The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2311.11045 · v2 · pith:JXUTRQVT · submitted 2023-11-18 · cs.AI

Orca 2: Teaching Small Language Models How to Reason

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:JXUTRQVTrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.AI
keywords modelsorcasmallerdifferentlargermodelreasoningsmall
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Orca 1 learns from rich signals, such as explanation traces, allowing it to outperform conventional instruction-tuned models on benchmarks like BigBench Hard and AGIEval. In Orca 2, we continue exploring how improved training signals can enhance smaller LMs' reasoning abilities. Research on training small LMs has often relied on imitation learning to replicate the output of more capable models. We contend that excessive emphasis on imitation may restrict the potential of smaller models. We seek to teach small LMs to employ different solution strategies for different tasks, potentially different from the one used by the larger model. For example, while larger models might provide a direct answer to a complex task, smaller models may not have the same capacity. In Orca 2, we teach the model various reasoning techniques (step-by-step, recall then generate, recall-reason-generate, direct answer, etc.). More crucially, we aim to help the model learn to determine the most effective solution strategy for each task. We evaluate Orca 2 using a comprehensive set of 15 diverse benchmarks (corresponding to approximately 100 tasks and over 36,000 unique prompts). Orca 2 significantly surpasses models of similar size and attains performance levels similar or better to those of models 5-10x larger, as assessed on complex tasks that test advanced reasoning abilities in zero-shot settings. make Orca 2 weights publicly available at aka.ms/orca-lm to support research on the development, evaluation, and alignment of smaller LMs

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 13 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Structure Before Collapse: Transient semantic geometry in next-token prediction

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Semantic geometry emerges transiently early in next-token prediction training before collapsing to Neural Collapse symmetry in synthetic settings with latent semantic factors.

  2. Enhancing Multilingual Reasoning via Steerable Model Merging

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ST-Merge uses gated cross-attention to adaptively weight source models during merging, outperforming baselines on multilingual reasoning tasks across 21 languages.

  3. Contribution Weights: A Geometrical Analysis of Self-Attention Transformers

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Contribution Weights combine attention, value magnitude, and directional alignment to measure token influence more faithfully than attention alone, and show attention sinks actively suppress information via a convex s...

  4. LLM-Agnostic Semantic Representation Attack

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SRA achieves 99.71% average attack success across 26 LLMs by optimizing for coherent malicious semantics via the SRHS algorithm, with claimed theoretical guarantees on convergence and transfer.

  5. Predict-then-Diffuse: Adaptive Response Length for Compute-Budgeted Inference in Diffusion LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Predict-then-Diffuse predicts response lengths for diffusion LLMs via an auxiliary model and safety buffer to reduce FLOP waste while preserving output quality.

  6. DART: Mitigating Harm Drift in Difference-Aware LLMs via Distill-Audit-Repair Training

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DART raises difference-awareness accuracy from 39% to 68.8% on benchmarks while cutting harm-drift cases by 72.6% and improving real-world appropriate responses from 39.8% to 77.5%.

  7. CoSpaDi: Compressing LLMs via Calibration-Guided Sparse Dictionary Learning

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    CoSpaDi introduces a training-free sparse dictionary learning framework for post-training LLM compression that optimizes functional reconstruction error via activation-derived orthonormalization and achieves improved ...

  8. Mid-Training with Self-Generated Data Improves Reinforcement Learning in Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Mid-training LLMs on self-generated diverse reasoning paths improves subsequent RL performance on mathematical benchmarks and OOD tasks.

  9. Predict-then-Diffuse: Adaptive Response Length for Compute-Budgeted Inference in Diffusion LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Predict-then-Diffuse predicts response length for diffusion LLMs before inference, cutting FLOPs with a data-driven safety buffer while preserving output quality.

  10. Large Language Model Post-Training: A Unified View of Off-Policy and On-Policy Learning

    cs.CL 2026-04 accept novelty 5.0

    LLM post-training is unified as off-policy or on-policy interventions that expand support for useful behaviors, reshape policies within reachable states, or consolidate behavior across training stages.

  11. Phi-4-reasoning Technical Report

    cs.AI 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A 14B reasoning model trained via supervised fine-tuning on selected prompts and o3-mini traces, plus outcome RL, outperforms larger open models like DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B on math, coding, planning and related...

  12. Will LLMs Scaling Hit the Wall? Breaking Barriers via Distributed Resources on Massive Edge Devices

    cs.DC 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Position paper claiming that distributed training across massive edge devices can overcome data depletion and centralized compute monopolies in LLM scaling.

  13. Small Language Models (SLMs) Can Still Pack a Punch: A survey (updated 2026)

    cs.CL 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A literature survey of Small Language Models (1-8B parameters) that can perform comparably or better than larger models, covering general-purpose and task-specific approaches plus creation techniques.