pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20610 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-22 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.IT· cs.SY· eess.SP· math.IT

Recognition: unknown

Model Predictive Communication for Timely Status Updates in Low-Altitude Networks

Bowen Li , Jiping Luo , Themistoklis Charalambous , Nikolaos Pappas
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 23:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.ITcs.SYeess.SPmath.IT
keywords model predictive communicationUAV networksstatus updatesenergy efficiencyterrestrial channel occupationtimeliness constraintPareto optimizationasymptotic optimality
0
0 comments X

The pith

A model predictive communication framework for UAVs achieves up to six times less terrestrial channel occupation and 6 dB energy savings while meeting strict timeliness constraints.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a model predictive communication framework that lets UAVs plan their transmissions ahead by using predictable future channel conditions. It formulates a bi-objective optimization to trade off energy use against interference with ground networks, all while enforcing a hard limit on how stale the delivered status information can become. The solution breaks the problem into two layers: an outer layer that picks the best communication times through graph search, and an inner layer that allocates power and channels for each chosen interval with an efficient algorithm that comes with asymptotic optimality guarantees. Simulations confirm large gains over standard approaches. If the predictions hold, UAV operations can expand with far lower impact on existing terrestrial services.

Core claim

Within the MPComm framework enabled by advanced channel sensing, the constrained bi-objective optimization problem for minimizing energy consumption and terrestrial channel occupation subject to a timeliness constraint is solved via Pareto analysis and decomposed into a two-layer structure, where the outer layer selects optimal communication timing through graph search and the inner layer optimizes power and channel allocation for each interval using non-convex analysis that delivers asymptotic optimality, resulting in up to a six-fold reduction in terrestrial channel occupation and 6 dB energy savings compared to benchmarks.

What carries the argument

The two-layer decomposition of the bi-objective optimization, in which the outer layer determines communication timing via graph search on inner-layer solutions and the inner layer solves power and channel allocation with asymptotic optimality guarantees.

If this is right

  • The framework extends directly to problem variants that include objective transformations and single-objective specializations.
  • Optimal timing decisions reduce overall terrestrial channel occupation while satisfying the strict timeliness requirement.
  • The inner-layer algorithm's asymptotic optimality guarantees near-optimal resource allocation for each communication interval.
  • Numerical evaluation shows consistent six-fold channel-occupation reduction and 6 dB energy savings relative to benchmark schemes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Longer prediction horizons could allow even lower average energy use by spreading transmissions over more favorable future intervals.
  • Adding a feedback loop that corrects predictions with fresh measurements would make the method robust to sudden channel changes not captured in the open-loop plan.
  • The same timing-plus-allocation split may apply to other mobile platforms that must share spectrum while delivering time-sensitive data.

Load-bearing premise

The channel conditions that the UAV will experience are largely predictable using advanced channel sensing techniques over the entire operation horizon.

What would settle it

A measurement campaign that compares achieved energy and channel-occupation reductions against the claimed levels when actual channel realizations deviate from the predicted trajectories by more than the sensing accuracy assumed in the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20610 by Bowen Li, Jiping Luo, Nikolaos Pappas, Themistoklis Charalambous.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the UAV telemetry system. The UAV symbols along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic representation of the two-layer structure. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of periodic and age-aware sampling policies. (a) The pe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Expected capacity vs. average SNR for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Illustration of power and access control algorithm. (a) Optimal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Construction of the timing-control graph. Each vertex represents a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Illustration of edge division based on communication interval [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Illustration of Pareto optimality for a two-variable, two-objective optimization problem example. (a) The nonconvex policy space. (b) Bi-objective [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Complexity, feasibility, and optimality of Algorithm 1 versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Pareto frontier, success rate, and stability analysis for Algorithm 2 with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Timely information delivery in low-altitude networks is critical for many time-sensitive applications, such as unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) navigation, inspection, and surveillance. The key challenge lies in balancing three competing factors: stringent data freshness requirements, UAV onboard energy consumption, and interference with terrestrial services. Addressing this challenge requires not only efficient power and channel allocation strategies but also effective communication timing over the entire operation horizon. In this work, we propose a model predictive communication (MPComm) framework, enabled by advanced channel sensing techniques, in which the channel conditions that the UAV will experience are largely predictable. Within this framework, we formulate a constrained bi-objective optimization problem to achieve a desired trade-off between energy consumption and terrestrial channel occupation, subject to a strict timeliness constraint. We solve this problem using Pareto analysis and show that the original non-convex, mixed-integer problem can be decomposed into a two-layer structure: the outer layer determines the optimal communication timing, while the inner layer determines the optimal power and channel allocation for each communication interval. An efficient algorithm for the inner problem is developed using non-convex analysis, with asymptotic optimality guarantees, while the outer problem is solved optimally via a simple graph search, with edges characterized by inner solutions. The proposed approach applies to a broad class of problem variants, including objective transformations and single-objective specializations. Numerical results demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed solution, achieving up to a six-fold reduction in terrestrial channel occupation and a 6dB energy saving compared to benchmark schemes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Model Predictive Communication (MPComm) framework for timely status updates in low-altitude UAV networks. It formulates a constrained bi-objective optimization problem trading off UAV energy consumption against terrestrial channel occupation subject to a strict timeliness constraint. The non-convex mixed-integer problem is decomposed via Pareto analysis into an outer layer that selects communication timing intervals (solved exactly by graph search) and an inner layer that optimizes power and channel allocation for each interval (solved with a non-convex algorithm that carries asymptotic optimality guarantees). Numerical results report up to a six-fold reduction in terrestrial channel occupation and 6 dB energy savings versus benchmark schemes, under the enabling assumption that channel conditions are largely predictable over the full horizon via advanced sensing.

Significance. If the decomposition and guarantees hold under the stated assumptions, the work supplies a computationally tractable, theoretically supported method for joint timing and resource allocation in UAV status-update systems. The explicit asymptotic optimality result for the inner problem and the claim that the approach extends to objective transformations and single-objective cases are concrete strengths that could influence subsequent control and communication designs.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The six-fold occupation reduction and 6 dB energy saving are derived under the assumption that “the channel conditions that the UAV will experience are largely predictable” over the entire operation horizon. No sensitivity analysis, bounded-error model, or robust reformulation is supplied; if prediction error is non-negligible, both the outer-layer graph-search decisions and the inner-layer allocations become suboptimal, rendering the reported gains invalid.
  2. [Inner problem analysis (section describing the non-convex algorithm)] The inner-layer non-convex solver is asserted to possess asymptotic optimality guarantees, yet the manuscript provides neither the precise statement of the limit (e.g., number of subcarriers or power levels tending to infinity) nor the key steps of the non-convex analysis that establish the guarantee. Because the outer layer’s edge weights are exactly the inner solutions, any gap in the inner guarantee directly undermines the optimality claim for the overall decomposition.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the approach “applies to a broad class of problem variants” but does not list the specific transformations or specializations that preserve the decomposition; a short enumerated list would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions planned for the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The six-fold occupation reduction and 6 dB energy saving are derived under the assumption that “the channel conditions that the UAV will experience are largely predictable” over the entire operation horizon. No sensitivity analysis, bounded-error model, or robust reformulation is supplied; if prediction error is non-negligible, both the outer-layer graph-search decisions and the inner-layer allocations become suboptimal, rendering the reported gains invalid.

    Authors: We agree that the reported gains are obtained under the assumption of largely predictable channels enabled by advanced sensing, as stated in the abstract and introduction. The manuscript does not provide sensitivity analysis or a robust reformulation for prediction errors. This is a valid limitation: non-negligible errors could indeed render the timing selections and allocations suboptimal. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection that includes a bounded-error sensitivity study, showing performance degradation as a function of prediction error variance, and we will qualify the numerical claims accordingly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Inner problem analysis (section describing the non-convex algorithm)] The inner-layer non-convex solver is asserted to possess asymptotic optimality guarantees, yet the manuscript provides neither the precise statement of the limit (e.g., number of subcarriers or power levels tending to infinity) nor the key steps of the non-convex analysis that establish the guarantee. Because the outer layer’s edge weights are exactly the inner solutions, any gap in the inner guarantee directly undermines the optimality claim for the overall decomposition.

    Authors: The inner algorithm relies on non-convex analysis whose asymptotic optimality holds as the number of subcarriers tends to infinity. We acknowledge that the current manuscript states the guarantee without explicitly defining the limiting regime or outlining the key analytical steps. Because the outer-layer graph-search weights are obtained from the inner solutions, this omission affects the strength of the overall optimality claim. In the revision we will insert the precise statement of the asymptotic result in the main text together with a high-level proof sketch (full details moved to an appendix) to substantiate the decomposition. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces the MPComm framework under the explicit assumption of predictable long-horizon channels via sensing techniques, then formulates a bi-objective optimization problem and decomposes it via Pareto analysis into an outer graph-search layer for timing and an inner non-convex solver for power/channel allocation with asymptotic optimality guarantees. All performance claims (six-fold occupation reduction, 6 dB energy saving) are supported by numerical benchmarking against independent external schemes rather than by re-deriving quantities from fitted parameters or self-citations internal to the paper. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-definition, fitted-input prediction, or self-citation chain; the chain remains externally falsifiable and mathematically derived from the stated problem structure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests primarily on the domain assumption of channel predictability enabling the model predictive approach; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are described in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Channel conditions that the UAV will experience are largely predictable using advanced channel sensing techniques over the operation horizon
    This assumption is invoked to justify the model predictive communication framework and enable planning over the entire horizon.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5594 in / 1354 out tokens · 35803 ms · 2026-05-09T23:49:35.364436+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Semantics-Aware Communication:A Differentiated Allocation Perspective

    cs.NI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Differentiated allocation using task-aware Age of Actuation and Cost of Missing Actuation improves critical-task reliability in computation-constrained semantics-aware WNCS.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A comprehensive overview on 5G-and-beyond networks with UA Vs: From communications to sensing and intelligence,

    Q. Wu, J. Xu, Y . Zeng, D. W. K. Ng, N. Al-Dhahir, R. Schober, and A. L. Swindlehurst, “A comprehensive overview on 5G-and-beyond networks with UA Vs: From communications to sensing and intelligence,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 2912–2945, 2021

    2021

  2. [2]

    Trustworthy intelligent networks for low-altitude economy,

    M. Song, Y . Lin, J. Wang, G. Sun, C. Dong, N. Ma, D. Niyato, and P. Zhang, “Trustworthy intelligent networks for low-altitude economy,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 72–79, 2025

    2025

  3. [3]

    Next generation intelligent low- altitude economy deployments: The O-RAN perspective,

    A. S. Abdalla and V . Marojevic, “Next generation intelligent low- altitude economy deployments: The O-RAN perspective,”IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 20–28, 2026

    2026

  4. [4]

    Joint optimization of user association, power control, and dynamic spectrum sharing for integrated aerial-terrestrial network,

    A. S. Matar and X. Shen, “Joint optimization of user association, power control, and dynamic spectrum sharing for integrated aerial-terrestrial network,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 396–409, 2025

    2025

  5. [5]

    Joint optimization of transmit power and trajectory for UA V-enabled data collection with dynamic constraints,

    H. Zhang, B. Li, Y . Rong, Y . Zeng, and R. Zhang, “Joint optimization of transmit power and trajectory for UA V-enabled data collection with dynamic constraints,”IEEE Trans. Commun., pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    Real-time status: How often should one update?

    S. Kaul, R. Yates, and M. Gruteser, “Real-time status: How often should one update?” inProc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2012, pp. 2731–2735

    2012

  7. [7]

    On the cost of consecutive estimation error: Significance-aware non-linear aging,

    J. Luo and N. Pappas, “On the cost of consecutive estimation error: Significance-aware non-linear aging,”IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 7976–7989, 2025

    2025

  8. [8]

    On the role of age and semantics of information in remote estimation of Markov sources,

    J. Luo and N. Pappas, “On the role of age and semantics of information in remote estimation of Markov sources,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 74, Apr. 2026

    2026

  9. [9]

    From information freshness to semantics of information and goal-oriented communica- tions,

    J. Luo, E. Delfani, M. Salimnejad, and N. Pappas, “From information freshness to semantics of information and goal-oriented communica- tions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.12758, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Predictive communica- tions for low-altitude networks,

    J. Chen, B. Li, H. Sun, S. Cui, and N. Pappas, “Predictive communica- tions for low-altitude networks,”IEEE Internet Things Mag., pp. 1–8, 2026

    2026

  11. [11]

    A distributed route network planning method with congestion pricing for drone delivery services in cities,

    X. He, L. Li, Y . Mo, J. Huang, and S. J. Qin, “A distributed route network planning method with congestion pricing for drone delivery services in cities,”Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., vol. 160, p. 104536, 2024

    2024

  12. [12]

    A tutorial on environment-aware communications via channel knowledge map for 6G,

    Y . Zeng, J. Chen, J. Xu, D. Wu, X. Xu, S. Jin, X. Gao, D. Gesbert, S. Cui, and R. Zhang, “A tutorial on environment-aware communications via channel knowledge map for 6G,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., pp. 1–1, 2024

    2024

  13. [13]

    Digital twin channel for 6G: Concepts, architectures and potential applications,

    H. Wang, J. Zhang, G. Nie, L. Yu, Z. Yuan, T. Li, J. Wang, and G. Liu, “Digital twin channel for 6G: Concepts, architectures and potential applications,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 24–30, 2025

    2025

  14. [14]

    Joint CFO-channel estimation over CFO-coherent SS burst sets for low-altitude radio mapping,

    B. Li, H. Zhang, M. Jia, J. Chen, and N. Pappas, “Joint CFO-channel estimation over CFO-coherent SS burst sets for low-altitude radio mapping,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.01386

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Large timescale optimization for communications over aerial ad hoc networks with predetermined trajectories,

    B. Li and J. Chen, “Large timescale optimization for communications over aerial ad hoc networks with predetermined trajectories,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 6371–6385, 2024

    2024

  16. [16]

    Radio map-assisted approach for interference-aware predictive UA V communications,

    B. Li and J. Chen, “Radio map-assisted approach for interference-aware predictive UA V communications,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 16 725–16 741, 2024

    2024

  17. [17]

    Model predictive control enabled UA V trajectory optimization and secure resource allocation,

    Z. Li, C. Su, Z. Su, H. Peng, Y . Wang, W. Chen, and Q. Wu, “Model predictive control enabled UA V trajectory optimization and secure resource allocation,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 12 652–12 665, 2025

    2025

  18. [18]

    Channel knowledge map-assisted dual-domain tracking and predictive beamforming for high-mobility wireless networks,

    R. Du, Z. Wei, Z. Yang, L. Yang, Y . Zeng, D. W. K. Ng, and J. Yuan, “Channel knowledge map-assisted dual-domain tracking and predictive beamforming for high-mobility wireless networks,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 10 968–10 985, 2026

    2026

  19. [19]

    Channel knowledge map enabled low-altitude ISAC networks: Joint air corridor planning and base station deployment,

    J. Li, Y . Chen, F. Liu, and J. Xu, “Channel knowledge map enabled low-altitude ISAC networks: Joint air corridor planning and base station deployment,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 975–979, 2026. 17

    2026

  20. [20]

    Radio map-assisted routing and predictive resource allocation over dynamic low-altitude networks,

    B. Li and J. Chen, “Radio map-assisted routing and predictive resource allocation over dynamic low-altitude networks,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 9955–9970, 2026

    2026

  21. [21]

    Aerial-ground interference mitigation for cellular-connected UA V,

    W. Mei and R. Zhang, “Aerial-ground interference mitigation for cellular-connected UA V,”IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 167–173, 2021

    2021

  22. [22]

    Deep reinforce- ment learning for interference management in UA V-based 3D networks: Potentials and challenges,

    M. Vaezi, X. Lin, H. Zhang, W. Saad, and H. V . Poor, “Deep reinforce- ment learning for interference management in UA V-based 3D networks: Potentials and challenges,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 134–140, 2024

    2024

  23. [23]

    AoI-minimal trajectory planning and data collection in UA V-assisted wireless powered IoT networks,

    H. Hu, K. Xiong, G. Qu, Q. Ni, P. Fan, and K. B. Letaief, “AoI-minimal trajectory planning and data collection in UA V-assisted wireless powered IoT networks,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1211–1223, 2021

    2021

  24. [24]

    UA V-aided data collection for information freshness in wireless sensor networks,

    J. Liu, P. Tong, X. Wang, B. Bai, and H. Dai, “UA V-aided data collection for information freshness in wireless sensor networks,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2368–2382, 2021

    2021

  25. [25]

    AoI-aware scheduling for air-ground collaborative mobile edge computing,

    Z. Qin, Z. Wei, Y . Qu, F. Zhou, H. Wang, D. W. K. Ng, and C.-B. Chae, “AoI-aware scheduling for air-ground collaborative mobile edge computing,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 2989– 3005, 2023

    2023

  26. [26]

    Hierarchical reinforcement learning-based joint trajectory planning and resource allocation in UA V-assisted IoT-sensor networks,

    W. Yuan, S. Chen, H. He, Y . Hou, S. Chen, X. Tan, and J. Yang, “Hierarchical reinforcement learning-based joint trajectory planning and resource allocation in UA V-assisted IoT-sensor networks,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 14 517–14 533, 2025

    2025

  27. [27]

    Deep reinforcement learning for AoI-aware trajectory and phase-shift design in IRS-assisted UA V data collection,

    J. Tang, J. Liu, X. He, L. Xie, L. Qu, and H. Dai, “Deep reinforcement learning for AoI-aware trajectory and phase-shift design in IRS-assisted UA V data collection,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 10 613–10 628, 2025

    2025

  28. [28]

    Joint trajectory planning and channel selection for AoI minimization in multi- UA V-assisted IoT networks,

    Z. Lu, Q. Wu, Z. Jia, C. Fei, J. Zhang, F. Zhou, and K.-K. Wong, “Joint trajectory planning and channel selection for AoI minimization in multi- UA V-assisted IoT networks,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 11 161–11 175, 2026

    2026

  29. [29]

    Predictive control and communication co-design via two-way gaussian process regression and AoI-aware scheduling,

    A. M. Girgis, J. Park, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, “Predictive control and communication co-design via two-way gaussian process regression and AoI-aware scheduling,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 7077–7093, 2021

    2021

  30. [30]

    On the spatio-temporal analysis and optimization of AoI in cell-free IIoT networks,

    M. Song, H. Shan, Y . Cheng, W. Zhuang, X. Li, Q. Zhang, and X. He, “On the spatio-temporal analysis and optimization of AoI in cell-free IIoT networks,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 16 421–16 436, 2024

    2024

  31. [31]

    Age of information in random access networks with energy harvesting,

    F. Zhao, N. Pappas, M. Zhang, and H. H. Yang, “Age of information in random access networks with energy harvesting,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 3813–3829, 2025

    2025

  32. [32]

    AoI-aware online transmission optimization for wbans with unreliable information delivery,

    S. Mu, Y . Lu, R. Jiang, W. Chen, B. Ai, and D. Niyato, “AoI-aware online transmission optimization for wbans with unreliable information delivery,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 5622–5639, 2026

    2026

  33. [33]

    The m-distribution: A general formula of intensity distribution of rapid fading,

    M. Nakagami, “The m-distribution: A general formula of intensity distribution of rapid fading,” inStatistical Methods in Radio Wave Propagation, W. HOFFMAN, Ed. Pergamon, 1960, pp. 3–36

    1960

  34. [34]

    Delay-Doppler alignment modulation for spatially sparse massive MIMO communication,

    H. Lu and Y . Zeng, “Delay-Doppler alignment modulation for spatially sparse massive MIMO communication,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6000–6014, 2024

    2024

  35. [35]

    Real-time reconstruction of markov sources and remote actuation over wireless channels,

    M. Salimnejad, M. Kountouris, and N. Pappas, “Real-time reconstruction of markov sources and remote actuation over wireless channels,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 2701–2715, 2024

    2024

  36. [36]

    Miettinen,Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization, 1st ed., ser

    K. Miettinen,Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization, 1st ed., ser. Inter- national Series in Operations Research & Management Science. New York, NY , USA: Springer, 1998, vol. 12

    1998

  37. [37]

    Air-ground channel characterization for unmanned aircraft systems-part III: The suburban and near-urban envi- ronments,

    D. W. Matolak and R. Sun, “Air-ground channel characterization for unmanned aircraft systems-part III: The suburban and near-urban envi- ronments,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 6607–6618, 2017

    2017

  38. [38]

    Boyd and L

    S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe,Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, 2004

    2004

  39. [39]

    CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.1,

    M. Grant and S. Boyd, “CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.1,” https://cvxr.com/cvx, Mar. 2014

    2014

  40. [40]

    R. K. Ahuja, T. L. Magnanti, and J. B. Orlin,Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. Prentice Hall, 1993

    1993

  41. [41]

    Optimal power management in wireless control systems,

    K. Gatsis, A. Ribeiro, and G. J. Pappas, “Optimal power management in wireless control systems,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1495–1510, 2014

    2014

  42. [42]

    S. M. Ross,Introduction to probability models. Academic press, 2014

    2014

  43. [43]

    Utility-based power allocation for multiclass wireless systems,

    J.-W. Lee and J.-A. Kwon, “Utility-based power allocation for multiclass wireless systems,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 3813– 3819, 2009

    2009

  44. [44]

    Goal-oriented semantic resource allocation with cumulative prospect theoretic agents,

    S. Vaidanis, P. A. Stavrou, and M. Kountouris, “Goal-oriented semantic resource allocation with cumulative prospect theoretic agents,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., 2025, pp. 4154–4159

    2025

  45. [45]

    Evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA); further advance- ments for E-UTRA physical layer aspects,

    “Evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA); further advance- ments for E-UTRA physical layer aspects,” 3GPP, Tech. Rep. TR 36.814 (Release 9), Mar. 2017

    2017

  46. [46]

    Mobile unmanned aerial vehicles (UA Vs) for energy-efficient internet of things communica- tions,

    M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, “Mobile unmanned aerial vehicles (UA Vs) for energy-efficient internet of things communica- tions,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 7574–7589, 2017

    2017

  47. [47]

    Integral boundary points of convex polyhedra,

    A. J. Hoffman and J. B. Kruskal, “Integral boundary points of convex polyhedra,” in50 Years of Integer Programming 1958-2008: From the Early Years to the State-of-the-Art. Springer, 2009, pp. 49–76

    1958

  48. [48]

    An equivalent transformation of multi-objective optimization problems,

    M. Zarepisheh and P. M. Pardalos, “An equivalent transformation of multi-objective optimization problems,”Annals of Operations Research, vol. 249, no. 1, pp. 5–15, 2017

    2017

  49. [49]

    On image space transformations in multiob- jective optimization,

    F. Neussel and O. Stein, “On image space transformations in multiob- jective optimization,”Optimization Online. Preprint, 2025

    2025

  50. [50]

    Schr ¨oder,Ordered sets: An introduction

    B. Schr ¨oder,Ordered sets: An introduction. Springer, 2016, vol. 328

    2016