KANs with learnable univariate spline activations on edges achieve better accuracy than MLPs with fewer parameters, faster scaling, and direct visualization for scientific discovery.
hub Canonical reference
Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empirically
Canonical reference. 79% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.
91
Pith papers citing it
Background
79% of classified citations
abstract
Deep learning (DL) creates impactful advances following a virtuous recipe: model architecture search, creating large training data sets, and scaling computation. It is widely believed that growing training sets and models should improve accuracy and result in better products. As DL application domains grow, we would like a deeper understanding of the relationships between training set size, computational scale, and model accuracy improvements to advance the state-of-the-art. This paper presents a large scale empirical characterization of generalization error and model size growth as training sets grow. We introduce a methodology for this measurement and test four machine learning domains: machine translation, language modeling, image processing, and speech recognition. Our empirical results show power-law generalization error scaling across a breadth of factors, resulting in power-law exponents---the "steepness" of the learning curve---yet to be explained by theoretical work. Further, model improvements only shift the error but do not appear to affect the power-law exponent. We also show that model size scales sublinearly with data size. These scaling relationships have significant implications on deep learning research, practice, and systems. They can assist model debugging, setting accuracy targets, and decisions about data set growth. They can also guide computing system design and underscore the importance of continued computational scaling.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 13
method 1
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract Deep learning (DL) creates impactful advances following a virtuous recipe: model architecture search, creating large training data sets, and scaling computation. It is widely believed that growing training sets and models should improve accuracy and result in better products. As DL application domains grow, we would like a deeper understanding of the relationships between training set size, computational scale, and model accuracy improvements to advance the state-of-the-art. This paper presents a large scale empirical characterization of generalization error and model size growth as training
co-cited works
representative citing papers
GPT-3 shows that scaling an autoregressive language model to 175 billion parameters enables strong few-shot performance across diverse NLP tasks via in-context prompting without fine-tuning.
Token loss trajectories follow localized sigmoids whose learning-time spectrum quantitatively reconstructs scaling-law derivatives on T, D, and M axes and enables faster training via distribution reshaping.
A novel complexity minimization meta-learning framework provably demonstrates that few-shot adaptation error decreases as meta-training data volume increases.
IRSL applies IRT to reduce scaling law estimation from O(M×N) to O(M+N) parameters, enabling reliable estimates with only 50 questions per benchmark after calibration and generalizable ability scores across related benchmarks.
Vendi Score and scaling-law objectives belong to the class of matrix spectral functions, which are submodular, enabling efficient greedy selection of training data that outperforms random subsets in predicting held-out performance.
Derives mini-batch scaling laws for sketched linear regression, with shared approximation terms and protocol-specific variance/fluctuation scalings under power-law spectrum and source condition.
LOSCAR-SGD combines local updates, sparse model averaging, and communication-computation overlap with a delay-corrected merge rule, providing convergence rates for smooth non-convex objectives under worker heterogeneity.
Ringmaster LMO extends delay-thresholding from ASGD to LMO-based momentum updates, providing convergence guarantees under (L0, L1)-smoothness and time-complexity bounds that recover optimal rates in the Euclidean case.
PEIRA learns predictive encoders by optimizing the trace of the optimal inter-view linear regressor, with only nontrivial global minimizers as stable equilibria that recover leading nonlinear canonical correlation subspaces.
Olivia harmonizes time series datasets via normalized power spectral density using a Harmonizer module and resonator-based HarmonicAttention, achieving state-of-the-art zero-shot, few-shot, and full-shot forecasting on TSLib, GIFT-Eval, and GluonTS benchmarks.
QuBD extends algorithmic complexity estimation to quantized DNN weights, revealing that complexity decreases during learning, increases with overfitting, follows grokking patterns, and correlates with generalization.
In extensive-width networks, features are recovered sequentially through sharp phase transitions, yielding an effective width k_c that unifies Bayes-optimal generalization error scaling as Θ(k_c d / n).
Inkheart SGD and M4 use bidirectional compression to achieve time complexities in distributed SGD that improve with worker count n and surpass prior lower bounds under a necessary structural assumption.
DBG mitigates boundary overlap in long-tailed learning by generating near-boundary samples, leading to better tail class accuracy and more separable decision spaces.
A cross-population framework for EEG Parkinson's detection using exhaustive 75 directional evaluations and nested validation shows asymmetric transfer and accuracy up to 94.1% when training diversity increases, supported by mixture risk theory.
Contextual entrainment decreases for semantic contexts but increases for non-semantic ones as LLMs scale, following power-law trends with 4x better resistance to misinformation but 2x more copying of arbitrary tokens.
DeepSeek-V2 delivers top-tier open-source LLM performance using only 21B active parameters by compressing the KV cache 93.3% and cutting training costs 42.5% via MLA and DeepSeekMoE.
Autoregressive transformers follow power-law scaling laws for cross-entropy loss with nearly universal exponents relating optimal model size to compute budget across four domains.
T5 casts all NLP tasks as text-to-text generation, systematically explores pre-training choices, and reaches strong performance on summarization, QA, classification and other tasks via large-scale training on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpus.
Fixed-source synthesis is bounded; a derived scaling law predicts high-budget performance from low-budget fits, and source expansion outperforms fixed-source at large matched budgets.
The generalization advantage of SGD over random sampling diminishes with growing training set size in binary networks, as measured by joint density of states over train and test accuracy.
Scaling population size during training of emergent sketching agents increases zero-shot mutual intelligibility between independent groups by raising in-group variation and driving perceptual grounding.
MIR improves validation loss in repeated-data pretraining and SoftQ fits data-constrained scaling experiments better than additive laws, equating MIR gains to roughly 1.3 times more unique data.
citing papers explorer
No citing papers match the current filters.