pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14290 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

Emergent structure in the binary black hole mass distribution and implications for population-based cosmology

Vasco Gennari , Tom Bertheas , Nicola Tamanini
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.CO
keywords binary black holesgravitational wavesmass distributionB-splinesHubble constantpopulation inferencecosmologyblack hole mergers
0
0 comments X

The pith

The binary black hole mass distribution shows emergent logarithmic hierarchy that biases Hubble constant measurements from gravitational waves.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reconstructs the primary mass distribution of merging black holes in an agnostic manner using B-splines applied to gravitational wave observations. Multiple distinct features appear as the model gains flexibility, pointing to a logarithmic pattern across the population. This structure alters inferences about the Universe's expansion rate, with the strongest effects arising from the edges of the mass range. The authors also outline a selection method that focuses on low-mass events to limit modeling errors in cosmological analyses.

Core claim

Using B-splines of increasing complexity on gravitational wave data, the reconstruction identifies several mass features that suggest a logarithmic hierarchy in the binary black hole population. The paper shows that these features, especially those at the distribution boundaries, introduce systematic shifts into population-based measurements of the Hubble constant, and it introduces an isolation approach for low-mass events that reduces such modeling systematics.

What carries the argument

B-spline reconstruction of the primary black hole mass distribution that identifies emergent structure by allowing increasing model complexity without a pre-chosen functional form.

If this is right

  • Cosmological parameter estimation from gravitational wave populations must incorporate the identified boundary features to avoid bias in the Hubble constant.
  • The logarithmic hierarchy provides a new observable for distinguishing between different black hole formation channels.
  • Isolating the low-mass subpopulation yields a cleaner sample that reduces systematic uncertainties in population-based cosmology.
  • Larger future catalogs will permit finer mapping of the hierarchy and its effects on other cosmological parameters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmation of the hierarchy could indicate that black hole formation involves discrete mass scales set by specific astrophysical processes.
  • Smooth parametric models currently used for black hole populations may systematically misestimate cosmological quantities.
  • Population simulations that embed log-spaced mass features could serve as a direct test of the reconstruction method's stability.

Load-bearing premise

The B-spline reconstruction with increasing complexity faithfully captures true population features without being dominated by selection effects, catalog incompleteness, or statistical fluctuations.

What would settle it

A substantially larger gravitational wave catalog analyzed with the same B-spline method that reveals no multiple mass features and no evidence of logarithmic spacing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14290 by Nicola Tamanini, Tom Bertheas, Vasco Gennari.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: , we compare their reconstruction with our 10-spline analysis (fourth panel), while the second panel shows their powerlaw plus two Gaussians model against a 6-spline reconstruction. These results highlight that limited model flexibility can hinder the recovery of this structure, which remains consistently supported by current GW data de￾spite the increased sample size. Conversely, overly flexible models ma… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Reconstructed primary mass distributions for spline models with uniform (left) and logarithmic (center) knot spacing on GWTC-4.0 data, showing the median, the 68% and 90% CIs. We report the natural logarithm of the maximum-likelihood values and the BFs relative to the 10-spline analysis with logarithmic knot spacing and fixed cosmology. The right column shows the corresponding H0 posteriors, with the dashe… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Reconstructed primary mass distributions using 24 events from GWTC-4.0 around the 10M⊙ peak, modeled with a uniform-knot 4-spline (left) and a tapered powerlaw (center), showing the median, 68% and 90% CIs. The dash-dotted curves correspond to the logarithmically spaced 10-spline analysis of the full BBH population. The right column shows the corresponding H0 posteriors, with the dashed vertical line indic… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Marginal posterior distributions for the Hubble constant from GWTC-4.0 data. Solid curves show results from logarithmi￾cally spaced spline models using the full BBH population with 10 (blue) and 14 (pink) components, and from a 4-spline model with uniform knots (green) using 24 events around the 10M⊙ peak. The dashed curves correspond to a four tapered powerlaw model (4sPL) from [26], while the dash-dotted… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Gravitational waves provide a powerful probe of both the astrophysical processes driving black hole mergers and the dynamics of the Universe, but these measurements rely on accurately inferring the unknown underlying population. We perform an agnostic reconstruction of the primary mass distribution using B-splines, characterising the emergence of structure with increasing model complexity. Using the latest gravitational-wave transient catalog, GWTC-4.0, we identify multiple mass features and find evidence suggesting a logarithmic hierarchy in the population. We show that this structure directly impacts measurements of the Hubble constant, primarily through features at the population boundaries. Finally, we introduce an approach that isolates a subpopulation of low-mass events to mitigate modelling systematics, providing a promising path toward robust population-based cosmology with future datasets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper performs an agnostic B-spline reconstruction of the primary black hole mass distribution from the GWTC-4.0 catalog. It reports the emergence of multiple mass features with increasing model complexity, including evidence for a logarithmic hierarchy, and demonstrates that boundary features in this distribution affect Hubble constant inference. It further proposes isolating a low-mass subpopulation to reduce modeling systematics for population-based cosmology.

Significance. If the identified hierarchy and boundary effects are shown to be intrinsic rather than artifacts, the work would strengthen the case for using GW population properties as cosmological probes and could inform astrophysical formation channels. The data-driven, prior-agnostic spline approach is a methodological strength that avoids strong parametric assumptions common in the field.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods and Results] The central claim that increasing B-spline complexity reveals a genuine logarithmic hierarchy (rather than selection biases or Poisson fluctuations in the ~100 events) requires explicit validation; without injection-recovery tests on smooth power-law populations or posterior-predictive checks against p(det|m,z), the hierarchy and its H0 impact remain unverified.
  2. [Results and Discussion] The reported direct impact of boundary features on H0 measurements depends on the fitted spline parameters and their propagation through the redshifted-mass mapping; the manuscript must quantify this dependence (e.g., via marginalization over knot number/order or sensitivity to the low-mass cutoff) to support the cosmology implication.
  3. [Methods] The subpopulation-isolation method for mitigating systematics is introduced but lacks a concrete description of the selection criterion, its effect on the remaining sample size, and validation that it preserves cosmological information while removing boundary artifacts.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Clarify the precise criteria used for increasing model complexity and for declaring features 'emergent' (e.g., any information criterion or cross-validation metric).
  2. [Figures] Ensure all figures showing the reconstructed mass function include the full posterior uncertainty bands and the underlying GWTC-4.0 event masses for direct comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed feedback, which has helped clarify several aspects of our work. We address each major comment point by point below. Revisions to the manuscript have been prepared to incorporate additional validations, quantifications, and methodological details as suggested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods and Results] The central claim that increasing B-spline complexity reveals a genuine logarithmic hierarchy (rather than selection biases or Poisson fluctuations in the ~100 events) requires explicit validation; without injection-recovery tests on smooth power-law populations or posterior-predictive checks against p(det|m,z), the hierarchy and its H0 impact remain unverified.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation against artifacts is essential. In the revised manuscript we have added injection-recovery tests on mock catalogs drawn from smooth power-law mass distributions, injected through the GWTC-4.0 selection function p(det|m,z). These tests show that the logarithmic hierarchy does not appear when the underlying population is featureless, confirming it is not driven by Poisson fluctuations or selection biases alone. We have also included posterior-predictive checks comparing model predictions to the observed data. These additions directly support the robustness of the hierarchy and its reported effect on H0 inference. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and Discussion] The reported direct impact of boundary features on H0 measurements depends on the fitted spline parameters and their propagation through the redshifted-mass mapping; the manuscript must quantify this dependence (e.g., via marginalization over knot number/order or sensitivity to the low-mass cutoff) to support the cosmology implication.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this dependence. The revised manuscript now quantifies it by marginalizing the H0 posterior over a range of knot numbers and spline orders. We additionally present sensitivity tests to shifts in the low-mass cutoff. These results demonstrate that the boundary features drive the H0 shift in a manner that is stable across reasonable variations in the spline hyperparameters and cutoff choice, thereby reinforcing the cosmological implications. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Methods] The subpopulation-isolation method for mitigating systematics is introduced but lacks a concrete description of the selection criterion, its effect on the remaining sample size, and validation that it preserves cosmological information while removing boundary artifacts.

    Authors: We have substantially expanded the Methods section. The revised text now specifies the selection criterion as isolating events whose primary mass lies below the lowest-mass feature recovered by the B-spline model. This reduces the analyzed sample from the full GWTC-4.0 catalog to approximately 65 events. Validation is provided by direct comparison of the H0 posterior obtained from the isolated subpopulation versus the full sample; the constraints remain statistically consistent while the boundary-induced systematics are suppressed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

B-spline reconstruction of mass distribution and H0 sensitivity are data-driven without circular reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper's core chain reconstructs the primary mass distribution via B-splines of increasing complexity directly from GWTC-4.0 events, identifies emergent features (including suggested logarithmic hierarchy) as outputs of that fit, and then demonstrates sensitivity of H0 inference to boundary features by feeding the fitted population model into the cosmological likelihood. This is a standard forward propagation of a data-driven model rather than any self-definitional loop, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation. The derivation remains self-contained against the catalog and selection function; no equation or step reduces the claimed structure or its cosmological implication to an input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the public GWTC-4.0 catalog being representative after selection effects and on the B-spline model being flexible enough to reveal true structure without overfitting.

free parameters (1)
  • B-spline order and knot number
    Chosen to characterize emergence of structure with increasing model complexity; values not specified in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption GWTC-4.0 catalog events accurately reflect the detectable population after accounting for selection biases and measurement uncertainties.
    All reconstructions and cosmological inferences are performed on this catalog.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5426 in / 1379 out tokens · 57602 ms · 2026-05-10T12:27:27.152231+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Secondary-Mass Features improve Spectral-Siren $H_0$ Constraints

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new model emphasizing secondary mass features and pairing transitions improves spectral siren H0 constraints by ~30% using 142 GW events from GWTC-4.0.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 106 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 14 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Obser- vation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Observed Gravitational-Wave Popula- tions,

    T. A. Callister, “Observed Gravitational-Wave Popula- tions,” (2024), arXiv:2410.19145 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Cosmology with Gravitational Waves: A Review,

    Simone Mastrogiovanni, Christos Karathanasis, Jonathan Gair, Gregory Ashton, Stefano Rinaldi, Hsiang-Yu Huang, and Gergely Dálya, “Cosmology with Gravitational Waves: A Review,” Annalen Phys. 536, 2200180 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment

    Jahed Abediet al., “Black hole spectroscopy: from the- ory to experiment,” (2025), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    and others

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Popula- tion Properties of Compact Objects from the Second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog,” As- trophys. J. Lett. (2021), 10.3847/2041-8213/abe949, arXiv:2010.14533

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abe949 2021

  6. [6]

    Physical Review X , author =

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), “Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3,” Phys. Rev. X (2023), 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048, arXiv:2111.03634

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.011048 2023

  7. [7]

    GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries,” (2025), arXiv:2508.18083 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    A Gravitational-wave Measurement of the Hubble Con- stant Following the Second Observing Run of Ad- vanced LIGO and Virgo,

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, VIRGO), “A Gravitational-wave Measurement of the Hubble Con- stant Following the Second Observing Run of Ad- vanced LIGO and Virgo,” Astrophys. J.909, 218 (2021), arXiv:1908.06060 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo,, KAGRA, VIRGO), Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion His- tory from GWTC–3, Astrophys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KA- GRA), “Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion His- tory from GWTC–3,” Astrophys. J.949, 76 (2023), arXiv:2111.03604 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    G., Abouelfettouh, I., Acernese, F., et al

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC-4.0: Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion Rate and Modified Gravitational-wave Propagation,” (2025), arXiv:2509.04348 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Talbot and E

    Colm Talbot and Eric Thrane, “Measuring the binary black hole mass spectrum with an astrophysically moti- vated parameterization,” Astrophys. J.856, 173 (2018), arXiv:1801.02699 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Wysocki, J

    Daniel Wysocki, Jacob Lange, and Richard O’Shaughnessy, “Reconstructing phenomenological dis- tributions of compact binaries via gravitational wave observations,” Phys. Rev. D100, 043012 (2019), arXiv:1805.06442 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Searching for additional structure and redshift evolution in the observed binary black hole population with a parametric time-dependent mass distribution

    Vasco Gennari, Simone Mastrogiovanni, Nicola Tamanini, Sylvain Marsat, and Grégoire Pierra, “Search- ing for additional structure and redshift evolution in the observed binary black hole population with a parametric time-dependent mass distribution,” Phys. Rev. D111, 123046 (2025), arXiv:2502.20445 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Things That Might Go Bump in the Night: As- sessing Structure in the Binary Black Hole Mass Spec- trum,

    Amanda M. Farah, Bruce Edelman, Michael Zevin, Maya Fishbach, Jose María Ezquiaga, Ben Farr, and Daniel E. Holz, “Things That Might Go Bump in the Night: As- sessing Structure in the Binary Black Hole Mass Spec- trum,” Astrophys. J.955, 107 (2023), arXiv:2301.00834 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    VAMANA: modeling binary black hole population with minimal assumptions,

    Vaibhav Tiwari, “VAMANA: modeling binary black hole population with minimal assumptions,” Class. Quant. Grav.38, 155007 (2021), arXiv:2006.15047 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    (H)DPGMM: a hierarchy of Dirichlet process Gaussian mixture mod- els for the inference of the black hole mass function,

    Stefano Rinaldi and Walter Del Pozzo, “(H)DPGMM: a hierarchy of Dirichlet process Gaussian mixture mod- els for the inference of the black hole mass function,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.509, 5454–5466 (2021), arXiv:2109.05960 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Flex- ible and fast estimation of binary merger population distributions with an adaptive kernel density estimator,

    Jam Sadiq, Thomas Dent, and Daniel Wysocki, “Flex- ible and fast estimation of binary merger population distributions with an adaptive kernel density estimator,” Phys. Rev. D105, 123014 (2022), arXiv:2112.12659 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Cover Your Basis: Comprehensive Data-driven Characteriza- tion of the Binary Black Hole Population,

    Bruce Edelman, Ben Farr, and Zoheyr Doctor, “Cover Your Basis: Comprehensive Data-driven Characteriza- tion of the Binary Black Hole Population,” Astrophys. J.946, 16 (2023), arXiv:2210.12834 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Parameter-Free Tour of the Binary Black Hole Population,

    Thomas A. Callister and Will M. Farr, “Parameter-Free Tour of the Binary Black Hole Population,” Phys. Rev. X14, 021005 (2024), arXiv:2302.07289 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Searching for bi- nary black hole sub-populations in gravitational wave data using binned Gaussian processes,

    Anarya Ray, Ignacio Magaña Hernandez, Katelyn Breivik, and Jolien Creighton, “Searching for bi- nary black hole sub-populations in gravitational wave data using binned Gaussian processes,” (2024), arXiv:2404.03166 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    PixelPop: High Resolution Nonparam- eteric Inference of Gravitational-Wave Populations in Multiple Dimensions,

    Jack Heinzel, Matthew Mould, Sofía Álvarez-López, and Salvatore Vitale, “PixelPop: High Resolution Nonparam- eteric Inference of Gravitational-Wave Populations in Multiple Dimensions,” (2024), arXiv:2406.16813 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Seeking spinning subpopulations of black hole binaries via iterative density estimation,

    Jam Sadiq, Thomas Dent, and Ana Lorenzo-Medina, “Seeking spinning subpopulations of black hole binaries via iterative density estimation,” Phys. Rev. D112, 123054 (2025), arXiv:2506.02250 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Measurement prospects for the pair-instability mass cutoff with gravitational waves

    Matthew Mould, Jack Heinzel, Sofia Alvarez-Lopez, Cailin Plunkett, Noah E. Wolfe, and Salvatore Vitale, “Measurement prospects for the pair-instability mass cut- off with gravitational waves,” (2026), arXiv:2602.11282 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.25579, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.25579

    Vaibhav Tiwari, “Population of Binary Black Holes In- ferred from One Hundred and Fifty Gravitational Wave Signals,” (2025), arXiv:2510.25579 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Mind the peak: improving cosmological constraints from GWTC-4.0 spectral sirens using semiparametric mass models

    Matteo Tagliazucchi, Michele Moresco, Nicola Borghi, and Chiara Ciapetti, “Mind the peak: improving cosmo- logical constraints from GWTC-4.0 spectral sirens using semiparametric mass models,” (2026), arXiv:2601.03347 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    Spectral sirens cosmology from binary black holes populations with sharper mass features

    Tom Bertheas, Vasco Gennari, Danièle Steer, and Nicola Tamanini, “Spectral sirens cosmology from binary black holes populations with sharper mass features,” (2026), arXiv:2603.06792 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    A new bump in the night: evidence of a new fea- ture in the binary black hole mass distribution at 70 M⊙ from gravitational-wave observations,

    Ignacio Magaña Hernandez and Antonella Palmese, “A new bump in the night: evidence of a new fea- ture in the binary black hole mass distribution at 70 M⊙ from gravitational-wave observations,” (2024), arXiv:2407.02460 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Heavy Black-Holes Also Matter in Standard Siren Cosmology

    Grégoire Pierra and Alexander Papadopoulos, “Heavy Black-Holes Also Matter in Standard Siren Cosmology,” (2026), arXiv:2601.03257 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Predictions of a simple parametric model 13 of hierarchical black hole mergers,

    Parthapratim Mahapatra, Debatri Chattopadhyay, Anu- radha Gupta, Marc Favata, B. S. Sathyaprakash, and K. G. Arun, “Predictions of a simple parametric model 13 of hierarchical black hole mergers,” Phys. Rev. D111, 023013 (2025), arXiv:2209.05766 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Physical Models for the Astrophysical Population of Black Holes: Application to the Bump in the Mass Distribution of Gravitational-wave Sources,

    Jacob Golomb, Maximiliano Isi, and Will M. Farr, “Physical Models for the Astrophysical Population of Black Holes: Application to the Bump in the Mass Distribution of Gravitational-wave Sources,” Astrophys. J.976, 121 (2024), arXiv:2312.03973 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Impact of gas hardening on the population properties of hierarchi- cal black hole mergers in active galactic nucleus disks,

    Maria Paola Vaccaro, Michela Mapelli, Carole Périgois, Dario Barone, Maria Celeste Artale, Marco Dall’Amico, Giuliano Iorio, and Stefano Torniamenti, “Impact of gas hardening on the population properties of hierarchi- cal black hole mergers in active galactic nucleus disks,” Astron. Astrophys.685, A51 (2024), arXiv:2311.18548 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Colloms, C

    Storm Colloms, Christopher P. L. Berry, John Veitch, and Michael Zevin, “Exploring the Evolution of Gravitational-wave Emitters with Efficient Emulation: Constraining the Origins of Binary Black Holes Us- ing Normalizing Flows,” Astrophys. J.988, 189 (2025), arXiv:2503.03819 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Calibrating spectral siren cosmology with synthetic catalogs of binary black hole mergers,

    Arianna Scarpa, Simone Mastrogiovanni, Filippo San- toliquido, and Manuel Arca-Sedda, “Calibrating spectral siren cosmology with synthetic catalogs of binary black hole mergers,” (2026), arXiv:2603.15332 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Dynamics of binary black holes in low-mass young star clusters,

    Sara Rastello, Michela Mapelli, Ugo N. di Carlo, Giu- liano Iorio, Alessandro Ballone, Nicola Giacobbo, Fil- ippo Santoliquido, and Stefano Torniamenti, “Dynamics of binary black holes in low-mass young star clusters,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.507, 3612–3625 (2021), arXiv:2105.01669 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Binary black hole mergers from population III stars: uncertainties from star formation and binary star properties,

    Filippo Santoliquido, Michela Mapelli, Giuliano Iorio, Guglielmo Costa, Simon C. O. Glover, Tilman Hartwig, Ralf S. Klessen, and Lorenzo Merli, “Binary black hole mergers from population III stars: uncertainties from star formation and binary star properties,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.524, 307–324 (2023), [Erra- tum: Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 528, 954–962...

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    The more accurately we model the metal-dependent star formation rate, the larger the predicted excess of binary black hole mergers,

    Cecilia Sgalletta, Michela Mapelli, Lumen Boco, Filippo Santoliquido, M. Celeste Artale, Giuliano Iorio, Andrea Lapi, and Mario Spera, “The more accurately we model the metal-dependent star formation rate, the larger the predicted excess of binary black hole mergers,” (2024), arXiv:2410.21401 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Exploration of fea- tures in the black hole mass spectrum inspired by non- parametric analyses of gravitational wave observations,

    Stefano Rinaldi, Yajie Liang, Gabriele Demasi, Michela Mapelli, and Walter Del Pozzo, “Exploration of fea- tures in the black hole mass spectrum inspired by non- parametric analyses of gravitational wave observations,” Astron. Astrophys.702, A52 (2025), arXiv:2506.05929 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Trust the process: mapping data-driven recon- structionstoinformedmodelsusingstochasticprocesses,

    Stefano Rinaldi, Alexandre Toubiana, and Jonathan R. Gair, “Trust the process: mapping data-driven recon- structionstoinformedmodelsusingstochasticprocesses,” JCAP12, 031 (2025), arXiv:2506.05153 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Variance of gravitational-wave populations,

    Alessia Corelli, Davide Gerosa, Matthew Mould, and Cecilia Maria Fabbri, “Variance of gravitational-wave populations,” (2026), arXiv:2603.00239 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    Ain’t No Mountain High Enough: Semi- parametric Modeling of LIGO–Virgo’s Binary Black Hole Mass Distribution,

    Bruce Edelman, Zoheyr Doctor, Jaxen Godfrey, and Ben Farr, “Ain’t No Mountain High Enough: Semi- parametric Modeling of LIGO–Virgo’s Binary Black Hole Mass Distribution,” Astrophys. J.924, 101 (2022), arXiv:2109.06137 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Hubble without the Hubble: Cosmology using advanced gravitational-wave detectors alone,

    Stephen R. Taylor, Jonathan R. Gair, and Ilya Mandel, “Hubble without the Hubble: Cosmology using advanced gravitational-wave detectors alone,” Phys. Rev. D85, 023535 (2012), arXiv:1108.5161 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2012

  42. [42]

    Spectral Sirens: Cosmology from the Full Mass Distribution of Compact Binaries,

    Jose María Ezquiaga and Daniel E. Holz, “Spectral Sirens: Cosmology from the Full Mass Distribution of Compact Binaries,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 061102 (2022), arXiv:2202.08240 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Striking a Chord with Spectral Sirens: Multiple Features in the Compact Bi- nary Population Correlate with H0,

    Utkarsh Mali and Reed Essick, “Striking a Chord with Spectral Sirens: Multiple Features in the Compact Bi- nary Population Correlate with H0,” Astrophys. J.980, 85 (2025), arXiv:2410.07416 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), “Advanced LIGO,” Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015

  45. [45]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    F. Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), “Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector,” Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015

  46. [46]

    Akutsu et al

    T. Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), “Overview of KAGRA: De- tector design and construction history,” PTEP2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    Prospects for Ob- 23 serving and Localizing Gravitational-Wave Transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA,

    B. P. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Prospectsforobservingandlocalizinggravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA,”LivingRev.Rel.19,1(2016),arXiv:1304.0670 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC-4.0: UpdatingtheGravitational-WaveTransient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run,” (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration), Phys

    R.Abbottet al.(LIGOScientific, Virgo),“GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of150M⊙,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 101102 (2020), arXiv:2009.01075 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  50. [50]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration), Astrophys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Properties and Astrophysical Implications of the 150 M⊙ Binary Black Hole Merger GW190521,” Astrophys. J. Lett.900, L13 (2020), arXiv:2009.01190 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    GW231123: A Binary Black Hole Merger with Total Mass 190–265M ⊙,

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GW231123: A Binary Black Hole Merger with Total Mass 190–265 M⊙,” Astrophys. J. Lett.993, L25 (2025), arXiv:2507.08219 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration), Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GW190412: Observation of a Binary-Black-Hole Coalescence with Asymmetric Masses,” Phys. Rev. D102, 043015 (2020), arXiv:2004.08342 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  53. [53]

    Digging the population of compact binary mergers out of the noise,

    Sebastian M. Gaebel, John Veitch, Thomas Dent, and Will M. Farr, “Digging the population of compact binary mergers out of the noise,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 484, 4008–4023 (2019), arXiv:1809.03815 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases

    Ilya Mandel, Will M. Farr, and Jonathan R. Gair, “Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncer- tain observations with selection biases,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.486, 1086–1093 (2019), arXiv:1809.02063 [physics.data-an]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  55. [55]

    Inferring the properties of a population of compact binaries in presence of selection effects

    Salvatore Vitale, Davide Gerosa, Will M. Farr, and Stephen R. Taylor, “Inferring the properties of a population of compact binaries in presence of selec- tion effects,” (2020), 10.1007/978-981-15-4702-7-45-1, arXiv:2007.05579 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/978-981-15-4702-7-45-1 2020

  56. [56]

    Cosmology in the dark: How compact binaries formation impact the 14 gravitational-waves cosmological measurements,

    Simone Mastrogiovanni, Konstantin Leyde, Christos Karathanasis, Eric Chassande-Mottin, Daniele Ann Steer, Jonathan Gair, Archisman Ghosh, Rachel Gray, Suvodip Mukherjee, and Stefano Rinaldi, “Cosmology in the dark: How compact binaries formation impact the 14 gravitational-waves cosmological measurements,” PoS EPS-HEP2021, 098 (2022), arXiv:2205.05421 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Mastrogiovanni, D

    Simone Mastrogiovanni, Danny Laghi, Rachel Gray, Giada Caneva Santoro, Archisman Ghosh, Christos Karathanasis, Konstantin Leyde, Daniele A. Steer, StephanePerries, andGregoirePierra,“Jointpopulation and cosmological properties inference with gravitational waves standard sirens and galaxy surveys,” Phys. Rev. D108, 042002 (2023), arXiv:2305.10488 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    Mastrogiovanni, G

    Simone Mastrogiovanni, Grégoire Pierra, Stéphane Per- riès, Danny Laghi, Giada Caneva Santoro, Archisman Ghosh, Rachel Gray, Christos Karathanasis, and Kon- stantin Leyde, “ICAROGW: A python package for in- ference of astrophysical population properties of noisy, heterogeneous, and incomplete observations,” Astron. Astrophys.682, A167 (2024), arXiv:2305.1...

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Piero Madau and Mark Dickinson, “Cosmic Star Forma- tion History,” Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.52, 415–486 (2014), arXiv:1403.0007 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  60. [60]

    Spinning spectral sirens: Robust cosmological measurement using mass-spin correlations in the binary black hole population

    Hui Tong, Maya Fishbach, and Eric Thrane, “Spin- ning Spectral Sirens: Robust Cosmological Measure- ment Using Mass–Spin Correlations in the Binary Black Hole Population,” Astrophys. J.985, 220 (2025), arXiv:2502.10780 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Building Better Spin Models for Merging Binary Black Holes: Evidence for Nonspin- ning and Rapidly Spinning Nearly Aligned Subpopu- lations,

    Shanika Galaudageet al., “Building Better Spin Models for Merging Binary Black Holes: Evidence for Nonspin- ning and Rapidly Spinning Nearly Aligned Subpopu- lations,” Astrophys. J. Lett.921, L15 (2021), [Erra- tum: Astrophys.J.Lett. 936, L18 (2022), Erratum: As- trophys.J. 936, L18 (2022)], arXiv:2109.02424 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Who Ordered That? Unequal-mass Binary Black Hole Mergers Have Larger Effective Spins,

    Thomas A. Callister, Carl-Johan Haster, Ken K. Y. Ng, Salvatore Vitale, and Will M. Farr, “Who Ordered That? Unequal-mass Binary Black Hole Mergers Have Larger Effective Spins,” Astrophys. J. Lett.922, L5 (2021), arXiv:2106.00521 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    The Binary Black Hole Spin Distribution Likely Broadens with Redshift,

    Sylvia Biscoveanu, Thomas A. Callister, Carl-Johan Haster, Ken K. Y. Ng, Salvatore Vitale, and Will M. Farr, “The Binary Black Hole Spin Distribution Likely Broadens with Redshift,” Astrophys. J. Lett.932, L19 (2022), arXiv:2204.01578 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.01679, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.01679

    Grégoire Pierra, Simone Mastrogiovanni, and Stéphane Perriès, “The spin magnitude of stellar-mass binary black holes evolves with the mass: evidence from gravitational wave data,” (2024), arXiv:2406.01679 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Inferring black hole formation channels in GWTC-4.0 via parametric mass-spin correlations de- rived from first principles,

    Emanuele Berti, Francesco Crescimbeni, Gabriele Fran- ciolini, Simone Mastrogiovanni, Paolo Pani, and Gré- goire Pierra, “Inferring black hole formation channels in GWTC-4.0 via parametric mass-spin correlations de- rived from first principles,” Phys. Rev. D113, 043048 (2026), arXiv:2512.03152 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  66. [66]

    nessai: Nested sampling with artificial intelligence,

    Michael J. Williams, “nessai: Nested sampling with artificial intelligence,” (2021)

    2021

  67. [67]

    Nested sampling with normalizing flows for gravitational-wave inference,

    Michael J. Williams, John Veitch, and Chris Mes- senger, “Nested sampling with normalizing flows for gravitational-wave inference,” Phys. Rev. D103, 103006 (2021), arXiv:2102.11056 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  68. [68]

    and Veitch, John and Messenger, Chris

    Michael J. Williams, John Veitch, and Chris Mes- senger, “Importance nested sampling with normalis- ing flows,” Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech.4, 035011 (2023), arXiv:2302.08526 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Gwtc-4.0 cumulative search sensitivity estimates,

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration, “Gwtc-4.0 cumulative search sensitivity estimates,”https://zenodo.org/records/ 16740128(2025)

    2025

  70. [70]

    Essicket al., Compact binary coalescence sensitivity estimates with injection campaigns during the LIGO- Virgo-KAGRA Collaborations’ fourth observing run, Phys

    Reed Essicket al., “Compact Binary Coalescence Sensi- tivity Estimates with Injection Campaigns during the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaborations’ Fourth Observing Run,” (2025), arXiv:2508.10638 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    Accuracy Requirements for Empirically- Measured Selection Functions,

    Will M. Farr, “Accuracy Requirements for Empirically- Measured Selection Functions,” Research Notes of the AAS3, 66 (2019), arXiv:1904.10879 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2019

  72. [72]

    Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters

    P. A. R. Adeet al.(Planck), “Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys.594, A13 (2016), arXiv:1502.01589 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  73. [73]

    Is there an excess of black holes around 20 M⊙? Optimizing the complexity of population models with the use of reversible jump MCMC

    Alexandre Toubiana, Michael L. Katz, and Jonathan R. Gair, “Is there an excess of black holes around 20 M⊙? Optimizing the complexity of population models with the use of reversible jump MCMC.” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.524, 5844–5853 (2023), arXiv:2305.08909 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    Towards a few percent measurement of the Hubble con- stant with the current network of gravitational wave detectors without using electromagnetic information,

    Tom Bertheas, Vasco Gennari, and Nicola Tamanini, “Towards a few percent measurement of the Hubble con- stant with the current network of gravitational wave detectors without using electromagnetic information,” (2025), arXiv:2508.19331 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Examining the Gap in the Chirp Mass Distribution of Binary Black Holes,

    Vaibhav Tiwari, “Examining the Gap in the Chirp Mass Distribution of Binary Black Holes,” Astrophys. J.995, 177 (2025), arXiv:2507.15697 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.01420, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.01420

    Isaac Legred, Jacob Golomb, and Katerina Chatziioan- nou, “Low-mass failed supernovae and the10M⊙ peak in the merging black hole mass distribution,” (2026), arXiv:2604.01420 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2026

  77. [77]

    Rapid inference and comparison of gravitational- wave population models with neural variational posteri- ors,

    Matthew Mould, Noah E. Wolfe, and Salvatore Vi- tale, “Rapid inference and comparison of gravitational- wave population models with neural variational posteri- ors,” Phys. Rev. D111, 123049 (2025), arXiv:2504.07197 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Hierarchical black hole mergers in young, globular and nuclear star clusters: the effect of metallicity, spin and cluster properties,

    Michela Mapelliet al., “Hierarchical black hole mergers in young, globular and nuclear star clusters: the effect of metallicity, spin and cluster properties,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.505, 339–358 (2021), arXiv:2103.05016 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  79. [79]

    Hierarchical merg- ers of stellar-mass black holes and their gravitational- wave signatures,

    Davide Gerosa and Maya Fishbach, “Hierarchical merg- ers of stellar-mass black holes and their gravitational- wave signatures,” Nature Astron.5, 749–760 (2021), arXiv:2105.03439 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  80. [80]

    Are LIGO’s Black Holes Made From Smaller Black Holes?

    Maya Fishbach, Daniel E. Holz, and Ben Farr, “Are LIGO’s Black Holes Made From Smaller Black Holes?” Astrophys. J. Lett.840, L24 (2017), arXiv:1703.06869 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2017

Showing first 80 references.