pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.03811 · v1 · pith:YTJGNX6Vnew · submitted 2026-06-02 · 💻 cs.CR · cs.AI· cs.LG

AI Agents Enable Adaptive Computer Worms

classification 💻 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG
keywords wormnetworkvulnerabilitiesagentsattackcomputerenablemachines
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

A computer worm is malware that spreads on a network by replicating itself from one machine to another. Traditional worms, like WannaCry, exploited predetermined vulnerabilities, and their spread can be halted by patching those vulnerabilities. Here we show that artificial intelligence (AI) agents enable a fundamentally new threat: a worm that generates tailored attack strategies to each target it encounters. The worm parasitically uses compromised machines to run open-weight large language models (LLMs) to sustain its reasoning, or extend its reach for further attacks. Deployed on a network of machines spanning Linux, Windows, and IoT (Internet of Things) devices, the worm propagated by exploiting common, real-world corporate network vulnerabilities. Since the worm is powered by stolen compute, the attacker's marginal cost per new infection is zero. This creates a destabilizing economic asymmetry between attackers and defenders. Moreover, because the worm requires no commercial AI platform, centralized safety controls, such as service refusals or rate limiting, are structurally irrelevant. Our results demonstrate that self-sustaining AI-driven cyber-threats are no longer theoretical. We must prepare for autonomous generative adversaries: malware systems that propagate without human operators and are defined not by fixed exploit code, but by the capacity to reason about targets, adapt to observations, and synthesize attack logic in real time.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Honeyquest for LLMs: Rethinking Cyber Deception for AI Attackers

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLMs fall for deceptive traps at higher rates than humans, lack the human attention-diversion effect, and exploit traps 73.4% of the time even after recognizing them in reasoning.