The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2402.12326 · v2 · pith:H5DJALHE · submitted 2024-02-19 · cs.CL · cs.CY· cs.HC· cs.LG· cs.MA

PsychoGAT: A Novel Psychological Measurement Paradigm through Interactive Fiction Games with LLM Agents

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:H5DJALHErecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.CYcs.HCcs.LGcs.MA
keywords psychogatpsychologicalagentsassessmentcontentengagementevaluationsfiction
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Psychological measurement is essential for mental health, self-understanding, and personal development. Traditional methods, such as self-report scales and psychologist interviews, often face challenges with engagement and accessibility. While game-based and LLM-based tools have been explored to improve user interest and automate assessment, they struggle to balance engagement with generalizability. In this work, we propose PsychoGAT (Psychological Game AgenTs) to achieve a generic gamification of psychological assessment. The main insight is that powerful LLMs can function both as adept psychologists and innovative game designers. By incorporating LLM agents into designated roles and carefully managing their interactions, PsychoGAT can transform any standardized scales into personalized and engaging interactive fiction games. To validate the proposed method, we conduct psychometric evaluations to assess its effectiveness and employ human evaluators to examine the generated content across various psychological constructs, including depression, cognitive distortions, and personality traits. Results demonstrate that PsychoGAT serves as an effective assessment tool, achieving statistically significant excellence in psychometric metrics such as reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. Moreover, human evaluations confirm PsychoGAT's enhancements in content coherence, interactivity, interest, immersion, and satisfaction.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Agent Security Bench (ASB): Formalizing and Benchmarking Attacks and Defenses in LLM-based Agents

    cs.CR 2024-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ASB is a new benchmark that tests 10 prompt injection attacks, memory poisoning, a novel Plan-of-Thought backdoor attack, and 11 defenses on LLM agents across 13 models, finding attack success rates up to 84.3% and li...

  2. GuardAgent: Safeguard LLM Agents by a Guard Agent via Knowledge-Enabled Reasoning

    cs.LG 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GuardAgent safeguards LLM agents by generating task plans from safety requests and mapping them to executable guardrail code, achieving over 98% accuracy on a healthcare access-control benchmark and 83% on a web safet...

  3. BlossomPsy: A User-Centric AI System for Adaptive and Engaging MBTI Personality Assessments

    cs.HC 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    BlossomPsy combines multi-turn LLM dialogue, photo-based questions, a multi-head classifier, and a modified UCB bandit algorithm to deliver MBTI assessments with higher user engagement and preliminary consistency with...

  4. Inertia in Moral and Value Judgments of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    LLMs exhibit persistent inertia in value orientations, with harm avoidance and fairness remaining skewed across persona prompts.