pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2006.02838 · v3 · submitted 2020-06-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 12:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-th
keywords primordial black holesdark mattermass windowsstructure formationseed effectPoisson effectLIGO/Virgocosmological constraints
0
0 comments X

The pith

Primordial black holes remain viable as dark matter in three mass windows and could seed cosmic structures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how primordial black holes might contribute to the dark matter density despite tight observational limits. It identifies three viable mass windows where PBHs could exist without violating current constraints: 10^16 to 10^17 grams, 10^20 to 10^24 grams, and 10 to 1000 solar masses. The authors argue that even a small fraction of these objects, particularly those in the 10 to 1000 solar mass range, could generate cosmic structures through seeding or Poisson fluctuations. This would help explain the formation of galaxies and supermassive black holes while addressing some shortcomings of the standard cold dark matter model. Additionally, exotic possibilities like Planck-mass relics from evaporating PBHs or stupendously large black holes are considered as potential dark components.

Core claim

Primordial black holes with masses in the ranges 10^{16}-10^{17} g, 10^{20}-10^{24} g and 10-10^3 M_⊙ are not excluded by observations and could provide some or all of the dark matter. In particular, the solar-mass range is of interest due to LIGO/Virgo detections, and larger PBHs could seed cosmological structures via the seed or Poisson effect, resolving issues in the standard CDM scenario and providing seeds for supermassive black holes. Planck-mass relics or stupendously large black holes bigger than 10^{12} M_⊙ could also serve as dark components.

What carries the argument

The seed and Poisson effects, whereby PBHs larger than 10^3 solar masses induce density perturbations that lead to structure formation.

If this is right

  • PBHs might resolve various cosmological conundra even if they are only a small part of the dark matter.
  • Larger PBHs could generate cosmological structures through the seed or Poisson effect, alleviating some problems in the standard cold dark matter scenario.
  • PBHs might provide seeds for the supermassive black holes in galactic nuclei.
  • Planck-mass relics of PBH evaporations could provide an interesting dark component.
  • Stupendously large black holes bigger than 10^{12} M_⊙ could provide an interesting dark component.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If LIGO/Virgo black hole mergers originate from PBHs, this would point to a substantial population in the stellar-mass range and require specific early-universe production mechanisms.
  • Early-universe models such as certain inflation scenarios would need to be tuned to produce PBHs at the abundances needed to populate these windows.
  • Searches for PBH-induced overdensities or modified galaxy formation patterns could provide independent tests beyond current mass constraints.

Load-bearing premise

The current observational constraints on PBH abundances in various mass ranges are both complete and accurate.

What would settle it

A direct detection of a primordial black hole abundance or signature outside the three allowed mass windows, or the absence of expected structure-seeding effects from PBHs in the 10 to 1000 solar mass range.

read the original abstract

Although the dark matter is usually assumed to be some form of elementary particle, primordial black holes (PBHs) could also provide some of it. However, various constraints restrict the possible mass windows to $10^{16}$ - $10^{17}\,$g, $10^{20}$ - $10^{24}\,$g and $10$ - $10^{3}\,M_{\odot}$. The last possibility is contentious but of special interest in view of the recent detection of black-hole mergers by LIGO/Virgo. PBHs might have important consequences and resolve various cosmological conundra even if they have only a small fraction of the dark-matter density. In particular, those larger than $10^{3}\,M_{\odot}$ could generate cosmological structures through the seed or Poisson effect, thereby alleviating some problems associated with the standard cold dark-matter scenario, and sufficiently large PBHs might provide seeds for the supermassive black holes in galactic nuclei. More exotically, the Planck-mass relics of PBH evaporations or stupendously large black holes bigger than $10^{12}\,M_{\odot}$ could provide an interesting dark component.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review summarizing the status of primordial black holes (PBHs) as a possible dark matter component. It identifies three observationally allowed mass windows (10^{16}-10^{17} g, 10^{20}-10^{24} g, and 10-10^3 M_⊙), notes the contentious nature of the stellar-mass window in light of LIGO/Virgo detections, and discusses potential implications even at low abundances, including structure seeding via seed or Poisson effects, seeds for supermassive black holes, and exotic relics or stupendously large black holes.

Significance. If the summarized constraints accurately reflect the cited literature, the review is significant for consolidating recent developments and highlighting how sub-dominant PBHs could address cosmological issues in the standard CDM paradigm. The cautious phrasing and emphasis on low-abundance effects provide a balanced reference point for the field, particularly given the relevance to gravitational-wave observations.

major comments (1)
  1. The abstract and introductory discussion of the 10-10^3 M_⊙ window state that it is 'contentious but of special interest' due to LIGO/Virgo; however, the manuscript does not quantify or reference the specific merger-rate tensions that render the window contentious, which is load-bearing for the claim of special interest in recent developments.
minor comments (2)
  1. A summary table listing the three mass windows together with the primary constraining observables and key references would improve the review's utility as a reference.
  2. The discussion of the seed versus Poisson effect for structure generation would benefit from a brief qualitative distinction or citation to the relevant mechanism papers for readers unfamiliar with the terminology.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive comment on the manuscript. We address the major comment below and will incorporate the suggested clarification in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The abstract and introductory discussion of the 10-10^3 M_⊙ window state that it is 'contentious but of special interest' due to LIGO/Virgo; however, the manuscript does not quantify or reference the specific merger-rate tensions that render the window contentious, which is load-bearing for the claim of special interest in recent developments.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from explicitly referencing the merger-rate tensions. In the revised version we will add a brief quantification in the introduction, citing the LIGO/Virgo observed rates (e.g., the local merger rate density of ~10-100 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1} for stellar-mass binaries) and the resulting upper limits on the PBH fraction in the 10-100 M_⊙ range from rate comparisons, thereby clarifying why the window remains contentious while preserving the overall narrative. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

This is a review paper that summarizes existing observational constraints on PBH mass windows from the literature and discusses possible implications (structure seeding, SMBH seeds) at low abundance. No new derivations, equations, or quantitative predictions are presented whose validity depends on internal steps. All central claims use cautious language and rest on cited external results rather than any self-referential reduction, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review relies on standard cosmological assumptions (inflation, radiation-dominated era, standard gravity) and existing observational constraints; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard early-universe cosmology and gravity apply to PBH formation and evolution
    Invoked throughout the discussion of mass windows and constraints

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5498 in / 1166 out tokens · 27493 ms · 2026-05-16T12:10:13.797913+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 17 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Tunneling and tidal stripping in multifield ultralight dark matter halos

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A semiclassical tunneling model shows that two-field ultralight DM halos have stability bounds that can be relaxed for some density-mass ratios but become more stringent across much of the parameter space compared to ...

  2. Reviving primordial black hole formation in slow first-order phase transitions

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Primordial black hole formation from slow first-order phase transitions remains viable if slow reheating after supercooling creates an early matter-dominated era allowing small overdensities to grow, producing black h...

  3. How lonely are the Binary Compact Objects Detected by the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration?

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    No three-body encounter signatures detected in GW170817, GW190814, and GW230627_015337, constraining intermediate-mass black holes above 100 solar masses within roughly 0.1 AU of these binaries.

  4. Microscopic primordial black holes as macroscopic dark matter from large extra dimensions

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In the ADD extra-dimension model, microscopic primordial black holes undergo runaway accretion and grow to macroscopic scales, allowing them to comprise all dark matter with initial abundances as low as 10^{-44}.

  5. Shadows of Giants: Constraints on Stupendously Large Black Holes from Negative Sources against the Cosmic Microwave Background

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Stupendously large black holes cast shadows on the CMB that rule out masses above 10^17 solar masses within the last scattering surface and limit their density parameter to below 10^-5 for masses 10^15 to 10^18 solar masses.

  6. Nonperturbative stochastic inflation in perturbative dynamical background

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Derives stochastic equations from Schwinger-Keldysh formalism that include quantum diffusion and classical metric perturbations for non-perturbative ultra-slow-roll inflation, validated on Starobinsky and critical Hig...

  7. Primordial black holes and the velocity acoustic oscillations features in 21 cm signals from the cosmic Dark Ages

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Primordial black holes generate up to 30% amplitude VAO wiggles in 21 cm signals from the Dark Ages at redshifts 20-40 even at dark matter fractions as low as 10^-13.

  8. Fixing the Renormalization of Inflationary Loops via Ward Identities

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Ward identities from large gauge symmetry impose model-independent constraints on renormalizing inflationary loops and non-perturbatively govern the infrared power spectrum evolution.

  9. Inflation driven by repulsive-like primordial black holes

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Repulsive-like primordial black holes in the Swiss-cheese framework produce quasi-de Sitter expansion, enabling inflation with evaporation reheating and acting as early dark energy for certain masses and densities.

  10. Purely Quadratic Non-Gaussianity from Tachyonic Instability: Primordial Black Holes and Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Purely quadratic non-Gaussianity from tachyonic instability allows narrow curvature spectra to exponentially suppress primordial black hole overproduction via correlation coefficient ρ approaching -1 while retaining s...

  11. Dark ages bounds on non-accreting massive compact halo objects

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Upper bounds on the dark matter fraction in MACHOs of 10^3 to 10^7 solar masses are derived from limits on distortions to the global 21-cm signal at z~17, z~89, and z>300.

  12. Self-resonance preheating in deformed attractor models: oscillon formation and evolution

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Deformed alpha-attractor T-models with a Gaussian feature near the minimum yield more smaller shorter-lived oscillons during self-resonance preheating, suppressing energy in oscillons and altering the high-frequency g...

  13. Subsolar mass black holes from stellar collapse induced by primordial black holes

    astro-ph.HE 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Subsolar mass black holes can arise when tiny primordial black holes capture and consume dwarf stars, leaving black holes with the stars' masses.

  14. Precision Analysis for $\boldsymbol{H_0}$ Using Upcoming Multi-band Gravitational Wave Observations

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Multi-band GW observations of PBHs can reduce H0 uncertainty to ≲2 km/s/Mpc (conservative) or O(0.1) km/s/Mpc (optimistic) via Fisher forecasts on M_PBH and f_PBH.

  15. In-depth analysis of the clustering of dark matter particles around primordial black holes. Part III: CMB constraints

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    CMB data limits the s-wave annihilation cross section of thermal dark matter particles to ≲ 10^{-30} cm³/s scaled by PBH fraction and mass for PBHs heavier than ~10^{-10} solar masses.

  16. Probing Primordial Black Holes with upcoming Radio Telescopes: a case study for LOFAR2.0, FAST Core Array and BINGO

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    LOFAR2.0, FAST Core Array and BINGO can constrain the PBH dark matter fraction f_PBH below 0.16-0.39 for masses above 10^{-2} to 10 solar masses via FRB lensing statistics.

  17. Constraints on Primordial Black Holes

    astro-ph.CO 2020-02 accept novelty 4.0

    Updated compilation shows PBHs are tightly constrained across 55 orders of magnitude in mass, ruling out dominant dark matter contributions except in narrow windows, with many limits carrying observational uncertainties.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · cited by 17 Pith papers · 170 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Figure 7 shows constraints on fPBH for WIMP masses of 10 GeV, 100 GeV and 1 TeV

    using the numerical packages from Reference [306] to obtain the optical depth and spectrum of by-products from WIMP annihilations. Figure 7 shows constraints on fPBH for WIMP masses of 10 GeV, 100 GeV and 1 TeV. The falling part at low M is associated with halos formed after dark-matter kinetic decoupling (when the kinetic energy of the WIMPs is important...

  2. [2]

    The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded during Expansion and the Hot Cosmological Model,

    Yakov Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov, “The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded during Expansion and the Hot Cosmological Model,” Sov. astron. 10, 602–603 (1967)

  3. [3]

    Black hole explosions,

    Stephen Hawking, “Black hole explosions,” Nature 248, 30–31 (1974)

  4. [4]

    New cosmological constraints on primordial black holes,

    Bernard Carr, Kazunori Kohri, Yuuiti Sendouda, and Jun’ichi Yokoyama, “New cosmological constraints on primordial black holes,” Phys. Rev. D81, 104019 (2010)

  5. [5]

    Gamma rays from primordial black holes,

    Don Page and Stephen Hawking, “Gamma rays from primordial black holes,” Astrophys. J. 206, 1–7 (1976)

  6. [6]

    Some cosmological consequences of primordial black-hole evaporations,

    Bernard Carr, “Some cosmological consequences of primordial black-hole evaporations,” Astrophys. J. 206, 8–25 (1976)

  7. [7]

    On the density of pbh’s in the galactic halo,

    Edward Wright, “On the density of pbh’s in the galactic halo,” Astrophys. J. 459, 487 (1996), arXiv:astro- ph/9509074 [astro-ph]

  8. [8]

    New constraints on the primordial black hole number density from Galactic gamma-ray astronomy

    Roland Lehoucq, M. Casse, J. M. Casandjian, and I. Grenier, “New constraints on the primordial black hole number density from Galactic gamma-ray astronomy,” Astron. astrophys. 502, 37 (2009), arXiv:0906.1648 [astro-ph.HE]

  9. [9]

    Anti-protons in the Cosmic Radiation,

    P´ eter Kiraly, J. Szabelski, J. Wdowczyk, and A. W. Wolfendale, “Anti-protons in the Cosmic Radiation,” Nature 293, 120–122 (1981)

  10. [10]

    Cosmic rays from primordial black holes,

    Jane MacGibbon and Bernard Carr, “Cosmic rays from primordial black holes,” Astrophys. J. 371, 447–469 (1991). 30 Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments

  11. [11]

    Observational consequences of positron production by evaporating black holes,

    P. N. Okele and Martin Rees, “Observational consequences of positron production by evaporating black holes,” A & A 81, 263 (1980)

  12. [12]

    Primordial black holes and the observed Galactic 511 keV line

    Cosimo Bambi, Alexander Dolgov, and Alexey Petrov, “Primordial black holes and the observed Galactic 511-keV line,” Phys. Lett. B670, 174–178 (2008), [Erratum: Phys. Lett.B681,504(2009)], arXiv:0801.2786 [astro-ph]

  13. [13]

    Primordial black holes with mass $10^{16}-10^{17}$ g and reionization of the Universe

    Konstantin Belotsky and A. a. Kirillov, “Primordial black holes with mass 10 16 – 1017 g and reionization of the Universe,” JCAP 1501, 041 (2015), arXiv:1409.8601 [astro-ph.CO]

  14. [14]

    Gamma-ray bursts from the final stage of primordial black hole evaporation,

    Alexey Belyanin, V. V. Kocharovsky, and V. V. Kocharovsky, “Gamma-ray bursts from the final stage of primordial black hole evaporation,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 283, 626 (1996)

  15. [15]

    Further evidence for gamma-ray bursts consistent with primordial black hole evaporation,

    David Cline, D. Sanders, and W. Hong, “Further evidence for gamma-ray bursts consistent with primordial black hole evaporation,” Astrophys. J. 486, 169–178 (1997)

  16. [16]

    Can pregalactic objects generate galaxies?

    Bernard Carr and Martin Rees, “Can pregalactic objects generate galaxies?” Mon. Not. Roy. astron. Soc. 206, 801–818 (1984)

  17. [17]

    Could supermassive black holes be quintessential primordial black holes?

    Rachel Bean and Joao Magueijo, “Could supermassive black holes be quintessential primordial black holes?” Phys. Rev. D66, 063505 (2002)

  18. [18]

    Primeval black holes and galaxy formation,

    P´ eter M´ esz´ aros, “Primeval black holes and galaxy formation,” Astron. astrophys.38, 5–13 (1975)

  19. [19]

    Pregalactic black hole accretion and the thermal history of the universe,

    Bernard Carr, “Pregalactic black hole accretion and the thermal history of the universe,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 194, 639–668 (1981)

  20. [20]

    Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter,

    Bernard Carr, Florian K¨ uhnel, and Marit Sandstad, “Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D94, 083504 (2016)

  21. [21]

    Cosmological effects of primordial black holes,

    George Chapline, “Cosmological effects of primordial black holes,” Nature (London) 253, 251–+ (1975)

  22. [22]

    Primordial Nucleosynthesis in Light of WMAP

    Richard Cyburt, Brian Fields, and Keith Olive, “Primordial nucleosynthesis in light of WMAP,” Phys. Lett. B567, 227–234 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0302431 [astro-ph]

  23. [23]

    Searching for Dark Matter Constituents with Many Solar Masses

    Paul Frampton, “Searching for Dark Matter Constituents with Many Solar Masses,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A31, 1650093 (2016), arXiv:1510.00400 [hep-ph]

  24. [24]

    The MACHO Project LMC Microlensing Results from the First Two Years and the Nature of the Galactic Dark Halo

    Charles Alcock et al. (MACHO), “The MACHO project LMC microlensing results from the first two years and the nature of the galactic dark halo,” Astrophys. J. 486, 697–726 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9606165 [astro-ph]

  25. [25]

    Could MACHOS be Primordial Black Holes formed during the QCD Epoch?

    Karsten Jedamzik, “Could MACHOS be primordial black holes formed during the QCD epoch?” Sources and detection of dark matter in the universe. Proceedings, 3rd International Symposium, and Workshop on Primordial Black Holes and Hawking Radiation, Marina del Rey, USA, February 17-20, 1998 , Phys. Rept. 307, 155–162 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9805147 [astro-ph]

  26. [26]

    The MACHO Project: Microlensing Results from 5.7 Years of LMC Observations

    Charles Alcock et al. (MACHO), “The MACHO project: Microlensing results from 5.7 years of LMC observations,” Astrophys. J. 542, 281–307 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0001272

  27. [27]

    Limits on the Macho Content of the Galactic Halo from the EROS-2 Survey of the Magellanic Clouds

    Patrick Tisserand et al. (EROS-2), “Limits on the Macho Content of the Galactic Halo from the EROS-2 Survey of the Magellanic Clouds,” Astron. astrophys. 469, 387–404 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0607207

  28. [28]

    Constraints on Primordial Black Holes

    Bernard Carr, Kazunori Kohri, Yuuiti Sendouda, and Jun’ichi Yokoyama, “Constraints on Primordial Black Holes,” (2020), arXiv:2002.12778 [astro-ph.CO]

  29. [29]

    Inflationary Primordial Black Holes as All Dark Matter

    Keisuke Inomata, Masahiro Kawasaki, Kyohei Mukaida, Yuichiro Tada, and Tsutomu Yanagida, “Infla- tionary Primordial Black Holes as All Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D96, 043504 (2017), arXiv:1701.02544 [astro-ph.CO]

  30. [30]

    Massive Primordial Black Holes from Hybrid Inflation as Dark Matter and the seeds of Galaxies

    S´ ebastien Clesse and Juan Garc´ ıa-Bellido, “Massive Primordial Black Holes from Hybrid Inflation as Dark Matter and the seeds of Galaxies,” Phys. Rev. D92, 023524 (2015), arXiv:1501.07565 [astro-ph.CO]

  31. [31]

    Primordial black holes with an accurate QCD equation of state

    Christian Byrnes, Mark Hindmarsh, Sam Young, and Michael Hawkins, “Primordial black holes with an accurate QCD equation of state,” JCAP 1808, 041 (2018), arXiv:1801.06138 [astro-ph.CO]

  32. [32]

    Baryon isocurvature fluctuations at small scales and baryonic dark matter,

    Alexander Dolgov and Joseph Silk, “Baryon isocurvature fluctuations at small scales and baryonic dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D47, 4244–4255 (1993)

  33. [33]

    Cosmological constraints on primordial black holes produced in the near-critical gravitational collapse

    Jun’ichi Yokoyama, “Cosmological constraints on primordial black holes produced in the near critical grav- itational collapse,” Phys. Rev. D58, 107502 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9804041 [gr-qc]

  34. [34]

    Microlensing and dynamical constraints on primordial black hole dark matter with an extended mass function

    Anne Green, “Microlensing and dynamical constraints on primordial black hole dark matter with an extended mass function,” Phys. Rev. D 94, 063530 (2016), arXiv:1609.01143 [astro-ph.CO]

  35. [35]

    Primordial black hole constraints for extended mass functions,

    Bernard Carr, Martti Raidal, Tommi Tenkanen, Ville Vaskonen, and Hardi Veerm¨ ae, “Primordial black hole constraints for extended mass functions,” Phys. Rev. D96, 023514 (2017). 31 Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments

  36. [36]

    Constraints on Primordial Black Holes with Extended Mass Functions

    Florian K¨ uhnel and Katherine Freese, “Constraints on Primordial Black Holes with Extended Mass Func- tions,” Phys. Rev. D95, 083508 (2017), arXiv:1701.07223 [astro-ph.CO]

  37. [37]

    Binary Black Hole Mergers in the first Advanced LIGO Observing Run

    Benjamin Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Binary Black Hole Mergers in the first Advanced LIGO Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X 6, 041015 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.X 8, 039903 (2018)], arXiv:1606.04856 [gr-qc]

  38. [38]

    Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914

    Benjamin Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03840 [gr-qc]

  39. [39]

    Binary Black Hole Population Properties Inferred from the First and Second Observing Runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo,

    Benjamin Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Binary Black Hole Population Properties Inferred from the First and Second Observing Runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo,” (2018), arXiv:1811.12940 [astro-ph.HE]

  40. [40]

    The first gravitational-wave source from the isolated evolution of two 40-100 Msun stars

    Krzysztof Belczynski, Daniel Holz, Tomasz Bulik, and Richard O’Shaughnessy, “The first gravitational- wave source from the isolated evolution of two stars in the 40-100 solar mass range,” Nature 534, 512–515 (2016), arXiv:1602.04531 [astro-ph.HE]

  41. [41]

    Gravitational waves from a population of binary black holes,

    Richard Bond and Bernard Carr, “Gravitational waves from a population of binary black holes,” Mon. Not. Roy. astron. Soc. 207, 585–609 (1984)

  42. [42]

    Possible Indirect Confirmation of the Existence of Pop III Massive Stars by Gravitational Wave

    Tomoya Kinugawa, Kohei Inayoshi, Kenta Hotokezaka, Daisuke Nakauchi, and Takashi Nakamura, “Possible Indirect Confirmation of the Existence of Pop III Massive Stars by Gravitational Wave,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 442, 2963–2992 (2014), arXiv:1402.6672 [astro-ph.HE]

  43. [43]

    Gravitational Waves from Coalescing Black Hole MACHO Binaries

    Takashi Nakamura, Misao Sasaki, Takahiro Tanaka, and Kip S. Thorne, “Gravitational waves from coa- lescing black hole MACHO binaries,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 487, L139–L142 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9708060

  44. [44]

    Did LIGO detect dark matter?

    Simeon Bird, Ilias Cholis, Julian Muoz, Yacine Ali-Ha¨ ımoud, Marc Kamionkowski, Ely D. Kovetz, Alvise Raccanelli, and Adam G. Riess, “Did LIGO detect dark matter?” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 201301 (2016), arXiv:1603.00464 [astro-ph.CO]

  45. [45]

    Primordial Black Hole Scenario for the Gravitational-Wave Event GW150914

    Misao Sasaki, Teruaki Suyama, Takahiro Tanaka, and Shuichiro Yokoyama, “Primordial Black Hole Sce- nario for the Gravitational-Wave Event GW150914,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 061101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 059901 (2018)], arXiv:1603.08338 [astro-ph.CO]

  46. [46]

    Pre-DECIGO can get the smoking gun to decide the astrophysical or cosmological origin of GW150914-like binary black holes

    Takashi Nakamura et al., “Pre-DECIGO can get the smoking gun to decide the astrophysical or cosmological origin of GW150914-like binary black holes,” PTEP 2016, 093E01 (2016), arXiv:1607.00897 [astro-ph.HE]

  47. [47]

    Primordial Black Holes - Perspectives in Gravitational Wave Astronomy -

    Misao Sasaki, Teruaki Suyama, Takahiro Tanaka, and Shuichiro Yokoyama, “Primordial black holes — perspectives in gravitational wave astronomy,” Class. Quant. Grav. 35, 063001 (2018), arXiv:1801.05235 [astro-ph.CO]

  48. [48]

    Gravitational Waves from Primordial Black Hole Mergers

    Martti Raidal, Ville Vaskonen, and Hardi Veerm¨ ae, “Gravitational Waves from Primordial Black Hole Mergers,” JCAP 1709, 037 (2017), arXiv:1707.01480 [astro-ph.CO]

  49. [49]

    The merger rate of primordial-black-hole binaries

    Yacine Ali-Ha¨ ımoud, Ely D. Kovetz, and Marc Kamionkowski, “Merger rate of primordial black-hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D96, 123523 (2017), arXiv:1709.06576 [astro-ph.CO]

  50. [50]

    Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,

    Stephen Hawking, “Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,” Mon. Not. Roy. astron. Soc. 152, 75 (1971)

  51. [51]

    Black holes in the early Universe,

    Bernard Carr and Stephen Hawking, “Black holes in the early Universe,” Mon. Not. R. astron. Soc. 168, 399–415 (1974)

  52. [52]

    Critical phenomena in gravitational collapse,

    Carsten Gundlach, “Critical phenomena in gravitational collapse,” Living Rev. Rel. 2, 4 (1999), arXiv:gr- qc/0001046 [gr-qc]

  53. [53]

    Primordial black hole formation in the early universe: critical behaviour and self-similarity,

    Ilia Musco and John Miller, “Primordial black hole formation in the early universe: critical behaviour and self-similarity,” Classical Quantum Gravity 30, 145009 (2013)

  54. [54]

    Critical phenomena in gravitational collapse (Physics Reports)

    Carsten Gundlach, “Critical phenomena in gravitational collapse,” Phys. Rept. 376, 339–405 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0210101 [gr-qc]

  55. [55]

    Near-Critical Gravitational Collapse and the Initial Mass Function of Primordial Black Holes

    Jens Niemeyer and Karsten Jedamzik, “Near-Critical Gravitational Collapse and the Initial Mass Function of Primordial Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5481–5484 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9709072

  56. [56]

    Dynamics of Primordial Black Hole Formation

    Jens Niemeyer and Karsten Jedamzik, “Dynamics of primordial black hole formation,” Phys. Rev. D59, 124013 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9901292 [astro-ph]

  57. [57]

    Black hole formation in the Friedmann universe: Formulation and computation in numerical relativity

    Masaru Shibata and Misao Sasaki, “Black hole formation in the Friedmann universe: Formulation and computation in numerical relativity,” Phys. Rev. D60, 084002 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9905064

  58. [58]

    Computations of primordial black hole formation

    Ilia Musco, John Miller, and Luciano Rezzolla, “Computations of primordial black hole formation,” Classical Quantum Gravity 22, 1405–1424 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0412063 [gr-qc]. 32 Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments

  59. [59]

    Primordial black hole formation in the radiative era: investigation of the critical nature of the collapse

    Ilia Musco, John Miller, and Alexander Polnarev, “Primordial black hole formation in the radiative era: Investigation of the critical nature of the collapse,” Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 235001 (2009), arXiv:0811.1452 [gr-qc]

  60. [60]

    Effects of Critical Collapse on Primordial Black-Hole Mass Spectra

    Florian K¨ uhnel, Cornelius Rampf, and Marit Sandstad, “Effects of Critical Collapse on Primordial Black- Hole Mass Spectra,” Eur. Phys. J. C76, 93 (2016), arXiv:1512.00488 [astro-ph.CO]

  61. [61]

    Planck 2015 results. XX. Constraints on inflation

    Peter Ade et al. (Planck), “Planck 2015 results. XX. Constraints on inflation,” Astron. Astrophys. 594, A20 (2016), arXiv:1502.02114 [astro-ph.CO]

  62. [62]

    Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Data Processing, Sky Maps, and Basic Results

    Gary Hinshaw et al. (WMAP), “Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe Observations: Data Processing, Sky Maps, and Basic Results,” Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180, 225–245 (2009), arXiv:0803.0732 [astro-ph]

  63. [63]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Nabila Aghanim et al. (Planck), “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” (2018), arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

  64. [64]

    Primordial black holes, dark matter and hot-spot electroweak baryogenesis at the quark-hadron epoch,

    Bernard Carr, Sebastien Clesse, and Juan Garc´ ıa-Bellido, “Primordial black holes, dark matter and hot-spot electroweak baryogenesis at the quark-hadron epoch,” (2019), arXiv:1904.02129 [astro-ph.CO]

  65. [65]

    The Primordial black hole mass spectrum,

    Bernard Carr, “The Primordial black hole mass spectrum,” Astrophys. J. 201, 1–19 (1975)

  66. [66]

    Threshold of primordial black hole formation

    Tomohiro Harada, Chul-Moon Yoo, and Kazunori Kohri, “Threshold of primordial black hole formation,” Phys. Rev. D88, 084051 (2013), [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D89,no.2,029903(2014)], arXiv:1309.4201 [astro- ph.CO]

  67. [67]

    Threshold for primordial black holes: Dependence on the shape of the cosmological perturba- tions,

    Ilia Musco, “Threshold for primordial black holes: Dependence on the shape of the cosmological perturba- tions,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 123524 (2019), arXiv:1809.02127 [gr-qc]

  68. [68]

    Universal threshold for primordial black hole forma- tion,

    Albert Escriva, Cristiano Germani, and Ravi Sheth, “Universal threshold for primordial black hole forma- tion,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 044022 (2020), arXiv:1907.13311 [gr-qc]

  69. [69]

    Analytical thresholds for black hole formation in general cosmological backgrounds,

    Albert Escriv, Cristiano Germani, and Ravi Sheth, “Analytical thresholds for black hole formation in general cosmological backgrounds,” (2020), arXiv:2007.05564 [gr-qc]

  70. [70]

    The role of non-gaussianities in Primordial Black Hole formation

    Vicente Atal and Cristiano Germani, “The role of non-gaussianities in Primordial Black Hole formation,” Phys. Dark Univ. 24, 100275 (2019), arXiv:1811.07857 [astro-ph.CO]

  71. [71]

    Non-Gaussian Formation of Primordial Black Holes: Effects on the Threshold,

    Alex Kehagias, Ilia Musco, and Antonio Riotto, “Non-Gaussian Formation of Primordial Black Holes: Effects on the Threshold,” JCAP 1912, 029 (2019), arXiv:1906.07135 [astro-ph.CO]

  72. [72]

    On Ellipsoidal Collapse and Primordial Black-Hole Formation

    Florian K¨ uhnel and Marit Sandstad, “Ellipsoidal collapse and primordial black hole formation,” Phys. Rev. D94, 063514 (2016), arXiv:1602.04815 [astro-ph.CO]

  73. [73]

    Simulation of primordial black hole formation using pseudo-spectral methods,

    Albert Escriva, “Simulation of primordial black hole formation using pseudo-spectral methods,” Phys. Dark Univ. 27, 100466 (2020), arXiv:1907.13065 [gr-qc]

  74. [74]

    The abundance of primordial black holes depends on the shape of the inflationary power spectrum

    Cristiano Germani and Ilia Musco, “Abundance of Primordial Black Holes Depends on the Shape of the Inflationary Power Spectrum,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 141302 (2019), arXiv:1805.04087 [astro-ph.CO]

  75. [75]

    Cosmic Conundra Explained by Thermal History and Primordial Black Holes,

    Bernard Carr, Sebastien Clesse, Juan Garc´ ıa-Bellido, and Florian K¨ uhnel, “Cosmic Conundra Explained by Thermal History and Primordial Black Holes,” (2019), arXiv:1906.08217 [astro-ph.CO]

  76. [76]

    Fluctuations at the threshold of classical cosmology,

    Edward Harrison, Phys. Rev. D1, 2726-2730 (1970), “Fluctuations at the threshold of classical cosmology,” (1970)

  77. [77]

    A hypothesis, unifying the structure and the entropy of the Universe,

    Yakov Zeldovich, “A hypothesis, unifying the structure and the entropy of the Universe,” Mon. Not. R. astron. Soc. 160, 1P (1972)

  78. [78]

    Primordial Black Holes As A Cosmological Test Of Grand Unification,

    Maxim Khlopov and Alexander Polnarev, “Primordial Black Holes As A Cosmological Test Of Grand Unification,” Phys. Lett. B97, 383–387 (1980)

  79. [79]

    Dustlike Stages in the Early Universe and Constraints on the Primordial Black-Hole Spectrum,

    Alexander Polnarev and Maxim Khlopov, “Dustlike Stages in the Early Universe and Constraints on the Primordial Black-Hole Spectrum,” Sov. astron. 26, 391–+ (1982)

  80. [80]

    Gravitational instability of scalar fields and formation of primordial black holes,

    Maxim Khlopov, Boris Malomed, and Yakov Zeldovich, “Gravitational instability of scalar fields and formation of primordial black holes,” Mon. Not. Roy. astron. Soc. 215, 575–589

Showing first 80 references.