pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.22066 · v1 · submitted 2025-05-28 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-ph

Cosmic Strings as Dynamical Dark Energy: Novel Constraints

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 14:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-ph
keywords cosmic stringsdynamical dark energycosmological constraintsCMB dataBAO measurementssupernova observationsLambdaCDM extensions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Current data limits cosmic strings to less than 1 percent as a dynamical dark energy component.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether a leftover network of cosmic strings could contribute to the universe's late-time acceleration in the same way dynamical dark energy does. The authors build four variants of the standard model that let the string energy density and velocity take different allowed ranges, including cases where the density can be negative. When these variants are fit to measurements of the cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillations, and Type Ia supernovae, positive string densities are pushed down to very small upper limits while negative densities give a modestly better numerical fit, yet the standard model without strings is still favored once parameter penalties are included. This matters because it turns precision cosmology into a direct test of high-energy ideas about topological defects and shows how close current observations are to ruling out or detecting such an extra component.

Core claim

Four phenomenological extensions of the LambdaCDM model are introduced that add a residual cosmic string network as a late-time contributor to the expansion. In the two models that restrict the string density to positive values, the data impose tight upper bounds, for example Omega_s less than 0.00901 at 95 percent from the CMB plus DESI plus DESY5 combination in the velocity-dependent case, while mildly raising the inferred Hubble constant. In the two models that allow negative densities, a slight preference for negative Omega_s appears together with a best-fit chi-squared improvement of 6, but Bayesian evidence continues to favor the standard LambdaCDM model over any of the string-network

What carries the argument

The four phenomenological models (Models 1-4) that parametrize a residual string network through its energy density Omega_s and bulk velocity v_s and add these terms to the late-time expansion history.

If this is right

  • Positive string densities are bounded above at the level of roughly 0.9 percent of the critical density in the simplest models.
  • The string bulk velocity is limited to less than about 0.57 in the data combinations examined.
  • Allowing negative string densities produces a modest numerical improvement in fit but does not overcome the Bayesian evidence penalty relative to LambdaCDM.
  • The inferred value of the Hubble constant shifts slightly upward when string contributions are included.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Negative energy densities for strings may correspond to networks with negative tension and could be linked to particular constructions in high-energy theory.
  • Next-generation surveys with tighter expansion-history measurements could either reveal a non-zero string signal or push the bounds much closer to zero.
  • The same late-time parametrization approach could be applied to other topological defects or exotic energy components using existing and upcoming data sets.

Load-bearing premise

A simple late-time parametrization of the string network's energy density and velocity is enough to capture its effect on the expansion without any additional early-universe evolution or changes to the standard background cosmology.

What would settle it

A future data set that either detects a clearly positive Omega_s with enough improvement to overcome the Occam penalty or that drives the upper limit on Omega_s even closer to zero would decide whether the string-network models are viable.

read the original abstract

Cosmic strings, topological defects predicted by high-energy theories, may contribute to the late-time expansion of the Universe, effectively mimicking dynamical dark energy. We investigate four phenomenological extensions of the $\Lambda$CDM model involving a residual string network: (i) a non-relativistic component with positive energy density (Model~1), (ii) a velocity-dependent extension (Model~2), (iii) a non-relativistic string network with energy density allowed to take both positive and negative values (Model~3), and (iv) a general scenario with free energy and velocity parameters (Model~4). These models are constrained using \textit{Planck} CMB data, SDSS or DESI baryon acoustic oscillations, and Type Ia supernovae observations. Models~1 and~2 yield strong upper bounds on the string density, for example, $\Omega_{\mathrm{s}} < 0.00901$ at 95\% CL from the CMB+DESI+DESY5 combination for Model~2, and mildly shift the inferred value of $H_0$ upward, though they are not favored by Bayesian evidence. For the same combination, the bulk velocity is bound as $v_{\mathrm{s}} < 0.569$. Models~3 and~4 exhibit a consistent preference for slightly negative values of $\Omega_{\mathrm{s}}$, with CMB-only data yielding $\Omega_{\mathrm{s}} = -0.038^{+0.029}_{-0.022}$ and $v_{\mathrm{s}}< 0.574$ in Model~4, and a best-fit improvement of $\Delta \chi^2 = -6.07$. However, these improvements are not sufficient to overcome the Occam penalty, and the Bayesian evidence continues to favor $\Lambda$CDM. These findings demonstrate the power of current data to constrain exotic energy components and encourage further exploration of string-inspired extensions to $\Lambda$CDM, particularly those involving negative-tension networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper investigates four phenomenological extensions of ΛCDM in which a residual cosmic string network contributes to late-time expansion as dynamical dark energy. The models are: (1) non-relativistic strings with positive Ω_s; (2) velocity-dependent extension; (3) non-relativistic with Ω_s allowed to be negative; (4) general free Ω_s and v_s. Constraints are obtained from Planck CMB, SDSS/DESI BAO, and Type Ia supernovae (including DESY5), yielding e.g. Ω_s < 0.00901 (95% CL) for Model 2 with CMB+DESI+DESY5, v_s < 0.569, and a mild preference for negative Ω_s in Models 3/4 with Δχ² = -6.07 improvement (though Bayesian evidence still favors ΛCDM).

Significance. If the late-time homogeneous-fluid parametrization is valid, the work supplies new upper limits on string density and explores negative-tension regimes, illustrating the reach of current datasets for exotic components. Strengths include explicit multi-dataset combinations, reported Δχ² values, and Bayesian evidence comparisons that quantify Occam penalties. The results do not displace ΛCDM but provide falsifiable bounds that could guide future string-network simulations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and model descriptions] Abstract and model descriptions: the four models modify only the background Friedmann equation through Ω_s and v_s while the Planck CMB likelihood is used unchanged. Cosmic-string networks source active vector/tensor modes and Kaiser-Stebbins temperature steps that are absent from standard ΛCDM Boltzmann codes; this mismatch is load-bearing for the reported CMB constraints, especially the negative-Ω_s preference in Models 3 and 4.
  2. [Results section (Models 3 and 4)] Results section (Models 3 and 4): the best-fit improvement Δχ² = -6.07 and the CMB-only value Ω_s = -0.038^{+0.029}_{-0.022} are presented without quantitative assessment of whether negative-tension networks remain stable or induce early-time perturbations that would alter the likelihoods employed.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the four models could be introduced with a compact table or explicit equations in the methods section to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive report. We address the two major comments point by point below. We agree that our analysis is phenomenological and have revised the manuscript to better highlight the associated limitations.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and model descriptions] Abstract and model descriptions: the four models modify only the background Friedmann equation through Ω_s and v_s while the Planck CMB likelihood is used unchanged. Cosmic-string networks source active vector/tensor modes and Kaiser-Stebbins temperature steps that are absent from standard ΛCDM Boltzmann codes; this mismatch is load-bearing for the reported CMB constraints, especially the negative-Ω_s preference in Models 3 and 4.

    Authors: We agree that the models are strictly phenomenological, altering only the background Friedmann equation while employing the standard Planck likelihood. Real cosmic-string networks would source additional vector and tensor perturbations and produce Kaiser-Stebbins steps, effects absent from the unmodified Boltzmann code. This approximation is a deliberate simplification to explore late-time background constraints with existing data. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the model-description section and the abstract to state these assumptions explicitly, to caution that the reported CMB constraints (including the mild negative-Ω_s preference) must be interpreted within this limited framework, and to note that a complete treatment would require a modified Boltzmann solver coupled to string-network simulations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section (Models 3 and 4)] Results section (Models 3 and 4): the best-fit improvement Δχ² = -6.07 and the CMB-only value Ω_s = -0.038^{+0.029}_{-0.022} are presented without quantitative assessment of whether negative-tension networks remain stable or induce early-time perturbations that would alter the likelihoods employed.

    Authors: The quoted Δχ² and parameter posteriors are the direct numerical outputs of the MCMC analysis performed with the chosen likelihoods. We do not supply a quantitative stability analysis or early-time perturbation calculation because such work would require dedicated numerical simulations of negative-tension string networks, which lies beyond the scope of the present study. In the revised results section we have added a short paragraph acknowledging the speculative character of negative-tension networks, reiterating that the Bayesian evidence still favors ΛCDM, and stating that future theoretical work is needed to assess stability and possible early-time effects. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Quantitative assessment of the stability of negative-tension cosmic-string networks and their impact on early-time perturbations

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct fits of phenomenological parameters to external datasets

full rationale

The paper defines four phenomenological models by introducing parameters Ω_s and v_s into the Friedmann equation to represent a residual string network's late-time effect. These are then constrained via standard likelihood analysis on independent external data (Planck CMB, DESI/SDSS BAO, DESY5 supernovae). Reported upper bounds, best-fit values, Δχ² improvements, and Bayesian evidence comparisons are direct outputs of this fitting procedure rather than any self-referential derivation or prediction that reduces to the inputs by construction. No self-citation chains, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or uniqueness theorems are invoked as load-bearing steps for the central results. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard cosmological assumptions plus four ad-hoc phenomenological parametrizations for string networks; no new particles or forces are postulated beyond the string network itself.

free parameters (2)
  • Ω_s
    String energy density parameter allowed to vary and fitted to data in all four models
  • v_s
    Bulk velocity of the string network, free in Models 2 and 4
axioms (2)
  • standard math Late-time universe described by FLRW metric with standard matter and radiation content
    Invoked implicitly when combining CMB, BAO, and supernova likelihoods
  • domain assumption Residual string network evolves according to the chosen phenomenological energy density and velocity parametrization
    Core modeling choice for the four extensions described in the abstract
invented entities (1)
  • Residual cosmic string network as dynamical dark energy component no independent evidence
    purpose: To provide an additional energy density that can mimic or modify late-time acceleration
    Introduced as the central extension in all four models; no independent falsifiable prediction outside the fit is provided

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5897 in / 1571 out tokens · 62064 ms · 2026-05-19T14:13:02.782258+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum from relativistic $N$-body Simulations: $\Lambda_{\rm s}$CDM versus $\Lambda$CDM

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Relativistic N-body simulations of Lambda_s CDM produce a redshift-dependent crest in the matter power spectrum ratio, peaking at 20-25% near the transition and leaving a 15-20% uplift at z=0 on group scales.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 56 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Kibble, Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings , J

    T.W.B. Kibble, Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings , J. Phys. A 9 (1976) 1387

  2. [2]

    Vilenkin, Gravitational radiation from cosmic strings , Phys

    A. Vilenkin, Gravitational radiation from cosmic strings , Phys. Lett. B 107 (1981) 47

  3. [3]

    Vilenkin, Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls , Phys

    A. Vilenkin, Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls , Phys. Rept. 121 (1985) 263

  4. [4]

    Witten, Superconducting Strings, Nucl

    E. Witten, Superconducting Strings, Nucl. Phys. B 249 (1985) 557

  5. [5]

    Vilenkin and E.P.S

    A. Vilenkin and E.P.S. Shellard, Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects , Cambridge University Press (7, 2000)

  6. [6]

    Bennett and F.R

    D.P. Bennett and F.R. Bouchet, High resolution simulations of cosmic string evolution. 1. Network evolution, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 2408

  7. [7]

    Albrecht and N

    A. Albrecht and N. Turok, Evolution of Cosmic String Networks , Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 973

  8. [8]

    Gravitational wave bursts from cosmic strings

    T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, Gravitational wave bursts from cosmic strings , Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 3761 [ gr-qc/0004075]

  9. [9]

    Gravitational wave stochastic background from cosmic (super)strings

    X. Siemens, V. Mandic and J. Creighton, Gravitational wave stochastic background from cosmic (super)strings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 111101 [ astro-ph/0610920]

  10. [10]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2013 results. XXV. Searches for cosmic strings and other topological defects, Astron. Astrophys. 571 (2014) A25 [ 1303.5085]

  11. [11]

    Improved constraint on the primordial gravitational-wave density using recent cosmological data and its impact on cosmic string models

    S. Henrot-Versille et al., Improved constraint on the primordial gravitational-wave density using recent cosmological data and its impact on cosmic string models , Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 045003 [1408.5299]

  12. [12]

    Constraints on the Nambu-Goto cosmic string contribution to the CMB power spectrum in light of new temperature and polarisation data

    A. Lazanu and P. Shellard, Constraints on the Nambu-Goto cosmic string contribution to the CMB power spectrum in light of new temperature and polarisation data , JCAP 02 (2015) 024 [1410.5046]. – 17 –

  13. [13]

    New CMB constraints for Abelian Higgs cosmic strings

    J. Lizarraga, J. Urrestilla, D. Daverio, M. Hindmarsh and M. Kunz, New CMB constraints for Abelian Higgs cosmic strings , JCAP 10 (2016) 042 [ 1609.03386]

  14. [14]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, Constraints on cosmic strings using data from the first Advanced LIGO observing run , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 102002 [ 1712.01168]

  15. [15]

    Auclair et al., Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA , JCAP 04 (2020) 034 [ 1909.00819]

    P. Auclair et al., Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA , JCAP 04 (2020) 034 [ 1909.00819]

  16. [16]

    LISA Cosmology Working Group collaboration, Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Living Rev. Rel. 26 (2023) 5 [ 2204.05434]

  17. [17]

    Punturo et al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory , Class

    M. Punturo et al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory , Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 194002

  18. [18]

    Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope

    B. Sathyaprakash et al., Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope , Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 124013 [ 1206.0331]

  19. [19]

    Science Case for the Einstein Telescope

    M. Maggiore et al., Science Case for the Einstein Telescope , JCAP 03 (2020) 050 [1912.02622]

  20. [20]

    NANOGrav collaboration, The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023) L11 [ 2306.16219]

  21. [21]

    Implications for massive black holes, dark matter and the early Universe , Astron

    EPTA collaboration, The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array: V. Implications for massive black holes, dark matter and the early Universe , Astron. Astrophys. 685 (2024) A94 [ 2306.16227]

  22. [22]

    Y. Cui, M. Lewicki, D.E. Morrissey and J.D. Wells, Cosmic Archaeology with Gravitational Waves from Cosmic Strings , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 123505 [ 1711.03104]

  23. [23]

    Y. Cui, M. Lewicki, D.E. Morrissey and J.D. Wells, Probing the pre-BBN universe with gravitational waves from cosmic strings , JHEP 01 (2019) 081 [ 1808.08968]

  24. [24]

    Chang and Y

    C.-F. Chang and Y. Cui, Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background from Global Cosmic Strings, Phys. Dark Univ. 29 (2020) 100604 [ 1910.04781]

  25. [25]

    Gouttenoire, G

    Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant and P. Simakachorn, Kination cosmology from scalar fields and gravitational-wave signatures, 2111.01150

  26. [26]

    J.A. Dror, K. Harigaya and V. Narayan, Parametric Resonance Production of Ultralight Vector Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 035036 [ 1810.07195]

  27. [27]

    Probing the Early Universe with Axion Physics and Gravitational Waves

    N. Ramberg and L. Visinelli, Probing the Early Universe with Axion Physics and Gravitational Waves, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 123513 [ 1904.05707]

  28. [28]

    Dark Photon Dark Matter from a Network of Cosmic Strings

    A.J. Long and L.-T. Wang, Dark Photon Dark Matter from a Network of Cosmic Strings , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 063529 [ 1901.03312]

  29. [29]

    Ramberg and L

    N. Ramberg and L. Visinelli, QCD axion and gravitational waves in light of NANOGrav results, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 063031 [ 2012.06882]

  30. [30]

    Cheng and L

    H. Cheng and L. Visinelli, Future targets for light gauge bosons from cosmic strings , Phys. Dark Univ. 46 (2024) 101667 [ 2408.16334]

  31. [31]

    Anisotropic perturbations due to dark energy

    R.A. Battye and A. Moss, Anisotropic perturbations due to dark energy , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 041301 [ astro-ph/0602377]

  32. [32]

    Cosmic Strings as the Source of Small-Scale Microwave Background Anisotropy

    L. Pogosian, S.H.H. Tye, I. Wasserman and M. Wyman, Cosmic Strings as the Source of Small-Scale Microwave Background Anisotropy , JCAP 02 (2009) 013 [ 0804.0810]

  33. [33]

    Silva, L

    R.P. Silva, L. Sousa and I.Y. Rybak, Cosmic microwave background anisotropies generated by cosmic strings with small-scale structure , JCAP 07 (2023) 016 [ 2303.07548]

  34. [34]

    Rybak, C.J.A.P

    I.Y. Rybak, C.J.A.P. Martins, P. Peter and E.P.S. Shellard, Cosmic microwave background signatures from current-carrying cosmic strings, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 023534 [2403.16332]. – 18 –

  35. [35]

    In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri et al., In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions , Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 153001 [ 2103.01183]

  36. [36]

    E. Abdalla et al., Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies , JHEAp 34 (2022) 49 [2203.06142]

  37. [37]

    The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics

    E. Di Valentino et al., The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics , 2504.01669

  38. [38]

    An exposition on Friedmann Cosmology with Negative Energy Densities

    R.J. Nemiroff, R. Joshi and B.R. Patla, An exposition on Friedmann Cosmology with Negative Energy Densities, JCAP 06 (2015) 006 [ 1402.4522]

  39. [39]

    Visinelli, S

    L. Visinelli, S. Vagnozzi and U. Danielsson, Revisiting a negative cosmological constant from low-redshift data, Symmetry 11 (2019) 1035 [ 1907.07953]

  40. [40]

    A Wormhole at the core of an infinite cosmic string

    R.O. Aros and N. Zamorano, A Wormhole at the core of an infinite cosmic string , Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 6607 [ gr-qc/9711044]

  41. [41]

    Traversable wormholes: Some simple examples

    M. Visser, Traversable wormholes: Some simple examples , Phys. Rev. D 39 (1989) 3182 [0809.0907]

  42. [42]

    Wormholes supported by a phantom energy

    S.V. Sushkov, Wormholes supported by a phantom energy , Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 043520 [gr-qc/0502084]

  43. [43]

    Example of a stable wormhole in general relativity

    K.A. Bronnikov, L.N. Lipatova, I.D. Novikov and A.A. Shatskiy, Example of a stable wormhole in general relativity, Grav. Cosmol. 19 (2013) 269 [ 1312.6929]

  44. [44]

    Traversable wormholes with arbitrarily small energy condition violations

    M. Visser, S. Kar and N. Dadhich, Traversable wormholes with arbitrarily small energy condition violations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 201102 [ gr-qc/0301003]

  45. [45]

    Morris and K.S

    M.S. Morris and K.S. Thorne, Wormholes in space-time and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity , Am. J. Phys. 56 (1988) 395

  46. [46]

    Twilight for the energy conditions?

    C. Barcelo and M. Visser, Twilight for the energy conditions? , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 11 (2002) 1553 [gr-qc/0205066]

  47. [47]

    The Null Energy Condition and its violation

    V.A. Rubakov, The Null Energy Condition and its violation , Phys. Usp. 57 (2014) 128 [1401.4024]

  48. [48]

    Averaged Energy Conditions and Quantum Inequalities

    L.H. Ford and T.A. Roman, Averaged energy conditions and quantum inequalities , Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 4277 [ gr-qc/9410043]

  49. [49]

    On wormholes with arbitrarily small quantities of exotic matter

    C.J. Fewster and T.A. Roman, On wormholes with arbitrarily small quantities of exotic matter , Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 044023 [ gr-qc/0507013]

  50. [50]

    Detection of negative energy: 4-dimensional examples

    P.C.W. Davies and A.C. Ottewill, Detection of negative energy: 4-dimensional examples , Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 104014 [ gr-qc/0203003]

  51. [51]

    Adelberger, J.H

    E.G. Adelberger, J.H. Gundlach, B.R. Heckel, S. Hoedl and S. Schlamminger, Torsion balance experiments: A low-energy frontier of particle physics , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 62 (2009) 102

  52. [52]

    Tests of Chameleon Gravity

    C. Burrage and J. Sakstein, Tests of Chameleon Gravity, Living Rev. Rel. 21 (2018) 1 [1709.09071]

  53. [53]

    de Sitter Vacua in String Theory

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde and S.P. Trivedi, De Sitter vacua in string theory , Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 046005 [ hep-th/0301240]

  54. [54]

    Ghost Condensation and a Consistent Infrared Modification of Gravity

    N. Arkani-Hamed, H.-C. Cheng, M.A. Luty and S. Mukohyama, Ghost condensation and a consistent infrared modification of gravity, JHEP 05 (2004) 074 [ hep-th/0312099]

  55. [55]

    Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w be less than -1?

    S.M. Carroll, M. Hoffman and M. Trodden, Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w be less than −1?, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 023509 [ astro-ph/0301273]

  56. [56]

    Vachaspati and A

    T. Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin, Evolution of cosmic networks , Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 1131. – 19 –

  57. [57]

    Deviation From \Lambda CDM With Cosmic Strings Networks

    S. Kumar, A. Nautiyal and A.A. Sen, Deviation from ΛCDM with cosmic strings networks , Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2562 [ 1207.4024]

  58. [58]

    Quantitative String Evolution

    C.J.A.P. Martins and E.P.S. Shellard, Quantitative string evolution , Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 2535 [hep-ph/9602271]

  59. [59]

    Extending the Velocity-dependent One-scale String Evolution Model

    C.J.A.P. Martins and E.P.S. Shellard, Extending the velocity dependent one scale string evolution model, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 043514 [ hep-ph/0003298]

  60. [60]

    Cosmology in a String-Dominated Universe

    D. Spergel and U.-L. Pen, Cosmology in a string dominated universe , Astrophys. J. Lett. 491 (1997) L67 [ astro-ph/9611198]

  61. [61]

    The cosmological evolution of p-brane networks

    L. Sousa and P.P. Avelino, The cosmological evolution of p-brane networks , Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 063502 [ 1107.4582]

  62. [62]

    Impact of string and monopole-type junctions on domain wall dynamics: implications for dark energy

    L. Sousa and P.P. Avelino, Impact of string and monopole-type junctions on domain wall dynamics: implications for dark energy , Phys. Lett. B 689 (2010) 145 [ 0911.3902]

  63. [63]

    Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models

    J. Torrado and A. Lewis, Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models , JCAP 05 (2021) 057 [ 2005.05290]

  64. [64]

    Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models

    A. Lewis, A. Challinor and A. Lasenby, Efficient computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models, Astrophys. J. 538 (2000) 473 [ astro-ph/9911177]

  65. [65]

    Gelman and D

    A. Gelman and D. Rubin, Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences , Statistical Science 7 (1992) 457

  66. [66]

    GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples

    A. Lewis, GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples , 1910.13970

  67. [67]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A1 [ 1807.06205]

  68. [68]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A5 [ 1907.12875]

  69. [69]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A8 [ 1807.06210]

  70. [70]

    ACT collaboration, The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters, Astrophys. J. 962 (2024) 113 [ 2304.05203]

  71. [71]

    ACT collaboration, The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Measurement of the DR6 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum and Its Implications for Structure Growth , Astrophys. J. 962 (2024) 112 [2304.05202]

  72. [72]

    eBOSS collaboration, Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 083533 [ 2007.08991]

  73. [73]

    DESI collaboration, DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints, 2503.14738

  74. [74]

    DESI collaboration, Extended Dark Energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements , 2503.14743

  75. [75]

    DESI collaboration, Validation of the DESI DR2 Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from Galaxies and Quasars , 2503.14742

  76. [76]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release

    D. Scolnic et al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release , Astrophys. J. 938 (2022) 113 [ 2112.03863]

  77. [77]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints

    D. Brout et al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints , Astrophys. J. 938 (2022) 110 [2202.04077]

  78. [78]

    DES collaboration, The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: Cosmological Analysis and Systematic Uncertainties, Astrophys. J. 975 (2024) 86 [ 2401.02945]. – 20 –

  79. [79]

    DES collaboration, The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results with ∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set , Astrophys. J. Lett. 973 (2024) L14 [2401.02929]

  80. [80]

    DES collaboration, The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: Light Curves and 5 Yr Data Release, Astrophys. J. 975 (2024) 5 [ 2406.05046]

Showing first 80 references.