pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25050 · v3 · pith:NCQ4Y6O6new · submitted 2026-04-27 · 💻 cs.RO

DiscreteRTC: Discrete Diffusion Policies are Natural Asynchronous Executors

Pengcheng Wang , Kaiwen Hong , Chensheng Peng , Katherine Driggs-Campbell , Masayoshi Tomizuka , Chenfeng Xu , Chen Tang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 08:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords discrete diffusionasynchronous executionreal-time chunkingrobotic policiesdiffusion policiesaction inpainting
0
0 comments X

The pith

Discrete diffusion policies enable native asynchronous execution for robots via their unmasking process.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Physical AI must generate actions while the world changes, so pauses between action chunks in synchronous policies cause failures on dynamic tasks. Real-time chunking addresses this by freezing committed actions and regenerating the rest as an inpainting problem. Flow-matching policies need extra inference corrections, fine-tuning, and heuristics for inpainting, increasing cost. Discrete diffusion policies instead generate by iterative unmasking, so inpainting occurs natively with no added code or training. Early stopping further adapts guidance and lowers compute. On dynamic benchmarks and real manipulation, this yields higher success than continuous alternatives.

Core claim

Discrete diffusion policies, which generate actions by iteratively unmasking, are natural asynchronous executors that resolve all limitations at once: they are fine-tuning free since inpainting is their native operation, while early stopping further provides adaptive guidance and reduces inference cost.

What carries the argument

Iterative unmasking operation in discrete diffusion policies, which directly supplies inpainting for real-time chunk transitions without external mechanisms.

If this is right

  • Implementation needs zero additional code to enable async inpainting.
  • Inference requires only about 0.7 times the computation of full generation from scratch.
  • Success rate improves 65 percent on real-world hockey defend task versus flow-matching RTC.
  • Success rate improves 30 percent versus training-time flow-matching RTC.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same native inpainting property could apply to other sequential generation settings that require partial commitment and revision.
  • Early stopping for adaptive compute might transfer to diffusion models in non-robotics domains under latency constraints.
  • Performance on a broader set of contact-rich or multi-agent dynamic tasks would test whether the gains generalize beyond the reported manipulation benchmarks.

Load-bearing premise

The native unmasking in discrete diffusion policies inherently supplies effective inpainting for real-time chunking without needing inference-time corrections or fine-tuning.

What would settle it

An experiment on a dynamic task showing that DiscreteRTC requires fine-tuning or external corrections to match flow-matching RTC success rates, or that early stopping fails to reduce compute while preserving performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25050 by Chenfeng Xu, Chensheng Peng, Chen Tang, Kaiwen Hong, Katherine Driggs-Campbell, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Pengcheng Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Async Execution with discrete diffusion policies solving dynamic manipulation. Gray rectangles and blocks represent the action chunks and the actions. Yellow and green cubes represent the masked and unmasked action tokens. During each inference cycle, discrete diffusion policies copy the tail of the last action chunk as the committed prefix, and inpaint upon it by simply forwardin itself. Compared with flo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: RTC with flow-matching head. Color represents the noise level, where green stands for the clear action and yellow stands for the pure noise. The flow-matching head is ill-suited for RTC because (a) during pre-training, the base policy is not trained on inpainting tasks; (b) to acquire this capability, a specially designed fine-tuning stage is required; (c) at inference time, RTC relies on heuristic guidanc… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: RTC with discrete diffusion head. Color represents the masking status, where green stands for the unmasked token and yellow stands for the masked token. The discrete diffusion head is naturally suited for RTC because (a) during pre-training, the base policy is already trained on inpainting tasks; (b) consequently, no inpainting-specific fine-tuning is required; (c) at inference time, early stopping from th… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Experimental Results in Kinetix. The throughputs represent the task completed by the policy every 256 steps. Left: Average solve rate and throughputs across all environments with different inference delays; Right: Solve rates for every tasks with different inference delays. The executions horizon follows s = max(1, d) and each datapoint represents 2048 trials. To ensure valid execution before the next infe… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Extend Experimental Results in Kinetix. Left: Required interative steps for each in￾painting inference of different policy architectures in Kinetix with s = max(1, d); Right: Average solve rates of extended variants in Kinetix. The evaluation setup keeps the same with view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Unmasking Trajectory Sample with Natural Schedule Inference. Green blocks denote unmasked action tokens, yellow blocks denote masked tokens, and the red rectangle marks the early￾stop boundary beyond which tokens do not need to be unmasked before the next inference. In practice, the natural schedule does work as expected compared to the simple hard mask approach. In this section, we show how the inappropri… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Detailed Main Results in Kinetix. The evaluation setup keeps the same with view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Fine-tuning Ablation in Kinetix. The evaluation setup keeps the same with view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: dynamic Pick and Place Real-world Setup Hardware and Data. We use a single UR5e arm with a Robotiq gripper and a wrist-mounted RGB camera. Demonstrations are recorded at 500 Hz via the FastUMI pipeline. Each action is a 10D vector [∆x, ∆y, ∆z, rot6d(6), gripper], with translational dimensions normalized to [−1, 1] via min-max scaling, rotation dimensions left unnormalized, and the gripper binarized to {0, … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Unlike chatbots, physical AI must act while the world keeps evolving. Therefore, the inter-chunk pause of synchronous executors are fatal for dynamic tasks regardless of how fast the inference is. Asynchronous execution -- thinking while acting -- is therefore a structural requirement, and real-time chunking (RTC) makes it viable by recasting chunk transitions as inpainting: freezing committed actions and consistently generating the remainder. However, RTC with flow-matching policy is structurally suboptimal: its inpainting comes from inference-time corrections rather than the base policy, yielding little pre-training benefit, specific fine-tuning, heuristic guidance, and extra computation that inflates the latency. In this work, we observe that discrete diffusion policies, which generate actions by iteratively unmasking, are natural asynchronous executors that resolve all limitations at once: they are fine-tuning free since inpainting is their native operation, while early stopping further provides adaptive guidance and reduces inference cost. We propose DiscreteRTC, which replaces external corrections with native unmasking, and show on dynamic simulated benchmarks and real-world dynamic manipulation tasks that it achieves higher success rates than continuous RTC and other baselines. In summary, DiscreteRTC is simpler to implement with 0 lines of additional code to enable async inpainting, faster at inference with only ~0.7 computation compared with generating actions from scratch, and better at execution with 65% higher success rate in real-world hockey defend task compared with flow-matching RTC, and 30% higher compared with training-time flow-matching RTC. More visualizations are on https://outsider86.github.io/DiscreteRTCSite/.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes DiscreteRTC, arguing that discrete diffusion policies are natural asynchronous executors for real-time chunking (RTC) in robotics. It claims their iterative unmasking process provides native inpainting for freezing committed actions and generating continuations, eliminating the need for inference-time corrections, task-specific fine-tuning, or heuristics required by flow-matching policies. Early stopping is said to add adaptive guidance while cutting compute. Empirical results on dynamic simulated benchmarks and real-world manipulation tasks are reported to show higher success rates, including 65% improvement over flow-matching RTC in a hockey defend task and ~0.7x inference cost.

Significance. If the central transfer assumption holds and the reported gains are reproducible, the work would offer a structurally simpler path to asynchronous execution in physical AI, leveraging an existing model capability rather than adding post-hoc machinery. The explicit credit for '0 lines of additional code' and reduced inference via early stopping would be a practical strength if verified.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that 'inpainting is their native operation' and thus the method is 'fine-tuning free' with '0 lines of additional code' rests on an unverified transfer from standard full-sequence training to the partial-masking regime needed for RTC (freezing the first chunk and unmasking the rest). No section demonstrates that the training distribution included relevant partial sequences or that unmasking produces consistent continuations once actions are locked; this assumption is load-bearing for both the pre-training benefit and the structural superiority over flow-matching.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (results claims): Reported performance numbers (65% higher success rate on real-world hockey defend task, 30% higher vs. training-time flow-matching RTC, ~0.7 computation) are presented without any experimental protocol, number of trials, error bars, statistical tests, or named baselines. This absence prevents verification that the data support the central empirical claim of superiority on dynamic tasks.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The visualizations link is given but the text provides no description of what specific behaviors or failure modes the videos illustrate.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We appreciate the referee's constructive feedback on our manuscript. Below, we provide point-by-point responses to the major comments, indicating revisions where appropriate to strengthen the presentation of our work.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that 'inpainting is their native operation' and thus the method is 'fine-tuning free' with '0 lines of additional code' rests on an unverified transfer from standard full-sequence training to the partial-masking regime needed for RTC (freezing the first chunk and unmasking the rest). No section demonstrates that the training distribution included relevant partial sequences or that unmasking produces consistent continuations once actions are locked; this assumption is load-bearing for both the pre-training benefit and the structural superiority over flow-matching.

    Authors: Discrete diffusion models are typically trained with random masking at various ratios, which directly corresponds to the partial masking required for RTC where the first chunk is fixed (masked as known) and the rest is unmasked iteratively. This makes inpainting a native capability without requiring task-specific fine-tuning or additional code. We acknowledge that an explicit verification of consistency on locked actions would strengthen the argument. We will add a new subsection or appendix with qualitative and quantitative analysis of unmasking consistency on partial sequences from the training distribution. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (results claims): Reported performance numbers (65% higher success rate on real-world hockey defend task, 30% higher vs. training-time flow-matching RTC, ~0.7 computation) are presented without any experimental protocol, number of trials, error bars, statistical tests, or named baselines. This absence prevents verification that the data support the central empirical claim of superiority on dynamic tasks.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from additional context on the experimental details to support the reported gains. The full paper describes the evaluation protocol, including the number of trials (e.g., 50-100 per task), baselines, and statistical measures in Section 4. To address this, we will revise the abstract to briefly note the evaluation setup, such as 'across 100 trials with reported standard deviations'. This ensures the claims are better supported at a glance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; claims rest on empirical results and definitional properties of discrete diffusion

full rationale

The paper's core assertion—that discrete diffusion policies are natural asynchronous executors because 'inpainting is their native operation' via iterative unmasking—is presented as an observation about the model class, not a derived prediction or fitted quantity. Support is given via reported success rates on simulated and real-world tasks rather than any reduction of outputs to inputs by construction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, ansatzes, or renamings appear as load-bearing steps in the abstract or described methods; the transfer assumption about partial masking is an empirical premise evaluated by experiment, not a self-referential fit.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract alone provides no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; full text required for assessment.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5839 in / 1123 out tokens · 48091 ms · 2026-07-01T08:29:20.919421+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Start Right, Arrive Right: Asynchronous Execution via Initial Noise Selection

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PAINT reframes asynchronous flow-based action chunking as an initial noise selection problem solved via backward Euler inversion and a repainting rule.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 24 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Brown, B

    T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020

    1901

  2. [2]

    A. Yang, A. Li, B. Yang, B. Zhang, B. Hui, B. Zheng, B. Yu, C. Gao, C. Huang, C. Lv, et al. Qwen3 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    T. Wan, A. Wang, B. Ai, B. Wen, C. Mao, C.-W. Xie, D. Chen, F. Yu, H. Zhao, J. Yang, et al. Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    $\pi_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control

    K. Black, N. Brown, D. Driess, A. Esmail, M. Equi, C. Finn, N. Fusai, L. Groom, K. Hausman, B. Ichter, et al. pi0: A vision-language-action flow model for general robot control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24164, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    $\pi_{0.5}$: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalization

    P. Intelligence, K. Black, N. Brown, J. Darpinian, K. Dhabalia, D. Driess, A. Esmail, M. Equi, C. Finn, N. Fusai, et al. pi0.5: a vision-language-action model with open-world generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16054, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robots

    J. Bjorck, F. Casta ˜neda, N. Cherniadev, X. Da, R. Ding, L. Fan, Y . Fang, D. Fox, F. Hu, S. Huang, et al. Gr00t n1: An open foundation model for generalist humanoid robots.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14734, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    P. Wang, Q. Liu, H. Lin, Y . Li, G. Zhan, M. Tomizuka, and Y . Wang. Dadp: Domain adaptive diffusion policy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.04037, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  8. [8]

    Learning Dexterous In-Hand Manipulation

    OpenAI, M. Andrychowicz, B. Baker, M. Chociej, R. J ´ozefowicz, B. McGrew, J. Pachocki, A. Petron, M. Plappert, G. Powell, A. Ray, J. Schneider, S. Sidor, J. Tobin, P. Welinder, L. Weng, and W. Zaremba. Learning dexterous in-hand manipulation.CoRR, 2018. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.00177

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    S. An, Z. Meng, C. Tang, Y . Zhou, T. Liu, F. Ding, S. Zhang, Y . Mu, R. Song, W. Zhang, et al. Dexterous manipulation through imitation learning: A survey.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.03515, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Z. Su, B. Zhang, N. Rahmanian, Y . Gao, Q. Liao, C. Regan, K. Sreenath, and S. S. Sastry. Hitter: A humanoid table tennis robot via hierarchical planning and learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.21043, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    R. Yu, Y . Wang, Q. Zhao, H. W. Tsui, J. Wang, P. Tan, and Q. Chen. Skillmimic-v2: Learning robust and generalizable interaction skills from sparse and noisy demonstrations. InProceed- ings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Confer- ence Conference Papers, pages 1–11, 2025

    2025

  12. [12]

    J. Hu, J. Shim, C. Tang, Y . Sung, B. Liu, P. Stone, and R. Martin-Martin. Simple recipe works: Vision-language-action models are natural continual learners with reinforcement learn- ing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.11653, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    TIC-VLA: A Think-in-Control Vision-Language-Action Model for Robot Navigation in Dynamic Environments

    Z. Huang, Y . Zhang, J. Liu, R. Song, C. Tang, and J. Ma. Tic-vla: A think-in-control vision-language-action model for robot navigation in dynamic environments.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02459, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  14. [14]

    C. Chi, Z. Xu, S. Feng, E. Cousineau, Y . Du, B. Burchfiel, R. Tedrake, and S. Song. Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion.The International Journal of Robotics Research, 44(10-11):1684–1704, 2025

    2025

  15. [15]

    L. Lai, A. Z. Huang, and S. J. Gershman. Action chunking as conditional policy compression. Cognition, 264:106201, 2025. 9

    2025

  16. [16]

    H. Xie, B. Wen, J. Zheng, Z. Chen, F. Hong, H. Diao, and Z. Liu. Dynamicvla: A vision- language-action model for dynamic object manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.22153, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    T. Z. Zhao, V . Kumar, S. Levine, and C. Finn. Learning fine-grained bimanual manipulation with low-cost hardware.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13705, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Real-Time Execution of Action Chunking Flow Policies

    K. Black, M. Y . Galliker, and S. Levine. Real-time execution of action chunking flow policies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.07339, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    $\pi^{*}_{0.6}$: a VLA That Learns From Experience

    P. Intelligence, A. Amin, R. Aniceto, A. Balakrishna, K. Black, K. Conley, G. Connors, J. Darpinian, K. Dhabalia, J. DiCarlo, et al.π ∗ 0.6: a vla that learns from experience.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.14759, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    ${\pi}_{0.7}$: a Steerable Generalist Robotic Foundation Model with Emergent Capabilities

    P. Intelligence, B. Ai, A. Amin, R. Aniceto, A. Balakrishna, G. Balke, K. Black, G. Bokin- sky, S. Cao, T. Charbonnier, et al.π 0.7: a steerable generalist robotic foundation model with emergent capabilities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.15483, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Flow Matching for Generative Modeling

    Y . Lipman, R. T. Chen, H. Ben-Hamu, M. Nickel, and M. Le. Flow matching for generative modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02747, 2022

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    J. Song, A. Vahdat, M. Mardani, and J. Kautz. Pseudoinverse-guided diffusion models for inverse problems. InInternational conference on learning representations, 2023

    2023

  23. [23]

    Training-time ac- tion conditioning for efficient real-time chunking,

    K. Black, A. Z. Ren, M. Equi, and S. Levine. Training-time action conditioning for efficient real-time chunking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.05964, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    H. Wang, G. Zhang, Y . Yan, Y . Shang, R. R. Kompella, and G. Liu. Real-time robot execution with masked action chunking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.20130, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Y . Liu, H. Yu, J. Zhao, B. Li, D. Zhang, M. Li, W. Wu, Y . Hu, J. Xie, J. Guo, et al. Learning native continuation for action chunking flow policies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.12978, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    Y . Lu, Z. Liu, X. Fan, Z. Yang, J. Hou, J. Li, K. Ding, and H. Zhao. Faster: Rethinking real-time flow vlas.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.19199, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    F. Yang, P. Jing, K. Qu, N. Zhao, and Y . Su. Abpolicy: Asynchronous b-spline flow policy for real-time and smooth robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.23901, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Discrete Diffusion VLA: Bringing Discrete Diffusion to Action Decoding in Vision-Language-Action Policies

    Z. Liang, Y . Li, T. Yang, C. Wu, S. Mao, T. Nian, L. Pei, S. Zhou, X. Yang, J. Pang, et al. Discrete diffusion vla: Bringing discrete diffusion to action decoding in vision-language-action policies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.20072, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Matthews, M

    M. Matthews, M. Beukman, C. Lu, and J. Foerster. Kinetix: Investigating the training of gen- eral agents through open-ended physics-based control tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.23208, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    G. Zhan, L. Tao, P. Wang, Y . Wang, Y . Li, Y . Chen, H. Li, M. Tomizuka, and S. E. Li. Mean flow policy with instantaneous velocity constraint for one-step action generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.13810, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    M. J. Kim, C. Finn, and P. Liang. Fine-tuning vision-language-action models: Optimizing speed and success.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19645, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    M. J. Kim, K. Pertsch, S. Karamcheti, T. Xiao, A. Balakrishna, S. Nair, R. Rafailov, E. Foster, G. Lam, P. Sanketi, et al. Openvla: An open-source vision-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09246, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Van Den Oord, O

    A. Van Den Oord, O. Vinyals, et al. Neural discrete representation learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017. 10

    2017

  34. [35]

    E. J. Hu, Y . Shen, P. Wallis, Z. Allen-Zhu, Y . Li, S. Wang, L. Wang, W. Chen, et al. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models.Iclr, 1(2):3, 2022

    2022

  35. [36]

    Y . Liu, J. I. Hamid, A. Xie, Y . Lee, M. Du, and C. Finn. Bidirectional decoding: Improving action chunking via closed-loop resampling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.17355, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [37]

    J. Tang, Y . Sun, Y . Zhao, S. Yang, Y . Lin, Z. Zhang, J. Hou, Y . Lu, Z. Liu, and S. Han. Vlash: Real-time vlas via future-state-aware asynchronous inference.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.01031, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [38]

    J. Ye, N. Gao, S. Yang, J. Zheng, Z. Wang, Y . Chen, P. Chen, Y . Chen, S. Liu, and J. Jia. Starvla- α: Reducing complexity in vision-language-action systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.11757, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  38. [39]

    Peebles and S

    W. Peebles and S. Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 4195–4205, 2023

    2023

  39. [40]

    Y . Ma, Y . Zhou, Y . Yang, T. Wang, and H. Fan. Running vlas at real-time speed.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.26742, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [41]

    FAST: Efficient Action Tokenization for Vision-Language-Action Models

    K. Pertsch, K. Stachowicz, B. Ichter, D. Driess, S. Nair, Q. Vuong, O. Mees, C. Finn, and S. Levine. Fast: Efficient action tokenization for vision-language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09747, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [42]

    C. Liu, X. Han, J. Gao, Y . Zhao, H. Chen, and Y . Du. Oat: Ordered action tokenization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.04215, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  42. [43]

    A. Lou, C. Meng, and S. Ermon. Discrete diffusion modeling by estimating the ratios of the data distribution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16834, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [44]

    Y . Wen, H. Li, K. Gu, Y . Zhao, T. Wang, and X. Sun. Llada-vla: Vision language diffusion action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.06932, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [45]

    J. Wen, M. Zhu, J. Liu, Z. Liu, Y . Yang, L. Zhang, S. Zhang, Y . Zhu, and Y . Xu. dvla: Diffusion vision-language-action model with multimodal chain-of-thought.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.25681, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [46]

    J. Chen, W. Song, P. Ding, Z. Zhou, H. Zhao, F. Tang, D. Wang, and H. Li. Unified diffu- sion vla: Vision-language-action model via joint discrete denoising diffusion process.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.01718, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [47]

    J. Ye, S. Gong, J. Gao, J. Fan, S. Wu, W. Bi, H. Bai, L. Shang, and L. Kong. Dream-vl & dream-vla: Open vision-language and vision-language-action models with diffusion language model backbone.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.22615, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [48]

    J. Chen, W. Song, S. Chen, J. Wang, Z. Li, and H. Li. Dfm-vla: Iterative action refinement for robot manipulation via discrete flow matching.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.26320, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  48. [49]

    W. Song, J. Chen, S. Chen, J. Wang, P. Ding, H. Zhao, Y . Qin, X. Zheng, D. Wang, Y . Wang, et al. Fast-dvla: Accelerating discrete diffusion vla to real-time performance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.25661, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  49. [50]

    T. Xiao, E. Jang, D. Kalashnikov, S. Levine, J. Ibarz, K. Hausman, and A. Herzog. Think- ing while moving: Deep reinforcement learning with concurrent control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.06089, 2020. 11

    work page arXiv 2004

  50. [51]

    Bradbury, R

    J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. Johnson, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin, G. Necula, A. Paszke, J. VanderPlas, S. Wanderman-Milne, and Q. Zhang. JAX: composable transfor- mations of Python+NumPy programs, 2018. URLhttp://github.com/jax-ml/jax. A Extended Related Works Efficient VLA via Discrete Diffusion.To train and run VLAs efficiently, many prior eff...

    2018