Can Generalist Foundation Models Outcompete Special-Purpose Tuning? Case Study in Medicine
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:MLAKXYO3record.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Generalist foundation models such as GPT-4 have displayed surprising capabilities in a wide variety of domains and tasks. Yet, there is a prevalent assumption that they cannot match specialist capabilities of fine-tuned models. For example, most explorations to date on medical competency benchmarks have leveraged domain-specific training, as exemplified by efforts on BioGPT and Med-PaLM. We build on a prior study of GPT-4's capabilities on medical challenge benchmarks in the absence of special training. Rather than using simple prompting to highlight the model's out-of-the-box capabilities, we perform a systematic exploration of prompt engineering. We find that prompting innovation can unlock deeper specialist capabilities and show that GPT-4 easily tops prior leading results for medical benchmarks. The prompting methods we explore are general purpose, and make no specific use of domain expertise, removing the need for expert-curated content. Our experimental design carefully controls for overfitting during the prompt engineering process. We introduce Medprompt, based on a composition of several prompting strategies. With Medprompt, GPT-4 achieves state-of-the-art results on all nine of the benchmark datasets in the MultiMedQA suite. The method outperforms leading specialist models such as Med-PaLM 2 by a significant margin with an order of magnitude fewer calls to the model. Steering GPT-4 with Medprompt achieves a 27% reduction in error rate on the MedQA dataset over the best methods to date achieved with specialist models and surpasses a score of 90% for the first time. Beyond medical problems, we show the power of Medprompt to generalize to other domains and provide evidence for the broad applicability of the approach via studies of the strategy on exams in electrical engineering, machine learning, philosophy, accounting, law, nursing, and clinical psychology.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 32 Pith papers
-
NeuroQA: A Large-Scale Image-Grounded Benchmark for 3D Brain MRI Understanding
NeuroQA is a large-scale 3D brain MRI visual question answering benchmark with verified image-grounded QA pairs, multi-domain coverage, and baseline evaluations showing current models lag behind text-only performance.
-
AgentClinic: a multimodal agent benchmark to evaluate AI in simulated clinical environments
AgentClinic is a multimodal agent benchmark demonstrating that LLM diagnostic accuracy on MedQA drops to below one-tenth in sequential clinical simulations, with Claude-3.5 leading and large tool-use differences acros...
-
Small LLMs for Biomedical Claim Verification: Cost-Effective Fine-Tuning, Structural Dataset Shortcuts, and Cross-Domain Generalization
Fine-tuned Mistral-7B via QLoRA achieves up to 12% higher F1 than GPT-4o on biomedical claim verification with 1008 examples, identifies a structural shortcut in SciFact, and shows robust cross-domain transfer from so...
-
FAM-Bench: A Multimodal Benchmark for Condition-Aware Food-as-Medicine Reasoning
FAM-Bench introduces 2500 nutrition-expert-verified multimodal instances across 13 conditions for dish suitability assessment and comparative ranking tasks.
-
MADE: A Living Benchmark for Multi-Label Text Classification with Uncertainty Quantification of Medical Device Adverse Events
MADE creates a contamination-resistant living benchmark for multi-label classification of medical device adverse events, with evaluations revealing model-specific trade-offs in accuracy and uncertainty quantification.
-
TextGrad: Automatic "Differentiation" via Text
TextGrad performs automatic differentiation for compound AI systems by backpropagating natural-language feedback from LLMs to optimize variables ranging from code to molecular structures.
-
LLM Agents for Deliberative Collaboration: A Study on Joint Decision Making Under Partial Observability
A benchmark for LLM agents in partially observable joint decision-making reveals that deliberation challenges current models but can enable reflection and error correction.
-
MedEvoEval: Evaluating Continual Evolution of Doctor Agents through Simulated Clinical Episodes
MedEvoEval is an executable longitudinal evaluation framework that converts medical cases into action-gated simulated episodes to track how doctor agents evolve decision-making, resource use, and experience across mul...
-
Towards Unified and Data-Efficient Prognostics and Health Management with Tabular Foundation Models
Tabular foundation models applied to PHM via signal-to-table conversion achieve the best average ranks across prognostic and diagnostic tasks and remain competitive in low-data regimes.
-
Search-Time Contamination in Deep Research Agents: Measuring Performance Inflation in Public Benchmark Evaluation
Deep research agents exhibit widespread search-time contamination on six public benchmarks, with three defined leakage types inflating performance by up to 4%.
-
When Medical Safety Alignment Fails: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on High-Risk Medical Queries
MedHarm benchmark shows aligned LLMs and guardrails can still produce unsafe responses on high-risk medical queries, indicating medical safety requires domain-specific testing.
-
A Clinically Validated Foundation Model for Comprehensive Lung Pathology Interpretation
PulmoFoundation achieves 92.3% average AUC on 32 lung pathology tasks in prospective validation and raises pathologist accuracy from 83.8% to 91.7% in a crossover RCT.
-
AgentCo-op: Retrieval-Based Synthesis of Interoperable Multi-Agent Workflows
AgentCo-op retrieves and assembles existing agents and tools into interoperable workflows for open-world scientific tasks, showing effectiveness in genomics case studies and competitive benchmark results with lower costs.
-
PrivScope: Task-scoped Disclosure Control for Hybrid Agentic Systems
PrivScope enforces task-scoped disclosure at the local-cloud boundary in hybrid agents, eliminating profile leakage and halving re-identification risk on medical workflows while preserving task success.
-
AgentSlimming: Towards Efficient and Cost-Aware Multi-Agent Systems
AgentSlimming compresses graph-structured multi-agent systems by estimating agent importance and removing or replacing low-value agents, cutting token costs by up to 78.9% with negligible performance loss.
-
SymptomAI: Toward a Conversational AI Agent for Everyday Symptom Assessment
In a large real-world randomized study, SymptomAI agents achieved higher differential diagnosis accuracy (OR 2.47) than clinicians and showed stronger results with dedicated symptom interviews.
-
SymptomAI: Toward a Conversational AI Agent for Everyday Symptom Assessment
Large real-world deployment found conversational AI agents for everyday symptom assessment more accurate than clinicians and improved by structured interviewing.
-
Evaluating Small Open LLMs for Medical Question Answering: A Practical Framework
Small open LLMs produce highly variable medical answers even at low temperature, with self-agreement at most 0.20 and 87-97% unique outputs per model across 10 runs.
-
Med-V1: Small Language Models for Zero-shot and Scalable Biomedical Evidence Attribution
Med-V1 small models trained on synthetic data match frontier LLMs on biomedical evidence attribution benchmarks and enable large-scale hallucination analysis.
-
HuatuoGPT-o1, Towards Medical Complex Reasoning with LLMs
HuatuoGPT-o1 achieves superior medical complex reasoning by using a verifier to curate reasoning trajectories for fine-tuning and then applying RL with verifier-based rewards.
-
Capabilities of Gemini Models in Medicine
Med-Gemini sets new records on 10 of 14 medical benchmarks including 91.1% on MedQA-USMLE, beats GPT-4V by 44.5% on multimodal tasks, and surpasses humans on medical text summarization.
-
Can an LLM Learn Preferences from Choice Data?
LLMs show improving recommendation accuracy with more observed choices under the disappointment aversion model, but learning success is heterogeneous across models and preference parameters.
-
FaithMed: Training LLMs For Faithful Evidence-Based Medical Reasoning
FaithMed applies reinforcement learning with process-level rewards derived from evidence-based medicine rubrics to improve both task performance and reasoning faithfulness in medical LLMs.
-
AgentRx: A Benchmark Study of LLM Agents for Multimodal Clinical Prediction Tasks
Single-agent LLM frameworks outperform naive multi-agent systems in multimodal clinical risk prediction tasks and are better calibrated.
-
Decodable but Not Corrected by Fixed Residual-Stream Linear Steering: Evidence from Medical LLM Failure Regimes
Overthinking in medical QA is linearly decodable at 71.6% accuracy yet fixed residual-stream steering yields no correction across 29 configurations, while enabling selective abstention with AUROC 0.610.
-
Medical Reasoning with Large Language Models: A Survey and MR-Bench
LLMs show strong exam performance on medical tasks but exhibit a clear gap in accuracy on authentic clinical decision-making as measured by the new MR-Bench benchmark and unified evaluations.
-
Measuring Competency, Not Performance: Item-Aware Evaluation Across Medical Benchmarks
MedIRT applies Item Response Theory to medical LLM benchmarks to separate latent competency from item difficulty and discrimination, producing more stable rankings and revealing domain heterogeneity than accuracy alone.
-
Making Prompts First-Class Citizens for Adaptive LLM Pipelines
SPEAR proposes structured prompt views, runtime adaptive refinement, and policy rules to make prompts first-class, versioned, and evolvable components in complex LLM applications.
-
GPT-4o System Card
GPT-4o is OpenAI's end-to-end multimodal model with human-like audio latency, improved non-English text performance, stronger vision and audio understanding, and accompanying safety evaluations.
-
SURGENT: A Surgical Multi-Agent Assistance System Across the Perioperative Workflow
SURGENT is a multi-agent surgical assistance system with novel memory management that outperforms baseline LLMs on case analysis, plan simulation, safety monitoring, risk assessment, and rehabilitation guidance.
-
Ask Patients with Patience: Enabling LLMs for Human-Centric Medical Dialogue with Grounded Reasoning
APP is a multi-turn LLM framework for medical dialogue that combines empathetic questioning, Bayesian active learning, and guideline-based reasoning, outperforming baselines on a new simulated-patient benchmark in acc...
-
Advances and Challenges in Foundation Agents: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Evolutionary, Collaborative, and Safe Systems
This survey frames foundation agents using brain-inspired modular architectures and reviews challenges in evolution, collaboration, and safety.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.