pith. sign in

arxiv: 2307.15343 · v2 · pith:XAYI6NFWnew · submitted 2023-07-28 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI· cs.LG· stat.ML

Med-HALT: Medical Domain Hallucination Test for Large Language Models

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LGstat.ML
keywords hallucinationmed-haltmedicalmodelsdatasetdomainlanguagellms
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This research paper focuses on the challenges posed by hallucinations in large language models (LLMs), particularly in the context of the medical domain. Hallucination, wherein these models generate plausible yet unverified or incorrect information, can have serious consequences in healthcare applications. We propose a new benchmark and dataset, Med-HALT (Medical Domain Hallucination Test), designed specifically to evaluate and reduce hallucinations. Med-HALT provides a diverse multinational dataset derived from medical examinations across various countries and includes multiple innovative testing modalities. Med-HALT includes two categories of tests reasoning and memory-based hallucination tests, designed to assess LLMs's problem-solving and information retrieval abilities. Our study evaluated leading LLMs, including Text Davinci, GPT-3.5, LlaMa-2, MPT, and Falcon, revealing significant differences in their performance. The paper provides detailed insights into the dataset, promoting transparency and reproducibility. Through this work, we aim to contribute to the development of safer and more reliable language models in healthcare. Our benchmark can be found at medhalt.github.io

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 12 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MedHal-Loc: Are "Explainable-by-Architecture" Medical Hallucination Detectors Faithful Localizers? A Localization Benchmark

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MedHal-Loc benchmark shows KG-triple hallucination detectors localize errors no better than chance on controlled medical statements due to entity extraction limits, while NLI and consistency methods succeed above chan...

  2. Structure Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Factual Queries

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SG-RAG frames retrieval as subgraph matching to ensure LLMs meet every condition in factual queries and reports large gains over baselines on a new 120k-pair ERQA dataset.

  3. Do No Harm? Hallucination and Actor-Level Abuse in Web-Deployed Medical Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Evaluation of 6233 MedGPTs finds 25-30% with low factual accuracy, 33.6-54.3% violating operational thresholds, and 57% of action-enabled models lacking privacy disclosures.

  4. Capabilities of Gemini Models in Medicine

    cs.AI 2024-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Med-Gemini sets new records on 10 of 14 medical benchmarks including 91.1% on MedQA-USMLE, beats GPT-4V by 44.5% on multimodal tasks, and surpasses humans on medical text summarization.

  5. Med-HEAL: Analyzing and Mitigating Hallucinations in Medical LLMs with Hallucination-Aware In-Context Learning

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Med-HEAL builds a hallucination dataset from BioMistral answers on EHRNoteQA via GPT-4o and human review, then shows self-critique improves accuracy in three of five tested LLMs without retraining.

  6. Beyond Literal Summarization: Redefining Hallucination for Medical SOAP Note Evaluation

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Redefining hallucination evaluation for medical SOAP notes to credit clinical reasoning reduces reported hallucination rates from 35% to 9%.

  7. Ten Headache Specialists versus Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Literature Summarization: A Critical Evaluation and Comparison

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Headache specialists preferred their own literature summaries over those from Sonnet, GPT-4o, and Llama 3.1 in a blinded evaluation, though AI summaries were sometimes indistinguishable.

  8. MedThink: Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy in Small Models via Teacher-Guided Reasoning Correction

    cs.CY 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    MedThink, a two-stage teacher-guided reasoning correction distillation framework, boosts small language models' medical diagnostic accuracy by up to 12.7% on benchmarks and achieves 56.4% on a gastroenterology dataset.

  9. Query pipeline optimization for cancer patient question answering systems

    cs.CL 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Three-aspect RAG query pipeline optimization for cancer patient QA introduces HSRDR and SEOS and reports 5.24% accuracy gain on Claude-3-haiku versus chain-of-thought on a custom dataset.

  10. Evaluating Hallucinations in Domain-Adapted Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-04 conditional novelty 3.0

    Fine-tuning Llama-2 on a small domain-specific dataset yields high memorization but near-zero reasoning on newly introduced entities, suggesting fine-tuning alone is insufficient for knowledge injection.

  11. Data-Centric Foundation Models in Computational Healthcare: A Survey

    cs.LG 2024-01 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    The paper surveys data-centric strategies for foundation models in computational healthcare and supplies a curated list of related models and datasets.

  12. A Survey of Hallucination in Large Foundation Models

    cs.AI 2023-09 accept novelty 3.0

    A survey classifying hallucination phenomena specific to large foundation models, establishing evaluation criteria, examining mitigation strategies, and discussing future directions.