified with a dedicated systematic uncertainty or variation in the limit-setting procedure.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Results section] The mass range 4–15 GeV is stated, but the lower edge near the 2τ threshold and any efficiency drop should be shown explicitly in a figure of acceptance vs mass.
  2. [Analysis strategy] Clarify whether the 2μ2τ channel contributes to the 4τ limit only through the assumed BR(a1→μμ)/BR(a1→ττ) ratio or whether a joint likelihood is used; a short equation or diagram would help.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our search and the constructive comment on the interpretation. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Interpretation section] Abstract and interpretation section: the reported limits are on the effective branching fraction to the 4τ final state, but the 2μ2τ channel is used to constrain the same a1a1 production; the translation between channels relies on the assumed Yukawa couplings and a1 branching ratios, which should be quantified with a dedicated systematic uncertainty or variation in the limit-setting procedure.

    Authors: We agree that combining the 4τ and 2μ2τ channels to set limits on the effective BR(H → a1a1 → 4τ) requires translating the 2μ2τ contribution using the a1 branching ratios to μμ and ττ, which are fixed under the Yukawa-like coupling assumption stated in the paper. To address this, we will add a dedicated systematic uncertainty by varying the relative a1 branching ratios within a ±15% range (reflecting typical higher-order QCD and electroweak corrections to the Yukawa couplings in this mass range) and rederive the combined limits. This variation will be included in the systematic uncertainties section, propagated through the asymptotic CLs procedure, and the updated limits (including the effect on the 2HD+S interpretations) will be presented in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected in analysis chain

full rationale

The paper reports a standard experimental search for Higgs decays to light pseudoscalars in the 4τ and 2μ2τ channels using 138 fb⁻¹ of 13 TeV data. The core result—no excess above SM expectations and the quoted 95% CL upper limits on the effective branching fraction—is obtained by direct comparison of observed data to background estimates (data-driven) and signal templates, followed by asymptotic CLs limit setting. The Yukawa-coupling assumption appears only in the interpretation section to compute signal acceptance and to recast limits in the 2HD+S framework; it does not enter the raw event selection, background modeling, or the numerical limit values themselves. No equations reduce the reported limits to a fitted parameter by construction, and no load-bearing step relies on self-citation of an unverified uniqueness theorem or ansatz. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external data and standard statistical procedures.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The search rests on standard model background modeling and the Yukawa-coupling assumption for interpretation; no new free parameters are introduced beyond the scanned a1 mass points.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard model processes accurately describe the background in the selected final states.
    Invoked to interpret the absence of excess as a limit on new physics.
  • ad hoc to paper a1 has Yukawa-like couplings proportional to fermion masses.
    Explicitly stated for the 2HD+S interpretation.
invented entities (1)
  • light pseudoscalar boson a1 no independent evidence
    purpose: Hypothetical particle mediating the Higgs decay mode under study.
    Postulated in the BSM models being constrained; no independent evidence provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5942 in / 1344 out tokens · 55424 ms · 2026-05-19T00:32:55.492824+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Search for Higgs boson decays into two neutral scalars with unequal masses in final states with b quarks and tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No statistically significant excess is observed in the search for Higgs decays to two neutral scalars with unequal masses, setting 95% CL upper limits between 0.9 and 36.8 pb depending on mass and decay scenario.

  2. Rare decays of the SM Higgs to light pseudoscalars in the CMS Experiment

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    An overview of CMS searches for rare SM Higgs decays to light pseudoscalars in b-quark, lepton, and photon final states with 13 TeV Run 2 data is presented.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 46 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020, arXiv:1207.7214

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 2012

  2. [2]

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021, arXiv:1207.7235

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021 2012

  3. [3]

    Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 and 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at √s = 7 and 8 TeV”, JHEP 06 (2013) 081, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2013)081, arXiv:1303.4571. References 25

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2013)081 2013

  4. [4]

    A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery

    ATLAS Collaboration, “A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery”, Nature 607 (2022) 52, doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04893-w , arXiv:2207.00092. [Erratum: doi:doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)91890-2]

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04893-w 2022

  5. [5]

    A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery

    CMS Collaboration, “A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery.”, Nature 607 (2022) 60, doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04892-x , arXiv:2207.00043. [Author correction: doi:doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06164-8 ]

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04892-x 2022

  6. [6]

    A Theory of Spontaneous T Violation

    T. D. Lee, “A theory of spontaneous T violation”, Phys. Rev. D 8 (1973) 1226, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.8.1226

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.8.1226 1973

  7. [7]

    Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models

    G. C. Branco et al., “Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models”, Phys. Rept. 516 (2012) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002, arXiv:1106.0034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002 2012

  8. [8]

    Exotic Decays of the 125 GeV Higgs Boson

    D. Curtin et al., “Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson”, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 075004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.075004, arXiv:1312.4992

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.075004 2014

  9. [9]

    Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino

    P . Fayet, “Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino”, Nucl. Phys. B 90 (1975) 104, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(75)90636-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(75)90636-7 1975

  10. [10]

    Spontaneously broken supersymmetric theories of weak, electromagnetic and strong interactions

    P . Fayet, “Spontaneously broken supersymmetric theories of weak, electromagnetic and strong interactions”, Phys. Lett. B 69 (1977) 489, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90852-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90852-8 1977

  11. [11]

    The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model

    U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie, and A. M. Teixeira, “The next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model”, Phys. Rept. 496 (2010) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.001, arXiv:0910.1785

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.001 2010

  12. [12]

    The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model reviewed

    M. Maniatis, “The next-to-minimal supersymmetric extension of the standard model reviewed”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 25 (2010) 3505, doi:10.1142/S0217751X10049827, arXiv:0906.0777

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217751x10049827 2010

  13. [13]

    The µ-problem and the strong CP-problem

    J. E. Kim and H. P . Nilles, “The µ-problem and the strong CP-problem”, Phys. Lett. B 138 (1984) 150, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)91890-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)91890-2 1984

  14. [14]

    The \mu-problem, the NMSSM and string theory

    S. Ramos-Sanchez, “The µ-problem, the NMSSM and string theory”, Fortsch. Phys. 58 (2010) 748, doi:10.1002/prop.201000058, arXiv:1003.1307

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1002/prop.201000058 2010

  15. [15]

    Search for new light gauge bosons in Higgs boson decays to four-lepton final states in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for new light gauge bosons in Higgs boson decays to four-lepton final states in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 092001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.092001, arXiv:1505.07645

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.092001 2015

  16. [16]

    Search for a non-standard-model Higgs boson decaying to a pair of new light bosons in four-muon final states

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for a non-standard-model Higgs boson decaying to a pair of new light bosons in four-muon Final States”, Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013) 564, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.09.009, arXiv:1210.7619

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.09.009 2013

  17. [17]

    A search for pair production of new light bosons decaying into muons

    CMS Collaboration, “A search for pair production of new light bosons decaying into muons”, Phys. Lett. B 752 (2016) 146, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.10.067, arXiv:1506.00424. 26

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.10.067 2016

  18. [18]

    Search for light bosons in decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for light bosons in decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions at √s = 8 TeV”, JHEP 10 (2017) 076, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)076, arXiv:1701.02032

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2017)076 2017

  19. [19]

    Search for a very light NMSSM Higgs boson produced in decays of the 125 GeV scalar boson and decaying into tau leptons in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for a very light NMSSM Higgs boson produced in decays of the 125 GeV scalar boson and decaying into τ leptons in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV”, JHEP 01 (2016) 079, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)079, arXiv:1510.06534

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2016)079 2016

  20. [20]

    Search for new phenomena in events with at least three photons collected in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for new phenomena in events with at least three photons collected in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 210, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4034-8 , arXiv:1509.05051

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4034-8 2016

  21. [21]

    Search for Higgs boson decays to beyond-the-Standard-Model light bosons in four-lepton events with the ATLAS detector at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for Higgs boson decays to beyond-the-standard-model light bosons in four-lepton events with the ATLAS detector at √s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 06 (2018) 166, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2018)166, arXiv:1802.03388

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2018)166 2018

  22. [22]

    A search for pair production of new light bosons decaying into muons in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “A search for pair production of new light bosons decaying into muons in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV”, Phys. Lett. B 796 (2019) 131, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.07.013, arXiv:1812.00380

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.07.013 2019

  23. [23]

    Search for Higgs bosons decaying to $aa$ in the $\mu\mu\tau\tau$ final state in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS experiment

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for Higgs bosons decaying to aa in the µµττ final state in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS experiment”, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 052002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.052002, arXiv:1505.01609

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.052002 2015

  24. [24]

    Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state of two muons and two $\tau$ leptons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state of two muons and two τ leptons in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 11 (2018) 018, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2018)018, arXiv:1805.04865

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2018)018 2018

  25. [25]

    Search for a light pseudoscalar Higgs boson in the boostedµµττ final state in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for a light pseudoscalar Higgs boson in the boosted µµττ final state in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 08 (2020) 139, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2020)139, arXiv:2005.08694

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2020)139 2020

  26. [26]

    Search for Higgs boson decays into a pair of light bosons in the $bb\mu\mu$ final state in $pp$ collision at $\sqrt{s} = $13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for Higgs boson decays into a pair of light bosons in the bbµµ final state in pp collision at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, Phys. Lett. B 790 (2019) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.10.073, arXiv:1807.00539

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.10.073 2019

  27. [27]

    Search for exotic decays of the Higgs boson to a pair of pseudoscalars in theµµbb andττbb final states

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for exotic decays of the Higgs boson to a pair of pseudoscalars in the µµbb and ττbb final states”, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 493, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12727-4 , arXiv:2402.13358

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12727-4 2024

  28. [28]

    Search for Higgs boson decays into pairs of light (pseudo)scalar particles in the $\gamma\gamma jj$ final state in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for Higgs boson decays into pairs of light (pseudo)scalar particles in the γγjj final state in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, Phys. Lett. B 782 (2018) 750, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.06.011, arXiv:1803.11145

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.06.011 2018

  29. [29]

    Search for light pseudoscalar boson pairs produced from decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson in final states with two muons and two nearby tracks in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for light pseudoscalar boson pairs produced from decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson in final states with two muons and two nearby tracks in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV”, Phys. Lett. B 800 (2020) 135087, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135087, arXiv:1907.07235

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135087 2020

  30. [30]

    Search for the decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalar bosons in the final state with four bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for the decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalar bosons in the final state with four bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 06 (2024) 097, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2024)097, arXiv:2403.10341. References 27

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2024)097 2024

  31. [31]

    Search for the exotic decay of the Higgs boson into two light pseudoscalars with four photons in the final state in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for the exotic decay of the Higgs boson into two light pseudoscalars with four photons in the final state in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 07 (2023) 148, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2023)148, arXiv:2208.01469

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2023)148 2023

  32. [32]

    Search for exotic Higgs boson decays H→ AA →4γwith events containing two merged diphotons in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for exotic Higgs boson decays H → AA → 4γ with events containing two merged diphotons in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 101801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.101801, arXiv:2209.06197

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.101801 2023

  33. [33]

    Search for Higgs boson exotic decays into Lorentz-boosted light bosons in the four-τ final state at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for Higgs boson exotic decays into Lorentz-boosted light bosons in the four-τ final state at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, 2025. arXiv:2503.05463. Submitted to Phys. Lett. B

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Identification of hadronic tau lepton decays using a deep neural network

    CMS Collaboration, “Identification of hadronic tau lepton decays using a deep neural network”, JINST 17 (2022) P07023, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/17/07/P07023, arXiv:2201.08458

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/17/07/p07023 2022

  35. [35]

    doi:10.17182/hepdata.158360

    HEPData record for this analysis, 2025. doi:10.17182/hepdata.158360

    work page doi:10.17182/hepdata.158360 2025

  36. [36]

    The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”, JINST 3 (2008) S08004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/s08004 2008

  37. [37]

    Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3

    CMS Collaboration, “Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3”, JINST 19 (2024) P05064, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/P05064, arXiv:2309.05466

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/p05064 2024

  38. [38]

    Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV”, JINST 15 (2020) P10017, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/P10017, arXiv:2006.10165

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/p10017 2020

  39. [39]

    The CMS trigger system

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”, JINST 12 (2017) P01020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020, arXiv:1609.02366

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/p01020 2017

  40. [40]

    Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2”, JINST 19 (2024) P11021, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/P11021, arXiv:2410.17038

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/p11021 2024

  41. [41]

    An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sj ¨ostrand et al., “An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2”, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024, arXiv:1410.3012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024 2015

  42. [42]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations”, JHEP 07 (2014) 079, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079, arXiv:1405.0301

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)079 2014

  43. [43]

    Transverse-momentum resummation and the spectrum of the Higgs boson at the LHC

    G. Bozzi, S. Catani, D. de Florian, and M. Grazzini, “Transverse-momentum resummation and the spectrum of the Higgs boson at the LHC”, Nucl. Phys. B 737 (2006) 73, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.12.022, arXiv:hep-ph/0508068

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.12.022 2006

  44. [44]

    Transverse-momentum resummation: Higgs boson production at the Tevatron and the LHC

    D. de Florian, G. Ferrera, M. Grazzini, and D. Tommasini, “Transverse-momentum resummation: Higgs boson production at the Tevatron and the LHC”, JHEP 11 (2011) 064, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2011)064, arXiv:1109.2109

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2011)064 2011

  45. [45]

    NLO Higgs boson production via gluon fusion matched with shower in POWHEG

    S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “NLO Higgs boson production via gluon fusion matched with shower in POWHEG ”, JHEP 04 (2009) 002, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/04/002, arXiv:0812.0578. 28

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/04/002 2009

  46. [46]

    A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

    P . Nason, “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms”, JHEP 11 (2004) 040, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040 2004

  47. [47]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P . Nason, and C. Oleari, “Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method”, JHEP 11 (2007) 070, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070, arXiv:0709.2092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070 2007

  48. [48]

    Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements

    CMS Collaboration, “Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements”, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 4, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4 , arXiv:1903.12179

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4 2020

  49. [49]

    Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions

    J. Alwall et al., “Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions”, Eur. Phys. J. C 53 (2008) 473, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0490-5 , arXiv:0706.2569

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0490-5 2008

  50. [50]

    Agostinelli, et al., Nucl

    GEANT4 Collaboration, “GEANT4—a simulation toolkit”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506 (2003) 250, doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8 2003

  51. [51]

    G EANT 4 developments and applications

    J. Allison et al., “GEANT4 developments and applications”, IEEE T rans. Nucl. Sci. 53 (2006) 270, doi:10.1109/TNS.2006.869826

    work page doi:10.1109/tns.2006.869826 2006

  52. [52]

    Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

    CMS Collaboration, “Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker”, JINST 9 (2014) P10009, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10009, arXiv:1405.6569

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/p10009 2014

  53. [53]

    Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid

    CMS Collaboration, “Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid”, CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector”, JINST 12 (2017) P10003, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003, arXiv:1706.04965

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/p10003 2017

  55. [55]

    Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV”, JINST 13 (2018) P06015, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015, arXiv:1804.04528

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/p06015 2018

  56. [56]

    The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “The anti-kT jet clustering algorithm”, JHEP 04 (2008) 063, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063, arXiv:0802.1189

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063 2008

  57. [57]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet user manual”, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2 , arXiv:1111.6097

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2 2012

  58. [58]

    Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV”, JINST 12 (2017) P02014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/P02014, arXiv:1607.03663

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/p02014 2017

  59. [59]

    Jet flavour classification using DeepJet

    E. Bols et al., “Jet Flavour Classification Using DeepJet”, JINST 15 (2020) P12012, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/12/P12012, arXiv:2008.10519

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/12/p12012 2020

  60. [60]

    Performance summary of AK4 jet b tagging with data from proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV with the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance summary of AK4 jet b tagging with data from proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV with the CMS detector”, CMS Detector Performance Summary CMS-DP-2023-005, 2023. References 29

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV”, JINST 13 (2018) P05011, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/P05011, arXiv:1712.07158

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/p05011 2018

  62. [62]

    Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector

    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, “Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector”, CERN Report CERN-2017-002-M, 2017. doi:10.23731/CYRM-2017-002, arXiv:1610.07922

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.23731/cyrm-2017-002 2017

  63. [63]

    Discovering the Higgs with Low Mass Muon Pairs

    M. Lisanti and J. G. Wacker, “Discovering the Higgs boson with low mass muon pairs”, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2010) 115006, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.115006, arXiv:0903.1377

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.115006 2010

  64. [64]

    Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples

    R. J. Barlow and C. Beeston, “Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples”, Comput. Phys. Commun. 77 (1993) 219, doi:10.1016/0010-4655(93)90005-W

    work page doi:10.1016/0010-4655(93)90005-w 1993

  65. [65]

    Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS

    CMS Collaboration, “Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS”, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 800, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2 , arXiv:2104.01927

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2 2015

  66. [66]

    CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at√s = 13 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004, 2018

    work page 2017

  67. [67]

    CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at√s = 13 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002, 2019

    work page 2018

  68. [68]

    Measurement of the Inclusive W and Z Production Cross Sections in pp Collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the inclusive W and Z production cross sections in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV”, JHEP 10 (2011) 132, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2011)132, arXiv:1107.4789

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2011)132 2011

  69. [69]

    Parton distributions for the LHC Run II

    NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions for the LHC Run II”, JHEP 04 (2015) 040, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040, arXiv:1410.8849

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)040 2015

  70. [70]

    The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: Combine

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: Combine”, Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 8 (2024) 19, doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4 , arXiv:2404.06614

    work page doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4 2024

  71. [71]

    The RooFit toolkit for data modeling

    W. Verkerke and D. P . Kirkby, “The RooFit toolkit for data modeling”, inStatistical Problems in Particle Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology (PHYSTAT 05): Proceedings , p. 186

    work page

  72. [72]

    arXiv:physics/0306116. eConf. doi:10.1142/9781860948985_0039

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/9781860948985_0039

  73. [73]

    The RooStats Project

    L. Moneta et al., “The RooStats Project”, PoS ACAT2010 (2010) 057, doi:10.22323/1.093.0057, arXiv:1009.1003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.22323/1.093.0057 2010

  74. [74]

    Oxford Univer- sity Press (2018).https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814788.001.0001

    J. K. Lindsey, “Parametric Statistical Inference”. Oxford University Press, 1996. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198523598.001.0001, ISBN 9780198523598

    work page doi:10.1093/oso/9780198523598.001.0001 1996

  75. [75]

    Cowan, G., Cranmer, K., Gross, E., Vitells, O.,

    R. D. Cousins, “Lectures on statistics in theory: prelude to statistics in practice”, 2018. arXiv:1807.05996

    work page arXiv 2018

  76. [76]

    Confidence Level Computation for Combining Searches with Small Statistics

    T. Junk, “Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 434 (1999) 435, doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00498-2, arXiv:hep-ex/9902006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(99)00498-2 1999

  77. [77]

    Presentation of search results: The CL s technique

    A. L. Read, “Presentation of search results: the CL s technique”, J. Phys. G 28 (2002) 2693, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313. 30

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313 2002

  78. [78]

    Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, “Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics”, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1554, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0 , arXiv:1007.1727. [Erratum: doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2501-z ]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0 2011

  79. [79]

    Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011

    ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, and LHC Higgs Combination Group, “Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011”, Technical Report CMS-NOTE-2011-005, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-11, 2011

    work page 2011

  80. [80]

    Collider constraints on light pseudoscalars

    U. Haisch, J. F. Kamenik, A. Malinauskas, and M. Spira, “Collider constraints on light pseudoscalars”, JHEP 03 (2018) 178, doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2018)178, arXiv:1802.02156

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2018)178 2018

Showing first 80 references.