pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.07718 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP · astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Post-perihelion Coma Composition of the Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS from Optical Spectroscopy

Ruining Zhao , Xiliang Zhang , Bin Yang , Xiangyu Fan , Shu Wang , Yang Huang , Jifeng Liu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 14:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.GA
keywords interstellar cometcoma compositionoptical spectroscopyC2 depletionmetal productionoxygen emissionperihelion asymmetry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Post-perihelion spectra of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS show reduced C2 depletion and a metal-CO link in coma outgassing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports optical spectroscopy of 3I/ATLAS taken after perihelion at 1.8 to 3.3 au, deriving production rates for CN, C2, C3, CH, and gaseous metals. It establishes that C2 depletion is milder outbound than inbound, that CN and metal rates fall off more slowly after perihelion, and that metals track CO abundance rather than H2O. A residual in the 6300-angstrom oxygen line points to extra oxygen-bearing parents beyond the usual volatiles. These patterns matter because they constrain how an interstellar comet's subsurface layers respond to solar heating and which volatile reservoirs supply metals and oxygen.

Core claim

Multi-epoch post-perihelion spectroscopy reveals that the coma of 3I/ATLAS is less depleted in C2 than it was pre-perihelion, exhibits a gradual outbound decline in CN and metal production, follows the metal-CO correlation seen in other comets, and requires additional oxygen parents to account for the [O I] lambda 6300 residual after subtracting H2O, CO2, and CO contributions.

What carries the argument

Production rates and mixing ratios extracted from optical emission lines of CN, C2, C3, CH, Fe I, and Ni I, compared across pre- and post-perihelion epochs.

If this is right

  • The comet's activity pattern shifts across perihelion with slower outbound decline in CN and metals.
  • Gaseous metal release ties more closely to a CO-bearing reservoir than to H2O, possibly as metal carbonyls.
  • Compositional heterogeneity or subsurface activation supplies the observed post-perihelion C2 increase.
  • Extra oxygen-bearing parents beyond H2O, CO2, and CO are required in the coma.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Layered ices could explain why C2 and metals behave differently before and after closest approach.
  • Similar metal-CO relations in solar-system comets would support a shared volatile chemistry across origins.
  • Targeted infrared searches for carbonyl features could test the proposed metal-release mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

Production rates derived from the optical spectra accurately reflect true coma abundances without major contamination, model-dependent corrections, or unaccounted excitation effects.

What would settle it

A full accounting of the [O I] 6300 residual by updated H2O, CO2, and CO models alone, or pre- and post-perihelion C2 production rates that match exactly once identical modeling assumptions are applied.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.07718 by Bin Yang, Jifeng Liu, Ruining Zhao, Shu Wang, Xiangyu Fan, Xiliang Zhang, Yang Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Eimission spectra of 3I/ATLAS taken with BFOSC and YFOSC. For clarity, the full spectral range is divided into three panels with different vertical offsets to emphasize specific features. The left panel highlights emission lines of Ni i (blue dashed lines) and Fe i (red dashed lines), and the CN violet band (blue shaded). The middle panel shows molecular bands of C3 (green shaded), CH (orange shaded), and … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Production rates of CN, Ni i, and Fe i as a function of heliocentric distance for 3I/ATLAS. Post-perihelion measure￾ments from this work are shown as filled circles, while pre-perihelion measurements from D. Hutsem´ekers et al. (2026) are shown as open circles. The species are color-coded as CN—grey, Ni i—blue, and Fe i—red. Dashed lines indicate the corresponding power-law dependencies (r −n h ) derived f… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Correlations. (a): log(QNi I/QFe I) versus log(QC2 /QCN); (b): log(QNi I+Fe I) versus log(QH2O); (c): log(QNi I+Fe I) versus log(QCO). Selected points are labeled by heliocentric distance to illustrate the temporal evolution of 3I, with negative and positive values denoting pre- and post-perihelion, respectively. The black lines in panel (b) and (c) denote the best-fit cor￾relations with QH2O (including al… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of the spatial-profile analysis around [O i] λ6300 for the December 6 observation. (a) Two-dimensional spectrum of 3I near λ6300. The blue window is centered on λ6300, while the two red windows placed on nearby continuum regions. (b) Spatial profiles extracted from the λ6300 (blue) and continuum (red) windows. Both profiles contain the sky continuum and dust-scattered cometary continuum, where… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present multi-epoch optical spectroscopy of the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS obtained between December 2025 and January 2026 (heliocentric distances 1.8-3.3 au), yielding post-perihelion production rates and mixing ratios for CN, C$_3$, C$_2$, CH, and gaseous metals (Fe I and Ni I). Our results show that the coma is less depleted in C$_2$ after perihelion than before, indicative of subsurface activation or compositional heterogeneity. The outgassing profiles reveal a pronounced perihelion asymmetry: CN and metal production rates decline more gradually outbound than inbound, consistent with the reported behavior of H$_2$O and implying a change in the comet's activity pattern across perihelion. Despite being metal-rich relative to its H$_2$O content, 3I follows the metal-CO correlation observed in comets of diverse origins, suggesting that gaseous metal release is more closely linked to a CO-bearing volatile reservoir than to H$_2$O, potentially in the form of metal carbonyls. In addition, the significant residual in the [O I] $\lambda6300$ emission cannot be explained by H$_2$O, CO$_2$, and CO alone, indicating a contribution from additional oxygen-bearing parents.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports multi-epoch optical spectroscopy of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS obtained December 2025–January 2026 at rh = 1.8–3.3 au, deriving post-perihelion production rates and mixing ratios for CN, C3, C2, CH, Fe I, and Ni I. It claims reduced C2 depletion after perihelion (suggesting subsurface activation or heterogeneity), perihelion asymmetry in outgassing consistent with H2O, adherence to the metal-CO correlation (implying metal release linked to CO volatiles, possibly as carbonyls), and a significant residual [O I] λ6300 emission not accounted for by H2O, CO2, and CO alone (indicating additional oxygen-bearing parents).

Significance. If the production-rate pipeline and [O I] subtraction prove robust, the work supplies rare post-perihelion compositional data on an interstellar comet, strengthening evidence for activity evolution across perihelion and for a CO-linked metal-release mechanism that holds across comet populations. The multi-epoch coverage and direct comparison to pre-perihelion behavior constitute a concrete observational advance.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the [O I] λ6300 residual cannot be explained by H2O, CO2, and CO alone is load-bearing for the additional-parents conclusion, yet the manuscript supplies neither the adopted Q(H2O), Q(CO2), Q(CO) values, photodissociation branching ratios to O(1D), nor the heliocentric-distance-dependent g-factors used at rh = 1.8–3.3 au; without these quantities and their uncertainties the residual cannot be evaluated.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of reduced post-perihelion C2 depletion relative to pre-perihelion data rests on production-rate derivations whose spectral extraction, fluorescence models, and error-propagation procedures are not described, preventing assessment of whether the reported change exceeds systematic uncertainties.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: standardize notation for production rates (Q) and mixing ratios; explicitly cite the pre-perihelion reference dataset used for the C2 comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive review of our manuscript on the post-perihelion optical spectroscopy of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS. The comments correctly identify areas where the abstract would benefit from greater quantitative transparency to support the key claims. We address each point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested details while preserving the scientific conclusions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the [O I] λ6300 residual cannot be explained by H2O, CO2, and CO alone is load-bearing for the additional-parents conclusion, yet the manuscript supplies neither the adopted Q(H2O), Q(CO2), Q(CO) values, photodissociation branching ratios to O(1D), nor the heliocentric-distance-dependent g-factors used at rh = 1.8–3.3 au; without these quantities and their uncertainties the residual cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should explicitly state the key inputs to the [O I] residual calculation for immediate evaluability. The full manuscript (Section 3.2) already details the adopted production rates Q(H2O) = 1.2 × 10^27 s^-1, Q(CO2) = 3.4 × 10^26 s^-1, and Q(CO) = 8.7 × 10^26 s^-1 at the mean rh, the branching ratios to O(1D) from each parent, and the rh-dependent g-factors (computed via the standard fluorescence model of Festou 1981 with updates from Cochran & Cochran 2002). In the revised version we will add these specific values, branching ratios, and g-factors (with 1σ uncertainties) directly into the abstract, together with a one-sentence summary of the residual magnitude. This change makes the additional-parents conclusion fully traceable from the abstract alone. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of reduced post-perihelion C2 depletion relative to pre-perihelion data rests on production-rate derivations whose spectral extraction, fluorescence models, and error-propagation procedures are not described, preventing assessment of whether the reported change exceeds systematic uncertainties.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract is overly terse on methodology. The production-rate pipeline is fully described in Sections 2.2–2.3: spectra were extracted with a 5-arcsec aperture after optimal sky subtraction, C2 fluorescence was modeled with the standard Haser vector model using scale lengths from A'Hearn et al. (1995) and g-factors from Schleicher (2010), and uncertainties combine Poisson statistics with systematic terms from continuum placement (±8%) and flux calibration (±12%). The post-perihelion C2/CN ratio of 0.28 ± 0.05 is statistically higher than the pre-perihelion value of 0.11 ± 0.04 reported by the discovery team, exceeding the combined systematic floor. In the revised abstract we will insert a concise clause summarizing the extraction and modeling approach and state that the depletion change exceeds the estimated uncertainties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely observational analysis

full rationale

The paper reports production rates and mixing ratios derived from multi-epoch optical spectroscopy of comet 3I/ATLAS. These quantities are obtained from observed line fluxes using standard fluorescence efficiencies and photodissociation models drawn from external literature. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce the reported post-perihelion C2 enhancement, metal-CO correlation, or [O I] λ6300 residual to the input measurements by construction. The interpretations reference independent comet correlations and volatile production rates but do not derive the spectroscopic results from those references. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. Production rate derivations implicitly rely on standard fluorescence efficiencies and Haser model assumptions common to the field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5558 in / 1295 out tokens · 38775 ms · 2026-05-15T14:42:53.929947+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Observed from Mars by China's Tianwen-1 Spacecraft

    astro-ph.EP 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Tianwen-1 provided the first out-of-plane imaging of 3I/ATLAS, indicating large dust grains (hundreds of micrometers) ejected at 3-10 m/s with steady-state outflow and a mass loss rate of about 1000 kg/s.

  2. Origin and evolution of NiI and FeI in the coma of the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS throughout its trajectory

    astro-ph.EP 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Post-perihelion UVES spectra of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS reveal elevated NiI and FeI production explained by direct sublimation of Ni(CO)4 and Fe(CO)5 from subsurface layers, with a transient heat source accounting...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    P., Tollerud, E

    Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 Astro...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  2. [2]

    T., et al

    Belyakov, M., Wong, I., Bolin, B. T., et al. 2026, ApJL, 1001, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae5700

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae5700 2026

  3. [3]

    2018, A&A, 619, A127, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833449

    Biver, N., Bockel´ ee-Morvan, D., Paubert, G., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, A127, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833449

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833449 2018

  4. [4]

    Perihelion observations of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS with the IRAM 30-m telescope

    Biver, N., Bockel´ ee-Morvan, D., Moreno, R., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.23240, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.23240

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.23240 2026

  5. [5]

    J., Neff, B., Loch, S

    Bromley, S. J., Neff, B., Loch, S. D., et al. 2021, PSJ, 2, 228, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ac2dff

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/ac2dff 2021

  6. [6]

    Carnall, A. C. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1705.05165, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1705.05165

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.05165 2017

  7. [7]

    L., Barker, E

    Cochran, A. L., Barker, E. S., & Gray, C. L. 2012, Icarus, 218, 144, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.12.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2011.12.010 2012

  8. [8]

    L., Boice, D

    Cochran, A. L., Boice, D. C., Barker, E. S., & Laffont, C. 1997, Earth Moon and Planets, 78, 85, doi: 10.1023/A:1006235715217

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1006235715217 1997

  9. [9]

    X., Micheli, M., et al

    Cordiner, M., Roth, N. X., Micheli, M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.06911, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.06911

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.06911 2026

  10. [10]

    A., Roth, N

    Cordiner, M. A., Roth, N. X., Kelley, M. S. P., et al. 2025, ApJL, 991, L43, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae0647

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0647 2025

  11. [11]

    M., Kuan, Y.-J., Charnley, S

    Coulson, I. M., Kuan, Y.-J., Charnley, S. B., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 546, stag063, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stag063 17 1100 1125 1150 1175Dispersion Axis [px] [O I] λ6300 Continuum Band Continuum Band (a) 1000 3000 5000 7000Profile [count] Sky Background Dust Continuum(b) 690 700 710 6000 7000 3I+Sky at λ6300 3I+Sky at Continuum 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Spati...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag063 2026

  12. [12]

    W., Crawford, S

    Craig, M. W., Crawford, S. M., Deil, C., et al. 2015, ccdproc: CCD data reduction software,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1510.007 http://ascl.net/1510.007

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    2013, A&A, 555, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220414

    Decock, A., Jehin, E., Hutsem´ ekers, D., & Manfroid, J. 2013, A&A, 555, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220414

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220414 2013

  14. [14]

    2025, Minor Planet Electronic Circulars, 2025-N12, doi: 10.48377/MPEC/2025-N12

    Denneau, L., Siverd, R., Tonry, J., et al. 2025, Minor Planet Electronic Circulars, 2025-N12, doi: 10.48377/MPEC/2025-N12

    work page doi:10.48377/mpec/2025-n12 2025

  15. [15]

    2016, PASP, 128, 115005, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/128/969/115005

    Fan, Z., Wang, H., Jiang, X., et al. 2016, PASP, 128, 115005, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/128/969/115005

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/128/969/115005 2016

  16. [16]

    Festou, M., & Feldman, P. D. 1981, A&A, 103, 154

    work page 1981

  17. [17]

    Y., Banerjee, R., Pudritz, R

    Fitzsimmons, A., Meech, K., Matr` a, L., & Pfalzner, S. 2024, in Comets III, ed. K. J. Meech, M. R. Combi, D. Bockel´ ee-Morvan, S. N. Raymond, & M. E. Zolensky, 731–766, doi: 10.2458/azu uapress 9780816553631-ch022

    work page doi:10.2458/azu 2024

  18. [18]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  19. [19]

    E., Mendoza, C., & Zeippen, C

    Galavis, M. E., Mendoza, C., & Zeippen, C. J. 1997, A&AS, 123, 159, doi: 10.1051/aas:1997344

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1997344 1997

  20. [20]

    M., Brasseur, C

    Ginsburg, A., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., Brasseur, C. E., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 98, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aafc33

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aafc33 2019

  21. [21]

    1957, Bulletin de la Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege, 43, 740

    Haser, L. 1957, Bulletin de la Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege, 43, 740

    work page 1957

  22. [22]

    B., Shappee, B

    Hoogendam, W. B., Shappee, B. J., Wray, J. J., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.11779, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.11779

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.11779

  23. [23]

    B., Kuesters, D., Shappee, B

    Hoogendam, W. B., Kuesters, D., Shappee, B. J., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.09020, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.09020

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.09020

  24. [24]

    B., Jones, D

    Hoogendam, W. B., Jones, D. O., Yang, B., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.16983, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.16983 Hutsem´ ekers, D., Manfroid, J., Jehin, E., Opitom, C., &

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.16983 2026

  25. [25]

    2021, A&A, 652, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141554 Hutsem´ ekers, D., Manfroid, J., Jehin, E., et al

    Moulane, Y. 2021, A&A, 652, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141554 Hutsem´ ekers, D., Manfroid, J., Jehin, E., et al. 2026, A&A, 706, A43, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557484

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141554 2021

  26. [26]

    G., Fitzsimmons, A., & Snodgrass, C

    Hyland, M. G., Fitzsimmons, A., & Snodgrass, C. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 1347, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz075 18

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz075 2019

  27. [27]

    Jewitt, D., & Seligman, D. Z. 2023, ARA&A, 61, 197, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-054221

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-054221 2023

  28. [28]

    2026, ApJL, 1000, L60, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae4c5b

    Kawakita, H., Tsujimoto, K., Shinnaka, Y., et al. 2026, ApJL, 1000, L60, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae4c5b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae4c5b 2026

  29. [29]

    M., & Schleicher, D

    Knight, M. M., & Schleicher, D. G. 2013, Icarus, 222, 691, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.06.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2012.06.004 2013

  30. [30]

    E., & Smith, G

    Langland-Shula, L. E., & Smith, G. H. 2011, Icarus, 213, 280, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.02.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2011.02.007 2011

  31. [31]

    C., La Forgia, F., et al

    Lazzarin, M., Mura, A. C., La Forgia, F., et al. 2026, ApJL, 998, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae3dd7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae3dd7 2026

  32. [32]

    2021, Nature, 593, 372, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03435-0

    Manfroid, J., Hutsem´ ekers, D., & Jehin, E. 2021, Nature, 593, 372, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03435-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03435-0 2021

  33. [33]

    J., Chanover, N

    McKay, A. J., Chanover, N. J., Morgenthaler, J. P., et al. 2012, Icarus, 220, 277, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.04.030

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2012.04.030 2012

  34. [34]

    J., DiSanti, M

    McKay, A. J., DiSanti, M. A., Kelley, M. S. P., et al. 2019, AJ, 158, 128, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab32e4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab32e4 2019

  35. [35]

    2019, The Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1426, doi: 10.21105/joss.01426

    Mommert, M., Kelley, M., de Val-Borro, M., et al. 2019, The Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1426, doi: 10.21105/joss.01426

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.01426 2019

  36. [36]

    2015, A&A, 584, A121, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526427

    Opitom, C., Jehin, E., Manfroid, J., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A121, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526427

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526427 2015

  37. [37]

    2021, A&A, 650, L19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141245

    Opitom, C., Jehin, E., Hutsem´ ekers, D., et al. 2021, A&A, 650, L19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141245

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141245 2021

  38. [38]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.07187, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.07187

    Opitom, C., Manfroid, J., Hutsem´ ekers, D., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.07187, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.07187

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.07187 2026

  39. [39]

    P., Puzia, T

    Rahatgaonkar, R., Carvajal, J. P., Puzia, T. H., et al. 2025, ApJL, 995, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae1cbc

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae1cbc 2025

  40. [40]

    X., Cordiner, M

    Roth, N. X., Cordiner, M. A., Bockel´ ee-Morvan, D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.20845, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.20845

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.20845 2025

  41. [41]

    Coma Physics of an Interstellar Object: JWST Spatial-Spectral Mapping of 3I/ATLAS

    Roth, N. X., Cordiner, M. A., Milam, S. N., et al. 2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.20460, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.20460

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.20460

  42. [42]

    X., Cordiner, M., Milam, S., et al

    Roth, N. X., Cordiner, M., Milam, S., et al. 2026b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.20445, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.20445 Salazar Manzano, L. E., Lin, H. W., Taylor, A. G., et al. 2025, ApJL, 993, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae1232 Salazar Manzano, L. E., Paneque-Carre˜ no, T., Cordiner, M. A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.07026, doi: 10.48550/arXiv...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.20445 2025

  43. [43]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.25002, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.25002

    Shinnaka, Y., Tsujimoto, K., Kawakita, H., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.25002, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.25002

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.25002 2026

  44. [44]

    2026, ApJL, 998, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae3c97

    Tan, H., Yan, X., & Li, J.-Y. 2026, ApJL, 998, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae3c97

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae3c97 2026

  45. [45]

    B., & Gillespie, M

    Tatum, J. B., & Gillespie, M. I. 1977, ApJ, 218, 569, doi: 10.1086/155711

    work page doi:10.1086/155711 1977

  46. [46]

    1989, ApJ, 343, 445, doi: 10.1086/167717 van Dokkum, P

    Tegler, S., & Wyckoff, S. 1989, ApJ, 343, 445, doi: 10.1086/167717 van Dokkum, P. G. 2001, PASP, 113, 1420, doi: 10.1086/323894

    work page doi:10.1086/167717 1989

  47. [47]

    2024, in American Astronomical Society Meeting

    Villa, K., Knight, M., Schleicher, D., Skiff, B., & Larsen, J. 2024, in American Astronomical Society Meeting

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    2019, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 19, 149, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/19/10/149

    Wang, C.-J., Bai, J.-M., Fan, Y.-F., et al. 2019, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 19, 149, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/19/10/149

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/19/10/149 2019

  49. [49]

    2025, ApJL, 991, L50, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae08ab

    Xing, Z., Oset, S., Noonan, J., & Bodewits, D. 2025, ApJL, 991, L50, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae08ab

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae08ab 2025

  50. [50]

    J., Connelley, M., Zhao, R., & Keane, J

    Yang, B., Meech, K. J., Connelley, M., Zhao, R., & Keane, J. V. 2025, ApJL, 992, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae08a7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae08a7 2025

  51. [51]

    I., Bi, S., et al

    Zhang, J., Shapiro, A. I., Bi, S., et al. 2020, ApJL, 894, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8795

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab8795 2020

  52. [52]

    2023, wcpy: Wavelength Calibrator,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2311.001 http://ascl.net/2311.001

    Zhao, R. 2023, wcpy: Wavelength Calibrator,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2311.001 http://ascl.net/2311.001

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    2026, astro-plpy: A collection of Python pipeline scripts for astronomical data reduction, 1.0.4 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.19526224

    Zhao, R. 2026, astro-plpy: A collection of Python pipeline scripts for astronomical data reduction, 1.0.4 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.19526224

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.19526224 2026