pith. sign in

arxiv: 2409.13047 · v2 · submitted 2024-09-19 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.GA

The case for super-Eddington accretion in JWST broad-line AGN during the first billion years

Erini Lambrides , Rebecca Larson , Kristen Garofali , Andrew Ptak , Marco Chiaberge , Arianna S. Long , Taylor A. Hutchison , Colin Norman
show 18 more authors
Jed McKinney Hollis B. Akins Danielle A. Berg John Chisholm Francesca Civano Aidan P. Cloonan Ryan Endsley Andreas L. Faisst Roberto Gilli Steven Gillman Michaela Hirschmann Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe Dale D. Kocevski Vasily Kokorev Fabio Pacucci Chris T. Richardson Massimo Stiavelli Kelly E. Whalen
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 20:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA
keywords super-Eddington accretionJWST AGNearly universebroad-line AGNEddington limitSMBH growthhigh-redshift black holesBalmer decrement
0
0 comments X

The pith

JWST broad-line AGN in the first billion years accrete at or beyond the Eddington limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

JWST has uncovered more massive accreting black holes at early times than standard models predict, yet these sources show broadened H-alpha lines but no detectable X-rays or high-ionization lines. The paper argues that the black holes are growing through super-Eddington accretion, a regime that naturally suppresses X-ray and ultraviolet output while producing high Balmer decrements. This picture accounts for the observations without requiring heavy dust obscuration or an overabundance of massive seed black holes. If the interpretation holds, super-Eddington growth must have been widespread in the early universe, altering how we model the first phases of supermassive black hole assembly.

Core claim

A sample of JWST AGN selected by broadened H-alpha and lying in the deepest X-ray fields shows neither measurable X-ray emission nor high-ionization lines. The authors propose these objects are accreting at or above the Eddington limit. A theoretical model of super-Eddington accretion reproduces the observed lack of X-ray and ultraviolet emission together with elevated Balmer decrements, all without invoking substantial dust attenuation. The result implies that super-Eddington accretion occurs readily throughout the early universe.

What carries the argument

Theoretical model of super-Eddington accretion that suppresses X-ray and UV emission while generating high Balmer decrements.

If this is right

  • The requirement for efficient formation of heavy black-hole seeds at cosmic dawn is reduced.
  • Super-Eddington accretion can be achieved throughout the early universe.
  • High Balmer decrements and weak X-ray and UV output are direct predictions of the super-Eddington regime.
  • Environments that trigger super-Eddington growth must be identified to understand early black-hole evolution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Simulations of high-redshift galaxy formation may need to include frequent super-Eddington episodes to match observed black-hole masses.
  • Other JWST AGN populations lacking X-rays could be re-examined for signs of the same accretion mode.
  • Time-variable accretion rates might still allow faint X-ray detections in deeper future observations.

Load-bearing premise

The missing X-ray emission and high-ionization lines are produced by the super-Eddington accretion flow itself rather than by dust, low luminosity, or selection effects.

What would settle it

Clear detection of X-ray emission or high-ionization lines in a comparable sample of JWST broad-line AGN at similar redshifts would falsify the super-Eddington explanation.

read the original abstract

A multitude of JWST studies reveal a surprising over-abundance of over-massive accreting super-massive black holes (SMBHs) -- leading to a deepening tension between theory and observation in the first billion years of cosmic time. Across X-ray to infrared wavelengths, models built off of pre-JWST predictions fail to easily reproduce observed AGN signatures (or lack thereof), driving uncertainty around the true nature of these sources. Using a sample of JWST AGN identified via their broadened H$\alpha$ emission and covered by the deepest X-ray surveys, we find neither any measurable X-ray emission nor any detection of high-ionization emission lines frequently associated with accreting SMBHs. We propose that these sources are accreting at or beyond the Eddington limit, which reduces the need for efficient production of heavy SMBH seeds at cosmic dawn. Using a theoretical model of super-Eddington accretion, we can produce the observed relative dearth of both X-ray and ultraviolet emission, as well as the high Balmer decrements, without the need for significant dust attenuation. This work indicates that super-Eddington accretion is easily achieved through-out the early Universe, and further study is required to determine what environments are required to trigger this mode of black hole growth.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes JWST broad-line AGN identified via broadened Hα in the first billion years, reporting no measurable X-ray emission or high-ionization lines in sources covered by the deepest X-ray surveys. It proposes these sources accrete at or above the Eddington limit and shows that a theoretical super-Eddington accretion model can reproduce the observed dearth of X-ray and UV emission plus high Balmer decrements without invoking significant dust attenuation, thereby reducing the need for efficient heavy SMBH seed production at cosmic dawn.

Significance. If the super-Eddington model is demonstrated to match the non-detections and line ratios with parameters fixed independently of the data, the result would be significant for early-universe SMBH growth models by indicating that super-Eddington accretion is readily achieved and common. The combination of broad-Hα selection with deep X-ray coverage provides a useful observational constraint on accretion modes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and model section] Abstract and theoretical model description: the assertion that the super-Eddington model produces the observed X-ray/UV dearth and high Balmer decrements is not supported by evidence that parameters such as accretion rate or disk geometry were determined independently of the JWST sample; without this, the attribution of non-detections to the accretion regime rather than obscuration carries circularity risk and does not uniquely reduce the need for heavy seeds.
  2. [Sample selection and X-ray analysis] Sample and selection section: the broad-Hα selection criterion may bias against obscured or sub-Eddington sources, yet the manuscript does not quantitatively compare the observed non-detections against predictions from Compton-thick obscuration or low-luminosity AGN models to establish that super-Eddington accretion is the preferred explanation.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract provides no numerical sample size, X-ray flux limits, or model parameter values, which should be added for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment below. Revisions have been made to clarify the independent basis of the model parameters and to include quantitative comparisons with alternative explanations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and model section] Abstract and theoretical model description: the assertion that the super-Eddington model produces the observed X-ray/UV dearth and high Balmer decrements is not supported by evidence that parameters such as accretion rate or disk geometry were determined independently of the JWST sample; without this, the attribution of non-detections to the accretion regime rather than obscuration carries circularity risk and does not uniquely reduce the need for heavy seeds.

    Authors: The super-Eddington model is taken from established theoretical slim-disk frameworks in the literature, with accretion rates and geometries set to values motivated by requirements for rapid early SMBH growth rather than optimized against the JWST broad-Hα sample. We have revised the model description section to explicitly cite the independent theoretical sources for these parameters and to state that the exercise demonstrates consistency rather than a fit to the current data. This removes the circularity concern while preserving the conclusion that super-Eddington accretion can account for the observations without heavy dust. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Sample selection and X-ray analysis] Sample and selection section: the broad-Hα selection criterion may bias against obscured or sub-Eddington sources, yet the manuscript does not quantitatively compare the observed non-detections against predictions from Compton-thick obscuration or low-luminosity AGN models to establish that super-Eddington accretion is the preferred explanation.

    Authors: Broad-Hα selection is less biased against moderate obscuration than X-ray or UV selections because Hα photons can escape more readily. We acknowledge that an explicit quantitative comparison to Compton-thick and low-luminosity AGN predictions was not present. We have added this comparison in a new subsection of the revised manuscript, showing that the depth of the X-ray non-detections is more readily explained by the super-Eddington regime than by the column densities required for Compton-thick obscuration at the observed Hα luminosities. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: theoretical model invoked as independent explanation

full rationale

The provided abstract and context present a proposal that a theoretical super-Eddington accretion model can reproduce the observed lack of X-ray/UV emission and high Balmer decrements. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are quoted that reduce any prediction to the input data by construction. The central claim remains a hypothesis linking an external theoretical framework to observations rather than a self-referential derivation. This is the common case of a self-contained interpretive paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of a super-Eddington accretion model whose parameters are not shown to be independent of the JWST data, plus the assumption that non-detections map directly to accretion rate rather than alternatives.

free parameters (1)
  • Super-Eddington model parameters (e.g., accretion rate, disk geometry)
    Used to reproduce observed X-ray/UV dearth and Balmer decrements; likely adjusted to match data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Super-Eddington accretion suppresses X-ray and UV emission without requiring significant dust
    Invoked to link non-detections to the proposed mode (abstract).

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5886 in / 1272 out tokens · 35219 ms · 2026-05-23T20:22:32.934115+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The GlimmIr: Spectroscopic Variability in a z~7 LRD Indicates Rapid Changes in Both the Narrow and Broad Line Regions

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    First spectroscopic variability in a z~7 LRD shows rapid changes in both narrow and broad line regions, implying direct ionization from the central source to surrounding nebular gas.

  2. Spectral Appearance of Self-gravitating Disks Powered by Stellar Objects: Universal Effective Temperature in the Optical Continuum and Application to Little Red Dots

    astro-ph.HE 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Self-gravitating disks heated by stars reach a universal optical effective temperature of 4000-4500 K independent of accretion rate, black hole mass, and viscosity, explaining Little Red Dots.

  3. The Missing Hard Photons of Little Red Dots: Their Incident Ionizing Spectra Resemble Massive Stars

    astro-ph.GA 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Little Red Dots show soft ionizing spectra consistent with massive stars, based on high H-alpha EWs and low HeII/H-beta ratios that rule out hard AGN spectra via Cloudy modeling.

  4. Hidden in Pixels I: Discovery of dual "little red dots" indicates excess clustering on kilo-parsec scales

    astro-ph.GA 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Four dual LRD candidates at z~5.5 with kpc separations show 20-30x excess sub-arcsec clustering versus extrapolated AGN ACF, implying merger-driven SMBH growth.

  5. Spectral Uniformity of Little Red Dots: A Natural Outcome of Coevolving Seed Black Holes and Nascent Starbursts

    astro-ph.GA 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Coevolving super-Eddington black holes and nuclear starbursts in high-redshift halos naturally generate the V-shaped UV-to-optical spectra and weak high-energy emission of little red dots.

  6. On the quenching of LRD X-ray emission by both Compton-thick gas and high accretion rates

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LRDs require Compton-thick gas at moderate metallicity plus high accretion rates producing weak X-rays to explain their non-detection, implying they are not chemically pristine.

  7. The X-ray weakness of Little Red Dots and JWST-selected AGN: comparison with local AGN in different accretion regimes

    astro-ph.GA 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    High-z LRDs and JWST AGN exhibit X-ray weakness consistent with local super-Eddington accreting SMBHs, supporting a link to highly accreting systems across cosmic time.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 95 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    J.963, 129 (2024)

    Matthee, J.et al.Little Red Dots: An Abundant Population of Faint Active Galactic Nuclei at z∼5 Revealed by the EIGER and FRESCO JWST Surveys.Astrophys. J.963, 129 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Astrophys.691, A145 (2024)

    Maiolino, R.et al.JADES: The diverse population of infant black holes at 4<z<11: Merging, tiny, poor, but mighty.Astron. Astrophys.691, A145 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    J.959, 39 (2023)

    Harikane, Y.et al.A JWST/NIRSpec First Census of Broad-line AGNs at z = 4-7: Detection of 10 Faint AGNs with M BH 106-108 M ⊙ and Their Host Galaxy Properties.Astrophys. J.959, 39 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    D.et al.Hidden Little Monsters: Spectroscopic Identification of Low-mass, Broad-line AGNs at z>5 with CEERS.Astrophys

    Kocevski, D. D.et al.Hidden Little Monsters: Spectroscopic Identification of Low-mass, Broad-line AGNs at z>5 with CEERS.Astrophys. J. Lett.954, L4 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    L.et al.A CEERS Discovery of an Accreting Supermassive Black Hole 570 Myr after the Big Bang: Identifying a Progenitor of Massive z>6 Quasars.Astrophys

    Larson, R. L.et al.A CEERS Discovery of an Accreting Supermassive Black Hole 570 Myr after the Big Bang: Identifying a Progenitor of Massive z>6 Quasars.Astrophys. J. Lett.953, L29 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    J.963, 128 (2024)

    Barro, G.et al.Extremely Red Galaxies at z = 5–9 with MIRI and NIRSpec: Dusty Galaxies or Obscured Active Galactic Nuclei?Astrophys. J.963, 128 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    J.et al.A high black-hole-to-host mass ratio in a lensed AGN in the early Universe.Nature628, 57–61 (2024)

    Furtak, L. J.et al.A high black-hole-to-host mass ratio in a lensed AGN in the early Universe.Nature628, 57–61 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    E.et al.UNCOVER Spectroscopy Confirms the Surprising Ubiquity of Active Galactic Nuclei in Red Sources at z>5.Astrophys

    Greene, J. E.et al.UNCOVER Spectroscopy Confirms the Surprising Ubiquity of Active Galactic Nuclei in Red Sources at z>5.Astrophys. J.964, 39 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Kokorev, V.et al.UNCOVER: A NIRSpec Identification of a Broad-line AGN at z = 8.50.Astrophys. J. Lett.957, L7 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    D.et al.The Rise of Faint, Red Active Galactic Nuclei at z ¿ 4: A Sample of Little Red Dots in the JWST Extragalactic Legacy Fields.Astrophys

    Kocevski, D. D.et al.The Rise of Faint, Red Active Galactic Nuclei at z ¿ 4: A Sample of Little Red Dots in the JWST Extragalactic Legacy Fields.Astrophys. J.986, 126 (2025). 10

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Astrophys

    Kokorev, V.et al.A Census of Photometrically Selected Little Red Dots at 4<z<9 in JWST Blank Fields. Astrophys. J.968, 38 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Little Red Dots

    Akins, H. B.et al.COSMOS-Web: The Overabundance and Physical Nature of “Little Red Dots”– Implications for Early Galaxy and SMBH Assembly.Astrophys. J.991, 37 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Liu, H.-Y.et al.A Comprehensive and Uniform Sample of Broad-line Active Galactic Nuclei from the SDSS DR7.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.243, 21 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Maiolino, R.et al.JWST meets Chandra: a large population of Compton thick, feedback-free, and intrinsically X-ray weak AGN, with a sprinkle of SNe.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.538, 1921–1943 (2025)

    work page 1921

  15. [15]

    T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O

    Ananna, T. T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O. E., Natarajan, P. & Hickox, R. C. X-Ray View of Little Red Dots: Do They Host Supermassive Black Holes?Astrophys. J. Lett.969, L18 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Little Red Dots

    Yue, M.et al.Stacking X-Ray Observations of “Little Red Dots”: Implications for Their Active Galactic Nucleus Properties.Astrophys. J. Lett.974, L26 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    C.et al.The Galaxies Missed by Hubble and ALMA: The Contribution of Extremely Red Galaxies to the Cosmic Census at 3<z<8.Astrophys

    Williams, C. C.et al.The Galaxies Missed by Hubble and ALMA: The Contribution of Extremely Red Galaxies to the Cosmic Census at 3<z<8.Astrophys. J.968, 34 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    J.984, 121 (2025)

    Wang, B.et al.RUBIES: JWST/NIRSpec Confirmation of an Infrared-luminous, Broad-line Little Red Dot with an Ionized Outflow.Astrophys. J.984, 121 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    B.et al.Tentative Detection of Neutral Gas in a Little Red Dot at z = 4.46.Astrophys

    Akins, H. B.et al.Tentative Detection of Neutral Gas in a Little Red Dot at z = 4.46.Astrophys. J.997, 218 (2026)

    work page 2026

  20. [20]

    M.et al.Dust in Little Red Dots.Astrophys

    Casey, C. M.et al.Dust in Little Red Dots.Astrophys. J. Lett.975, L4 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    The black hole masses of high-redshift QSOs.Mon

    King, A. The black hole masses of high-redshift QSOs.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.531, 550–553 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    & Narayan, R

    Pacucci, F. & Narayan, R. Mildly Super-Eddington Accretion onto Slowly Spinning Black Holes Explains the X-Ray Weakness of the Little Red Dots.Astrophys. J.976, 96 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Little Red Dots

    Baggen, J. F. W.et al.The Small Sizes and High Implied Densities of “Little Red Dots” with Balmer Breaks Could Explain Their Broad Emission Lines without an Active Galactic Nucleus.Astrophys. J. Lett.977, L13 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Reines, A. E. & Volonteri, M. Relations between Central Black Hole Mass and Total Galaxy Stellar Mass in the Local Universe.Astrophys. J.813, 82 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    & Loeb, A

    Pacucci, F. & Loeb, A. The Redshift Evolution of the M –M ⋆ Relation for JWST’s Supermassive Black Holes at z>4.Astrophys. J.964, 154 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Natarajan, P.et al.First Detection of an Overmassive Black Hole Galaxy UHZ1: Evidence for Heavy Black Hole Seed Formation from Direct Collapse.Astrophys. J. Lett.960, L1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Chisholm, J.et al.[Ne v] emission from a faint epoch of reionization-era galaxy: evidence for a narrow-line intermediate-mass black hole.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.534, 2633–2652 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Schneider, R.et al.Are we surprised to find SMBHs with JWST at z≥9?Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.526, 3250–3261 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Signorini, M.et al.Quasars as standard candles. IV. Analysis of the X-ray and UV indicators of the disc-corona relation.Astron. Astrophys.676, A143 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    & Risaliti, G

    Lusso, E. & Risaliti, G. Quasars as standard candles. I. The physical relation between disc and coronal emission.Astron. Astrophys.602, A79 (2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    11 Astrophys.655, A109 (2021)

    Bisogni, S.et al.The Chandra view of the relation between X-ray and UV emission in quasars.Astron. 11 Astrophys.655, A109 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Astrophys.693, A176 (2025)

    Bertemes, C.et al.JWST ERS Program Q3D: The pitfalls of virial black hole mass constraints shown for a z∼3 quasar with an ultramassive host.Astron. Astrophys.693, A176 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    & Mazzucchelli, C

    Lupi, A., Trinca, A., Volonteri, M., Dotti, M. & Mazzucchelli, C. Size matters: are we witnessing super- Eddington accretion in high-redshift black holes from JWST?Astron. Astrophys.689, A128 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Astrophys.695, A33 (2025)

    Volonteri, M.et al.Exploring active galactic nuclei and little red dots with the Obelisk simulation.Astron. Astrophys.695, A33 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Brightman, M.et al.A statistical relation between the X-ray spectral index and Eddington ratio of active galactic nuclei in deep surveys.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.433, 2485–2496 (2013)

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    The Γ X-L/LEdd relation.Mon

    Trakhtenbrot, B.et al.BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey (BASS) - VI. The Γ X-L/LEdd relation.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.470, 800–814 (2017)

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    J.910, 103 (2021)

    Liu, H.et al.On the Observational Difference between the Accretion Disk-Corona Connections among Super- and Sub-Eddington Accreting Active Galactic Nuclei.Astrophys. J.910, 103 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    Astrophys.657, A57 (2022)

    Laurenti, M.et al.X-ray spectroscopic survey of highly accreting AGN.Astron. Astrophys.657, A57 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    M., Halpern, J

    Leighly, K. M., Halpern, J. P., Jenkins, E. B. & Casebeer, D. The Intrinsically X-Ray-weak Quasar PHL

    work page

  40. [40]

    Optical and UV Spectra and Analysis.Astrophys

    II. Optical and UV Spectra and Analysis.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.173, 1–36 (2007)

    work page 2007

  41. [41]

    Stark, D. P. Galaxies in the First Billion Years After the Big Bang.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.54, 761–803 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    Exploring UV Diagnostics of the Interstellar Medium in Local High-z Analogs at the Dawn of the JWST Era.Astrophys

    Mingozzi, M.et al.CLASSY IV. Exploring UV Diagnostics of the Interstellar Medium in Local High-z Analogs at the Dawn of the JWST Era.Astrophys. J.939, 110 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    J.976, 193 (2024)

    Roberts-Borsani, G.et al.Between the Extremes: A JWST Spectroscopic Benchmark for High-redshift Galaxies Using∼500 Confirmed Sources at z≥5.Astrophys. J.976, 193 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Tang, M.et al.The JWST Spectroscopic Properties of Galaxies atz= 9−14.arXiv e-printsarXiv:2507.08245 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    J.736, 28 (2011)

    Wu, J.et al.A Population of X-Ray Weak Quasars: PHL 1811 Analogs at High Redshift.Astrophys. J.736, 28 (2011)

    work page 2011

  46. [46]

    A weak-line Seyfert linking to the weak-line quasar.Mon

    Jin, C.et al.The extreme super-eddington NLS1 RX J0134.2-4258 - II. A weak-line Seyfert linking to the weak-line quasar.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.518, 6065–6082 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    M.et al.High-redshift SDSS Quasars with Weak Emission Lines.Astrophys

    Diamond-Stanic, A. M.et al.High-redshift SDSS Quasars with Weak Emission Lines.Astrophys. J.699, 782–799 (2009)

    work page 2009

  48. [48]

    T.et al.Probing the Nature of High-redshift Weak Emission Line Quasars: A Young Quasar with a Starburst Host Galaxy.Astrophys

    Andika, I. T.et al.Probing the Nature of High-redshift Weak Emission Line Quasars: A Young Quasar with a Starburst Host Galaxy.Astrophys. J.903, 34 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    J.805, 122 (2015)

    Luo, B.et al.X-ray Insights into the Nature of PHL 1811 Analogs and Weak Emission-line Quasars: Unification with a Geometrically Thick Accretion Disk?Astrophys. J.805, 122 (2015)

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    Ni, Q.et al.Connecting the X-ray properties of weak-line and typical quasars: testing for a geometrically thick accretion disk.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.480, 5184–5202 (2018)

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    J.900, 141 (2020)

    Pu, X.et al.On the Fraction of X-Ray-weak Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey.Astrophys. J.900, 141 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    Lupi, A.et al.Growing massive black holes through supercritical accretion of stellar-mass seeds.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.456, 2993–3003 (2016). 12

    work page 2016

  53. [53]

    & Schneider, R

    Pezzulli, E., Valiante, R. & Schneider, R. Super-Eddington growth of the first black holes.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.458, 3047–3059 (2016)

    work page 2016

  54. [54]

    & Urry, C

    Pacucci, F., Natarajan, P., Volonteri, M., Cappelluti, N. & Urry, C. M. Conditions for Optimal Growth of Black Hole Seeds.Astrophys. J. Lett.850, L42 (2017)

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    A.et al.Super-Eddington accretion and feedback from the first massive seed black holes.Mon

    Regan, J. A.et al.Super-Eddington accretion and feedback from the first massive seed black holes.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.486, 3892–3906 (2019)

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    & Beckmann, R

    Massonneau, W., Volonteri, M., Dubois, Y. & Beckmann, R. S. How the super-Eddington regime regulates black hole growth in high-redshift galaxies.Astron. Astrophys.670, A180 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    & Regan, J

    Lupi, A., Quadri, G., Volonteri, M., Colpi, M. & Regan, J. A. Sustained super-Eddington accretion in high-redshift quasars.Astron. Astrophys.686, A256 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    & Hopkins, P

    Shi, Y., Kremer, K. & Hopkins, P. F. From Seeds to Supermassive Black Holes: Capture, Growth, Migration, and Pairing in Dense Protobulge Environments.Astrophys. J. Lett.969, L31 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Begelman, M. C. Can a spherically accreting black hole radiate very near the Eddington limit?Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.187, 237–251 (1979)

    work page 1979

  60. [60]

    A., Czerny, B., Lasota, J

    Abramowicz, M. A., Czerny, B., Lasota, J. P. & Szuszkiewicz, E. Slim Accretion Disks.Astrophys. J.332, 646 (1988)

    work page 1988

  61. [61]

    & Done, C

    Kubota, A. & Done, C. Modelling the spectral energy distribution of super-Eddington quasars.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.489, 524–533 (2019)

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    Astrophys

    Wu, J.et al.The Weakness of Soft X-Ray Intensity: Possible Physical Reason for Weak-line Quasars. Astrophys. J.965, 84 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Slim Accretion Disks: Theory and Observational Consequences.Universe5, 131 (2019)

    Czerny, B. Slim Accretion Disks: Theory and Observational Consequences.Universe5, 131 (2019)

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    & Done, C

    Kubota, A. & Done, C. A physical model of the broad-band continuum of AGN and its implications for the UV/X relation and optical variability.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.480, 1247–1262 (2018)

    work page 2018

  65. [65]

    Shen, X.et al.The bolometric quasar luminosity function at z = 0-7.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.495, 3252–3275 (2020)

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    & Ichikawa, K

    Inayoshi, K. & Ichikawa, K. Birth of Rapidly Spinning, Overmassive Black Holes in the Early Universe. Astrophys. J. Lett.973, L49 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    J.et al.The 2017 Release Cloudy.Rev

    Ferland, G. J.et al.The 2017 Release Cloudy.Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrofis.53, 385–438 (2017)

    work page 2017

  68. [68]

    J.533, 682–695 (2000)

    Calzetti, D.et al.The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-forming Galaxies.Astrophys. J.533, 682–695 (2000)

    work page 2000

  69. [69]

    D., Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Misselt, K. A., Landolt, A. U. & Wolff, M. J. A Quantitative Comparison of the Small Magellanic Cloud, Large Magellanic Cloud, and Milky Way Ultraviolet to Near-Infrared Extinction Curves.Astrophys. J.594, 279–293 (2003)

    work page 2003

  70. [70]

    & Netzer, H

    Baron, D., Stern, J., Poznanski, D. & Netzer, H. Evidence That Most Type-1 AGNs are Reddened by Dust in the Host ISM.Astrophys. J.832, 8 (2016)

    work page 2016

  71. [71]

    Netzer, H.The Physics and Evolution of Active Galactic Nuclei(Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    work page 2013

  72. [72]

    Scarlata, C.et al.On the universal validity of Case B recombination theory.arXiv e-printsarXiv:2404.09015 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    J.et al.New Determinations of the UV Luminosity Functions from z = 9 to 2 Show a Remarkable Consistency with Halo Growth and a Constant Star Formation Efficiency.Astron

    Bouwens, R. J.et al.New Determinations of the UV Luminosity Functions from z = 9 to 2 Show a Remarkable Consistency with Halo Growth and a Constant Star Formation Efficiency.Astron. J.162, 47 (2021). 13

    work page 2021

  74. [74]

    Trinca, A.et al.Episodic super-Eddington accretion as a clue to Overmassive Black Holes in the early Universe.arXiv e-printsarXiv:2412.14248 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    Bunker, A. J.et al.JADES NIRSpec initial data release for the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Redshifts and line fluxes of distant galaxies from the deepest JWST Cycle 1 NIRSpec multi-object spectroscopy.Astron. Astrophys.690, A288 (2024)

    work page 2024

  76. [76]

    Overview of the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES)

    Eisenstein, D. J.et al.Overview of the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES).arXiv e-prints arXiv:2306.02465 (2023)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    D’Eugenio, F.et al.JADES Data Release 3: NIRSpec/Microshutter Assembly Spectroscopy for 4000 Galaxies in the GOODS Fields.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.277, 4 (2025)

    work page 2025

  78. [78]

    A.et al.The JWST FRESCO survey: legacy NIRCam/grism spectroscopy and imaging in the two GOODS fields.Mon

    Oesch, P. A.et al.The JWST FRESCO survey: legacy NIRCam/grism spectroscopy and imaging in the two GOODS fields.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.525, 2864–2874 (2023)

    work page 2023

  79. [79]

    Q.et al.The Chandra Deep Field-South Survey: 4 Ms Source Catalogs.Astrophys

    Xue, Y. Q.et al.The Chandra Deep Field-South Survey: 4 Ms Source Catalogs.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 195, 10 (2011)

    work page 2011

  80. [80]

    Luo, B.et al.The Chandra Deep Field-South Survey: 7 Ms Source Catalogs.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.228, 2 (2017)

    work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.