pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.09362 · v2 · submitted 2025-06-11 · 💻 cs.HC · cs.AI

"I Said Things I Needed to Hear Myself": Peer Support as an Emotional, Organisational, and Sociotechnical Practice in Singapore

Kellie Yu Hui Sim , Kenny Tsu Wei Choo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 10:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC cs.AI
keywords peer supportmental healthSingaporeemotional laboursociotechnical practicedigital toolsAI augmentationculturally responsive design
0
0 comments X

The pith

Peer supporters in Singapore describe practices shaped by emotional labor and local culture, pointing to digital tools that scaffold rather than replace human connections.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper draws on interviews with 20 peer supporters who work across online, offline, and hybrid settings in Singapore. It shows how they start from personal experiences, manage the emotional demands of the role, and navigate sociocultural expectations while sustaining their work. From these accounts the authors derive directions for digital platforms and AI that assist organisation and logistics but leave relational care intact. This grounded view matters for designers because mental-health technologies risk undermining trust if they ignore the human and cultural elements that make peer support effective.

Core claim

Peer support in Singapore operates as an emotional, organisational, and sociotechnical practice in which supporters begin with personal motivations, perform emotional labour, and embed their activities in local cultural norms; these patterns yield concrete design directions for culturally responsive digital tools that scaffold relational care and a situated view of how AI can responsibly augment rather than supplant such support.

What carries the argument

Thematic analysis of motivations, emotional labour, and sociocultural dimensions drawn from the 20 interview accounts.

If this is right

  • Digital tools can usefully handle scheduling, resource sharing, and administrative tasks that currently burden peer supporters.
  • AI features should remain limited to non-relational functions so they do not erode the empathetic connections that define effective support.
  • Platform designs must incorporate Singapore's multicultural context to avoid mismatches with how supporters actually work.
  • Sustaining long-term peer support requires built-in features that address supporter self-care and community maintenance.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Comparable interview studies in other Asian cities could test whether the same emotional and organisational patterns recur or shift with different cultural settings.
  • A prototype built from these directions could be field-tested to measure whether supporters adopt it and whether it changes the quality or reach of their work.
  • The emphasis on scaffolding suggests that future AI mental-health systems should include explicit human-oversight mechanisms in relational domains.

Load-bearing premise

The patterns identified in interviews with these 20 self-selected Singapore peer supporters are stable and representative enough to ground design directions for digital tools and AI intended for wider use.

What would settle it

A follow-up study or deployment in which peer supporters in Singapore report preferring fully automated AI systems that replace human interaction over tools that support existing relationships and emotional labour.

read the original abstract

Peer support plays a vital role in expanding access to mental health care by providing empathetic, community-based support outside formal clinical systems. As digital platforms increasingly mediate such support, the design and impact of these technologies remain under-examined, particularly in Asian contexts. This paper presents findings from an interview study with 20 peer supporters in Singapore, who operate across diverse online, offline, and hybrid environments. Through a thematic analysis, we unpack how participants start, conduct, and sustain peer support, highlighting their motivations, emotional labour, and the sociocultural dimensions shaping their practices. Building on this grounded understanding, we surface design directions for culturally responsive digital tools that scaffold rather than supplant relational care. Drawing insights from qualitative accounts, we offer a situated perspective on how AI might responsibly augment peer support. This research contributes to human-centred computing by articulating the lived realities of peer supporters and proposing design implications for trustworthy and context-sensitive AI in mental health.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper reports findings from a thematic analysis of interviews with 20 peer supporters in Singapore who work across online, offline, and hybrid settings. It examines how participants initiate, conduct, and sustain peer support, focusing on motivations, emotional labour, and sociocultural dimensions. Building on these themes, the authors propose design directions for culturally responsive digital tools that scaffold rather than replace relational care and offer a situated view on responsible AI augmentation of peer support in mental health contexts.

Significance. If the thematic patterns prove robust, the work supplies valuable situated knowledge from an Asian context that is underrepresented in HCI research on mental health technologies. The emphasis on scaffolding relational care and responsible AI use could usefully inform the design of context-sensitive tools, strengthening human-centred computing by grounding recommendations in lived practices rather than abstract principles.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Methods section: The account of the thematic analysis provides insufficient detail on recruitment strategy, interview protocol, coding process, inter-coder reliability, or member-checking procedures. These omissions make it difficult to evaluate whether the identified themes on emotional labour and sociocultural dimensions are stable enough to support the subsequent design claims.
  2. [Discussion] Discussion / Design Implications section: The paper extrapolates from themes observed in a self-selected sample of 20 participants in one city-state to concrete recommendations for digital tools and AI augmentation intended for broader use. Without explicit discussion of how key variations in relational care or cultural norms might alter the patterns, the design directions risk being under-specified for wider Asian or global contexts.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: Adding one sentence summarising the main themes or the most salient design directions would help readers quickly grasp the contribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed feedback, which has helped us identify areas for clarification and improvement. We address each major comment below, indicating the specific revisions we will make to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods section: The account of the thematic analysis provides insufficient detail on recruitment strategy, interview protocol, coding process, inter-coder reliability, or member-checking procedures. These omissions make it difficult to evaluate whether the identified themes on emotional labour and sociocultural dimensions are stable enough to support the subsequent design claims.

    Authors: We agree that greater methodological transparency is needed. In the revised manuscript we will expand the Methods section with: (1) a full description of the recruitment strategy, including outreach via Singapore peer-support organisations, social media, and snowball sampling; (2) the complete semi-structured interview protocol; (3) the inductive thematic-analysis procedure following Braun and Clarke; (4) details of the inter-coder process, in which two authors independently coded a subset of transcripts and resolved discrepancies through discussion; and (5) any member-checking steps performed. These additions will allow readers to better assess the stability of the reported themes. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion / Design Implications section: The paper extrapolates from themes observed in a self-selected sample of 20 participants in one city-state to concrete recommendations for digital tools and AI augmentation intended for broader use. Without explicit discussion of how key variations in relational care or cultural norms might alter the patterns, the design directions risk being under-specified for wider Asian or global contexts.

    Authors: We acknowledge the risk of over-generalisation. While the study is deliberately situated in Singapore to contribute underrepresented Asian perspectives, we will revise the Discussion to add an explicit subsection on limitations and transferability. This subsection will address the self-selected sample, note potential variations in relational-care practices and cultural norms across other Asian or global settings, and frame the design directions as context-sensitive starting points that require local adaptation rather than universal prescriptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in qualitative thematic analysis of interview data

full rationale

The paper reports a standard qualitative interview study with thematic analysis of 20 peer supporters' accounts in Singapore. It identifies motivations, emotional labour, and sociocultural dimensions from the data, then surfaces design directions for digital tools and responsible AI augmentation. No mathematical derivations, equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-citation chains exist that reduce any claim to its own inputs by construction. The central claims rest directly on primary data interpretation without self-definitional loops, fitted-input renamings, or load-bearing self-citations, rendering the analysis self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard qualitative assumptions rather than new mathematical constructs. No free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced beyond the choice to treat thematic analysis of 20 interviews as sufficient grounding for design claims.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews can reliably surface motivations, emotional labour, and sociocultural dimensions of peer support practice.
    Invoked implicitly when the abstract states that thematic analysis was used to unpack how participants start, conduct, and sustain peer support.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5701 in / 1360 out tokens · 44449 ms · 2026-05-19T10:24:42.913504+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. "I'm Not Able to Be There for You": Emotional Labour, Responsibility, and AI in Peer Support

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Peer supporters bear concentrated emotional labor from institutional ambiguity and judge AI by its effects on redistributing responsibility and risk within fragile support roles.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 103 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Self-Care Nights and Peer Support: How Young S’poreans Are Breaking the Burnout Cycle

    2024. Self-Care Nights and Peer Support: How Young S’poreans Are Breaking the Burnout Cycle. The Straits Times (Oct. 2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Mine Aladağ and Esin Tezer. 2009. Effects of a Peer Helping Training Program on Helping Skills and Self-Growth of Peer Helpers. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling 31, 4 (Dec. 2009), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10447-009-9082-4

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    Mary Alavanza. 2025. Singapore Youth Turn to AI Chatbots for Mental Health Needs as They Find It ’far Cheaper than Therapy’ - Singapore News. (March 2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    What’s the Point of Having This Conversa- tion?

    Ananya Bhattacharjee, Sharifa Sultana, Mohammad Ruhul Amin, Yeshim Iqbal, and Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed. 2023. “What’s the Point of Having This Conversa- tion?”: From a Telephone Crisis Helpline in Bangladesh to the Decolonization of Mental Health Services. ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies 1, 2 (Dec. 2023), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3616381

    work page doi:10.1145/3616381 2023

  5. [5]

    Boucher, Harake , Nicole R., Ward , Haley E., Stoeckl , Sarah Elizabeth, Vargas , Junielly, Minkel , Jared, Parks , Acacia C., and Ran and Zilca

    Eliane M. Boucher, Harake , Nicole R., Ward , Haley E., Stoeckl , Sarah Elizabeth, Vargas , Junielly, Minkel , Jared, Parks , Acacia C., and Ran and Zilca. 2021. Artificially Intelligent Chatbots in Digital Mental Health Interventions: A Review. Expert Review of Medical Devices 18, sup1 (Dec. 2021), 37–49. https://doi.org/10. 1080/17434440.2021.2013200

    work page arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (Jan. 2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10. 1191/1478088706qp063oa

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Alicja Chaszczewicz, Raj Shah, Ryan Louie, Bruce Arnow, Robert Kraut, and Diyi Yang. 2024. Multi-Level Feedback Generation with Large Language Models for Empowering Novice Peer Counselors. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , Lun-Wei Ku, Andre Martins, and Vivek Srikumar (Eds....

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl- 2024

  8. [8]

    Kraut, and Laura Dabbish

    Tianying Chen, Kristy Zhang, Robert E. Kraut, and Laura Dabbish. 2021. Scaf- folding the Online Peer-support Experience: Novice Supporters’ Strategies and Challenges. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2 (Oct. 2021), 366:1– 366:30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479510

    work page doi:10.1145/3479510 2021

  9. [9]

    Yun Ze Chua and Jungup Lee. 2024. Young Adults, Mental Health, and Help- Seeking: What Difficulties Do They Face? A Singapore-based Study. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development (Dec. 2024), 1–15. https://doi.org/10. 1080/29949769.2024.2442577

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Helen Cowie and Sonia Sharp. 2017. Peer Counselling in Schools: A Time to Listen (1st ed ed.). Taylor and Francis, Milton

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Sander de Jong, Ville Paananen, Benjamin Tag, and Niels van Berkel. 2025. Cog- nitive Forcing for Better Decision-Making: Reducing Overreliance on AI Systems Through Partial Explanations. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 9, 2 (May 2025), CSCW048:1–CSCW048:30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3710946

    work page doi:10.1145/3710946 2025

  12. [12]

    Kathleen Kara Fitzpatrick, Alison Darcy, and Molly Vierhile. 2017. Delivering Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Young Adults With Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot): A Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mental Health 4, 2 (June 2017), e7785. https://doi.org/10. 2196/mental.7785

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Carmen C. D. Franke, Barbara C. Paton, and Lee-Anne J. Gassner. 2010. Imple- menting Mental Health Peer Support: A South Australian Experience. Australian Journal of Primary Health 16, 2 (2010), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1071/py09067

    work page doi:10.1071/py09067 2010

  14. [14]

    Mark R. Frost. 2021. An Unsettled Majority: Immigration and the Racial ‘Balance’ in Multicultural Singapore. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (Dec. 2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    I Will Not Drink With You Today

    Robert P Gauthier, Mary Jean Costello, and James R Wallace. 2022. “I Will Not Drink With You Today”: A Topic-Guided Thematic Analysis of Addiction Recovery on Reddit. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502076

    work page doi:10.1145/3491102.3502076 2022

  16. [16]

    Yan Han Goh. 2023. Young People Cite Anonymity, Safe Space in Turning to Discord for Mental Health Peer Support. The Straits Times (Feb. 2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Goldberg, Tony Rousmaniere, Scott D

    Simon B. Goldberg, Tony Rousmaniere, Scott D. Miller, Jason Whipple, Stevan Lars Nielsen, William T. Hoyt, and Bruce E. Wampold. 2016. Do Psychotherapists Improve with Time and Experience? A Longitudinal Analysis of Outcomes in a Clinical Setting. Journal of Counseling Psychology 63, 1 (Jan. 2016), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000131

    work page doi:10.1037/cou0000131 2016

  18. [18]

    Toumbourou

    Jane Green, Lata Satyen, and John W. Toumbourou. 2024. Influence of Cultural Norms on Formal Service Engagement Among Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Meta-synthesis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 25, 1 (Jan. 2024), 738–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231162971

    work page doi:10.1177/15248380231162971 2024

  19. [19]

    Shang-Ling Hsu, Raj Sanjay Shah, Prathik Senthil, Zahra Ashktorab, Casey Dugan, Werner Geyer, and Diyi Yang. 2025. Helping the Helper: Supporting Peer Coun- selors via AI-Empowered Practice and Feedback. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Inter- act. 9, 2 (May 2025), CSCW095:1–CSCW095:45. https://doi.org/10.1145/3710993

    work page doi:10.1145/3710993 2025

  20. [20]

    Lam, Eric J

    Jen-tse Huang, Man H. Lam, Eric J. Li, Shujie Ren, Wenxuan Wang, Wenxiang Jiao, Zhaopeng Tu, and Michael R. Lyu. 2024. Apathetic or Empathetic? Evaluating LLMs’ Emotional Alignments with Humans. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 (Dec. 2024), 97053–97087

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Together but Not To- gether

    Zainab Iftikhar, Yumeng Ma, and Jeff Huang. 2023. “Together but Not Together”: Evaluating Typing Indicators for Interaction-Rich Communication. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi. org/10.1145/3544548.3581248

    work page doi:10.1145/3544548.3581248 2023

  22. [22]

    Zainab Iftikhar, Sean Ransom, Amy Xiao, and Jeff Huang. 2024. Therapy as an NLP Task: Psychologists’ Comparison of LLMs and Human Peers in CBT. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.02244 arXiv:2409.02244 [cs]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.02244 2024

  23. [23]

    Becky Inkster, Shubhankar Sarda, and Vinod Subramanian. 2018. An Empathy- Driven, Conversational Artificial Intelligence Agent (Wysa) for Digital Mental Well-Being: Real-World Data Evaluation Mixed-Methods Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 6, 11 (Nov. 2018), e12106. https://doi.org/10.2196/12106

    work page doi:10.2196/12106 2018

  24. [24]

    Onno P. Kampman, Ye Sheng Phang, Stanley Han, Michael Xing, Xinyi Hong, Hazirah Hoosainsah, Caleb Tan, Genta Indra Winata, Skyler Wang, Creighton Heaukulani, Janice Huiqin Weng, and Robert JT Morris. 2024. A Multi-Agent Dual Dialogue System to Support Mental Health Care Providers. https://doi. org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.18429 arXiv:2411.18429 [cs]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.18429 2024

  25. [25]

    Jasmeet Kaur and Pushpendra Singh. 2025. Exploring the Potential of Peer Support Group for Family Planning Needs of Women in Resource-constrained Settings in India. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 9, 2 (May 2025), CSCW080:1– CSCW080:25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3710978

    work page doi:10.1145/3710978 2025

  26. [26]

    Meeyun Kim, Koustuv Saha, Munmun De Choudhury, and Daejin Choi. 2023. Supporters First: Understanding Online Social Support on Mental Health from a Supporter Perspective. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7, CSCW1 (April 2023), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579525

    work page doi:10.1145/3579525 2023

  27. [27]

    Taewan Kim, Seolyeong Bae, Hyun Ah Kim, Su-Woo Lee, Hwajung Hong, Chanmo Yang, and Young-Ho Kim. 2024. MindfulDiary: Harnessing Large Language Model to Support Psychiatric Patients’ Journaling. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’24) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–20. https: //...

    work page doi:10.1145/3613904.3642937 2024

  28. [28]

    Bazarova, and Janis Whitlock

    Kaylee Payne Kruzan, Natalya N. Bazarova, and Janis Whitlock. 2021. Investigat- ing Self-injury Support Solicitations and Responses on a Mobile Peer Support Application. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2 (Oct. 2021), 354:1– 354:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479498

    work page doi:10.1145/3479498 2021

  29. [29]

    Adrian T. H. Kuah, Chang H. Kim, and Stéphane Le Queux. 2020. Multiculturalism in Singapore and Malaysia: Approaches and Outcomes. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 40, 3 (Oct. 2020), 290–308. https://doi.org/10. 1108/EDI-05-2019-0148

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Daniel Lambton-Howard, Emma Simpson, Kim Quimby, Ahmed Kharrufa, Heidi Hoi Ming Ng, Emma Foster, and Patrick Olivier. 2021. Blending into Everyday Life: Designing a Social Media-Based Peer Support System. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14...

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Ying Ying Lee, Suying Ang, Hong Choon Chua, and Mythily Subramaniam. 2019. Peer Support in Mental Health: A Growing Movement in Singapore. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 48, 3 (March 2019), 95–97. https://doi.org/ 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V48N3p95

    work page doi:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.v48n3p95 2019

  32. [32]

    Anqi Li, Yu Lu, Nirui Song, Shuai Zhang, Lizhi Ma, and Zhenzhong Lan. 2024. Understanding the Therapeutic Relationship between Counselors and Clients in Online Text-based Counseling Using LLMs. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 , Yaser Al-Onaizan, Mohit Bansal, and Yun-Nung Chen (Eds.). Association for Computational ...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.69 2024

  33. [33]

    Tianjian Liu, Hongzheng Zhao, Yuheng Liu, Xingbo Wang, and Zhenhui Peng

    work page

  34. [34]

    In Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST ’24)

    ComPeer: A Generative Conversational Agent for Proactive Peer Support. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3654777.3676430

    work page doi:10.1145/3654777.3676430

  35. [35]

    Si Yuan Lou. 2023. Chatbots See Greater Usage as Mental Health Support Tool but Can’t Deal with Urgent or Suicidal Cases: NTU Study. https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/chatbots-mental-health-support- suicidal-cases-ntu-study-2075326

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Ryan Louie, Ananjan Nandi, William Fang, Cheng Chang, Emma Brunskill, and Diyi Yang. 2024. Roleplay-Doh: Enabling Domain-Experts to Create LLM- simulated Patients via Eliciting and Adhering to Principles. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , Yaser Al-Onaizan, Mohit Bansal, and Yun-Nung Chen (Eds.). As...

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Gallo, Jeanine M

    QianHui Ma, Joseph J. Gallo, Jeanine M. Parisi, and Jin Hui Joo. 2022. Development of the Mental Health Peer Support Questionnaire in Colleges and Vocational Schools in Singapore. International Journal of Mental Health Systems 16, 1 (Sept. 2022), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-022-00555-6

    work page doi:10.1186/s13033-022-00555-6 2022

  38. [38]

    Laura Martinengo, Elaine Lum, and Josip Car. 2022. Evaluation of Chatbot- Delivered Interventions for Self-Management of Depression: Content Analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders 319 (Dec. 2022), 598–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jad.2022.09.028

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2022

  39. [39]

    Shery Mead and Cheryl MacNeil. 2004. Peer Support: What Makes It Unique? (Dec. 2004)

    work page 2004

  40. [40]

    Miner, Nigam Shah, Kim D

    Adam S. Miner, Nigam Shah, Kim D. Bullock, Bruce A. Arnow, Jeremy Bailenson, and Jeff Hancock. 2019. Key Considerations for Incorporating Conversational AI in Psychotherapy. Frontiers in Psychiatry 10 (Oct. 2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyt.2019.00746

    work page arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Ministry of Health. 2024. WHOLE-OF-SOCIETY EFFORTS TO SUP- PORT MENTAL HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF YOUTHS IN SINGA- PORE. https://www.moh.gov.sg/newsroom/whole-of-society-efforts-to-support- mental-health-and-well-being-of-youths-in-singapore

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Robert R Morris, Kareem Kouddous, Rohan Kshirsagar, and Stephen M Schueller

    work page

  43. [43]

    Journal of Medical Internet Research 20, 6 (June 2018), e10148

    Towards an Artificially Empathic Conversational Agent for Mental Health Applications: System Design and User Perceptions. Journal of Medical Internet Research 20, 6 (June 2018), e10148. https://doi.org/10.2196/10148

    work page doi:10.2196/10148 2018

  44. [44]

    Richard Mpango, Jasmine Kalha, Donat Shamba, Mary Ramesh, Fileuka Ngakongwa, Arti Kulkarni, Palak Korde, Juliet Nakku, and Grace K. Ryan. 2020. Challenges to Peer Support in Low- and Middle-Income Countries during COVID-

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    2020), 90

    Globalization and Health 16, 1 (Sept. 2020), 90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992- 020-00622-y

    work page doi:10.1186/s12992- 2020

  46. [46]

    J. A. Naslund, K. A. Aschbrenner, L. A. Marsch, and S. J. Bartels. 2016. The Future of Mental Health Care: Peer-to-Peer Support and Social Media. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 25, 2 (April 2016), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S2045796015001067

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    03 May 2022 06:15AM

    Chai Chin Neo, Christy Yip, and Chiew Tong Goh. 03 May 2022 06:15AM. ‘It’s Really about Normalising Mental Health’: What Schools Are Doing so Students Seek Help. CNA (03 May 2022 06:15AM)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Munson, Jacob O

    Kathleen O’Leary, Arpita Bhattacharya, Sean A. Munson, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Wanda Pratt. 2017. Design Opportunities for Mental Health Peer Support Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing . ACM, Portland Oregon USA, 1470–1484. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998349

    work page doi:10.1145/2998181.2998349 2017

  49. [49]

    Qin Soo Ong, Hui Zhu Yang, Jonathan Han Loong Kuek, and Yong Shian Goh

    work page

  50. [50]

    Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 30, 3 (June 2023), 309–325

    Implementation of Peer-Support Services in Asia: A Scoping Review. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 30, 3 (June 2023), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12879

    work page doi:10.1111/jpm.12879 2023

  51. [51]

    Yasmin Y. Ortiga. 2015. Multiculturalism on Its Head: Unexpected Boundaries and New Migration in Singapore. Journal of International Migration and Integration 16, 4 (Nov. 2015), 947–963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-014-0378-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s12134-014-0378-9 2015

  52. [52]

    Olga Oulanova, Roy Moodley, and Monique Séguin. 2014. From Suicide Survivor to Peer Counselor: Breaking the Silence of Suicide Bereavement.OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying 69, 2 (Oct. 2014), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.69.2.d

    work page doi:10.2190/om.69.2.d 2014

  53. [53]

    Kavitha Palaniappan, Natarajan Rajaraman, and Santu Ghosh. 2023. Effective- ness of Peer Support to Reduce Depression, Anxiety and Stress among Migrant Construction Workers in Singapore. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 30, 10 (Jan. 2023), 4867–4880. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03- 2022-0269

    work page doi:10.1108/ecam-03- 2023

  54. [54]

    Zhenhui Peng, Qingyu Guo, Ka Wing Tsang, and Xiaojuan Ma. 2020. Exploring the Effects of Technological Writing Assistance for Support Providers in Online Mental Health Community. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3...

    work page doi:10.1145/3313831.3376695 2020

  55. [55]

    Instead, You’re Going to a Friend

    Kate Perepezko, Mathew Bergendahl, Christopher Kunz, Alain Labrique, Matthew Carras, and Michelle Colder Carras. 2024. “Instead, You’re Going to a Friend”: Evaluation of a Community-Developed, Peer-Delivered Online Crisis Prevention Intervention. Psychiatric Services 75, 12 (Dec. 2024), 1267–1275. https://doi.org/ 10.1176/appi.ps.20230233

    work page doi:10.1176/appi.ps.20230233 2024

  56. [56]

    Avgar, Madeline Sterling, and Nicola Dell

    Anthony Poon, Vaidehi Hussain, Julia Loughman, Ariel C. Avgar, Madeline Sterling, and Nicola Dell. 2021. Computer-Mediated Peer Support Needs of Home Care Workers: Emotional Labor & the Politics of Professionalism. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2 (Oct. 2021), 336:1–336:32. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3476077

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Adam Poulsen, Ian B Hickie, Zsofi de Haan, William Capon, Haley M LaMon- ica, Ebenezer Eyeson-Annan, Jalal Radwan, Nia Barnabie, Elizabeth M Scott, and Frank Iorfino. 2025. Co-Designing a Conversational Generative Artifi- cial Intelligence System for Youth Mental Health. In Proceedings of the Ex- tended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in ...

    work page doi:10.1145/3706599.3719696 2025

  58. [58]

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Tao Xu, Greg Brockman, Christine McLeavey, and Ilya Sutskever. 2022. Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2212.04356

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.04356 2022

  59. [59]

    Amy Rayland and Jacob Andrews. 2023. From Social Network to Peer Support Network: Opportunities to Explore Mechanisms of Online Peer Support for Mental Health. JMIR Mental Health 10, 1 (Feb. 2023), e41855. https://doi.org/10. 2196/41855

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Julie Repper and Tim Carter. 2011. A Review of the Literature on Peer Support in Mental Health Services. Journal of Mental Health 20, 4 (Aug. 2011), 392–411. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2011.583947

    work page doi:10.3109/09638237.2011.583947 2011

  61. [61]

    Sara Rolando, Giulia Arrighetti, Elisa Fornero, Ombretta Farucci, and Franca Beccaria. 2023. Telegram as a Space for Peer-Led Harm Reduction Communities and Netreach Interventions. Contemporary Drug Problems 50, 2 (June 2023), 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/00914509221145196

    work page doi:10.1177/00914509221145196 2023

  62. [62]

    Alicia Salamanca-Sanabria, Ahmad Ishqi Jabir, Xiaowen Lin, Aishah Alattas, A Baki Kocaballi, Jimmy Lee, Tobias Kowatsch, and Lorainne Tudor Car. 2023. Exploring the Perceptions of mHealth Interventions for the Prevention of Common Mental Disorders in University Students in Singapore: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 25 (March 2023),...

    work page doi:10.2196/44542 2023

  63. [63]

    Neil K R Sehgal, Hita Kambhamettu, Sai Preethi Matam, Lyle Ungar, and Sharath Chandra Guntuku. 2025. Exploring Socio-Cultural Challenges and Op- portunities in Designing Mental Health Chatbots for Adolescents in India. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’25). Association for Computi...

    work page doi:10.1145/3706599.3720137 2025

  64. [64]

    Kraut, and Diyi Yang

    Raj Sanjay Shah, Faye Holt, Shirley Anugrah Hayati, Aastha Agarwal, Yi-Chia Wang, Robert E. Kraut, and Diyi Yang. 2022. Modeling Motivational Interviewing Strategies on an Online Peer-to-Peer Counseling Platform. Proc. ACM Hum.- Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 527:1–527:24. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3555640

    work page 2022

  65. [65]

    Hameed Shalaby and Vincent I

    Reham A. Hameed Shalaby and Vincent I. O. Agyapong. 2020. Peer Support in Mental Health: Literature Review. JMIR Mental Health 7, 6 (June 2020), e15572. https://doi.org/10.2196/15572

    work page doi:10.2196/15572 2020

  66. [67]

    In Proceedings of the Web Con- ference 2021 (WWW ’21)

    Towards Facilitating Empathic Conversations in Online Mental Health Support: A Reinforcement Learning Approach. In Proceedings of the Web Con- ference 2021 (WWW ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442381.3450097

    work page doi:10.1145/3442381.3450097 2021

  67. [68]

    Lin, Adam S

    Ashish Sharma, Inna W. Lin, Adam S. Miner, David C. Atkins, and Tim Althoff

    work page

  68. [69]

    and Miner, Adam S

    Human–AI Collaboration Enables More Empathic Conversations in Text- Based Peer-to-Peer Mental Health Support. Nature Machine Intelligence 5, 1 (Jan. 2023), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00593-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00593-2 2023

  69. [70]

    Shultz and David Forbes

    James M. Shultz and David Forbes. 2014. Psychological First Aid: Rapid Pro- liferation and the Search for Evidence. Disaster Health 2, 1 (2014), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.4161/dish.26006

    work page doi:10.4161/dish.26006 2014

  70. [71]

    Kellie Yu Hui Sim and Kenny Tsu Wei Choo. 2025. Envisioning an AI- Enhanced Mental Health Ecosystem. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.14883 arXiv:2503.14883 [cs]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.14883 2025

  71. [72]

    Phyllis Solomon. 2004. Peer Support/Peer Provided Services Underlying Pro- cesses, Benefits, and Critical Ingredients. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 27, 4 (2004), 392–401. https://doi.org/10.2975/27.2004.392.401

    work page doi:10.2975/27.2004.392.401 2004

  72. [73]

    Pendse, Neha Kumar, and Munmun De Choudhury

    Inhwa Song, Sachin R. Pendse, Neha Kumar, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2024. The Typing Cure: Experiences with Large Language Model Chatbots for Mental Health Support. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.14362 arXiv:2401.14362 [cs]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.14362 2024

  73. [74]

    Ian Steenstra, Farnaz Nouraei, and Timothy Bickmore. 2025. Scaffolding Empathy: Training Counselors with Simulated Patients and Utterance-level Performance Visualizations. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3714014

    work page doi:10.1145/3706598.3714014 2025

  74. [75]

    Subramaniam, E

    M. Subramaniam, E. Abdin, L. Picco, S. Pang, S. Shafie, J. A. Vaingankar, K. W. Kwok, K. Verma, and S. A. Chong. 2017. Stigma towards People with Mental Disorders and Its Components – a Perspective from Multi-Ethnic Singapore. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 26, 4 (Aug. 2017), 371–382. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S2045796016000159

    work page doi:10.1017/s2045796016000159 2017

  75. [76]

    Mythily Subramaniam, Shazana Shahwan, Chong Min Janrius Goh, Gregory Tee Hng Tan, Wei Jie Ong, and Siow Ann Chong. 2022. A Qualitative Exploration of the Views of Policymakers and Policy Advisors on the Impact of Mental Health Stigma on the Development and Implementation of Mental Health Policy in Singapore. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and ...

    work page doi:10.1007/s10488-021-01171-1 2022

  76. [77]

    Baseman, Myeonghan Ryu, Saeed Abdullah, Christopher W

    Nathaniel Swinger, Cynthia M. Baseman, Myeonghan Ryu, Saeed Abdullah, Christopher W. Wiese, Andrew M. Sherrill, and Rosa I. Arriaga. 2025. There’s No "I" in TEAMMAIT: Impacts of Domain and Expertise on Trust in AI Teammates for Mental Health Work. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 9, 2 (May 2025), CSCW019:1–CSCW019:36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3710917

    work page doi:10.1145/3710917 2025

  77. [78]

    Tanana, Christina S

    Michael J. Tanana, Christina S. Soma, Patty B. Kuo, Nicolas M. Bertagnolli, Aaron Dembe, Brian T. Pace, Vivek Srikumar, David C. Atkins, and Zac E. Imel. 2021. How Do You Feel? Using Natural Language Processing to Automatically Rate Emotion in Psychotherapy. Behavior Research Methods 53, 5 (Oct. 2021), 2069–

    work page 2021

  78. [79]

    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01531-z

    work page doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01531-z

  79. [80]

    Christopher Terry and Jeff Cain. 2016. The Emerging Issue of Digital Empathy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 80, 4 (May 2016), 58. https://doi. org/10.5688/ajpe80458

    work page doi:10.5688/ajpe80458 2016

  80. [81]

    Anja Thieme, Maryann Hanratty, Maria Lyons, Jorge Palacios, Rita Faia Marques, Cecily Morrison, and Gavin Doherty. 2023. Designing Human-centered AI for Mental Health: Developing Clinically Relevant Applications for Online CBT Treatment. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 30, 2 (March 2023), 27:1–27:50. https://doi.org/10.1145/3564752

    work page doi:10.1145/3564752 2023

Showing first 80 references.