arxiv: 2604.25916 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Nonlocal-in-time tail effects in gravitational scattering to fifth Post-Minkowskian and tenth self-force orders

Christoph Dlapa , Gregor K\"alin , Zhengwen Liu , Rafael A. Porto

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc

keywords gravitational scatteringpost-Minkowskian expansiontail effectsnonlocal-in-timeworldline effective field theorypolylogarithmsself-forceconservative dynamics

0 comments

The pith

Nonlocal-in-time tail effects in gravitational scattering are computed at fifth Post-Minkowskian order using polylogarithms.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper calculates the nonlocal-in-time conservative contributions from tail effects in the scattering of two massive bodies under gravity, reaching fifth order in the Post-Minkowskian expansion and tenth order in the self-force expansion. These contributions are expressed using multiple polylogarithmic functions. The calculation is performed within the worldline effective field theory framework and employs a new integration-by-parts algorithm called the Sparse Integral Reducer. The results match known expressions through sixth post-Newtonian order and supply the missing nonlocal piece required to determine the local conservative two-body dynamics at this high order.

Core claim

Using the worldline effective field theory formalism, we derive the nonlocal-in-time conservative contributions arising from tail effects in gravitational scattering to fifth Post-Minkowskian (5PM) and tenth self-force (10SF) orders. The result features multiple polylogarithms of up to weight three. This challenging computation relies on state-of-the-art integration techniques, including a novel integration-by-parts algorithm: the Sparse Integral Reducer (SpideR). We find perfect agreement in the overlap with all existing literature through sixth post-Newtonian order.

What carries the argument

The Sparse Integral Reducer (SpideR) algorithm, which performs the integration-by-parts reduction of the integrals that arise when computing tail effects in the worldline effective field theory.

Load-bearing premise

The worldline effective field theory formalism together with the Sparse Integral Reducer algorithm correctly captures all relevant tail contributions at 5PM without missing terms or introducing artifacts.

What would settle it

An independent computation of the 5PM tail contributions using amplitude-based methods or a different integration algorithm that produces different polylogarithmic coefficients would falsify the result.

read the original abstract

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives the first explicit 5PM nonlocal tail terms with weight-three polylogs, backed by lower-order matches but resting on an untested new reduction algorithm for the fresh integrals.

read the letter

The main point is that they have worked out the nonlocal-in-time conservative tail contributions in gravitational scattering at fifth post-Minkowskian order, reaching tenth self-force order as well. The expressions involve multiple polylogarithms up to weight three, and they position this as a necessary step to separate local and nonlocal pieces in the 5PM conservative dynamics for binary inspirals. They use the standard worldline effective field theory setup and introduce a new Sparse Integral Reducer algorithm to manage the integration-by-parts reductions on the relevant Feynman integrals. They also report exact agreement with all existing results through sixth post-Newtonian order, which covers the overlap region cleanly. That agreement is reassuring and shows the overall framework is consistent where it can be checked. The new terms themselves are not in the prior literature, so this extends the post-Minkowskian program in a concrete way that should feed into better gravitational-wave templates. The soft spot is the reliance on the novel SpideR algorithm for the higher-order integrals that produce the weight-three polylogs. The validation only reaches 6PN, so the sectors unique to this calculation have no independent cross-check yet. A hidden issue in how SpideR handles those new reductions would directly affect the claimed 5PM results. The paper is aimed at people already working on high-order post-Minkowskian expansions, self-force methods, or effective field theory approaches to binary dynamics. Anyone building 5PM waveforms or studying tail effects will get usable expressions from it. I would send this to peer review. The advance is real and the lower-order checks are solid, but referees can usefully pressure-test the new algorithm on the unreproduced terms.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives the nonlocal-in-time conservative tail contributions to gravitational two-body scattering at fifth post-Minkowskian (5PM) and tenth self-force (10SF) orders using worldline effective field theory. The calculation employs a novel Sparse Integral Reducer (SpideR) algorithm for integration-by-parts reductions and yields expressions involving polylogarithms of weight up to three. The results agree with all existing literature in the overlap region up to sixth post-Newtonian order and are presented as a key step toward determining the local-in-time conservative dynamics at 5PM order.

Significance. If the results hold, this work provides a substantial advance in post-Minkowskian and self-force calculations by delivering the tail sector at 5PM/10SF, which is required to isolate the local conservative two-body Hamiltonian at this order. The explicit appearance of weight-three polylogarithms and the development of the SpideR algorithm constitute concrete technical progress that can be reused in future high-order computations.

major comments (1)

The only reported cross-check is agreement with existing literature through 6PN order. This overlap does not exercise the new 5PM integrals that generate the weight-three polylogarithms; an undetected reduction error or missed sector in SpideR would directly invalidate the central 5PM tail result. Independent verification (numerical evaluation of sample integrals or comparison against an alternative IBP tool) is required before the new expressions can be used as input for the local 5PM dynamics.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the positive assessment of its significance. We address the major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The only reported cross-check is agreement with existing literature through 6PN order. This overlap does not exercise the new 5PM integrals that generate the weight-three polylogarithms; an undetected reduction error or missed sector in SpideR would directly invalidate the central 5PM tail result. Independent verification (numerical evaluation of sample integrals or comparison against an alternative IBP tool) is required before the new expressions can be used as input for the local 5PM dynamics.

Authors: We agree that the 6PN overlap, while essential, does not directly probe the novel 5PM integrals responsible for the weight-three polylogarithms. The SpideR algorithm was validated on a broad set of lower-order integrals where independent analytic results exist, and its reduction rules are order-independent, but we acknowledge that this does not constitute a fully independent check of the new sectors. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection with numerical evaluations of several representative 5PM tail integrals. These will be performed via direct numerical integration over the worldline parameters for fixed kinematic configurations and compared against the analytic polylogarithmic expressions. We will also include a brief comparison of SpideR reductions against an alternative IBP implementation on a subset of the 5PM integrals. These additions will provide the requested independent verification. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation uses independent EFT computation and novel algorithm validated externally in overlap

full rationale

The paper computes nonlocal tail contributions at 5PM/10SF via worldline EFT and the new SpideR IBP reducer, reporting exact agreement with prior literature only through 6PN as external cross-check. No quoted step reduces the new weight-three polylog results to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the higher-order terms are generated by the algorithm on previously uncomputed integrals and are not forced by construction from inputs. The central claim therefore retains independent computational content against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields limited visibility into free parameters or invented entities; the central computation rests on the domain assumption that worldline EFT plus the new reducer algorithm faithfully reproduces tail effects.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Worldline effective field theory formalism accurately captures nonlocal tail effects at 5PM order
Invoked as the foundational method for the entire derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5428 in / 1183 out tokens · 27273 ms · 2026-05-07T15:37:13.297578+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

A Runway to Dissipation of Angular Momentum via Worldline Quantum Field Theory
hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

The authors introduce static correlators in worldline QFT to compute angular momentum dissipation in black hole scattering, reproducing the known O(G^3) flux and extending the approach to electromagnetism at O(α^3).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 4 internal anchors

[1]

Ampli- tudes, Strong-Field Gravity and Resummation

at the 1SF level. The factor multiplying log ˆr e2γE in (10) can be shown to depend on lower order ˆci’s com- bined with the source (“1rad”-only) energy flux. The relation follows from the general structure in (1), in- cluding the factor ofGE, together with the cancellation in dimensional regularization of ultraviolet and infrared divergences—and associat...
[2]

Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

P. Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2017
[3]

Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO

D. Reitzeet al., Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 035 (2019), 10 arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019
[4]

The Science of the Einstein Telescope

A. Abacet al., (2025), arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[5]

R. A. Porto, (2017), arXiv:1703.06440 [physics.pop-ph]

work page arXiv 2017
[6]

Nonlocal-in-time action for the fourth post-Newtonian conservative dynamics of two-body systems

T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Rev. D89, 064058 (2014), arXiv:1401.4548

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[7]

The tail effect in gravitational radiation-reaction: time non-locality and renormalization group evolution

C. Galley, A. Leibovich, R. A. Porto, and A. Ross, Phys. Rev. D93, 124010 (2016), arXiv:1511.07379

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[8]

N. T. Maia, C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. D96, 084065 (2017), arXiv:1705.07938 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2017
[9]

N. T. Maia, C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. D96, 084064 (2017), arXiv:1705.07934 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2017
[10]

Marchand, L

T. Marchand, L. Bernard, L. Blanchet, and G. Faye, Phys. Rev. D97, 044023 (2018), arXiv:1707.09289

work page arXiv 2018
[11]

Foffa and R

S. Foffa and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev.D100, 024047 (2019), arXiv:1903.05113 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[12]

Foffa, R

S. Foffa, R. A. Porto, I. Rothstein, and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev.D100, 024048 (2019), arXiv:1903.05118

work page arXiv 2019
[13]

G. Cho, R. A. Porto, and Z. Yang, Phys. Rev. D106, L101501 (2022), arXiv:2201.05138 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[14]

Blanchet, G

L. Blanchet, G. Faye, Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou, and D. Trestini, Phys. Rev. D108, 064041 (2023), arXiv:2304.11186 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[15]

Foffa and R

S. Foffa and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D101, 064033 (2020), arXiv:1907.02869 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[16]

Static two-body potential at fifth post-Newtonian order

S. Foffa, P. Mastrolia, R. Sturani, C. Sturm, and W. J. Torres Bobadilla, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 241605 (2019), arXiv:1902.10571

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[17]

Bl¨ umlein, A

J. Bl¨ umlein, A. Maier, and P. Marquard, Phys. Lett. B 800, 135100 (2020), arXiv:1902.11180

work page arXiv 2020
[18]

G. L. Almeida, S. Foffa, and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D 104, 124075 (2021), arXiv:2110.14146 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[19]

Bl¨ umlein, A

J. Bl¨ umlein, A. Maier, P. Marquard, and G. Sch¨ afer, Nucl. Phys. B965, 115352 (2021), arXiv:2010.13672 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[20]

D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Phys. Rev. D102, 024062 (2020), arXiv:2003.11891 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[21]

D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Phys. Rev. D102, 024061 (2020), arXiv:2004.05407 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[22]

D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Phys. Rev. D102, 084047 (2020), arXiv:2007.11239 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[23]

Khalil, A

M. Khalil, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, and J. Vines, Phys. Rev. D106, 024042 (2022), arXiv:2204.05047v3 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[24]

Bl¨ umlein, A

J. Bl¨ umlein, A. Maier, P. Marquard, and G. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Lett. B816, 136260 (2021), arXiv:2101.08630 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[25]

R. A. Porto, M. M. Riva, and Z. Yang, JHEP04, 050, arXiv:2409.05860 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[26]

G. L. Almeida, A. M¨ uller, S. Foffa, and R. Sturani, (2025), arXiv:2410.10565 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[27]

G. Cho, B. Pardo, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. D104, 024037 (2021), arXiv:2103.14612 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[28]

Amalberti, Z

L. Amalberti, Z. Yang, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. D 110, 044046 (2024), arXiv:2406.03457 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[29]

D. Bini, T. Damour, S. De Angelis, A. Geralico, A. Herderschee, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, Phys. Rev. D 109, 125008 (2024), arXiv:2402.06604 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation and Effective One-Body theory

T. Damour, Phys. Rev.D94, 104015 (2016), arXiv:1609.00354

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[31]

High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem

T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D97, 044038 (2018), arXiv:1710.10599 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[32]

N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, G. Festuccia, L. Plante, and P. Vanhove, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 171601 (2018), arXiv:1806.04920

work page arXiv 2018
[33]

From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion

C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein, and M. P. Solon, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 251101 (2018), arXiv:1808.02489

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[34]

D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee, and D. O’Connell, JHEP02, 137, arXiv:1811.10950

work page arXiv
[35]

Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 201603 (2019), arXiv:1901.04424

work page arXiv 2019
[36]

From boundary data to bound states,

G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, JHEP01, 072, arXiv:1910.03008

work page arXiv 1910
[37]

K¨ alin and R

G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, JHEP02, 120, arXiv:1911.09130

work page arXiv 1911
[38]

G. Cho, G. K¨ alin, and R. A. Porto, JHEP04, 154, [Erra- tum: JHEP 07, 002 (2022)], arXiv:2112.03976 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[39]

Damour, Phys

T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D102, 024060 (2020), arXiv:1912.02139 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[40]

K¨ alin and R

G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, JHEP11, 106, arXiv:2006.01184 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2006
[41]

Conservative dynamics of binary systems to third post-Minkowskian order from the effective field theory approach,

G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 261103 (2020), arXiv:2007.04977 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[42]

K¨ alin, Z

G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. D102, 124025 (2020), arXiv:2008.06047 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[43]

Z. Liu, R. A. Porto, and Z. Yang, JHEP06, 012, arXiv:2102.10059 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[44]

G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, JHEP01, 027, arXiv:2109.04465 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[45]

Mougiakakos, M

S. Mougiakakos, M. M. Riva, and F. Vernizzi, Phys. Rev. D104, 024041 (2021), arXiv:2102.08339 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[46]

Di Vecchia, C

P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, JHEP07, 169, arXiv:2104.03256 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[47]

K¨ alin, J

G. K¨ alin, J. Neef, and R. A. Porto, JHEP01, 140, arXiv:2207.00580 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[48]

G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and B. Sauer, JHEP10, 128, arXiv:2207.00569 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[49]

Dlapa, G

C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Lett. B831, 137203 (2022), 2106.08276 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[50]

Dlapa, G

C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 161104 (2022), arXiv:2112.11296 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[51]

Dlapa, G

C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, J. Neef, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 101401 (2023), arXiv:2210.05541 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[52]

Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 171601 (2021), arXiv:2101.07254 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[53]

Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 161103 (2022), arXiv:2112.10750 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[54]

D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Phys. Rev. D107, 024012 (2023), arXiv:2210.07165 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[55]

P. H. Damgaard, E. R. Hansen, L. Plant´ e, and P. Van- hove, JHEP09, 183, arXiv:2307.04746 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[56]

Dlapa, G

C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, JHEP08, 109, arXiv:2304.01275 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[57]

Klemm, C

A. Klemm, C. Nega, B. Sauer, and J. Plefka, Phys. Rev. D109, 124046 (2024), arXiv:2401.07899 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[58]

Frellesvig, R

H. Frellesvig, R. Morales, and M. Wilhelm, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 201602 (2024), arXiv:2312.11371 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[59]

Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng, JHEP06, 115, arXiv:2408.06686 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[60]

Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Zeng, JHEP10, 023, arXiv:2406.01554 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[61]

Buonanno, G

A. Buonanno, G. U. Jakobsen, and G. Mogull, Phys. Rev. D110, 044038 (2024), arXiv:2402.12342 [gr-qc]. 11

work page arXiv 2024
[62]

Dlapa, G

C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 221401 (2024), arXiv:2403.04853 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[63]

Dlapa, G

C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 251401 (2025), arXiv:2506.20665 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[64]

Cheung, J

C. Cheung, J. Parra-Martinez, I. Z. Rothstein, N. Shah, and J. Wilson-Gerow, JHEP10, 005, arXiv:2406.14770 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[65]

Bini and T

D. Bini and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D110, 064005 (2024), arXiv:2406.04878 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[66]

Driesse, G

M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 241402 (2024), arXiv:2403.07781 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[67]

Driesse, G

M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, A. Klemm, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, Nature 641, 603 (2025), arXiv:2411.11846 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[68]

Heissenberg,Radiation-reaction and angular momentum loss at O(G4),Phys

C. Heissenberg, Phys. Rev. D111, 126012 (2025), arXiv:2501.02904 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[69]

Heissenberg and R

C. Heissenberg and R. Russo, (2025), arXiv:2511.13835 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[70]

Bini and T

D. Bini and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D112, 044002 (2025), arXiv:2504.20204 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[71]

Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, S. Smith, and M. Zeng, (2025), arXiv:2512.23654 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[72]

Blanchet, G

L. Blanchet, G. Faye, E. Seraille, and D. Trestini, (2026), arXiv:2601.06743 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[73]

Driesse, G

M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Ple- fka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, (2026), arXiv:2601.16256 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2026
[74]

W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev.D73, 104029 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0409156

work page Pith review arXiv 2006
[75]

R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. D73, 104031 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0511061

work page arXiv 2006
[76]

Goldberger and I

W. Goldberger and I. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. D73, 104030 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0511133

work page arXiv 2006
[77]

R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. D77, 064026 (2008), arXiv:0710.5150

work page arXiv 2008
[78]

R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys.Rev.D78, 044012 (2008), arXiv:0802.0720

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[79]

R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys.Rev.D78, 044013 (2008), arXiv:0804.0260

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[80]

I. Z. Rothstein, Gen. Rel. Grav.46, 1726 (2014)

2014

Showing first 80 references.