Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.18835 v1 pith:CWTATO2J submitted 2024-09-27 cs.DC

Accelerating stencils on the Tenstorrent Grayskull RISC-V accelerator

classification cs.DC
keywords risc-vacceleratorarounde150grayskulltimesenergyexplore
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The RISC-V Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) has enjoyed phenomenal growth in recent years, however it still to gain popularity in HPC. Whilst adopting RISC-V CPU solutions in HPC might be some way off, RISC-V based PCIe accelerators offer a middle ground where vendors benefit from the flexibility of RISC-V yet fit into existing systems. In this paper we focus on the Tenstorrent Grayskull PCIe RISC-V based accelerator which, built upon Tensix cores, decouples data movement from compute. Using the Jacobi iterative method as a vehicle, we explore the suitability of stencils on the Grayskull e150. We explore best practice in structuring these codes for the accelerator and demonstrate that the e150 provides similar performance to a Xeon Platinum CPU (albeit BF16 vs FP32) but the e150 uses around five times less energy. Over four e150s we obtain around four times the CPU performance, again at around five times less energy.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Assessing Performance and Porting Strategies for Gravitational $N$-Body Simulations on the RISC-V-Based Tenstorrent Wormhole\textsuperscript{\texttrademark}

    cs.DC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Three scaling strategies for an N-body code on Tenstorrent Wormhole accelerators are compared via execution time and energy measurements, identifying the configuration with the best efficiency-performance balance.