An Evaluation Dataset for Intent Classification and Out-of-Scope Prediction
Reviewed by Pithpith:GBY3PDE4open to challenge →
read the original abstract
Task-oriented dialog systems need to know when a query falls outside their range of supported intents, but current text classification corpora only define label sets that cover every example. We introduce a new dataset that includes queries that are out-of-scope---i.e., queries that do not fall into any of the system's supported intents. This poses a new challenge because models cannot assume that every query at inference time belongs to a system-supported intent class. Our dataset also covers 150 intent classes over 10 domains, capturing the breadth that a production task-oriented agent must handle. We evaluate a range of benchmark classifiers on our dataset along with several different out-of-scope identification schemes. We find that while the classifiers perform well on in-scope intent classification, they struggle to identify out-of-scope queries. Our dataset and evaluation fill an important gap in the field, offering a way of more rigorously and realistically benchmarking text classification in task-driven dialog systems.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
SENTINEL: Failure-Driven Reinforcement Learning for Training Tool-Using Language Model Agents
SENTINEL generates targeted tasks from model failures in a Controller-Proposer-Solver loop, raising Pass^1 from 66.4 to 74.9 on Tau2-Bench Retail and outperforming standard RL.
-
Task-Adaptive Embedding Refinement via Test-time LLM Guidance
Test-time LLM feedback refines query embeddings to deliver up to 25% relative gains on zero-shot literature search, intent detection, and related benchmarks.
-
Whose Story Gets Told? Positionality and Bias in LLM Summaries of Life Narratives
A proposed pipeline shows LLMs introduce detectable race and gender biases when summarizing life narratives, creating potential for representational harm in research.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.