pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27007 · v1 · pith:376GQHPEnew · submitted 2026-05-26 · 🧮 math.CO · math.RT

Locally anti-blocking g-polytopes for flow polytopes

Jonah Berggren , Benjamin Braun , Alvaro Cornejo , James Ford McElroy , Chloe' Napier , Zachery Peterson , Williem Rizer , Khrystyna Serhiyenko
show 1 more author
Martha Yip
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 17:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.CO math.RT
keywords flow polytopesg-polytopesDAGstriangulationspulling triangulationscoherence diagramsGorenstein polytopesanti-blocking polytopes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Amply framed DAGs with locally anti-blocking g-polytopes have DKK-induced triangulations that are pulling triangulations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a combinatorial characterization of amply framed directed acyclic graphs whose associated g-polytopes are locally anti-blocking. It shows that the unimodular triangulation of these g-polytopes induced from the DKK triangulation of the flow polytope is a pulling triangulation, and identifies the pulling orders that produce it. Coherence diagrams are introduced to model the combinatorial coherence required for these properties. These findings connect the projection from flow polytopes to reflexive g-polytopes with explicit control over their triangulations.

Core claim

Given an acyclic directed graph that admits an ample framing, the flow polytope is Gorenstein and projects linearly onto a reflexive g-polytope. When the g-polytope is locally anti-blocking, the DAGs receive a combinatorial characterization, the minimal faces containing any fixed pair of vertices are described, the induced unimodular triangulation is proven to be a pulling triangulation, and the pulling orders that recover the DKK triangulation are characterized. Coherence diagrams supply the combinatorial model that establishes these facts, with indications toward extensions for g-polytopes of gentle Nakayama algebras.

What carries the argument

coherence diagrams as a combinatorial model of coherence for amply framed DAGs with locally anti-blocking g-polytopes

If this is right

  • Amply framed DAGs that have locally anti-blocking g-polytopes receive a combinatorial characterization.
  • The minimal faces of the g-polytope containing a fixed pair of vertices are characterized.
  • The unimodular triangulation of the g-polytope induced by the DKK triangulation of the flow polytope is a pulling triangulation.
  • The pulling orders that yield the DKK triangulation are characterized.
  • The results point toward possible extensions to g-polytopes for gentle Nakayama algebras.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The characterizations may permit direct formulas for the Ehrhart series or h-vectors of these g-polytopes.
  • Coherence diagrams could be generalized to analyze projections and triangulations for other reflexive polytopes arising from algebraic structures.
  • The connection between flow polytopes and locally anti-blocking g-polytopes may clarify when such projections preserve unimodular triangulations.

Load-bearing premise

The DAG admits an ample framing so that the flow polytope linearly projects onto a reflexive g-polytope.

What would settle it

An explicit amply framed DAG whose g-polytope is locally anti-blocking but whose induced triangulation from the flow polytope fails to be a pulling triangulation would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.27007 by Alvaro Cornejo, Benjamin Braun, Chloe' Napier, James Ford McElroy, Jonah Berggren, Khrystyna Serhiyenko, Martha Yip, Williem Rizer, Zachery Peterson.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The edge labeling of Path(3, 4, 2) induced from an ample framing, as discussed in Example 2.30. Example 2.30 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The framed DAG discussed in Example 2.38, including a collection of dashed edges {eR1 , eR2 , eR3 } that give a transversal of the exceptional routes. Proposition 2.37. A set of routes S lie on a common facet of the g-polytope of an amply framed DAG (G, F) if and only if for every exceptional route R in (G, F), there is an edge eR in R such that eR is not in any of the routes in S. In other words, there ex… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The DAG from Example 3.4. The source-adjacent and sink￾adjacent edge labeling of G is shown in red. way to define these routes in the locally anti-blocking case which follows from results in the next subsection; in particular, an exceptional route is short if it has exactly two edges, and it is long otherwise. We next describe two conventions for drawing and labeling Path(k) and Cycle(k). We call the first… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The figure on the left shows the inner graph of Path(3, 4, 2) with a horizontal layout, and the figure on the right shows the inner graph of Cycle(3, 4, 2, 3) with a horizontal layout. Both figures show our standard convention for the framing edge labels, which (as we will see) are a locally anti-blocking framing. DAGs as for path DAGs. One may visualize Cycle(k) as if it were embedded on a cylinder so tha… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The figure on the left shows the inner graph of Path(3, 4, 2) with a circular layout, and the figure on the right shows the inner graph of Cycle(3, 4, 2, 3) with a circular layout. Vertex names are circled to distinguish them from the framing labels. Both figures show our standard convention for the framing edge labels, which (as we will see) are a locally anti-blocking fram￾ing. route in G has constant ed… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The route from the source to vertices 7 then 6 then to the sink is denoted by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The cycle Cycle(3, 2) with a lab framing. allows us to differentiate between the routes in Cycle(k1, k2) that have the same source and sink edges. For instance, in Cycle(k1, k2), the pair (1+, k− 1 ) refers to the route lying on a 2-leg with these source and sink edges while (k − 1 , 1 +) refers to the route lying on a 1-leg with the same source and sink edges. Example 4.10. Consider the framed DAG given b… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The coherence diagram corresponding to Path(3, 4, 2). Boxes with a dot inside indicate exceptional routes. Example 4.14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The coherence diagrams corresponding to Cycle(3, 4, 2, 3). Boxes with a dot inside indicate exceptional routes. 2 3 4 − 4 + 5 1 − 1 + 2 3 5 1 − 1 + [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The coherence diagram corresponding to Cycle(3, 2). Boxes with a dot inside indicate exceptional routes. Boxes containing a diamond indicate anomalous routes. collection of coherent boxes in the coherence diagram of Path(k) is a grid representation of a binary tree, see [25]. Remark 4.18. The work [10] associates to an amply framed DAG (G, F) a gentle algebra Λ(G, F) whose τ -tilting theory describes the D… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: On the left is the caracol graph whose inner subgraph is Path(6). On the right is the coherence diagram for this caracol graph. See Example 4.27 for an explanation of the color-coded boxes in the coherence diagram. Lemma 4.26 (The Coherence Lemma). Let R and S be routes in a locally anti-blocking framed DAG G with g-polytope P. (i) If both R and S are anomalous: (a) S ∈ NW(R) ∪ SE(R) if and only if R and … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Diagrams representing pulling orders for Path(2) and Path(4). Bullets represent routes that have been pulled. A box is shaded blue or green if the route can be pulled, where it is shaded green if it is a redundant DKK pull step. of g-polytope considered in this work. We expect that the main results of this paper can be generalized to the setting of representation-finite gentle algebras. In particular, we … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Given an acyclic directed graph (DAG), the space of strength one flows is a lattice polytope called the flow polytope of the DAG. If the DAG admits an ample framing, then the flow polytope is Gorenstein and it linearly projects onto a reflexive polytope called the $\mathbf{g}$-polytope. We provide a combinatorial characterization of amply framed DAGs that have a locally anti-blocking $\mathbf{g}$-polytope, and we characterize the minimal faces of the $\mathbf{g}$-polytope containing a fixed pair of vertices. We prove in this case that the unimodular triangulation of the $\mathbf{g}$-polytope induced by the DKK triangulation of the flow polytope is a pulling triangulation, and we characterize the pulling orders that yield the DKK triangulation. To prove our results, we introduce and study coherence diagrams, a combinatorial model of coherence for amply framed DAGs with locally anti-blocking $\mathbf{g}$-polytopes. We conclude by indicating possible extensions of these results to the setting of $\mathbf{g}$-polytopes for gentle Nakayama algebras.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies flow polytopes of acyclic directed graphs (DAGs). When the DAG admits an ample framing, the flow polytope is Gorenstein and linearly projects onto a reflexive g-polytope. The central claims are: (i) a combinatorial characterization of amply framed DAGs whose g-polytopes are locally anti-blocking; (ii) a characterization of the minimal faces of the g-polytope containing any fixed pair of vertices; (iii) a proof that the unimodular triangulation of the g-polytope induced by the DKK triangulation of the flow polytope is a pulling triangulation, together with an explicit characterization of the pulling orders that recover the DKK triangulation. The proofs rely on a new combinatorial model called coherence diagrams. The paper concludes with remarks on possible extensions to g-polytopes arising from gentle Nakayama algebras.

Significance. If the characterizations and the pulling-triangulation statement hold, the work supplies concrete combinatorial tools (coherence diagrams and explicit pulling orders) for studying reflexive g-polytopes that arise as projections of flow polytopes. These tools connect polyhedral combinatorics with the theory of DKK triangulations and may facilitate further links to the representation theory of gentle algebras. The explicit, checkable nature of the characterizations is a strength.

minor comments (3)
  1. [§1] §1 (Introduction): the definition of an 'ample framing' is referenced to prior work but the precise numerical conditions used in the present paper (e.g., the inequalities that guarantee the projection is reflexive) are not restated; a short self-contained paragraph would improve readability.
  2. [§3] The notation for coherence diagrams (introduced in §3) is compact; adding a small table that lists the allowed local configurations and their corresponding flow values would make the subsequent proofs easier to follow.
  3. [Theorem 5.3] Theorem 5.3 (pulling orders): the statement lists four families of orders; it would be helpful to include a one-sentence remark on whether these families are exhaustive or whether additional orders exist outside the DKK case.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work on locally anti-blocking g-polytopes arising from amply framed DAG flow polytopes, including the combinatorial tools via coherence diagrams and the links to DKK triangulations and gentle Nakayama algebras. The report recommends minor revision but lists no specific major comments under that heading. Accordingly, we have no individual points to address point-by-point at this stage.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper's derivation begins from the standard setup that an ample framing makes the flow polytope Gorenstein with a linear projection to a reflexive g-polytope; all subsequent claims are combinatorial characterizations of amply framed DAGs admitting locally anti-blocking g-polytopes, minimal faces, and the induced DKK triangulation being a pulling triangulation. These rest on the newly introduced coherence diagrams as an independent combinatorial model rather than on any self-definitional reduction, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The central results are proved directly from the coherence diagrams and do not reduce by the paper's own equations to their inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted. The setup relies on standard background notions in polytope theory (flow polytopes, Gorenstein property, reflexive polytopes, DKK triangulation) whose independence from the present claims cannot be assessed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5754 in / 1148 out tokens · 29685 ms · 2026-06-29T17:08:32.483212+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Order polytopes of generalized snake posets are $h^*$-real-rooted

    math.CO 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proves the conjecture that Ehrhart h*-polynomials of order polytopes of generalized snake posets are real-rooted by connecting them to non-nesting rook polynomials.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Morales, GaYee Park, and Hugh Thomas

    Antoine Abram, Jose Bastidas, Benjamin Dequˆ ene, Alejandro H. Morales, GaYee Park, and Hugh Thomas. Flows on graphs with cycles, locally gentle algebras, and the mutoperhedron, 2026. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08150

    work page arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Math., 150(3):415–452, 2014

    Takahide Adachi, Osamu Iyama, and Idun Reiten.τ-tilting theory.Compos. Math., 150(3):415–452, 2014

    2014

  3. [3]

    Fans and poly- topes in tilting theory I: Foundations

    Toshitaka Aoki, Akihiro Higashitani, Osamu Iyama, Ryoichi Kase, and Yuya Mizuno. Fans and poly- topes in tilting theory I: Foundations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.15213

    work page arXiv

  4. [4]

    Geometric inequalities for anti-blocking bodies.Commun

    Shiri Artstein-Avidan, Shay Sadovsky, and Raman Sanyal. Geometric inequalities for anti-blocking bodies.Commun. Contemp. Math., 25(3):Paper No. 2150113, 30, 2023

    2023

  5. [5]

    Ehrhart polynomials, simplicial polytopes, magic squares and a conjecture of Stanley.Journal fur die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 2005, 01 2004

    Christos Athanasiadis. Ehrhart polynomials, simplicial polytopes, magic squares and a conjecture of Stanley.Journal fur die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 2005, 01 2004. 34 BERGGREN, BRAUN, CORNEJO, MCELROY, NAPIER, PETERSON, RIZER, SERHIYENKO, AND YIP

    2005

  6. [6]

    Kostant partitions functions and flow polytopes.Transform

    Welleda Baldoni and Mich‘ele Vergne. Kostant partitions functions and flow polytopes.Transform. Groups, 13(3-4):447–469, 2008

    2008

  7. [7]

    Victor V. Batyrev. Dual polyhedra and mirror symmetry for Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces in toric varieties. J. Algebraic Geom., 3(3):493–535, 1994

    1994

  8. [8]

    McAllister

    Matthias Beck, Pallavi Jayawant, and Tyrrell B. McAllister. Lattice-point generating functions for free sums of convex sets.J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, 120(6):1246–1262, 2013

    2013

  9. [9]

    Undergraduate Texts in Math- ematics

    Matthias Beck and Sinai Robins.Computing the Continuous Discretely. Undergraduate Texts in Math- ematics. Springer, second edition, 2007

    2007

  10. [10]

    Triangulations of flow polytopes, ample framings, and gentle algebras.Selecta Math

    Matias von Bell, Benjamin Braun, Kaitlin Bruegge, Derek Hanely, Zachery Peterson, Khrystyna Ser- hiyenko, and Martha Yip. Triangulations of flow polytopes, ample framings, and gentle algebras.Selecta Math. (N.S.), 30(3):Paper No. 55, 34, 2024

    2024

  11. [11]

    Vindas-Mel´ endez, and Martha Yip

    Matias von Bell, Benjamin Braun, Derek Hanely, Khrystyna Serhiyenko, Julianne Vega, Andr´ es R. Vindas-Mel´ endez, and Martha Yip. Triangulations, order polytopes, and generalized snake posets.S´ em. Lothar. Combin., 86B:Art. 5, 12, 2022

    2022

  12. [12]

    Framing Lattices and Flow Polytopes

    Matias von Bell and Cesar Ceballos. Framing lattices and flow polytopes, 2026. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.20575

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    Gonz´ alez D’Le´ on, Francisco A

    Matias von Bell, Rafael S. Gonz´ alez D’Le´ on, Francisco A. Mayorga Cetina, and Martha Yip. A unifying framework for theν-Tamari lattice and principal order ideals in Young’s lattice.Combinatorica, pages 1–26, 2023

    2023

  14. [14]

    Gonz´ alez D’Le´ on, Christopher R

    Carolina Benedetti, Rafael S. Gonz´ alez D’Le´ on, Christopher R. H. Hanusa, Pamela E. Harris, Apoorva Khare, Alejandro H. Morales, and Martha Yip. A combinatorial model for computing volumes of flow polytopes.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 372(5):3369–3404, 2019

    2019

  15. [15]

    Flows on gentle algebras, 2025

    Jonah Berggren. Flows on gentle algebras, 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12688

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Framing Triangulations and Framing Posets of Planar DAGs with Nontrivial Netflow Vectors

    Jonah Berggren. Framing triangulations and framing posets of planar DAGs with nontrivial netflow vectors, 2026. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12684

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    Framing Triangulations for Arbitrary Integer Flow Polytopes

    Jonah Berggren. Framing triangulations for arbitrary integer flow polytopes, 2026. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24328

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    On the common generalization of gentle algebras and framed directed acyclic graphs,

    Jonah Berggren. On the common generalization of gentle algebras and framed directed acyclic graphs,

  19. [19]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24327

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Wilting theory of flow polytopes.S´ em

    Jonah Berggren and Khrystyna Serhiyenko. Wilting theory of flow polytopes.S´ em. Lothar. Combin., 91B:Art. 21, 12, 2024

    2024

  21. [21]

    Flow polytopes for extensions of bipartite graphs, 2025

    Benjamin Braun, Kaitlin Bruegge, Robert Davis, and Derek Hanely. Flow polytopes for extensions of bipartite graphs, 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26445

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Equatorial flow triangulations of Gorenstein flow polytopes.Elec- tron

    Benjamin Braun and Alvaro Cornejo. Equatorial flow triangulations of Gorenstein flow polytopes.Elec- tron. J. Combin., 32(4):Paper No. 4.22, 34, 2025

    2025

  23. [23]

    Detecting the integer decomposition property and Ehrhart unimodality in reflexive simplices.Adv

    Benjamin Braun, Robert Davis, and Liam Solus. Detecting the integer decomposition property and Ehrhart unimodality in reflexive simplices.Adv. in Appl. Math., 100:122–142, 2018

    2018

  24. [24]

    Volume inequalities for flow polytopes of full directed acyclic graphs.Comb

    Benjamin Braun and James Ford McElroy. Volume inequalities for flow polytopes of full directed acyclic graphs.Comb. Theory, 5(2):Paper No. 14, 39, 2025

    2025

  25. [25]

    h-vectors of Gorenstein polytopes.J

    Winfried Bruns and Tim R¨ omer. h-vectors of Gorenstein polytopes.J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A, 114:65–76, 2007

    2007

  26. [26]

    Geometry of Tamari lattices in typesAandB

    Cesar Ceballos, Arnau Padrol, and Camilo Sarmiento. Geometry of Tamari lattices in typesAandB. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 371(4):2575–2622, 2019

    2019

  27. [27]

    Chan, David P

    Clara S. Chan, David P. Robbins, and David S. Yuen. On the volume of a certain polytope.Experiment. Math., 9(1):91–99, 2000

    2000

  28. [28]

    Fr´ ed´ eric Chapoton and Driss Essouabri.q-Ehrhart polynomials of Gorenstein polytopes, Bernoulli um- bra and related Dirichlet series.Mosc. J. Comb. Number Theory, 5(4):13–38, 2015

    2015

  29. [29]

    David A. Cox. Mirror symmetry and polar duality of polytopes.Symmetry, 7(3):1633–1645, 2015

    2015

  30. [30]

    Danilov, Alexander V

    Vladimir I. Danilov, Alexander V. Karzanov, and Gleb A. Koshevoy. Coherent fans in the space of flows in framed graphs. In24th International Conference on Formal Power Series and Algebraic Combina- torics (FPSAC 2012), Discrete Math. Theor. Comput. Sci. Proc., AR, pages 481–490. Assoc. Discrete Math. Theor. Comput. Sci., Nancy, 2012

    2012

  31. [31]

    On the equations and classification of toric quiver varieties.Proc

    M´ aty´ as Domokos and D´ aniel Jo´ o. On the equations and classification of toric quiver varieties.Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 146(2):265–295, 2016. LOCALLY ANTI-BLOCKINGg-POLYTOPES FOR FLOW POLYTOPES 35

    2016

  32. [32]

    Dugan, Maura Hegarty, Alejandro H

    William T. Dugan, Maura Hegarty, Alejandro H. Morales, and Annie Raymond. Generalized Pitman- Stanley polytope: vertices and faces.Discrete Comput. Geom., 74(2):492–543, 2025

    2025

  33. [33]

    Dugan, Maura Hegarty, Alejandro H

    William T. Dugan, Maura Hegarty, Alejandro H. Morales, and Annie Raymond. Volume and lattice points of generalized Pitman-Stanley flow polytopes.S´ em. Lothar. Combin., 93B:Art. 94, 12, 2025

    2025

  34. [34]

    D. R. Fulkerson. Blocking and anti-blocking pairs of polyhedra.Math. Programming, 1:168–194, 1971

    1971

  35. [35]

    D. R. Fulkerson. Anti-blocking polyhedra.J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. B, 12:50–71, 1972

    1972

  36. [36]

    Gonz´ alez D’Le´ on, Christopher R

    Rafael S. Gonz´ alez D’Le´ on, Christopher R. H. Hanusa, Alejandro H. Morales, and Martha Yip. Column- convex matrices,G-cyclic orders, and flow polytopes.Discrete Comput. Geom., 70(4):1593–1631, 2023

    2023

  37. [37]

    Gonz´ alez D’Le´ on, Alejandro H

    Rafael S. Gonz´ alez D’Le´ on, Alejandro H. Morales, Eva Philippe, Daniel Tamayo Jim´ enez, and Martha Yip. Realizing the s-permutahedron via flow polytopes.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 378(11):7625–7666, 2025

    2025

  38. [38]

    [DHY25] Rafael S

    Rafael S. Gonz´ alez D’Le´ on, Christopher R. H. Hanusa, and Martha Yip. Permutation flows I: Triangu- lations of flow polytopes (research announcement). http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04078

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    Piechnik, and Francisco Santos

    Christian Haase, Andreas Paffenholz, Lindsay C. Piechnik, and Francisco Santos. Existence of unimod- ular triangulations—positive results.Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 270(1321):v+83, 2021

    2021

  40. [40]

    Martin Henk, J¨ urgen Richter-Gebert, and G¨ unter M. Ziegler. Basic properties of convex polytopes. In Handbook of discrete and computational geometry, CRC Press Ser. Discrete Math. Appl., pages 243–270. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1997

    1997

  41. [41]

    Roots of Ehrhart polynomials of Gorenstein Fano polytopes.Proc

    Takayuki Hibi, Akihiro Higashitani, and Hidefumi Ohsugi. Roots of Ehrhart polynomials of Gorenstein Fano polytopes.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 139(10):3727–3734, 2011

    2011

  42. [42]

    Gorenstein graphic matroids.Israel J

    Takayuki Hibi, Micha l Laso´ n, Kazunori Matsuda, Mateusz Micha lek, and Martin Vodiˇ cka. Gorenstein graphic matroids.Israel J. Math., 243(1):1–26, 2021

    2021

  43. [43]

    Gorenstein properties and integer decomposition properties of lecture hall polytopes.Mosc

    Takayuki Hibi, McCabe Olsen, and Akiyoshi Tsuchiya. Gorenstein properties and integer decomposition properties of lecture hall polytopes.Mosc. Math. J., 18(4):667–679, 2018

    2018

  44. [44]

    Facets and volume of Gorenstein Fano polytopes.Math

    Takayuki Hibi and Akiyoshi Tsuchiya. Facets and volume of Gorenstein Fano polytopes.Math. Nachr., 290(16):2619–2628, 2017

    2017

  45. [45]

    The depth of a reflexive polytope.Arch

    Takayuki Hibi and Akiyoshi Tsuchiya. The depth of a reflexive polytope.Arch. Math. (Basel), 113(3):265–272, 2019

    2019

  46. [46]

    Reflexive polytopes arising from partially ordered sets and perfect graphs.J

    Takayuki Hibi and Akiyoshi Tsuchiya. Reflexive polytopes arising from partially ordered sets and perfect graphs.J. Algebraic Combin., 49(1):69–81, 2019

    2019

  47. [47]

    Gorenstein polytopes with trinomialh ∗- polynomials.Beitr

    Akihiro Higashitani, Benjamin Nill, and Akiyoshi Tsuchiya. Gorenstein polytopes with trinomialh ∗- polynomials.Beitr. Algebra Geom., 62(3):667–685, 2021

    2021

  48. [48]

    Quivers, cones and polytopes.Linear Algebra and its Applications, 365:215–237, 2003

    Lutz Hille. Quivers, cones and polytopes.Linear Algebra and its Applications, 365:215–237, 2003. Special Issue on Linear Algebra Methods in Representation Theory

    2003

  49. [49]

    Counting integer points of flow polytopes.Dis- crete Comput

    Kabir Kapoor, Karola M´ esz´ aros, and Linus Setiabrata. Counting integer points of flow polytopes.Dis- crete Comput. Geom., 66(2):723–736, 2021

    2021

  50. [50]

    Unconditional reflexive polytopes.Discrete Comput

    Florian Kohl, McCabe Olsen, and Raman Sanyal. Unconditional reflexive polytopes.Discrete Comput. Geom., 64(2):427–452, 2020

    2020

  51. [51]

    Gorenstein matroids.Int

    Micha l Laso´ n and Mateusz Micha l ek. Gorenstein matroids.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (18):15687– 15728, 2023

    2023

  52. [52]

    Carl W. Lee. Subdivisions and triangulations of polytopes. InHandbook of discrete and computational geometry, CRC Press Ser. Discrete Math. Appl., pages 271–290. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1997

    1997

  53. [53]

    B. V. Lidski˘i. The Kostant function of the system of rootsA n.Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen., 18(1):76– 77, 1984

    1984

  54. [54]

    Liu, Karola M´ esz´ aros, and Avery St

    Ricky I. Liu, Karola M´ esz´ aros, and Avery St. Dizier. Gelfand-Tsetlin polytopes: a story of flow and order polytopes.SIAM J. Discrete Math., 33(4):2394–2415, 2019

    2019

  55. [55]

    Morales, and Karola M´ esz´ aros

    Ricky Ini Liu, Alejandro H. Morales, and Karola M´ esz´ aros. Flow polytopes and the space of diagonal harmonics.Canad. J. Math., 71(6):1495–1521, 2019

    2019

  56. [56]

    On smooth Gorenstein polytopes.Tohoku Math

    Benjamin Lorenz and Benjamin Nill. On smooth Gorenstein polytopes.Tohoku Math. J. (2), 67(4):513– 530, 2015

    2015

  57. [57]

    McMullen

    P. McMullen. Constructions for projectively unique polytopes.Discrete Math., 14(4):347–358, 1976

    1976

  58. [58]

    Karola M´ esz´ aros and Alejandro H. Morales. Volumes and Ehrhart polynomials of flow polytopes.Math. Z., 293(3-4):1369–1401, 2019. 36 BERGGREN, BRAUN, CORNEJO, MCELROY, NAPIER, PETERSON, RIZER, SERHIYENKO, AND YIP

    2019

  59. [59]

    Morales, and Jessica Striker

    Karola M´ esz´ aros, Alejandro H. Morales, and Jessica Striker. On flow polytopes, order polytopes, and certain faces of the alternating sign matrix polytope.Discrete Comput. Geom., 62(1):128–163, 2019

    2019

  60. [60]

    Morales and William Shi

    Alejandro H. Morales and William Shi. Refinements and symmetries of the Morris identity for volumes of flow polytopes.C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 359:823–851, 2021

    2021

  61. [61]

    Volume and lattice points of reflexive simplices.Discrete Comput

    Benjamin Nill. Volume and lattice points of reflexive simplices.Discrete Comput. Geom., 37(2):301–320, 2007

    2007

  62. [62]

    Gorenstein polytopes and their stringyE-functions.Math

    Benjamin Nill and Jan Schepers. Gorenstein polytopes and their stringyE-functions.Math. Ann., 355(2):457–480, 2013

    2013

  63. [63]

    Gorenstein cut polytopes.European J

    Hidefumi Ohsugi. Gorenstein cut polytopes.European J. Combin., 38:122–129, 2014

    2014

  64. [64]

    Convex polytopes all of whose reverse lexicographic initial ideals are squarefree.Proc

    Hidefumi Ohsugi and Takayuki Hibi. Convex polytopes all of whose reverse lexicographic initial ideals are squarefree.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 129(9):2541–2546, 2001

    2001

  65. [65]

    Special simplices and Gorenstein toric rings.J

    Hidefumi Ohsugi and Takayuki Hibi. Special simplices and Gorenstein toric rings.J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, 113(4):718–725, 2006

    2006

  66. [66]

    Theh ∗-polynomials of locally anti-blocking lattice polytopes and theirγ-positivity.Discrete Comput

    Hidefumi Ohsugi and Akiyoshi Tsuchiya. Theh ∗-polynomials of locally anti-blocking lattice polytopes and theirγ-positivity.Discrete Comput. Geom., 66(2):701–722, 2021

    2021

  67. [67]

    M. A. Perles and G. C. Shephard. Facets and nonfacets of convex polytopes.Acta Math., 119:113–145, 1967

    1967

  68. [68]

    Kyle Petersen, Pavlo Pylyavskyy, and David E

    T. Kyle Petersen, Pavlo Pylyavskyy, and David E. Speyer. A non-crossing standard monomial theory. J. Algebra, 324(5):951–969, 2010

    2010

  69. [69]

    Harmonics and graded Ehrhart theory, 2024

    Victor Reiner and Brendon Rhoades. Harmonics and graded Ehrhart theory, 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06511

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Root, flow and order polytopes with connections to toric geometry.Forum Math

    Konstanze Rietsch and Lauren Kiyomi Williams. Root, flow and order polytopes with connections to toric geometry.Forum Math. Sigma, 13:Paper No. e194, 35, 2025

    2025

  71. [71]

    Richard P. Stanley. Hilbert functions of graded algebras.Advances in Math., 28(1):57–83, 1978

    1978

  72. [72]

    Stanley and Jim Pitman

    Richard P. Stanley and Jim Pitman. A polytope related to empirical distributions, plane trees, parking functions, and the associahedron.Discrete Comput. Geom., 27(4):603–634, 2002

    2002

  73. [73]

    Compressed polytopes and statistical disclosure limitation.Tohoku Math

    Seth Sullivant. Compressed polytopes and statistical disclosure limitation.Tohoku Math. J. (2), 58(3):433–445, 2006

    2006

  74. [74]

    Gorenstein simplices and the associated finite abelian groups.European J

    Akiyoshi Tsuchiya. Gorenstein simplices and the associated finite abelian groups.European J. Combin., 67:145–157, 2018

    2018

  75. [75]

    Classification and counting of Gorenstein simplices with $h^*$-polynomial $1+t^k+\cdots+t^{(v-1)k}$

    Akiyoshi Tsuchiya. Classification and counting of Gorenstein simplices withh ∗-polynomial 1+t k +· · ·+ t(v−1)k, 2026. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11820

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  76. [76]

    Gorenstein Simplices and Even Binary Self-Complementary Codes

    Akiyoshi Tsuchiya. Gorenstein simplices and even binary self-complementary codes, 2026. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15005. LOCALLY ANTI-BLOCKINGg-POLYTOPES FOR FLOW POLYTOPES 37 Department of Mathematics, University of Kentucky Email address:jrberggren@uky.edu URL:https://sites.google.com/view/jonahberggrenmath/ Department of Mathematics, University of Ken...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026