arxiv: 2602.09105 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-09 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el· hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Generalized Families of QFTs

T. Daniel Brennan , Kenneth Intriligator

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 05:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-elhep-ph

keywords family anomaliesgeneralized symmetriesnon-invertible symmetriesanomaly inflowSymTFTRG flowsQCD-like theoriesIR phases

0 comments

The pith

Broken generalized symmetries can still constrain RG flows and IR phases of QFT families through their anomalies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper generalizes the notion of family anomalies from ordinary symmetries to broken generalized and categorical symmetries, including higher-group and non-invertible ones. These symmetries act on the space of coupling constants across families of theories, and their anomalies continue to constrain possible renormalization-group trajectories and the infrared phases they can reach. The authors analyze anomaly inflow and symmetry topological field theories (SymTFTs) for such families and apply the framework to four-dimensional QCD-like theories deformed by irrelevant multi-fermion operators, showing how the anomalies limit allowed low-energy behaviors.

Core claim

We generalize family anomaly considerations to cases of broken generalized/categorical symmetries, including higher-group and non-invertible symmetries. We consider the anomaly inflow and SymTFTs of such generalized families of QFTs, and their implications for RG flows and constraints on the IR phases. As examples, we apply family anomalies to study the IR phases of 4d QCD-like theories deformed by irrelevant, multi-fermion interactions.

What carries the argument

Family anomalies realized through anomaly inflow and SymTFTs for broken generalized symmetries acting on the space of couplings.

Load-bearing premise

Anomaly inflow and SymTFT constructions remain well-defined and constraining when the generalized symmetries are broken and act on the space of couplings in a family of theories.

What would settle it

An explicit RG flow or lattice simulation in a 4d QCD-like theory with multi-fermion deformations that reaches an IR phase forbidden by the family anomaly constraint.

read the original abstract

RG flows and IR phases of QFTs can be constrained by generalized symmetries and their anomalies. Broken symmetries act on the space of coupling constants of families of theories, and can also have IR-constraining family anomalies. We generalize family anomaly considerations to cases of broken generalized/categorical symmetries, including higher-group and non-invertible symmetries. We consider the anomaly inflow and SymTFTs of such generalized families of QFTs, and their implications for RG flows and constraints on the IR phases. As examples, we apply family anomalies to study the IR phases of $4d$ QCD-like theories deformed by irrelevant, multi-fermion interactions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper extends family anomalies to broken higher-group and non-invertible symmetries via SymTFT and inflow but stays mostly at the level of setup without shown explicit calculations.

read the letter

The core point is that Brennan and Intriligator are generalizing family anomalies to broken generalized symmetries, including higher-group and non-invertible ones, and using anomaly inflow plus SymTFTs to get constraints on RG flows and IR phases for families of theories. They apply this to 4d QCD-like models with irrelevant multi-fermion deformations. That extension to the broken categorical case is the main new angle, and it fits into the current interest in generalized symmetries acting on coupling space. The framing is clean and pulls together existing tools in a way that could organize some IR constraints at the family level rather than for single theories. Credit for trying to push the anomaly machinery into this regime. The soft spot is that nothing in the abstract or stress-test note shows an explicit anomaly polynomial, inflow computation, or worked SymTFT for a non-invertible symmetry acting on the coupling space. Without those, it is hard to verify that the construction stays well-defined and actually constrains the IR once the symmetry is broken. The concern about needing extra data to promote the broken defects and fusion rules to a family SymTFT looks real on the evidence given. If the full paper supplies concrete examples with numbers or explicit matching, that would change the picture; otherwise the claims rest on formal extension. This is aimed at hep-th readers already working on generalized symmetries, anomalies, and RG constraints in QFT. Someone in that subfield could pick up useful language or questions from it. It is worth sending to a serious referee to check whether the details hold up, even if the paper will need more explicit checks to land cleanly.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims to generalize family anomaly considerations to cases of broken generalized/categorical symmetries (including higher-group and non-invertible symmetries). It examines anomaly inflow and SymTFT constructions for such generalized families of QFTs, their implications for RG flows, and constraints on IR phases, with examples in 4d QCD-like theories deformed by irrelevant multi-fermion interactions.

Significance. If the central constructions can be made explicit, the work would extend anomaly-based constraints on IR phases to families of theories with broken generalized symmetries. The approach rests on standard anomaly inflow but applies it to symmetry-breaking acting on coupling space; however, without explicit derivations or worked examples the significance cannot be assessed beyond the level of a coherent program outline.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract and examples: the central claim requires that anomaly inflow and SymTFTs remain well-defined and yield IR constraints once non-invertible symmetries are broken and act on the space of couplings. No explicit anomaly polynomial, inflow computation, or promotion of topological defects/fusion rules to a family SymTFT is supplied for the 4d QCD-like multi-fermion deformation cases, leaving the constraining power on RG flows undemonstrated.
[Examples] The treatment of broken generalized symmetries lacks a concrete definition of how the SymTFT is constructed when the symmetry acts on coupling space; this is load-bearing for the claimed implications for IR phases.

minor comments (1)

[Introduction] Clarify the distinction between standard family anomalies and the generalized version in the introduction to avoid potential notational overlap.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major points below, clarifying the general framework while committing to explicit additions that strengthen the demonstrations for the examples.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and examples: the central claim requires that anomaly inflow and SymTFTs remain well-defined and yield IR constraints once non-invertible symmetries are broken and act on the space of couplings. No explicit anomaly polynomial, inflow computation, or promotion of topological defects/fusion rules to a family SymTFT is supplied for the 4d QCD-like multi-fermion deformation cases, leaving the constraining power on RG flows undemonstrated.

Authors: We agree that explicit computations would make the constraining power more concrete. The general construction of anomaly inflow for broken generalized symmetries acting on coupling space, including the promotion of defects to family defects, is developed in Sections 3 and 4. For the 4d QCD-like theories deformed by irrelevant multi-fermion interactions, the family anomaly follows from the UV 't Hooft anomaly of the broken non-invertible symmetry. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit anomaly polynomial computation for this case, derived via anomaly matching, together with the resulting constraints on possible IR phases such as confinement patterns. This will demonstrate the RG flow implications directly. revision: yes
Referee: [Examples] The treatment of broken generalized symmetries lacks a concrete definition of how the SymTFT is constructed when the symmetry acts on coupling space; this is load-bearing for the claimed implications for IR phases.

Authors: The family SymTFT is constructed by coupling the topological defects of the broken symmetry to background fields parametrizing the space of couplings, with fusion rules extended accordingly. We recognize that a more explicit, step-by-step definition would improve clarity. In the revision we will expand Section 5 with a precise definition of this construction for non-invertible symmetries, including the modified fusion rules when acting on coupling space, and apply it to the QCD multi-fermion deformation to illustrate the IR phase constraints. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in the derivation chain

full rationale

The provided abstract and description outline a generalization of family anomaly considerations and SymTFT constructions to broken generalized symmetries (higher-group and non-invertible). No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are quoted that reduce the central claims to inputs by construction. The approach applies standard anomaly inflow methods to new settings with examples in 4d QCD-like theories deformed by irrelevant interactions. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks, with no load-bearing steps that rename known results or smuggle ansatze via self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard QFT axioms and anomaly inflow principles already established in the literature; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

standard math Standard axioms of quantum field theory and anomaly inflow
Invoked throughout the abstract for defining generalized symmetries and their anomalies.
domain assumption Existence and consistency of SymTFT descriptions for generalized symmetries
Used to analyze anomaly inflow in families of theories.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5398 in / 1235 out tokens · 48349 ms · 2026-05-16T05:05:10.861373+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We generalize family anomaly considerations to cases of broken generalized/categorical symmetries, including higher-group and non-invertible symmetries. We consider the anomaly inflow and SymTFTs of such generalized families of QFTs
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The anomaly is matched by inflow via the (d+1)-dimensional SPT phase: A = ∫ dθ/2π ∪ ω_d(A)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Higher Connection in Open String Field Theory
hep-th 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A 2-form connection is defined in the space of open string field theory solutions, producing invariant higher holonomies and 3-form curvature potentially corresponding to the B-field.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

157 extracted references · 157 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 36 internal anchors

[1]

Generalized Global Symmetries

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “Generalized Global Symmetries,”JHEP 02(2015) 172,arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[2]

What is an anomaly?,

D. S. Freed, “What is an anomaly?,”arXiv:2307.08147 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[3]

Anomalies in the Space of Coupling Constants and Their Dynamical Applications I,

C. C´ ordova, D. S. Freed, H. T. Lam, and N. Seiberg, “Anomalies in the Space of Coupling Constants and Their Dynamical Applications I,”SciPost Phys.8no. 1, (2020) 001, arXiv:1905.09315 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[4]

Anomalies in the Space of Coupling Constants and Their Dynamical Applications II,

C. C´ ordova, D. S. Freed, H. T. Lam, and N. Seiberg, “Anomalies in the Space of Coupling Constants and Their Dynamical Applications II,”SciPost Phys.8no. 1, (2020) 002, arXiv:1905.13361 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[5]

Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,

G. ’t Hooft, “Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,” NATO Sci. Ser. B59(1980) 135–157

work page 1980
[6]

The Axial Anomaly and the Bound State Spectrum in Confining Theories,

Y. Frishman, A. Schwimmer, T. Banks, and S. Yankielowicz, “The Axial Anomaly and the Bound State Spectrum in Confining Theories,”Nucl. Phys. B177(1981) 157–171

work page 1981
[7]

’t Hooft’s Consistency Condition as a Consequence of Analyticity and Unitarity,

S. R. Coleman and B. Grossman, “’t Hooft’s Consistency Condition as a Consequence of Analyticity and Unitarity,”Nucl. Phys. B203(1982) 205–220

work page 1982
[8]

Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain,

E. H. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, “Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain,” Annals Phys.16(1961) 407–466

work page 1961
[9]

Interacting fermionic topological insulators/superconductors in three dimensions

C. Wang and T. Senthil, “Interacting fermionic topological insulators/superconductors in three dimensions,”Phys. Rev. B89no. 19, (2014) 195124,arXiv:1401.1142 [cond-mat.str-el]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.B 91, 239902 (2015)]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[10]

Composite fermi liquids in the lowest Landau level

C. Wang and T. Senthil, “Composite fermi liquids in the lowest Landau level,”Phys. Rev. B 94no. 24, (2016) 245107,arXiv:1604.06807 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[11]

Symmetric Gapped Interfaces of SPT and SET States: Systematic Constructions

J. Wang, X.-G. Wen, and E. Witten, “Symmetric Gapped Interfaces of SPT and SET States: Systematic Constructions,”Phys. Rev. X8no. 3, (2018) 031048,arXiv:1705.06728 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[12]

Lieb-Schultz-Mattis type theorem with higher-form symmetry and the quantum dimer models,

R. Kobayashi, K. Shiozaki, Y. Kikuchi, and S. Ryu, “Lieb-Schultz-Mattis type theorem with higher-form symmetry and the quantum dimer models,”Phys. Rev. B99no. 1, (2019) 014402, arXiv:1805.05367 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

work page arXiv 2019
[13]

Adjoint QCD$_4$, Deconfined Critical Phenomena, Symmetry-Enriched Topological Quantum Field Theory, and Higher Symmetry-Extension

Z. Wan and J. Wang, “Adjoint QCD 4, Deconfined Critical Phenomena, Symmetry-Enriched Topological Quantum Field Theory, and Higher Symmetry-Extension,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 6, (2019) 065013,arXiv:1812.11955 [hep-th]. – 58 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[14]

Quantum 4d Yang-Mills Theory and Time-Reversal Symmetric 5d Higher-Gauge Topological Field Theory,

Z. Wan, J. Wang, and Y. Zheng, “Quantum 4d Yang-Mills Theory and Time-Reversal Symmetric 5d Higher-Gauge Topological Field Theory,”Phys. Rev. D100no. 8, (2019) 085012,arXiv:1904.00994 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[15]

Anomaly Obstructions to Symmetry Preserving Gapped Phases,

C. C´ ordova and K. Ohmori, “Anomaly Obstructions to Symmetry Preserving Gapped Phases,”arXiv:1910.04962 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 1910
[16]

Anomaly Constraints on Gapped Phases with Discrete Chiral Symmetry,

C. C´ ordova and K. Ohmori, “Anomaly Constraints on Gapped Phases with Discrete Chiral Symmetry,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 2, (2020) 025011,arXiv:1912.13069 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[17]

Obstructions to Gapped Phases from Non-Invertible Symmetries,

A. Apte, C. Cordova, and H. T. Lam, “Obstructions to gapped phases from noninvertible symmetries,”Phys. Rev. B108no. 4, (2023) 045134,arXiv:2212.14605 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[18]

Anomaly enforced gaplessness and symmetry fractionalization for Spin G symmetries,

T. D. Brennan, “Anomaly enforced gaplessness and symmetry fractionalization for Spin G symmetries,”JHEP02(2024) 065,arXiv:2308.12999 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[19]

Anomaly enforced gaplessness for background flux anomalies and symmetry fractionalization,

T. D. Brennan and A. Sheckler, “Anomaly enforced gaplessness for background flux anomalies and symmetry fractionalization,”JHEP05(2024) 159,arXiv:2311.00093 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[20]

Constraints on symmetry-preserving gapped phases from coupling constant anomalies,

T. D. Brennan, “Constraints on symmetry-preserving gapped phases from coupling constant anomalies,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 4, (2024) L041701,arXiv:2404.11660 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[21]

Berry Phase in Quantum Field Theory: Diabolical Points and Boundary Phenomena,

P.-S. Hsin, A. Kapustin, and R. Thorngren, “Berry Phase in Quantum Field Theory: Diabolical Points and Boundary Phenomena,”Phys. Rev. B102(2020) 245113, arXiv:2004.10758 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2020
[22]

Anomalies of (1 + 1)D categorical symmetries,

C. Zhang and C. C´ ordova, “Anomalies of (1+1)-dimensional categorical symmetries,”Phys. Rev. B110no. 3, (2024) 035155,arXiv:2304.01262 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2024
[23]

Anomalies of non-invertible symmetries in (3+1)d,

C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, and C. Zhang, “Anomalies of non-invertible symmetries in (3+1)d,” SciPost Phys.17no. 5, (2024) 131,arXiv:2308.11706 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[24]

Anomalies of non-invertible self-duality symmetries: fractionalization and gauging,

A. Antinucci, F. Benini, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, “Anomalies of non-invertible self-duality symmetries: fractionalization and gauging,”arXiv:2308.11707 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[25]

Solitons with Fermion Number 1/2,

R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, “Solitons with Fermion Number 1/2,”Phys. Rev. D13(1976) 3398–3409

work page 1976
[26]

Symmetry Fractionalization, Defects, and Gauging of Topological Phases,

M. Barkeshli, P. Bonderson, M. Cheng, and Z. Wang, “Symmetry Fractionalization, Defects, and Gauging of Topological Phases,”Phys. Rev. B100no. 11, (2019) 115147, arXiv:1410.4540 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2019
[27]

Anomalies and symmetry fractionalization,

D. G. Delmastro, J. Gomis, P.-S. Hsin, and Z. Komargodski, “Anomalies and symmetry fractionalization,”SciPost Phys.15no. 3, (2023) 079,arXiv:2206.15118 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[28]

Matching higher symmetries across Intriligator-Seiberg duality,

Y. Lee, K. Ohmori, and Y. Tachikawa, “Matching higher symmetries across Intriligator-Seiberg duality,”JHEP10(2021) 114,arXiv:2108.05369 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[29]

Line Defect Quantum Numbers & Anomalies,

T. D. Brennan, C. Cordova, and T. T. Dumitrescu, “Line Defect Quantum Numbers & Anomalies,”arXiv:2206.15401 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[30]

Consequences of Symmetry Fractionalization without 1-Form Global Symmetries,

T. D. Brennan, T. Jacobson, and K. Roumpedakis, “Consequences of Symmetry Fractionalization without 1-Form Global Symmetries,”arXiv:2504.08036 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[31]

Classification of interacting electronic topological insulators in three dimensions

C. Wang, A. C. Potter, and T. Senthil, “Classification of interacting electronic topological insulators in three dimensions,”Science343(2014) 629,arXiv:1306.3238 [cond-mat.str-el]. – 59 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[32]

Framed Wilson Operators, Fermionic Strings, and Gravitational Anomaly in 4d

R. Thorngren, “Framed Wilson Operators, Fermionic Strings, and Gravitational Anomaly in 4d,”JHEP02(2015) 152,arXiv:1404.4385 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[33]

All-fermion electrodynamics and fermion number anomaly inflow

S. M. Kravec, J. McGreevy, and B. Swingle, “All-fermion electrodynamics and fermion number anomaly inflow,”Phys. Rev. D92no. 8, (2015) 085024,arXiv:1409.8339 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[34]

Symmetry enriched U(1) quantum spin liquids

L. Zou, C. Wang, and T. Senthil, “Symmetry enriched U(1) quantum spin liquids,”Phys. Rev. B97no. 19, (2018) 195126,arXiv:1710.00743 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[35]

A New SU(2) Anomaly

J. Wang, X.-G. Wen, and E. Witten, “A New SU(2) Anomaly,”J. Math. Phys.60no. 5, (2019) 052301,arXiv:1810.00844 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[36]

Symmetry-enriched quantum spin liquids in (3 + 1)d,

P.-S. Hsin and A. Turzillo, “Symmetry-enriched quantum spin liquids in (3 + 1)d,”JHEP09 (2020) 022,arXiv:1904.11550 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2020
[37]

Symmetry fractionalization and duality defects in Maxwell theory,

N. Kan, K. Kawabata, and H. Wada, “Symmetry fractionalization and duality defects in Maxwell theory,”JHEP10(2024) 238,arXiv:2404.14481 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[38]

Non-invertible symmetries along 4d RG flows,

J. A. Damia, R. Argurio, F. Benini, S. Benvenuti, C. Copetti, and L. Tizzano, “Non-invertible symmetries along 4d RG flows,”JHEP02(2024) 084,arXiv:2305.17084 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[39]

Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter,

J. McGreevy, “Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter,”Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys.14(2023) 57–82,arXiv:2204.03045 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2023
[40]

arXiv:2205.09545 [hep-th]

C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, K. Intriligator, and S.-H. Shao, “Snowmass White Paper: Generalized Symmetries in Quantum Field Theory and Beyond,” inSnowmass 2021. 5, 2022. arXiv:2205.09545 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[41]

ICTP Lectures on (Non-)Invertible Generalized Symmetries

S. Schafer-Nameki, “ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries,”Phys. Rept. 1063(2024) 1–55,arXiv:2305.18296 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024
[42]

What's Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries

S.-H. Shao, “What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries,” arXiv:2308.00747 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[43]

Lectures on Generalized Symmetries,

L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre, and H. Tillim, “Lectures on generalized symmetries,”Phys. Rept.1051(2024) 1–87, arXiv:2307.07547 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[44]

Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics,

T. D. Brennan and S. Hong, “Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics,”arXiv:2306.00912 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[45]

Simons Lectures on Categorical Symmetries,

D. Costaet al., “Simons Lectures on Categorical Symmetries,” 11, 2024.arXiv:2411.09082 [math-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[46]

Orbifold groupoids,

D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, “Orbifold groupoids,”JHEP02(2021) 132,arXiv:2008.05960 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[47]

Topological symmetry in quantum field theory,

D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, “Topological symmetry in quantum field theory,” arXiv:2209.07471 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[48]

Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories,

J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, “Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett.128no. 11, (2022) 111601,arXiv:2111.01141 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[49]

Symmetry TFTs for Non-Invertible Defects,

J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, “Symmetry TFTs for Non-invertible Defects,”Commun. Math. Phys.404no. 2, (2023) 1021–1124,arXiv:2209.11062 [hep-th]. – 60 –

work page arXiv 2023
[50]

Symmetry TFTs and Anomalies of Non-Invertible Symmetries,

J. Kaidi, E. Nardoni, G. Zafrir, and Y. Zheng, “Symmetry TFTs and anomalies of non-invertible symmetries,”JHEP10(2023) 053,arXiv:2301.07112 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[51]

Algebraic higher symmetry and categorical symmetry – a holographic and entanglement view of symmetry,

L. Kong, T. Lan, X.-G. Wen, Z.-H. Zhang, and H. Zheng, “Algebraic higher symmetry and categorical symmetry – a holographic and entanglement view of symmetry,”Phys. Rev. Res.2 no. 4, (2020) 043086,arXiv:2005.14178 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2020
[52]

Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,

F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. n. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,”Commun. Math. Phys.402no. 1, (2023) 895–949, arXiv:2112.02092 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[53]

The club sandwich: Gapless phases and phase transitions with non-invertible symmetries,

L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “The club sandwich: Gapless phases and phase transitions with non-invertible symmetries,”SciPost Phys.18no. 5, (2025) 156,arXiv:2312.17322 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[54]

Aspects of categorical symmetries from branes: SymTFTs and generalized charges,

F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, D. S. W. Gould, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Aspects of categorical symmetries from branes: SymTFTs and generalized charges,”SciPost Phys.17no. 1, (2024) 025,arXiv:2306.16405 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[55]

Generalized Charges, Part I: Invertible Symmetries and Higher Representations,

L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Generalized charges, part I: Invertible symmetries and higher representations,”SciPost Phys.16no. 4, (2024) 093,arXiv:2304.02660 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[56]

Generalized Charges, Part II: Non-Invertible Symmetries and the Symmetry TFT,

L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Generalized charges, part II: Non-invertible symmetries and the symmetry TFT,”SciPost Phys.19no. 4, (2025) 098,arXiv:2305.17159 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[57]

Higher representations for extended operators,

T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, and A. Grigoletto, “Higher representations for extended operators,” arXiv:2304.03789 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[58]

Representation theory for categorical symmetries,

T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, and A. Grigoletto, “Representation theory for categorical symmetries,”arXiv:2305.17165 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[59]

Symmetry TFTs for 3d QFTs from M-theory,

M. van Beest, D. S. W. Gould, S. Schafer-Nameki, and Y.-N. Wang, “Symmetry TFTs for 3d QFTs from M-theory,”JHEP02(2023) 226,arXiv:2210.03703 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[60]

When are Duality Defects Group-Theoretical?,

Z. Sun and Y. Zheng, “When are Duality Defects Group-Theoretical?,”arXiv:2307.14428 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[61]

A SymTFT for Continuous Symmetries,

T. D. Brennan and Z. Sun, “A SymTFT for continuous symmetries,”JHEP12(2024) 100, arXiv:2401.06128 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[62]

SymTFT for (3+1)d Gapless SPTs and Obstructions to Confinement,

A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “SymTFT for (3+1)d Gapless SPTs and Obstructions to Confinement,”SciPost Phys.18(2025) 114,arXiv:2408.05585 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[63]

Anomalies and gauging of U(1) symmetries,

A. Antinucci and F. Benini, “Anomalies and gauging of U(1) symmetries,”Phys. Rev. B111 no. 2, (2025) 024110,arXiv:2401.10165 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[64]

SymTFTs for Continuous non-Abelian Symmetries,

F. Bonetti, M. Del Zotto, and R. Minasian, “SymTFTs for Continuous non-Abelian Symmetries,”arXiv:2402.12347 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[65]

Remarks on geometric engineering, symmetry TFTs and anomalies,

M. Del Zotto, S. N. Meynet, and R. Moscrop, “Remarks on geometric engineering, symmetry TFTs and anomalies,”JHEP07(2024) 220,arXiv:2402.18646 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[66]

SymTh for non-finite symmetries,

F. Apruzzi, F. Bedogna, and N. Dondi, “SymTh for non-finite symmetries,” arXiv:2402.14813 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[67]

SymTrees and Multi-Sector QFTs,

F. Baume, J. J. Heckman, M. H¨ ubner, E. Torres, A. P. Turner, and X. Yu, “SymTrees and Multi-Sector QFTs,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 10, (2024) 106013,arXiv:2310.12980 [hep-th]. – 61 –

work page arXiv 2024
[68]

Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions

C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang, and X. Yin, “Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions,”JHEP01(2019) 026,arXiv:1802.04445 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[69]

Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,

Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 12, (2022) 125016,arXiv:2111.01139 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[70]

Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects,

K. Roumpedakis, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Shao, “Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects,”Commun. Math. Phys.401no. 3, (2023) 3043–3107, arXiv:2204.02407 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[71]

Non-invertible higher-categorical symmetries,

L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, “Non-invertible higher-categorical symmetries,”SciPost Phys.14no. 1, (2023) 007,arXiv:2204.06564 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[72]

Non-invertible Condensation, Duality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions,

Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Non-invertible Condensation, Duality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions,”Commun. Math. Phys.402no. 1, (2023) 489–542,arXiv:2204.09025 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[73]

A Long Exact Sequence in Symmetry Breaking: order parameter constraints, defect anomaly-matching, and higher Berry phases

A. Debray, S. K. Devalapurkar, C. Krulewski, Y. L. Liu, N. Pacheco-Tallaj, and R. Thorngren, “A long exact sequence in symmetry breaking: order parameter constraints, defect anomaly-matching, and higher Berry phases,”JHEP07(2025) 007,arXiv:2309.16749 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[74]

Bulk anyons as edge symmetries: Boundary phase diagrams of topologically ordered states,

T. Lichtman, R. Thorngren, N. H. Lindner, A. Stern, and E. Berg, “Bulk anyons as edge symmetries: Boundary phase diagrams of topologically ordered states,”Phys. Rev. B104 no. 7, (2021) 075141,arXiv:2003.04328 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2021
[75]

Higher Berry phase of fermions and index theorem,

Y. Choi and K. Ohmori, “Higher Berry phase of fermions and index theorem,”JHEP09 (2022) 022,arXiv:2205.02188 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[76]

The QCD phase diagram in the space of imaginary chemical potential via ’t Hooft anomalies,

S. K. Kobayashi, T. Yokokura, and K. Yonekura, “The QCD phase diagram in the space of imaginary chemical potential via ’t Hooft anomalies,”JHEP08(2023) 132, arXiv:2305.01217 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[77]

Dimensionally reducing generalized symmetries from (3+1)-dimensions,

E. Nardoni, M. Sacchi, O. Sela, G. Zafrir, and Y. Zheng, “Dimensionally reducing generalized symmetries from (3+1)-dimensions,”JHEP07(2024) 110,arXiv:2403.15995 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[78]

Chern-Weil global symmetries and how quantum gravity avoids them,

B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, M. Montero, M. Reece, T. Rudelius, and I. Valenzuela, “Chern-Weil global symmetries and how quantum gravity avoids them,”JHEP11(2021) 053, arXiv:2012.00009 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[79]

Higher Form Symmetries and M-theory,

F. Albertini, M. Del Zotto, I. n. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria, and S. S. Hosseini, “Higher Form Symmetries and M-theory,”JHEP12(2020) 203,arXiv:2005.12831 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[80]

Baby Universes, Holography, and the Swampland,

J. McNamara and C. Vafa, “Baby Universes, Holography, and the Swampland,” arXiv:2004.06738 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2004

Showing first 80 references.