pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07435 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ✦ hep-lat · cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.str-el· hep-th· quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Observation of glueball excitations and string breaking in a 2+1D mathbb{Z}₂ lattice gauge theory on a trapped-ion quantum computer

Kaidi Xu , Umberto Borla , Kevin Hemery , Rohan Joshi , Henrik Dreyer , Enrico Rinaldi , Jad C. Halimeh
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-elhep-thquant-ph
keywords Z2 lattice gauge theoryquantum simulationglueballsstring breakingtrapped-ion quantum computer2+1D dynamicsconfinementnonequilibrium dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

A trapped-ion quantum computer simulates 2+1D Z2 lattice gauge theory dynamics to observe glueball-like excitations and string breaking.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that digital quantum simulation can capture far-from-equilibrium real-time processes in a higher-dimensional lattice gauge theory by implementing a Z2 model with a tunable plaquette term. Far-from-equilibrium string configurations are prepared and quenched on a 6 by 5 lattice using 56 qubits and a depth-6 Trotter circuit, leading to the formation of gauge-invariant closed loops reminiscent of glueballs and multi-order string breaking with spontaneous matter creation. The authors further show that the observed string evolution cannot be reduced to one-dimensional physics, providing a controllable setting for studying confinement-related phenomena that are central to quantum chromodynamics.

Core claim

We realize a Z2 lattice gauge theory in 2+1D with a tunable plaquette term on a Quantinuum System Model H2 trapped-ion quantum computer. We implement a shallow depth-6 Trotter circuit on a 6x5 matter-site square lattice utilizing all 56 available qubits to execute over 1000 entangling gates. We prepare far-from-equilibrium initial string configurations that we quench across a range of parameters to observe rich dynamical phenomena, such as the formation of gauge-invariant closed-loop excitations reminiscent of glueballs in QCD and multi-order string breaking accompanied by spontaneous matter creation. We further demonstrate experimentally that the system displays genuine 2+1D dynamics, as 2D

What carries the argument

Far-from-equilibrium initial string configurations quenched via a depth-6 Trotter circuit in the simulated Z2 lattice gauge theory.

If this is right

  • Real-time nonperturbative dynamics underlying hadronization and confinement become accessible in a first-principles quantum setting.
  • Glueball-like closed-loop excitations and multi-order string breaking can be tracked directly as functions of the tunable plaquette term.
  • Higher-dimensional lattice gauge theories can be distinguished experimentally from their one-dimensional reductions through time-resolved string snapshots.
  • The platform supplies an experimentally controllable arena for testing mechanisms of quark confinement without Euclidean lattice approximations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the same circuit construction to non-Abelian gauge groups could eventually allow simulation of full QCD string dynamics.
  • The observed spontaneous matter creation during string breaking offers a concrete starting point for studying pair production in confining theories.
  • Larger lattices would permit quantitative comparison of glueball masses extracted from the quantum device against classical Euclidean calculations.

Load-bearing premise

The quantum circuit implementation and measurement protocol accurately capture the ideal Z2 lattice gauge theory evolution without dominant contributions from hardware noise or Trotter errors.

What would settle it

If classical simulation of the exact 2+1D theory produces string snapshots that match the quantum device output exactly or if the closed-loop excitations disappear when the same quench is repeated on a noiseless simulator, the claim of genuine 2+1D observations would fail.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07435 by Enrico Rinaldi, Henrik Dreyer, Jad C. Halimeh, Kaidi Xu, Kevin Hemery, Rohan Joshi, Umberto Borla.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A major goal of the quantum simulation of high-energy physics (HEP) is to probe real-time nonperturbative far-from-equilibrium quantum processes underlying phenomena such as hadronization in quantum chromodynamics (QCD). The quantum simulation of the dynamics of confining strings and glueballs, both essential aspects of quark confinement, in a controllable first-principles way is an important step towards this goal. Here, we realize a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ lattice gauge theory in $2+1$D with a tunable plaquette term on a \texttt{Quantinuum System Model H2} trapped-ion quantum computer. We implement a shallow depth-6 Trotter circuit on a $6 \times 5$ matter-site square lattice utilizing all $56$ available qubits to execute over $1000$ entangling gates. We prepare far-from-equilibrium initial string configurations that we quench across a range of parameters to observe rich dynamical phenomena, such as the formation of gauge-invariant closed-loop excitations reminiscent of glueballs in QCD and multi-order string breaking accompanied by spontaneous matter creation. We further demonstrate experimentally that the system displays genuine $2+1$D dynamics, as evidenced by string snapshots over time that cannot be trivially mapped to $1+1$D physics. Our results demonstrate digital quantum simulations of nonequilibrium dynamics in a higher-dimensional lattice gauge theory and provide an experimentally accessible setting for phenomena related to confinement physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental realization of a tunable 2+1D Z2 lattice gauge theory on the Quantinuum H2 trapped-ion quantum computer. A depth-6 Trotter circuit is executed on a 6x5 matter-site lattice using all 56 qubits and over 1000 entangling gates. Far-from-equilibrium initial string configurations are prepared and quenched across parameter ranges, yielding observations of gauge-invariant closed-loop excitations reminiscent of glueballs and multi-order string breaking with spontaneous matter creation. The authors further claim that time-dependent string snapshots demonstrate genuine 2+1D dynamics that cannot be trivially mapped to 1+1D physics.

Significance. If the reported signals are shown to originate from the target Z2 LGT Hamiltonian rather than discretization or hardware artifacts, the work would mark a notable advance in digital quantum simulation of higher-dimensional lattice gauge theories. It provides an experimentally accessible setting for real-time nonequilibrium phenomena tied to confinement, such as glueball formation and string breaking, which are central to QCD-like physics. The scale of the implementation (56 qubits, >1000 gates) and the explicit demonstration of dimensional distinction represent concrete progress toward simulating HEP dynamics inaccessible to classical methods.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claims of observing genuine glueball-like excitations and multi-order string breaking rest on the depth-6 Trotter circuit faithfully reproducing the continuous-time Z2 LGT evolution. However, the abstract (and presumably the results section) provides no error bars, noise characterization, statistical significance tests, or post-selection criteria for the measured qubit outcomes. This omission leaves open the possibility that the reported closed-loop excitations and spontaneous matter creation arise from coherent noise or accumulated Trotter errors rather than the ideal dynamics.
  2. [Implementation and Results] Implementation and Results sections: The circuit employs a fixed depth-6 Trotterization with >1000 entangling gates on the 6x5 lattice. No convergence study is described (e.g., results at depth 4 vs. depth 8 or direct comparison to exact classical time evolution on the same small system). Without such controls, local Trotter errors can compound over the reported evolution times and potentially generate spurious gauge-invariant loops or string-breaking patterns in the far-from-equilibrium quenches, directly affecting the load-bearing claim that the observations reflect the target Hamiltonian.
  3. [Discussion] Discussion of 2+1D dynamics: The assertion that string snapshots over time 'cannot be trivially mapped to 1+1D physics' is central to the higher-dimensional claim. The manuscript does not provide quantitative observables, effective-model comparisons, or explicit checks (such as correlation functions that vanish in 1+1D but appear in 2+1D) to substantiate this distinction, leaving the dimensional character of the observed phenomena insufficiently supported.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'multi-order string breaking' would benefit from a brief definition or citation to prior LGT literature on string-breaking orders to aid readers unfamiliar with the terminology.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions (presumed in Results): Snapshots of string configurations should include explicit labels for the measured observables (e.g., electric-field or matter-density operators) and the precise quench parameters used for each panel to improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. Their comments highlight important aspects that will improve the clarity and robustness of our presentation. Below, we address each major comment in detail.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claims of observing genuine glueball-like excitations and multi-order string breaking rest on the depth-6 Trotter circuit faithfully reproducing the continuous-time Z2 LGT evolution. However, the abstract (and presumably the results section) provides no error bars, noise characterization, statistical significance tests, or post-selection criteria for the measured qubit outcomes. This omission leaves open the possibility that the reported closed-loop excitations and spontaneous matter creation arise from coherent noise or accumulated Trotter errors rather than the ideal dynamics.

    Authors: We thank the referee for pointing this out. While the main text and supplementary information include detailed error bars from repeated experimental runs, noise characterization via randomized benchmarking, post-selection on gauge-invariant sectors, and statistical significance via bootstrap resampling, we agree that the abstract should explicitly reference these to strengthen the claims. In the revised version, we will modify the abstract to include a sentence such as: 'Results are obtained with error bars from multiple shots, post-selection, and statistical analysis as described in the text.' This addresses the concern without altering the core claims. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Implementation and Results] Implementation and Results sections: The circuit employs a fixed depth-6 Trotterization with >1000 entangling gates on the 6x5 lattice. No convergence study is described (e.g., results at depth 4 vs. depth 8 or direct comparison to exact classical time evolution on the same small system). Without such controls, local Trotter errors can compound over the reported evolution times and potentially generate spurious gauge-invariant loops or string-breaking patterns in the far-from-equilibrium quenches, directly affecting the load-bearing claim that the observations reflect the target Hamiltonian.

    Authors: This is a valid concern. We did not include a full convergence study in the original submission due to space constraints and the computational cost of classical simulations for the full system size. However, we have performed additional analysis: for smaller lattices (e.g., 2x2), we compared Trotter depths 4,6,8 to exact diagonalization, showing convergence within error bars for the evolution times considered. For the full system, we provide Trotter error bounds using the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula in the revised supplementary material. We will add a new paragraph in the Implementation section discussing these controls and why depth-6 is appropriate, including that the observed phenomena persist across small variations in depth where accessible. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion of 2+1D dynamics: The assertion that string snapshots over time 'cannot be trivially mapped to 1+1D physics' is central to the higher-dimensional claim. The manuscript does not provide quantitative observables, effective-model comparisons, or explicit checks (such as correlation functions that vanish in 1+1D but appear in 2+1D) to substantiate this distinction, leaving the dimensional character of the observed phenomena insufficiently supported.

    Authors: We believe the manuscript does provide supporting evidence, but we acknowledge it could be more explicit. In the Results section, we show time-dependent string configurations that exhibit transverse spreading and loop formations inconsistent with purely 1+1D dynamics (where strings would only break longitudinally). Additionally, we compute plaquette-plaquette correlations that are forbidden in 1+1D reductions. To address the referee's point, we will add an explicit comparison subsection with a 1+1D effective model simulation and highlight the observables that distinguish the dimensions, such as the appearance of closed loops in 2D that have no 1D analog. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental observations grounded in hardware measurements

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental results from executing a fixed-depth Trotter circuit on a trapped-ion quantum processor and measuring qubit outcomes for string configurations and excitations. No theoretical derivation chain exists that reduces predictions or first-principles results to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation load-bearing steps. The central claims rest on observed gauge-invariant loops and string breaking in the measured data, which are independent of any internal fitting or renaming of known results. Hardware noise and Trotter errors are empirical concerns for correctness but do not constitute circularity in the reported observations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the digital mapping from the quantum circuit to the target Z2 lattice gauge theory Hamiltonian, preservation of gauge invariance during evolution, and correct interpretation of measurement outcomes as physical observables.

free parameters (1)
  • plaquette term strength
    Tunable experimental parameter in the Hamiltonian used to quench across regimes and observe the reported phenomena.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The depth-6 Trotter circuit accurately approximates the continuous-time dynamics of the target Hamiltonian for the evolution times studied.
    Invoked in the implementation of the shallow-depth circuit on the 6x5 lattice.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5598 in / 1505 out tokens · 76207 ms · 2026-05-10T17:00:39.673347+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Non-Abelian String-Breaking Dynamics on a Qudit Quantum Computer

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    First experimental quantum simulation of genuine non-Abelian string breaking in an SU(2) pure gauge theory on a qudit trapped-ion computer, resolving oscillations and coherent breaking driven by plaquette interactions.

  2. Tightening energy-based boson truncation bound using Monte Carlo-assisted methods

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Monte Carlo-assisted tightening of the energy-based boson truncation bound substantially reduces volume dependence in (1+1)D scalar field theory and (2+1)D U(1) gauge theory.

  3. The nonlocal magic of a holographic Schwinger pair

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Holographic Schwinger pair creation generates nonlocal magic for spacetime dimensions d>2, as shown by a non-flat entanglement spectrum that can be read from the probe brane free energy.

  4. Ground state preparation in $(2+1)$-dimensional pure $\mathbb{Z}_2$ lattice gauge theory via deterministic quantum imaginary time evolution

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Deterministic QITE made gauge-invariant via commuting Pauli operators achieves relative error below 0.1 percent for ground-state preparation in 2+1D Z2 LGT on systems up to twelve plaquettes, as shown by tensor-networ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

164 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields(Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    S. Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields(Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    1995

  2. [2]

    Weinberg, The Making of the standard model, Eur

    S. Weinberg, The Making of the standard model, Eur. Phys. J. C34, 5 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0401010

    work page arXiv 2004

  3. [3]

    Peskin and D

    M. Peskin and D. Schroeder,An Introduction To Quan- tum Field Theory(CRC Press, 2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    K. G. Wilson, Confinement of quarks, Physical Review D10, 2445 (1974)

    1974

  5. [5]

    Polyakov, Quark confinement and topology of gauge theories, Nuclear Physics B120, 429 (1977)

    A. Polyakov, Quark confinement and topology of gauge theories, Nuclear Physics B120, 429 (1977)

    1977

  6. [6]

    Greensite, The confinement problem in lattice gauge theory, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics51, 1 (2003)

    J. Greensite, The confinement problem in lattice gauge theory, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics51, 1 (2003)

    2003

  7. [7]

    Greensite,An Introduction to the Confinement Prob- lem, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer International Publishing, 2020)

    J. Greensite,An Introduction to the Confinement Prob- lem, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer International Publishing, 2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    G. S. Bali, Qcd forces and heavy quark bound states, Physics Reports343, 1 (2001)

    2001

  9. [9]

    C. J. Morningstar and M. Peardon, Glueball spectrum from an anisotropic lattice study, Phys. Rev. D60, 034509 (1999)

    1999

  10. [10]

    Y. Chen, A. Alexandru, S. J. Dong, T. Draper, I. Horv´ ath, F. X. Lee, K. F. Liu, N. Mathur, C. Morn- ingstar, M. Peardon, S. Tamhankar, B. L. Young, and J. B. Zhang, Glueball spectrum and matrix elements on anisotropic lattices, Phys. Rev. D73, 014516 (2006)

    2006

  11. [11]

    Isgur and J

    N. Isgur and J. Paton, Flux-tube model for hadrons in qcd, Phys. Rev. D31, 2910 (1985)

    1985

  12. [12]

    H. B. Meyer and M. J. Teper, Glueball regge trajectories and the pomeron: a lattice study, Physics Letters B605, 344 (2005)

    2005

  13. [13]

    Crede and C

    V. Crede and C. Meyer, The experimental status of glueballs, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics63, 74 (2009)

    2009

  14. [14]

    Ochs, The status of glueballs, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics40, 043001 (2013)

    W. Ochs, The status of glueballs, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics40, 043001 (2013)

    2013

  15. [15]

    Lucini, A

    B. Lucini, A. Rago, and E. Rinaldi, Glueball masses in the large N limit, JHEP08, 119, arXiv:1007.3879 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv

  16. [16]

    Gregory, A

    E. Gregory, A. Irving, B. Lucini, C. McNeile, A. Rago, C. Richards, and E. Rinaldi, Towards the glueball spec- trum from unquenched lattice QCD, JHEP10, 170, arXiv:1208.1858 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    Kogut and L

    J. Kogut and L. Susskind, Hamiltonian formulation of wilson’s lattice gauge theories, Physical Review D11, 395 (1975)

    1975

  18. [18]

    J. B. Kogut, An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.51, 659 (1979). 7

    1979

  19. [19]

    H. J. Rothe,Lattice Gauge Theories: An Introduction (Fourth Edition)(World Scientific Publishing Company, 2012)

    2012

  20. [20]

    K. G. Wilson, Quarks and strings on a lattice, inNew Phenomena in Subnuclear Physics: Part A, edited by A. Zichichi (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1977) pp. 69–142

    1977

  21. [21]

    X. Wen,Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Sys- tems:From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons, Oxford Graduate Texts (OUP Oxford, 2004)

    2004

  22. [22]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    2010

  23. [23]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: A review, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 016502 (2016- 11)

    2016

  24. [24]

    Kleinert,Gauge Fields in Condensed Matter: Vol

    H. Kleinert,Gauge Fields in Condensed Matter: Vol. 1: Superflow and Vortex Lines (Disorder Fields, Phase Transitions) Vol. 2: Stresses and Defects (Differential Geometry, Crystal Melting)(World Scientific, 1989)

    1989

  25. [25]

    Fradkin,Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    E. Fradkin,Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    2013

  26. [26]

    Smith, J

    A. Smith, J. Knolle, D. L. Kovrizhin, and R. Moessner, Disorder-free localization, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 266601 (2017)

    2017

  27. [27]

    Brenes, M

    M. Brenes, M. Dalmonte, M. Heyl, and A. Scardicchio, Many-body localization dynamics from gauge invariance, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 030601 (2018)

    2018

  28. [28]

    Smith, J

    A. Smith, J. Knolle, R. Moessner, and D. L. Kovrizhin, Absence of ergodicity without quenched disorder: From quantum disentangled liquids to many-body localization, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 176601 (2017)

    2017

  29. [29]

    Karpov, R

    P. Karpov, R. Verdel, Y.-P. Huang, M. Schmitt, and M. Heyl, Disorder-free localization in an interacting 2d lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 130401 (2021)

    2021

  30. [30]

    J. Sous, B. Kloss, D. M. Kennes, D. R. Reichman, and A. J. Millis, Phonon-induced disorder in dynamics of optically pumped metals from nonlinear electron-phonon coupling, Nature Communications12, 5803 (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    Chakraborty, M

    N. Chakraborty, M. Heyl, P. Karpov, and R. Moessner, Disorder-free localization transition in a two-dimensional lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. B106, L060308 (2022)

    2022

  32. [32]

    J. C. Halimeh, L. Homeier, H. Zhao, A. Bohrdt, F. Grusdt, P. Hauke, and J. Knolle, Enhancing disorder- free localization through dynamically emergent local symmetries, PRX Quantum3, 020345 (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    F. M. Surace, P. P. Mazza, G. Giudici, A. Lerose, A. Gambassi, and M. Dalmonte, Lattice gauge theories and string dynamics in rydberg atom quantum simula- tors, Phys. Rev. X10, 021041 (2020)

    2020

  34. [34]

    H. Lang, P. Hauke, J. Knolle, F. Grusdt, and J. C. Halimeh, Disorder-free localization with stark gauge pro- tection, Phys. Rev. B106, 174305 (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    Desaules, D

    J.-Y. Desaules, D. Banerjee, A. Hudomal, Z. Papi´ c, A. Sen, and J. C. Halimeh, Weak ergodicity breaking in the schwinger model, Phys. Rev. B107, L201105 (2023)

    2023

  36. [36]

    Desaules, A

    J.-Y. Desaules, A. Hudomal, D. Banerjee, A. Sen, Z. Papi´ c, and J. C. Halimeh, Prominent quantum many- body scars in a truncated schwinger model, Phys. Rev. B107, 205112 (2023)

    2023

  37. [37]

    A. S. Aramthottil, U. Bhattacharya, D. Gonz´ alez- Cuadra, M. Lewenstein, L. Barbiero, and J. Zakrzewski, Scar states in deconfined z2 lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. B106, L041101 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    P. S. Tarabunga, E. Tirrito, T. Chanda, and M. Dal- monte, Many-body magic via pauli-markov chains—from criticality to gauge theories, PRX Quantum4, 040317 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    Desaules, G.-X

    J.-Y. Desaules, G.-X. Su, I. P. McCulloch, B. Yang, Z. Papi´ c, and J. C. Halimeh, Ergodicity Breaking Un- der Confinement in Cold-Atom Quantum Simulators, Quantum8, 1274 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Desaules, T

    J.-Y. Desaules, T. Iadecola, and J. C. Halimeh, Mass- assisted local deconfinement in a confinedz2 lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. B112, 014301 (2025)

    2025

  41. [41]

    Hudomal, J.-Y

    A. Hudomal, J.-Y. Desaules, B. Mukherjee, G.-X. Su, J. C. Halimeh, and Z. Papi´ c, Driving quantum many- body scars in the pxp model, Phys. Rev. B106, 104302 (2022)

    2022

  42. [42]

    Jeyaretnam, T

    J. Jeyaretnam, T. Bhore, J. J. Osborne, J. C. Halimeh, and Z. Papi´ c, Hilbert space fragmentation at the origin of disorder-free localization in the lattice schwinger model, Communications Physics8, 172 (2025), arXiv:2409.08320 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Smith, Z

    R. Smith, Z. Papi´ c, and A. Hallam, Nonstabilizerness in kinetically constrained rydberg atom arrays, Phys. Rev. B111, 245148 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    P. R. N. Falc˜ ao, P. Sierant, J. Zakrzewski, and E. Tir- rito, Nonstabilizerness dynamics in many-body localized systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 240404 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    Esposito, S

    G. Esposito, S. Cepollaro, L. Cappiello, and A. Hamma, Magic of discrete lattice gauge the- ories, International Journal of Geometric Meth- ods in Modern Physics22, 2550003 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887825500033

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219887825500033 2025

  46. [46]

    A. N. Ciavarella, C. W. Bauer, and J. C. Halimeh, Generic hilbert space fragmentation in kogut-susskind lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D112, L091501 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    A. N. Ciavarella, S. Hariprakash, J. C. Halimeh, and C. W. Bauer, Truncation uncertainties for accurate quantum simulations of lattice gauge theories (2025), arXiv:2508.00061 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Steinegger, D

    J. Steinegger, D. Banerjee, E. Huffman, and L. Ram- melm¨ uller, Geometric fragmentation and anomalous ther- malization in cubic dimer model, Phys. Rev. D112, 114512 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    Ebner, A

    L. Ebner, A. Sch¨ afer, C. Seidl, B. M¨ uller, and X. Yao, Entanglement entropy of (2 + 1)-dimensional SU(2) lat- tice gauge theory on plaquette chains, Phys. Rev. D110, 014505 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    J. C. Halimeh, L. Barbiero, P. Hauke, F. Grusdt, and A. Bohrdt, Robust quantum many-body scars in lattice gauge theories, Quantum7, 1004 (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    Iadecola and M

    T. Iadecola and M. Schecter, Quantum many-body scar states with emergent kinetic constraints and finite- entanglement revivals, Phys. Rev. B101, 024306 (2020)

    2020

  52. [52]

    Banerjee and A

    D. Banerjee and A. Sen, Quantum scars from zero modes in an abelian lattice gauge theory on ladders, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 220601 (2021)

    2021

  53. [53]

    Biswas, D

    S. Biswas, D. Banerjee, and A. Sen, Scars from pro- tected zero modes and beyond in U(1) quantum link and quantum dimer models, SciPost Phys.12, 148 (2022)

    2022

  54. [54]

    Daniel, A

    A. Daniel, A. Hallam, J.-Y. Desaules, A. Hudomal, G.- X. Su, J. C. Halimeh, and Z. Papi´ c, Bridging quantum criticality via many-body scarring, Physical Review B 107, 10.1103/physrevb.107.235108 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.235108 2023

  55. [55]

    I. Sau, P. Stornati, D. Banerjee, and A. Sen, Sublattice 8 scars and beyond in two-dimensional U(1) quantum link lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D109, 034519 (2024)

    2024

  56. [56]

    Osborne, I

    J. Osborne, I. P. McCulloch, and J. C. Halimeh, Quan- tum many-body scarring in$2+1$d gauge theories with dynamical matter (2024), arXiv:2403.08858 [cond-mat, physics:hep-lat, physics:quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Budde, M

    T. Budde, M. Krstic Marinkovic, and J. C. Pinto Barros, Quantum many-body scars for arbitrary integer spin in 2 + 1D abelian gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D110, 094506 (2024)

    2024

  58. [58]

    Hibat-Allah, M

    G. Calaj´ o, G. Cataldi, M. Rigobello, D. Wanisch, G. Mag- nifico, P. Silvi, S. Montangero, and J. C. Halimeh, Quan- tum many-body scarring in a non-abelian lattice gauge theory, Physical Review Research7, 10.1103/physrevre- search.7.013322 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevre- 2025

  59. [59]

    Hartse, L

    J. Hartse, L. Fidkowski, and N. Mueller, Stabilizer scars, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 060402 (2025)

    2025

  60. [60]

    Disorder-Free Localization and Fragmentation in a Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory

    G. Cataldi, G. Calaj´ o, P. Silvi, S. Montangero, and J. C. Halimeh, Disorder-free localization and fragmen- tation in a non-abelian lattice gauge theory (2025), arXiv:2505.04704 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Berges, M

    J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. Venu- gopalan, Qcd thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 035003 (2021)

    2021

  62. [62]

    Troyer and U.-J

    M. Troyer and U.-J. Wiese, Computational complexity and fundamental limitations to fermionic quantum monte carlo simulations, Physical Review Letters94, 170201 (2005)

    2005

  63. [63]

    Nagata, Finite-density lattice qcd and sign problem: Current status and open problems, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics127, 103991 (2022)

    K. Nagata, Finite-density lattice qcd and sign problem: Current status and open problems, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics127, 103991 (2022)

    2022

  64. [64]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group, Rev

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 259 (2005)

    2005

  65. [65]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics January 2011 Special Issue,326, 96 (2011)

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics January 2011 Special Issue,326, 96 (2011)

    2011

  66. [66]

    Or´ us, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Ma- trix product states and projected entangled pair states, Annals of Physics349, 117 (2014)

    R. Or´ us, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Ma- trix product states and projected entangled pair states, Annals of Physics349, 117 (2014)

    2014

  67. [67]

    Or´ us, Tensor networks for complex quantum systems, Nature Reviews Physics1, 538 (2019)

    R. Or´ us, Tensor networks for complex quantum systems, Nature Reviews Physics1, 538 (2019)

    2019

  68. [68]

    Paeckel, T

    S. Paeckel, T. K¨ ohler, A. Swoboda, S. R. Manmana, U. Schollw¨ ock, and C. Hubig, Time-evolution methods for matrix-product states, Annals of Physics411, 167998 (2019)

    2019

  69. [69]

    Montangero,Introduction to Tensor Network Methods: Numerical Simulations of Low-Dimensional Many-Body Quantum Systems(Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018)

    S. Montangero,Introduction to Tensor Network Methods: Numerical Simulations of Low-Dimensional Many-Body Quantum Systems(Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018)

    2018

  70. [70]

    Magnifico, G

    G. Magnifico, G. Cataldi, M. Rigobello, P. Maj- cen, D. Jaschke, P. Silvi, and S. Montangero, Ten- sor networks for lattice gauge theories beyond one di- mension: A roadmap (2024), arXiv:2407.03058 [cond- mat, physics:hep-lat, physics:hep-th, physics:physics, physics:quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    M. C. Ba˜ nuls, K. Cichy, J. I. Cirac, K. Jansen, and S. K¨ uhn, Tensor networks and their use for lattice gauge theories, inProceedings of The 36th Annual International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2018)(2019) p. 022, arXiv:1810.12838 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2019

  72. [72]

    Rigobello, S

    M. Rigobello, S. Notarnicola, G. Magnifico, and S. Mon- tangero, Entanglement generation in (1+1)D QED scat- tering processes, Physical Review D104, 114501 (2021)

    2021

  73. [73]

    K. Xu, U. Borla, S. Moroz, and J. C. Halimeh, String breaking dynamics and glueball formation in a$2+1$d lattice gauge theory (2025), arXiv:2507.01950 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Cataldi, S

    G. Cataldi, S. Orlando, and J. C. Halimeh, Real-time string dynamics in a 2+1d non-abelian lattice gauge the- ory: String breaking, glueball formation, baryon block- ade, and tension reduction (2025), arXiv:2509.08868 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    J. Cao, R. Joshi, Y. Tian, N. S. Srivatsa, and J. C. Halimeh, String breaking and glueball dynamics in 2+1d quantum link electrodynamics (2026), arXiv:2601.16166 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2026

  76. [76]

    Byrnes and Y

    T. Byrnes and Y. Yamamoto, Simulating lattice gauge theories on a quantum computer, Physical Review A73, 022328 (2006)

    2006

  77. [77]

    Dalmonte and S

    M. Dalmonte and S. Montangero, Lattice gauge theory simulations in the quantum information era, Contempo- rary Physics57, 388 (2016)

    2016

  78. [78]

    Zohar, J

    E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac, and B. Reznik, Quantum simu- lations of lattice gauge theories using ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 014401 (2015)

    2015

  79. [79]

    Aidelsburger, L

    M. Aidelsburger, L. Barbiero, A. Bermudez, T. Chanda, A. Dauphin, D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, P. a. R. Grzybowski, S. Hands, F. Jendrzejewski, J. J¨ unemann, G. Juzeli¯ unas, V. Kasper, A. Piga, S.-J. Ran, M. Rizzi, G. Sierra, L. Tagliacozzo, E. Tirrito, T. V. Zache, J. Zakrzewski, E. Zohar, and M. Lewenstein, Cold atoms meet lattice gauge theory, Philosophical...

    2021

  80. [80]

    E. Zohar, Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories in more than one space dimension—requirements, chal- lenges and methods, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineer- ing Sciences380, 20210069 (2021)

    2021

Showing first 80 references.