pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.24732 · v3 · submitted 2025-05-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph· hep-th

The Quintom theory of dark energy after DESI DR2

Yifu Cai , Xin Ren , Taotao Qiu , Mingzhe Li , Xinmin Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 13:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords Quintom cosmologydark energyDESI DR2equation of statephantom divideno-go theoremcosmological constraintsmodified gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

DESI DR2 data indicate dark energy equation of state crosses w = -1, which single-field models cannot achieve.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews Quintom cosmology prompted by DESI DR2 observations that suggest dark energy's equation-of-state parameter evolves across the w = -1 boundary. It outlines the shift from a constant cosmological constant to dynamical dark energy and presents recent constraints that favor a time-varying w(z). Central to the review is the no-go theorem establishing that no single canonical scalar field or perfect fluid can cross this boundary smoothly. The paper then examines viable Quintom constructions such as two-field models, higher-derivative terms, modified gravity, interacting dark energy, and an effective field theory framework that encompasses them. It also addresses possible interactions with ordinary matter and applications to non-singular cosmologies.

Core claim

DESI DR2 supplies observational support for a Quintom scenario in which the dark energy equation-of-state parameter crosses w = -1. The paper shows that this crossing is forbidden for single canonical fields or perfect fluids by a no-go theorem, and therefore surveys the range of multi-component or modified constructions that permit it while remaining consistent with the data.

What carries the argument

The no-go theorem proving single canonical fields cannot cross w = -1, together with the Quintom constructions that evade the theorem through multiple fields, higher derivatives, or interactions.

If this is right

  • Dark energy must involve at least two fields or equivalent mechanisms such as higher derivatives to allow a smooth w = -1 crossing.
  • Quintom models can generate non-singular universe solutions that avoid the big bang singularity.
  • Interactions between Quintom fields and ordinary matter become possible and may produce observable effects.
  • An effective field theory approach can unify the different Quintom constructions under a single description.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • More precise measurements at higher redshifts could distinguish among the different Quintom constructions by mapping the detailed shape of w(z).
  • Quintom dynamics might help relieve other cosmological tensions such as the Hubble constant discrepancy through their time-dependent behavior.
  • Signatures in the large-scale structure or in gravitational wave propagation could provide independent tests of these models.

Load-bearing premise

The DESI DR2 measurements reflect a genuine physical crossing of w = -1 rather than a statistical fluctuation or systematic bias in the BAO data.

What would settle it

Future higher-precision BAO or supernova surveys that measure w(z) remaining strictly greater than or less than -1 across the relevant redshift range without evidence of a crossing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.24732 by Mingzhe Li, Taotao Qiu, Xinmin Zhang, Xin Ren, Yifu Cai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The constraint on coefficients ˜c [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The value of factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Observations from DESI DR2 are challenging the $\Lambda$CDM paradigm by suggesting that the equation-of-state parameter of dark energy evolves across $w = -1$, a phenomenon known as the Quintom scenario. Inspired by this development, we present a staged review of Quintom cosmology including its theoretical foundations, observational supports, and implications as well as possible extensions. We first trace the historical progression from Einstein's static cosmological constant to modern dynamical dark energy, summarizing recent cosmological constraints that favor an evolving $w(z)$ along time. A key focus is the theoretical no-go theorem for dark energy showing that no single canonical field or perfect fluid model can smoothly cross the $w = -1$ boundary. We then survey viable Quintom constructions, including two-field models, single-scalar fields with higher derivatives, modified gravity frameworks, interacting dark energy, and an effective field theory approach that unifies these mechanisms. Possible interactions of Quintom fields with ordinary matter and the potential roles in yielding non-singular universe solutions are discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review of Quintom cosmology motivated by DESI DR2 data suggesting that the dark energy equation-of-state parameter crosses w = -1. It traces the historical development from the cosmological constant to dynamical dark energy, restates the no-go theorem prohibiting single canonical scalar fields or perfect fluids from smoothly crossing w = -1, and surveys constructions that evade the theorem including two-field models, higher-derivative terms, modified gravity, interacting dark energy, and an effective field theory unification. It further discusses interactions with ordinary matter and implications for non-singular cosmologies.

Significance. If the DESI DR2 indication of a w = -1 crossing is robust, the review provides a timely and structured compilation of theoretical options for realizing Quintom behavior. It correctly recalls the standard no-go theorem and lists established evasion mechanisms without introducing new derivations or performing a re-analysis of the data. The historical overview and survey of extensions constitute a useful reference for the community, though the paper's impact is constrained by its reliance on external literature for both the observational claim and the theoretical constructions.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract and introduction: The paper presents DESI DR2 as established observational support for a genuine dynamical crossing of w = -1. This interpretation is load-bearing for the review's motivation and structure, yet the manuscript does not address potential systematics in BAO analyses such as template fitting choices, redshift-space distortion modeling, or covariance estimation. A short discussion of robustness under alternative pipelines would strengthen the empirical foundation without requiring new data analysis.
minor comments (2)
  1. Historical progression paragraph: The summary of the shift from Einstein's static cosmological constant to modern dynamical dark energy would benefit from explicit citation of at least two post-2020 reviews on the same topic to ensure completeness.
  2. Notation throughout: The equation-of-state parameter is referred to interchangeably as w and w(z); a single consistent definition and a brief clarification of any assumed parametrization (e.g., CPL) would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the constructive suggestion for minor revision. We have addressed the comment regarding the presentation of DESI DR2 results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and introduction: The paper presents DESI DR2 as established observational support for a genuine dynamical crossing of w = -1. This interpretation is load-bearing for the review's motivation and structure, yet the manuscript does not address potential systematics in BAO analyses such as template fitting choices, redshift-space distortion modeling, or covariance estimation. A short discussion of robustness under alternative pipelines would strengthen the empirical foundation without requiring new data analysis.

    Authors: We agree that explicitly acknowledging potential systematics in the DESI DR2 BAO analyses would strengthen the motivation. Although the manuscript is a theoretical review that relies on published observational results rather than performing new data analysis, we will add a concise paragraph in the introduction. This paragraph will summarize the current status of robustness checks under alternative pipelines, including references to studies examining template fitting choices, redshift-space distortion modeling, and covariance estimation. The addition will note that while the w = -1 crossing preference appears in several independent analyses, we recognize that further scrutiny of systematics remains important. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review structure relies on external literature for no-go theorem and DESI constraints; no internal derivations reduce to self-defined inputs

full rationale

This is a staged review paper that traces the historical development of dark energy models, summarizes external cosmological constraints favoring evolving w(z) from DESI DR2, and surveys Quintom constructions based on the established no-go theorem for single canonical fields. The central claims about the necessity of multi-field, higher-derivative, or modified gravity approaches are grounded in cited literature results rather than any equations or predictions derived within the manuscript itself. No load-bearing steps involve fitting parameters to subsets of data and then relabeling them as predictions, self-definitional loops, or uniqueness theorems imported solely from overlapping author citations. The paper remains self-contained against external benchmarks, with the DESI interpretation serving as observational motivation rather than an internally constructed result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper the central narrative rests on standard cosmological assumptions (FRW metric, energy conditions) and on the cited literature for the no-go theorem and model constructions rather than introducing new fitted parameters or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The universe is described by a flat FRW metric with dark energy as a dynamical component whose equation-of-state parameter w can evolve.
    Invoked in the opening historical progression and observational constraints section of the abstract.
  • standard math A no-go theorem prohibits single canonical scalar fields or perfect fluids from crossing w = -1 without instabilities.
    Stated as a key focus in the abstract; the theorem is treated as established background.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5723 in / 1454 out tokens · 44824 ms · 2026-05-19T13:02:35.845351+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 15 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Model-Independent Reconstruction of Quintessence Potential and Kinetic Energy from DESI DR2 and Pantheon+ Supernovae

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    Quintessence potential decreases monotonically with redshift while kinetic energy crosses zero near z=1, with negative values at intermediate redshifts being statistical artifacts from derivative reconstruction.

  2. Evidence for deviation in gravitational light deflection from general relativity at cosmological scales with KiDS-Legacy and CMB lensing

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    KiDS-Legacy weak lensing plus CMB data yields a 3 sigma deviation in light deflection from GR in a Lambda CDM background, with the signal driven by large-scale CMB lensing amplitudes.

  3. Signatures of Modified Gravity Below $\mathcal{O}(10)$ Mpc in a Dynamical Dark Energy Background

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Modified gravity below O(10) Mpc in a CPL dynamical dark energy background is required to suppress structure growth at low redshifts while satisfying CMB constraints from ISW and lensing.

  4. Study of dark interactions through strong gravitational lenses

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Strong gravitational lensing data from early-type galaxies and Abell 1689 constrain three sign-changeable dark-sector interaction models, yielding negative interaction strengths larger in magnitude than prior probes a...

  5. Cosmological Impact of Redshift-Dependent Type Ia Supernovae Calibration

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A phenomenological redshift-dependent SNIa magnitude correction shows no evidence in ΛCDM but is preferred at 4.3σ with dynamical dark energy, reducing Hubble tension to 1.5σ.

  6. Is the $w_0w_a$CDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck PR4 CMB anisotropy data?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    Planck PR4 CMB data mildly favors dynamical dark energy, but this preference weakens when accounting for possible excess smoothing, indicating the signal may partly arise from data processing issues.

  7. Exploring the interplay of late-time dynamical dark energy and new physics before recombination

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Model-independent reconstruction finds 96.7-98.5% probability of phantom crossing if recombination is standard, but early new physics to ease Hubble tension weakens this preference while requiring unrealistically high...

  8. Resolving the Planck-DESI tension by nonminimally coupled quintessence

    astro-ph.CO 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Non-minimally coupled quintessence resolves the Planck-DESI Ω_m tension at >3σ while the effective equation of state stays above w=-1 and other tensions on neutrino mass and growth rate are relieved.

  9. Constraints on Coupled Dark Energy in the DESI Era

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    New cosmological data mildly favor a small coupling between dark matter and a scalar dark energy field at |β| ≈ 0.03 while allowing an effective phantom-crossing equation of state.

  10. Coupled Dark Energy and Dark Matter for DESI: An Effective Guide to the Phantom Divide

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Coupled quintessence-dark matter models can produce an apparent phantom-crossing effective equation of state matching DESI preferences if the scalar field begins frozen in the radiation era.

  11. Revisiting the Hubble tension problem in the framework of holographic dark energy

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    HDE models with future event horizon IR cutoff partially ease the Hubble tension while Hubble-scale cutoffs do not, consistent across six models and multiple BAO/SN/CMB combinations.

  12. Evidence of dynamical dark energy found via the DESI DR2 Lyman$\alpha$ forest

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    DESI DR2 Lyman-alpha forest data combined with other probes yields up to 3.1 sigma preference for dynamical dark energy parameterizations over LambdaCDM, with w0 > -1 and wa < 0.

  13. Probing departures from $\Lambda$CDM by late-time datasets

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Late-time datasets yield 1-2.74σ preference for dynamical dark energy over ΛCDM, with consistent signs of Quintom-B behavior (ω0 > -1, ωa < 0) that strengthen when DES-Dovekie or Union3 supernovae are added.

  14. Evidence for evolving dark energy from DESI DR2 BAO and Pantheon$^+$, DES-Dovekie, and Union3

    astro-ph.CO 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0

    DESI DR2 BAO combined with Pantheon+, DES-Dovekie and Union3 supernovae yields 1.1-2.3 sigma preference for Quintom-B type evolving dark energy (w0 > -1, wa < 0) with phantom crossing near z ~ 0.5, but no model reache...

  15. Interacting Scalar Fields as Dark Energy and Dark Matter in Einstein scalar Gauss Bonnet Gravity

    gr-qc 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Interacting scalar fields coupled to Gauss-Bonnet gravity yield viable dark energy and dark matter models that match Pantheon+ and DES supernova data while preferring over LambdaCDM at high redshifts with Roman mocks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

272 extracted references · 272 canonical work pages · cited by 15 Pith papers · 145 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. G. Riess, et al., Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J. 116 (1998) 1009–1038.arXiv:astro-ph/9805201

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae

    S. Perlmutter, et al., Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High Redshift Supernovae, Astrophys. J. 517 (1999) 565–586. arXiv:astro-ph/9812133

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  3. [3]

    The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design

    A. Aghamousa, et al., The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design (10 2016).arXiv:1611.00036

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Overview of the Instrumentation for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument

    B. Abareshi, et al., Overview of the Instrumentation for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, Astron. J. 164 (5) (2022) 207.arXiv:2205.10939

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    A. G. Adame, et al., DESI 2024 III: baryon acoustic oscillations from galaxies and quasars, JCAP 04 (2025) 012. arXiv:2404.03000

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    A. G. Adame, et al., DESI 2024 IV: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Lyman alpha forest, JCAP 01 (2025) 124. arXiv:2404.03001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    A. G. Adame, et al., DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations, JCAP 02 (2025) 021.arXiv:2404.03002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Dark Energy Constraints from the Cosmic Age and Supernova

    B. Feng, X.-L. Wang, X.-M. Zhang, Dark energy constraints from the cosmic age and supernova, Phys. Lett. B 607 (2005) 35–41.arXiv:astro-ph/0404224

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  9. [9]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    M. Abdul Karim, et al., DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints, Phys. Rev. D 112 (8) (2025) 083515.arXiv:2503.14738

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Extended Dark Energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements

    K. Lodha, et al., Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements, Phys. Rev. D 112 (8) (2025) 083511.arXiv:2503.14743

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Gu, et al., Dynamical dark energy in light of the DESI DR2 baryonic acoustic oscillations measurements, Nature Astron

    G. Gu, et al., Dynamical dark energy in light of the DESI DR2 baryonic acoustic oscillations measurements, Nature Astron. 9 (12) (2025) 1879–1889, [Erratum: Nature Astron. 9, 1898 (2025)].arXiv:2504.06118

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Li, P.-J

    T.-N. Li, P.-J. Wu, G.-H. Du, S.-J. Jin, H.-L. Li, J.-F. Zhang, X. Zhang, Constraints on Interacting Dark Energy Models from the DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation and DES Supernovae Data, Astrophys. J. 976 (1) (2024) 1.arXiv:2407.14934

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Cortˆ es, A

    M. Cortˆ es, A. R. Liddle, Interpreting DESI’s evidence for evolving dark energy, JCAP 12 (2024) 007.arXiv:2404.08056

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Calderon, et al., DESI 2024: reconstructing dark en- ergy using crossing statistics with DESI DR1 BAO data, JCAP 10 (2024) 048.arXiv:2405.04216,doi:10

    R. Calderon, et al., DESI 2024: reconstructing dark energy using crossing statistics with DESI DR1 BAO data, JCAP 10 (2024) 048.arXiv:2405.04216

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Lodha et al

    K. Lodha, et al., DESI 2024: Constraints on physics-focused aspects of dark energy using DESI DR1 BAO data, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2) (2025) 023532.arXiv:2405.13588

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Y. Yang, X. Ren, Q. Wang, Z. Lu, D. Zhang, Y.-F. Cai, E. N. Saridakis, Quintom cosmology and modified gravity after DESI 2024, Sci. Bull. 69 (2024) 2698–2704.arXiv:2404.19437

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Wang and Y.-S

    H. Wang, Y.-S. Piao, Dark energy in light of DESI DR1 and Hubble tension, Phys. Lett. B 873 (2026) 140180.arXiv: 2404.18579

    work page arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    Carloni, O

    Y. Carloni, O. Luongo, M. Muccino, Does dark energy really revive using DESI 2024 data?, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2) (2025) 023512.arXiv:2404.12068. 18

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Giarè, M

    W. Giar` e, M. Najafi, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino, J. T. Firouzjaee, Robust preference for Dynamical Dark Energy in DESI BAO and SN measurements, JCAP 10 (2024) 035.arXiv:2407.16689

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Mukherjee, A

    P. Mukherjee, A. A. Sen, Model-independent cosmological inference post DESI DR1 BAO measurements, Phys. Rev. D 110 (12) (2024) 123502.arXiv:2405.19178

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Jiang, D

    J.-Q. Jiang, D. Pedrotti, S. S. da Costa, S. Vagnozzi, Nonparametric late-time expansion history reconstruction and implications for the Hubble tension in light of recent DESI and type Ia supernovae data, Phys. Rev. D 110 (12) (2024) 123519.arXiv:2408.02365

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    B. R. Dinda, A new diagnostic for the null test of dynamical dark energy in light of DESI 2024 and other BAO data, JCAP 09 (2024) 062.arXiv:2405.06618

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Y. Yang, Q. Wang, C. Li, P. Yuan, X. Ren, E. N. Saridakis, Y.-F. Cai, Gaussian process reconstructions and model building of quintom dark energy from latest cosmological observations, JCAP 08 (2025) 050.arXiv:2501.18336

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Giarè, Phys

    W. Giar` e, Dynamical dark energy beyond Planck? Constraints from multiple CMB probes, DESI BAO, and type-Ia supernovae, Phys. Rev. D 112 (2) (2025) 023508.arXiv:2409.17074

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    G. Liu, Y. Wang, W. Zhao, Impact of LRG1 and LRG2 in DESI 2024 BAO data on dark energy evolution (7 2024). arXiv:2407.04385

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Escamilla-Rivera, R

    C. Escamilla-Rivera, R. Sandoval-Orozco, f(T) gravity after DESI Baryon acoustic oscillation and DES supernovae 2024 data, JHEAp 42 (2024) 217–221.arXiv:2405.00608

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Yin, Cosmic clues: DESI, dark energy, and the cosmological constant problem, JHEP 05 (2024) 327.arXiv:2404

    W. Yin, Cosmic clues: DESI, dark energy, and the cosmological constant problem, JHEP 05 (2024) 327.arXiv:2404. 06444

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Chudaykin and M

    A. Chudaykin, M. Kunz, Modified gravity interpretation of the evolving dark energy in light of DESI data, Phys. Rev. D 110 (12) (2024) 123524.arXiv:2407.02558

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Huang, R.-G

    L. Huang, R.-G. Cai, S.-J. Wang, The DESI DR1/DR2 evidence for dynamical dark energy is biased by low-redshift supernovae, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68 (10) (2025) 100413.arXiv:2502.04212

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Updated Cosmological Constraints in Extended Parameter Space with Planck PR4, DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, and Supernovae: Dynamical Dark Energy, Neutrino Masses, Lensing Anomaly, and the Hubble Tension

    S. Roy Choudhury, T. Okumura, Updated Cosmological Constraints in Extended Parameter Space with Planck PR4, DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, and Supernovae: Dynamical Dark Energy, Neutrino Masses, Lensing Anomaly, and the Hubble Tension (2024).arXiv:2409.13022

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    S. D. Odintsov, D. S´ aez-Chill´ on G´ omez, G. S. Sharov, Modified gravity/dynamical dark energy vs ΛCDM: is the game over?, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (3) (2025) 298.arXiv:2412.09409

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    A. N. Ormondroyd, W. J. Handley, M. P. Hobson, A. N. Lasenby, Comparison of dynamical dark energy with ΛCDM in light of DESI DR2 (3 2025).arXiv:2503.17342

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Y.-H. Pang, X. Zhang, Q.-G. Huang, The impact of the Hubble tension on the evidence for dynamical dark energy, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68 (8) (2025) 280410.arXiv:2503.21600

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, D. Lust, S-dual quintessence, the Swampland, and the DESI DR2 results, Phys. Lett. B 868 (2025) 139632.arXiv:2503.19428

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    S. Pan, S. Paul, E. N. Saridakis, W. Yang, Interacting dark energy after DESI DR2: A challenge for the ΛCDM paradigm?, Phys. Rev. D 113 (2) (2026) 023515.arXiv:2504.00994

    work page arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    J. Pan, G. Ye, Non-minimally coupled gravity constraints from DESI DR2 data (3 2025).arXiv:2503.19898

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Paliathanasis, Dark energy within the generalized uncertainty principle in light of DESI DR2, JCAP 09 (2025) 067

    A. Paliathanasis, Dark energy within the generalized uncertainty principle in light of DESI DR2, JCAP 09 (2025) 067. arXiv:2503.20896

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Abedin, G.-J

    M. Abedin, G.-J. Wang, Y.-Z. Ma, S. Pan, In search of an interaction in the dark sector through Gaussian Process and ANN approaches, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 540 (2025) 2253–2268.arXiv:2505.04336

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, G. S. Sharov, Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet cosmology confronted with observations, JHEAp 47 (2025) 100398.arXiv:2503.17946

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Cheng, E

    H. Cheng, E. Di Valentino, L. A. Escamilla, A. A. Sen, L. Visinelli, Pressure parametrization of dark energy: first and second-order constraints with latest cosmological data, JCAP 09 (2025) 031.arXiv:2505.02932

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Deformation of the quintom cosmological model and its consequences

    J. Sadeghi, B. Pourhassan, Z. Nekouee, M. Shokri, Deformation of the quintom cosmological model and its consequences, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27 (03) (2017) 1850025.arXiv:1708.04319

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Einstein, Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativit¨ atstheorie, Sitzungsberichte der K&ouml;niglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (1917) 142–152

    A. Einstein, Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativit¨ atstheorie, Sitzungsberichte der K&ouml;niglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (1917) 142–152

    work page 1917

  43. [43]

    Testing for w<-1 in the Solar System

    J. Martin, C. Schimd, J.-P. Uzan, Testing for w<-1 in the solar system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 061303.arXiv: astro-ph/0510208

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  44. [44]

    E. V. Linder, The Mirage of w=-1 (8 2007).arXiv:0708.0024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  45. [45]

    Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe

    J. Frieman, M. Turner, D. Huterer, Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 46 (2008) 385–432.arXiv:0803.0982

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  46. [46]

    Evolving Newton's Constant, Extended Gravity Theories and SnIa Data Analysis

    S. Nesseris, L. Perivolaropoulos, Evolving newton’s constant, extended gravity theories and snia data analysis, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 103511.arXiv:astro-ph/0602053

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  47. [47]

    Y. Wang, L. Pogosian, G.-B. Zhao, A. Zucca, Evolution of dark energy reconstructed from the latest observations, Astrophys. J. Lett. 869 (2018) L8.arXiv:1807.03772

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [48]

    Heisenberg, H

    L. Heisenberg, H. Villarrubia-Rojo, J. Zosso, Can late-time extensions solve the H0 andσ8 tensions?, Phys. Rev. D 106 (4) (2022) 043503.arXiv:2202.01202

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Heisenberg, H

    L. Heisenberg, H. Villarrubia-Rojo, J. Zosso, Simultaneously solving the H0 andσ8 tensions with late dark energy, Phys. Dark Univ. 39 (2023) 101163.arXiv:2201.11623

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess, J. Silk, In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions, Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (15) (2021) 153001.arXiv:2103.01183. 19

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    Challenges for $\Lambda$CDM: An update

    L. Perivolaropoulos, F. Skara, Challenges for ΛCDM: An update, New Astron. Rev. 95 (2022) 101659.arXiv:2105.05208

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    E. Abdalla, et al., Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies, JHEAp 34 (2022) 49–211.arXiv:2203.06142

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    B.-H. Lee, W. Lee, E. O. Colg´ ain, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, S. Thakur, Is local H 0 at odds with dark energy EFT?, JCAP 04 (04) (2022) 004.arXiv:2202.03906

    work page arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics

    E. Di Valentino, et al., The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics, Phys. Dark Univ. 49 (2025) 101965.arXiv:2504.01669

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, S. Tsujikawa, Dynamics of dark energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15 (2006) 1753–1936.arXiv: hep-th/0603057

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  56. [56]

    Decay of cosmological constant as Bose condensate evaporation

    I. Dymnikova, M. Khlopov, Decay of cosmological constant as Bose condensate evaporation, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 15 (2000) 2305–2314.arXiv:astro-ph/0102094

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  57. [57]

    Phenomenology of $\Lambda$-CDM model: a possibility of accelerating Universe with positive pressure

    U. Mukhopadhyay, P. P. Ghosh, M. Khlopov, S. Ray, Phenomenology of Λ-CDM model: a possibility of accelerating Universe with positive pressure, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 50 (2011) 939–951.arXiv:0711.0686

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  58. [58]

    S. W. Hawking, G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press

    work page

  59. [59]

    Null Energy Condition and Dark Energy Models

    T. Qiu, Y.-F. Cai, X.-M. Zhang, Null Energy Condition and Dark Energy Models, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 23 (2008) 2787– 2798.arXiv:0710.0115

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  60. [60]

    Moghtaderi, B

    E. Moghtaderi, B. R. Hull, J. Quintin, G. Geshnizjani, How much null-energy-condition breaking can the Universe endure?, Phys. Rev. D 111 (12) (2025) 123552.arXiv:2503.19955

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter

    M. Chevallier, D. Polarski, Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 10 (2001) 213–224. arXiv:gr-qc/0009008

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  62. [62]

    E. V. Linder, Exploring the expansion history of the universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 091301.arXiv:astro-ph/ 0208512

    work page 2003

  63. [63]

    W. J. Percival, et al., The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: The Power spectrum and the matter content of the Universe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 327 (2001) 1297.arXiv:astro-ph/0105252

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  64. [64]

    Beutler, C

    F. Beutler, C. Blake, M. Colless, D. H. Jones, L. Staveley-Smith, L. A. Campbell, Q. A. Parker, Q. A. Parker, W. J. Saunders, F. G. Watson, The 6df galaxy survey: baryon acoustic oscillations and the local hubble constant, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 416 (2011) 3017–3032. URLhttps://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55926132

    work page 2011

  65. [65]

    The Supernova Legacy Survey: Measurement of Omega_M, Omega_Lambda and w from the First Year Data Set

    P. Astier, et al., The Supernova Legacy Survey: Measurement of Ω M, Ω Λ and⊒from the first year data set, Astron. Astrophys. 447 (2006) 31–48.arXiv:astro-ph/0510447

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  66. [66]

    Suzuki, D

    N. Suzuki, D. Rubin, D. Rubin, C. Lidman, G. S. Aldering, R. Amanullah, K. Barbary, K. Barbary, L. F. Barrientos, J. Boty´ anszki, M. Brodwin, N. Connolly, K. S. Dawson, A. Dey, M. Doi, M. Donahue, S. E. Deustua, P. Eisenhardt, E. Ellingson, L. H. Faccioli, L. H. Faccioli, V. Fadeyev, H. K. Fakhouri, H. K. Fakhouri, A. S. Fruchter, D. Gilbank, M. D. Gladd...

    work page 2011

  67. [67]

    D. N. Spergel, et al., First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: Determination of cosmo- logical parameters, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 148 (2003) 175–194.arXiv:astro-ph/0302209

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  68. [68]

    D. N. Spergel, et al., Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) three year results: implications for cosmology, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 170 (2007) 377.arXiv:astro-ph/0603449

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  69. [69]

    Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation

    E. Komatsu, et al., Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpreta- tion, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180 (2009) 330–376.arXiv:0803.0547

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  70. [70]

    Komatsu, K

    E. Komatsu, K. M. Smith, J. Dunkley, C. L. Bennett, B. Gold, G. F. Hinshaw, N. Jarosik, D. L. Larson, M. R. Nolta, L. A. Page, D. N. Spergel, M. Halpern, R. Hill, A. J. Kogut, M. Limon, S. S. Meyer, N. P. Odegard, G. S. Tucker, J. L. Weiland, E. J. Wollack, E. L. Wright, Seven-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (wmap) observations: Cosmological int...

    work page 2010

  71. [71]

    C. L. Bennett, D. L. Larson, J. L. Weiland, N. Jarosik, G. F. Hinshaw, N. P. Odegard, K. M. Smith, R. S. Hill, B. Gold, M. Halpern, E. Komatsu, M. R. Nolta, L. A. Page, D. N. Spergel, E. J. Wollack, J. Dunkley, A. J. Kogut, M. Limon, S. S. Meyer, G. S. Tucker, E. L. Wright, Nine-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (wmap) observations: Final maps and...

    work page 2012

  72. [72]

    P. A. R. Ade, et al., Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 571 (2014) A16.arXiv: 1303.5076

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  73. [73]

    Improved cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the SDSS-II and SNLS supernova samples

    M. Betoule, et al., Improved cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the SDSS-II and SNLS supernova samples, Astron. Astrophys. 568 (2014) A22.arXiv:1401.4064. 20

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  74. [74]

    P. A. R. Ade, et al., Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A13.arXiv: 1502.01589

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  75. [75]

    P. A. R. Ade, et al., Planck 2015 results. XIV. Dark energy and modified gravity, Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A14. arXiv:1502.01590

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  76. [76]

    M. A. Troxel, et al., Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear, Phys. Rev. D 98 (4) (2018) 043528.arXiv:1708.01538

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  77. [77]

    T. M. C. Abbott, et al., Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing, Phys. Rev. D 98 (4) (2018) 043526.arXiv:1708.01530

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  78. [78]

    D. M. Scolnic, et al., The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from the Combined Pantheon Sample, Astrophys. J. 859 (2) (2018) 101.arXiv:1710.00845

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  79. [79]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanim, et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)].arXiv:1807.06209

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  80. [80]

    T. M. C. Abbott, et al., Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2) (2022) 023520.arXiv:2105.13549

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.