The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2410.16282 · v2 · pith:N6PZ2UF6 · submitted 2024-10-04 · cs.NI · cs.AI· cs.SY· eess.SY

Optimal Ground Station Selection for Low-Earth Orbiting Satellites

Reviewed by Pithpith:N6PZ2UF6open to challenge →

classification cs.NI cs.AIcs.SYeess.SY
keywords stationgroundmissionproblemoptimalprovidersselectionspace
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper presents a solution to the problem of optimal ground station selection for low-Earth orbiting (LEO) space missions that enables mission operators to precisely design their ground segment performance and costs. Space mission operators are increasingly turning to Ground-Station-as-a-Service (GSaaS) providers to supply the terrestrial communications segment to reduce costs and increase network size. However, this approach leads to a new challenge of selecting the optimal service providers and station locations for a given mission. We consider the problem of ground station selection as an optimization problem and present a general solution framework that allows mission designers to set their overall optimization objective and constrain key mission performance variables such as total data downlink, total mission cost, recurring operational cost, and maximum communications time-gap. We solve the problem using integer programming (IP). To address computational scaling challenges, we introduce a surrogate optimization approach where the optimal station selection is determined based on solving the problem over a reduced time domain. Two different IP formulations are evaluated using randomized selections of LEO satellites of varying constellation sizes. We consider the networks of the commercial GSaaS providers Atlas Space Operations, Amazon Web Services (AWS) Ground Station, Azure Orbital Ground Station, Kongsberg Satellite Services (KSAT), Leaf Space, and Viasat Real-Time Earth. We compare our results against standard operational practices of integrating with one or two primary ground station providers.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fault-Aware MPC for Robotic Fleet Communications Scheduling

    eess.SY 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    IMM-MPC recovers 59.8% of lethal-fault spacecraft in 200 satellite scheduling trials versus 9.0% for binary-MPC and 2.0% for graph matching, while preserving healthy-satellite acquisition.

  2. Designing a Satellite Serviced Quantum Network Backbone for Concurrent Global Connectivity

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Simulations identify anisotropic ground stations, multi-inclination LEO orbits, and multi-party service policies as key to achieving concurrent global quantum connectivity with acceptable latency and link strength.