REVIEW 3 cited by
The Challenges of Studying Misinformation on Video-Sharing Platforms During Crises and Mass-Convergence Events
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Mis- and disinformation can spread rapidly on video-sharing platforms (VSPs). Despite the growing use of VSPs, there has not been a proportional increase in our ability to understand this medium and the messages conveyed through it. In this work, we draw on our prior experiences to outline three core challenges faced in studying VSPs in high-stakes and fast-paced settings: (1) navigating the unique affordances of VSPs, (2) understanding VSP content and determining its authenticity, and (3) novel user behaviors on VSPs for spreading misinformation. By highlighting these challenges, we hope that researchers can reflect on how to adapt existing research methods and tools to these new contexts, or develop entirely new ones.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Multimodal Fake News Video Explanation: Dataset, Analysis and Evaluation
A new dataset (FakeVE) and a benchmark model (MRGT) for generating natural-language explanations of why multimodal news videos are fake.
-
Political Fact-Checking Efforts are Constrained by Deficiencies in Coverage, Speed, and Reach
During the 2022 U.S. midterms, fewer than half of prominent misinformation narratives received fact-checks, the median fact-check came four days late, and fact-check posts were about 1.2% of narrative-related conversation.
-
FakeSV-VLM: Taming VLM for Detecting Fake Short-Video News via Progressive Mixture-Of-Experts Adapter
FakeSV-VLM reaches 90.22% and 89.30% accuracy on FakeSV and FakeTT by adding a two-stage MoE adapter and contrastive alignment to InternVL2.5-8B.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.