pith. sign in

hub Mixed citations

Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPO

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (67%).

19 Pith papers citing it
Background 67% of classified citations
abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have formulated a blueprint for the advancement of artificial general intelligence. Its primary objective is to function as a human-centric (helpful, honest, and harmless) assistant. Alignment with humans assumes paramount significance, and reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) emerges as the pivotal technological paradigm underpinning this pursuit. Current technical routes usually include \textbf{reward models} to measure human preferences, \textbf{Proximal Policy Optimization} (PPO) to optimize policy model outputs, and \textbf{process supervision} to improve step-by-step reasoning capabilities. However, due to the challenges of reward design, environment interaction, and agent training, coupled with huge trial and error cost of large language models, there is a significant barrier for AI researchers to motivate the development of technical alignment and safe landing of LLMs. The stable training of RLHF has still been a puzzle. In the first report, we dissect the framework of RLHF, re-evaluate the inner workings of PPO, and explore how the parts comprising PPO algorithms impact policy agent training. We identify policy constraints being the key factor for the effective implementation of the PPO algorithm. Therefore, we explore the PPO-max, an advanced version of PPO algorithm, to efficiently improve the training stability of the policy model. Based on our main results, we perform a comprehensive analysis of RLHF abilities compared with SFT models and ChatGPT. The absence of open-source implementations has posed significant challenges to the investigation of LLMs alignment. Therefore, we are eager to release technical reports, reward models and PPO codes, aiming to make modest contributions to the advancement of LLMs.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 4 dataset 1 method 1

citation-polarity summary

clear filters

representative citing papers

Internalizing Curriculum Judgment for LLM Reinforcement Fine-Tuning

cs.LG · 2026-05-11 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

METIS internalizes curriculum judgment in LLM reinforcement fine-tuning by predicting within-prompt reward variance via in-context learning and jointly optimizing with a self-judgment reward, yielding superior performance and up to 67% faster convergence across math, code, and agent benchmarks.

Joint Optimization of Multi-agent Memory System

cs.MA · 2026-03-13 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

CoMAM jointly optimizes agents in multi-agent LLM memory systems via end-to-end RL and adaptive credit assignment to improve collaboration and performance.

InternLM2 Technical Report

cs.CL · 2024-03-26 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

InternLM2 is a new open-source LLM that outperforms prior versions on 30 benchmarks and long-context tasks through scaled pre-training to 32k tokens and a conditional online RLHF alignment strategy.

BalancedDPO: Adaptive Multi-Metric Alignment

cs.CV · 2025-03-16 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

BalancedDPO applies majority-vote consensus from multiple preference scorers and dynamic reference model updates within DPO to achieve multi-metric alignment for text-to-image diffusion models, reporting improved win rates on Pick-a-Pic, PartiPrompt, and HPD datasets across SD 1.5, 2.1, and SDXL.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper after filters.