pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.04101 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-04 · ✦ hep-th · nlin.PS

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Scattering of kinks in Frankensteinian potentials: Kinks as bubbles of exotic mass and phase transitions in oscillon production

Luk\'a\v{s} Rafaj , Ond\v{r}ej Nicolas Karp\'i\v{s}ek , Filip Blaschke
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 16:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th nlin.PS
keywords kink scatteringFrankensteinian potentialsoscillon productionphase transitionkink-antikink collisionspiecewise potentialssoliton dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Kinks in Frankensteinian potentials act as bubbles of exotic mass, with collisions switching to oscillon production below a field threshold.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies kink and antikink scattering in two special potentials built from piecewise quadratic and linear pieces. These potentials allow kinks without distinct skin and core regions. The authors interpret the models as free massive field theories that include a built-in mechanism for producing particle pairs once the field value crosses certain thresholds. In the second model, lowering the threshold enough causes a switch in collision outcomes: for large ranges of initial velocities, the kinks no longer break apart into massive waves but instead produce oscillons.

Core claim

The central claim is that Frankensteinian potentials support kinks without skin and core regions and can be interpreted as free massive theories with a built-in particle-pair production mechanism that activates above field-value thresholds. The second model exhibits a phase-transition-like property in which the nature of collisions switches from disintegration into a massive wave to production of oscillons for large segments of initial velocities when the field threshold is low enough.

What carries the argument

Frankensteinian potentials made of piecewise quadratic and linear segments that support kinks without skin and core regions, functioning as free massive theories with a built-in particle-pair production mechanism above field-value thresholds.

If this is right

  • Kink characteristics such as mass and shape change depending on the chosen field-value thresholds.
  • The distribution of bouncing windows in collisions varies with the thresholds in both models.
  • In the second model, collisions produce oscillons rather than massive waves for wide velocity segments once the threshold drops low enough.
  • The collision outcome undergoes a phase-transition-like change tied to the field threshold value.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the free-theory-plus-threshold interpretation holds, it may allow simpler analytic estimates for interaction outcomes in other piecewise soliton models.
  • The phase-transition behavior could be tested by varying the threshold continuously in simulations to map the exact velocity ranges where oscillon production begins.
  • Similar threshold-activated production mechanisms might appear in other field theories where potentials are defined piecewise.
  • The exotic-mass bubble picture could connect to studies of soliton stability in potentials with sharp transitions.

Load-bearing premise

The Frankensteinian potentials support kinks without skin and core regions and can be interpreted as free massive theories with a built-in particle-pair production mechanism that activates above field-value thresholds.

What would settle it

Numerical simulation of kink-antikink collisions in the second model at low field thresholds across a range of velocities, checking whether stable oscillons appear instead of disintegration into massive waves.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.04101 by Filip Blaschke, Luk\'a\v{s} Rafaj, Ond\v{r}ej Nicolas Karp\'i\v{s}ek.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The simplest Frankensteinian potentials and their corresponding kinks. The vacua are placed at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: ). Here, it is impossible to even formulate the kink scattering problem. We illustrate the VTCT potential and its two limits in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Upper panel: A TCT kink, centered at origin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Number of bound modes for TCT as depending on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dependence of the mass, size of the core and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The TSST potential for a generic value of the sewing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Upper panel: A TSST kink, here centered at origin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The dependence of the number of bound modes of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Examples of KK¯ scattering in the TCT model (β = 0.6) showcasing generic outcomes: a) quasi-elastic collisions, b) bouncing, and c) capture into a bound state and subsequent decay. illustrated on Figs. 12, 13 and 14. The first of these dis￾plays dependence of the central field, i.e., ϕ(0, t), on both the initial velocity and β in several ways. In particular, we pay attention to the number of times the fie… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: A velocity map of KK¯ scattering in TCT model (β = 0.427). Top: Field value at the center of collision as dependent on velocity and the first 100 time units. Bottom: Number of crossings of field levels, that is, the number of instances of zeros, ϕ(0, t) = 0, and crossing the sewing points, i.e., ϕ(0, t) = ±β, as dependent on the velocity. #(ϕ(0,t) = β) #(ϕ(0,t) = 0) #(ϕ(0,t) = − β) ϕ(0,200) [PITH_FULL_IM… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: A scan of KK¯ scattering in the TCT model for a range of initial velocities and β. Top left: the value of the field at t = 200. Top right: number of times the field at the center ϕ(0, t) crosses the −β sewing point. Bottom left: number of times the field at the center ϕ(0, t) crosses the β sewing point. Bottom right: Number of zeros of the field at the center [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Dependence of the critical velocity and position of bouncing windows on the sewing point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Dependence of frequency of the field at the center of the collision [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: A velocity map of KK¯ scattering in TSST model (β = 0.65). Top: Field value at the center of collision as dependent on velocity for 200 time units. Bottom: Number of times the field value at the center crosses ϕ(0, t) = 0 (blue), ϕ(0, t) = β (red), and ϕ(0, t) = −β (green). anism. The piece-wise structure introduces sharp field￾value boundaries at which the theory effectively switches between free regimes… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: A scan of KK¯ scattering in the TSST model for a range of initial velocities and β. Top left: the value of the field at t = 200. Top right: number of times the field at the center ϕ(0, t) crosses the −β sewing point. Bottom left: number of times the field at the center ϕ(0, t) crosses the β sewing point. Bottom right: Number of zeros of the field at the center [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Here, however, the bouncing happens at very [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Dependence of the critical velocity and position of bouncing windows on the sewing point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Dependence of frequency of the field at the center of the collision [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Comparison between the symmetric TSC potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Since it is symmetric under reflections x → −x, m2 −x+ 0 −x− 0 m2 −α2 x− x+ UTSC eff (x) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: The dependence of TSC kink on the position of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_22.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a dynamical picture of kink-anti-kink scattering in a pair of special, Frankensteinian potentials made of piece-wise quadratic and linear pieces. Specifically, we focus on models that support kinks without skin and core regions. We propose an intuitive interpretation for these models as being essentially free massive theories with a built-in particle-pair like production mechanism that enters into the dynamics above certain field-value thresholds. We present results concerning the kink's characteristics depending on these thresholds and the distribution of bouncing windows. We show that the second model exhibits a phase-transition-like property in which the nature of collisions switches from disintegration into a massive wave to production of oscillons for large segments of initial velocities when the field threshold is low enough.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines kink-antikink scattering in two Frankensteinian potentials constructed from piecewise linear and quadratic segments. These potentials support kinks without skin or core regions and are interpreted as free massive scalar theories equipped with a threshold-activated particle-pair production mechanism. Numerical results are reported on kink properties as functions of the field threshold, the distribution of bouncing windows, and a phase-transition-like switch in the second model: for sufficiently low thresholds, collisions change from producing a massive wave to generating oscillons over large intervals of initial velocities.

Significance. If the numerical observations are robust, the work supplies a simplified, intuitive framework for soliton scattering and oscillon formation, with the exotic-mass-bubble interpretation offering potential new intuition for threshold-driven production in nonlinear field theories. The absence of quantitative diagnostics for the reported transition, however, confines its immediate significance to a qualitative illustration rather than a controlled study of criticality.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract and section describing the second model: the headline claim of a 'phase-transition-like property' lacks any defined order parameter, critical exponent, or scaling analysis. The switch from massive-wave disintegration to oscillon production is presented only qualitatively for low thresholds and broad velocity segments; no test is given to distinguish a sharp transition from a smooth crossover induced by the non-analytic points of the piecewise potential.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed review and insightful comments on our manuscript arXiv:2603.04101. We address the major comment below and will make revisions to improve the clarity of our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and section describing the second model: the headline claim of a 'phase-transition-like property' lacks any defined order parameter, critical exponent, or scaling analysis. The switch from massive-wave disintegration to oscillon production is presented only qualitatively for low thresholds and broad velocity segments; no test is given to distinguish a sharp transition from a smooth crossover induced by the non-analytic points of the piecewise potential.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the claim is presented qualitatively without a formal order parameter, critical exponents, or scaling analysis. The term 'phase-transition-like' is intended to describe the observed qualitative switch in collision outcomes—from the production of a massive wave to the generation of oscillons over large intervals of initial velocities—when the field threshold is sufficiently low. This behavior is tied to the threshold-activated mechanism in our model. We agree that the piecewise construction introduces non-analytic points, which are central to the threshold effect we aim to model. To address this, we will revise the abstract and the section on the second model to qualify the claim as an observed qualitative transition rather than implying a full critical phenomenon. We will also add a brief discussion noting that distinguishing a sharp transition from a crossover would require additional quantitative diagnostics, which are beyond the scope of the current work but could be explored in future studies. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from direct numerical integration of field equations

full rationale

The paper explicitly constructs the Frankensteinian potentials as piecewise quadratic/linear functions, interprets them as free massive theories with threshold-activated pair production, and reports collision outcomes (including the phase-transition-like switch) from numerical integration of the equations of motion. No derivation reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or self-citation chain; the central claims are simulation outputs rather than self-referential predictions. This is the expected non-circular outcome for a numerical study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the construction of two piecewise potentials and the assumption that their dynamics can be interpreted as free massive theories with threshold-activated pair production; no independent evidence for the interpretation is supplied beyond the numerical results.

free parameters (1)
  • field threshold
    Value above which particle-pair production mechanism activates in the dynamics.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The chosen piecewise quadratic and linear potentials support kinks without skin and core regions.
    Invoked to define the models under study.
invented entities (1)
  • exotic mass bubbles no independent evidence
    purpose: Intuitive picture of the kinks as regions carrying exotic mass that enables pair production.
    Proposed interpretation without independent falsifiable handle outside the simulations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5443 in / 1309 out tokens · 29832 ms · 2026-05-15T16:41:10.279436+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 13 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Scattering of kinks in Frankensteinian potentials: Kinks as bubbles of exotic mass and phase transitions in oscillon production

    or Q-balls [29] in (1+1)-dimensions. Relatively re- cently, bouncing has been detected in solitons in higher dimensions as well [30, 31]. The phenomenon of bouncing was studied in the double-well model since 80ties [14–18]. Other potentials that came under detailed scrutiny areϕ 6 potential [19– 21], the Christ-Lee model [22] andϕ 8 potential [23, 24] amo...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    19 (right)

    TSC kink and its properties The kink solution consists of two exponential tails, two quadratic skin regions, and a central sine core as illus- trated in Fig. 19 (right). The position of sewing points on thex-axis is denoted asx ±, and they are determined so that theϕ TSC(x) is differentiable everywhere. This gives us x− = 1 αarccot α√−η r 2 + η m2 + 2η α2...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Unlike normal modes, this mode exists independently of the potential and plays an important role in restoring Lorentz covariance in collective coordi- nate models [45]

    Derrick mode An important property of the kink is its response to the infinitesimal scaling that is captured by the so-called Derrick’s mode. Unlike normal modes, this mode exists independently of the potential and plays an important role in restoring Lorentz covariance in collective coordi- nate models [45]. The associated frequency is defined as a ratio...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Normal modes The normal modes of a kink are obtained by adding to the static solution a small periodic correction, i.e. ϕ=ϕ K(x) + cos(ωt)b(x),|b(x)| ≪1,(A34) and plugging this into the equation of motion, that for a generic scalar field theory in 1 + 1 dimensions reads ∂2ϕ+V ′(ϕ) = 0.(A35) Retaining only linear terms inb, we obtain an effective Schr¨ odi...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Initial Conditions The initial boosted kink configuration was constructed by numerically integrating the BPS equation dϕ dx = p 2V(ϕ)p 1−v 2 in ,(B5) wherev in is the initial velocity. The static half-kink pro- file was obtained by solving this first-order equation with high precision and then mirrored to construct the full boosted kink profile, ϕK(x) = s...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Time integra- tion was performed with an explicit adaptive Runge– Kutta method, typically the Bogacki–Shampine 5/4 scheme (BS5())

    Time Evolution The resulting initial-value problem was evolved using theDifferentialEquations.jllibrary. Time integra- tion was performed with an explicit adaptive Runge– Kutta method, typically the Bogacki–Shampine 5/4 scheme (BS5()). In the construction of static profiles, theTsit5()method was used for high-accuracy integra- tion. Overall, the procedure...

    work page

  7. [7]

    doi:10.1088/0305-4470/9/8/029

    T. W. B. Kibble, “Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings,” J. Phys. A9(1976), 1387-1398 doi:10.1088/0305-4470/9/8/029 20

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/9/8/029 1976

  8. [8]

    Gravitational Field of Vacuum Domain Walls and Strings,

    A. Vilenkin, “Gravitational Field of Vacuum Domain Walls and Strings,” Phys. Rev. D23(1981), 852-857 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.23.852

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.852 1981

  9. [9]

    The Hierarchy Problem and New Dimensions at a Millimeter

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. R. Dvali, “The Hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millime- ter,” Phys. Lett. B429, 263 (1998) doi:10.1016/S0370- 2693(98)00466-3 [hep-ph/9803315]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370- 1998

  10. [10]

    New Dimensions at a Millimeter to a Fermi and Superstrings at a TeV

    I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. R. Dvali, “New dimensions at a millimeter to a Fermi and superstrings at a TeV,” Phys. Lett. B436, 257 (1998) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00860-0 [hep-ph/9804398]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00860-0 1998

  11. [11]

    A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, “A Large mass hierar- chy from a small extra dimension,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3370 [hep- ph/9905221]

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3370 1999

  12. [12]

    An Alternative to Compactification

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, “An Alternative to compactification,” Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 4690 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4690 [hep-th/9906064]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.4690 1999

  13. [13]

    Do We Live Inside a Domain Wall?,

    V. A. Rubakov and M. E. Shaposhnikov, “Do We Live Inside a Domain Wall?,” Phys. Lett.125B, 136 (1983). doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)91253-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)91253-4 1983

  14. [14]

    Solitons in polyacetylene,

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer and A. J. Heeger, “Solitons in polyacetylene,” Phys. Rev. Lett.42(1979), 1698-1701 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.1698

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.42.1698 1979

  15. [15]

    Elastic Kink-Meson scattering,

    J. Evslin and H. Liu, “Elastic Kink-Meson scattering,” JHEP04(2024), 072 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2024)072 [arXiv:2311.14369 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2024)072 2024

  16. [16]

    The domain wall soli- ton’s tension,

    J. Evslin, H. Liu and B. Zhang, “The domain wall soli- ton’s tension,” Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) no.6, 639 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14383-8 [arXiv:2412.20814 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14383-8 2025

  17. [17]

    Meson produc- tion from kink-meson scattering,

    J. Evslin, H. Liu and B. Zhang, “Meson produc- tion from kink-meson scattering,” Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) no.2, 025012 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.025012 [arXiv:2211.01794 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.025012 2023

  18. [18]

    Manton and P.M

    N. S. Manton and P. Sutcliffe, “Topological soli- tons,” Cambridge University Press, 2004, ISBN 978-0-521-04096-9, 978-0-521-83836-8, 978-0-511-20783-9 doi:10.1017/CBO9780511617034

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511617034 2004

  19. [19]

    Topological and Non-Topological Solitons in Scalar Field Theories,

    Y. M. Shnir, “Topological and Non-Topological Solitons in Scalar Field Theories,” Cambridge University Press, 2018, ISBN 978-1-108-63625-4

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Kink-antikink collisions in the two- dimensionalϕ 4 model

    T. Sugiyama, “Kink-antikink collisions in the two- dimensionalϕ 4 model”, Prog. Theor. Phys.61(1979), 1550-1563 doi:10.1143/PTP.61.1550

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.61.1550 1979

  21. [21]

    Resonance Structure in Kink - Antikink Interactions in ϕ4 Theory,

    D. K. Campbell, J. F. Schonfeld and C. A. Wingate, “Resonance Structure in Kink - Antikink Interactions in ϕ4 Theory,” Physica D9(1983), 1 FERMILAB-PUB-82- 051-THY

    work page 1983

  22. [22]

    Soliton - Anti-soliton Scattering and Cap- ture inλϕ 4 Theory,

    M. Moshir, “Soliton - Anti-soliton Scattering and Cap- ture inλϕ 4 Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B185(1981), 318-332 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90320-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90320-5 1981

  23. [23]

    QUASIPERIOD- ICAL ORBITS IN THE SCALAR CLASSICAL lambda phi**4 FIELD THEORY,

    T. I. Belova and A. E. Kudryavtsev, “QUASIPERIOD- ICAL ORBITS IN THE SCALAR CLASSICAL lambda phi**4 FIELD THEORY,” Physica D32(1988), 18 ITEP-94-1985

    work page 1988

  24. [24]

    Frac- tal structure in the scalar lambda (phi**2-1)**2 theory,

    P. Anninos, S. Oliveira and R. A. Matzner, “Frac- tal structure in the scalar lambda (phi**2-1)**2 theory,” Phys. Rev. D44(1991), 1147-1160 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.1147

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.44.1147 1991

  25. [25]

    Kink-antikink collisions in the phi^6 model

    P. Dorey, K. Mersh, T. Romanczukiewicz and Y. Shnir, “Kink-antikink collisions in theϕ 6 model,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011), 091602 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.091602 [arXiv:1101.5951 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.091602 2011

  26. [26]

    Multikink scattering in theϕ6 model revisited,

    C. Adam, P. Dorey, A. Garcia Martin-Caro, M. Huido- bro, K. Oles, T. Romanczukiewicz, Y. Shnir and A. Wereszczynski, “Multikink scattering in theϕ6 model revisited,” Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.12, 125003 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.125003 [arXiv:2209.08849 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.125003 2022

  27. [27]

    Kink-Antikink Scattering in \phi^4 and \phi^6 Models

    H. Weigel, “Kink-Antikink Scattering inφ 4 andϕ 6 Models,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser.482(2014), 012045 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/482/1/012045 [arXiv:1309.6607 [nlin.PS]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1742-6596/482/1/012045 2014

  28. [28]

    Collisions of weakly-bound kinks in the Christ-Lee model,

    P. Dorey, A. Gorina, T. Roma´ nczukiewicz and Y. Shnir, “Collisions of weakly-bound kinks in the Christ-Lee model,” [arXiv:2304.11710 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Generalizing the coupling between geometry and matter: f (R, Lm, T ) gravity

    V. A. Gani, A. M. Marjaneh and K. Javidan, “Exotic final states in theφ 8 multi-kink collisions,” Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) no.12, 1124 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021- 09935-7 [arXiv:2106.06399 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021- 2021

  30. [30]

    Kink excitation spectra in the (1+1)-dimensional $\varphi^8$ model

    V. A. Gani, V. Lensky and M. A. Lizunova, “Kink ex- citation spectra in the (1+1)-dimensionalφ 8 model,” JHEP08(2015), 147 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2015)147 [arXiv:1506.02313 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2015)147 2015

  31. [31]

    Collective coordinates method for long-range kink collisions,

    J. G. F. Campos, A. Mohammadi and T. Ro- manczukiewicz, “Collective coordinates method for long-range kink collisions,” JHEP01(2025), 166 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2025)166 [arXiv:2411.12630 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2025)166 2025

  32. [32]

    Resonance with quasinormal modes in long-range kinks’ collisions,

    J. G. F. Campos, A. Mohammadi and T. Ro- manczukiewicz, “Resonance with quasinormal modes in long-range kinks’ collisions,” Eur. Phys. J. C86 (2026) no.1, 90 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15330-x [arXiv:2510.05311 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15330-x 2026

  33. [33]

    Dynamics of multi-kinks in the presence of wells and barriers

    S. W. Goatham, L. E. Mannering, R. Hann and S. Kr- usch, “Dynamics of multi-kinks in the presence of wells and barriers,” Acta Phys. Polon. B42(2011), 2087-2106 doi:10.5506/APhysPolB.42.2087 [arXiv:1007.2641 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.5506/aphyspolb.42.2087 2011

  34. [34]

    Amplitude modulations and reso- nant decay of excited oscillons,

    F. Blaschke, T. Roma´ nczukiewicz, K. S lawi´ nska and A. Wereszczy´ nski, “Amplitude modulations and reso- nant decay of excited oscillons,” Phys. Rev. E110 (2024) no.1, 014203 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.110.014203 [arXiv:2403.00443 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.110.014203 2024

  35. [35]

    Oscil- lons and bubbles in Q-ball dynamics,

    D. C. Mart´ ınez, P. Dorey, T. Rom´ anczukiewicz, P. M. Saffin, K. Slawinska and A. Wereszczy´nski, “Oscil- lons and bubbles in Q-ball dynamics,” JHEP12(2025), 154 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2025)154 [arXiv:2509.03192 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2025)154 2025

  36. [36]

    Scattering of vor- tices with excited normal modes,

    S. Krusch, M. Rees and T. Winyard, “Scattering of vor- tices with excited normal modes,” Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) no.5, 056050 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.056050 [arXiv:2406.04164 [math-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.056050 2024

  37. [37]

    Resonance phe- nomena in vortex-antivortex collisions,

    M. Bachmaier and A. Wereszczynski, “Resonance phe- nomena in vortex-antivortex collisions,”, Physics Let- ters B, 2026, 140324, ISSN 0370-2693, [arXiv:2510.17964 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Kink solutions in logarithmic scalar field theory: Excita- tion spectra, scattering, and decay of bions,

    E. Belendryasova, V. A. Gani and K. G. Zloshchastiev, “Kink solutions in logarithmic scalar field theory: Excita- tion spectra, scattering, and decay of bions,” Phys. Lett. B823(2021), 136776 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136776 [arXiv:2111.09096 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136776 2021

  39. [39]

    Topological Compactons

    H. Arodz, “Topological compactons,” Acta Phys. Polon. B33(2002), 1241-1252 [arXiv:nlin/0201001 [nlin.PS]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  40. [40]

    Compact oscillons in the signum-Gordon model

    H. Arodz, P. Klimas and T. Tyranowski, “Compact 21 oscillons in the signum-Gordon model,” Phys. Rev. D77(2008), 047701 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.047701 [arXiv:0710.2244 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.047701 2008

  41. [41]

    Scattering of compact oscillons,

    F. M. Hahne, P. Klimas, J. S. Streibel and W. J. Zakrzewski, “Scattering of compact oscillons,” JHEP01(2020), 006 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2020)006 [arXiv:1909.01992 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2020)006 2020

  42. [42]

    Compact kink and its in- teraction with compact oscillons,

    F. M. Hahne and P. Klimas, “Compact kink and its in- teraction with compact oscillons,” JHEP09(2022), 100 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2022)100 [arXiv:2207.07064 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2022)100 2022

  43. [43]

    Scattering of compact kinks,

    F. M. Hahne and P. Klimas, “Scattering of compact kinks,” JHEP01(2024), 067 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024)067 [arXiv:2311.09494 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2024)067 2024

  44. [44]

    Signum-Gordon spectral mass from nonlinear Fourier mode mixing

    J. S. Streibel and P. Klimas, “Signum-Gordon spec- tral mass from nonlinear Fourier mode mixing,” [arXiv:2602.16971 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Kink-antikink collisions in hyper-massive models,

    F. M. Hahne and P. Klimas, “Kink-antikink colli- sions in hyper-massive models,” JHEP10(2024), 162 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2024)162 [arXiv:2408.06991 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2024)162 2024

  46. [46]

    From Kinks to Compactons

    D. Bazeia, L. Losano, M. A. Marques and R. Menezes, “From Kinks to Compactons,” Phys. Lett. B736 (2014), 515-521 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.08.015 [arXiv:1407.3478 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.08.015 2014

  47. [47]

    Scattering of compactlike struc- tures,

    D. Bazeia, T. S. Mendon¸ ca, R. Menezes and H. P. de Oliveira, “Scattering of compactlike struc- tures,” Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) no.12, 1000 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7519-4 [arXiv:1910.05458 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7519-4 2019

  48. [48]

    Quasinor- mal modes in kink excitations and kink–antikink in- teractions: a toy model,

    J. G. F. Campos and A. Mohammadi, “Quasinor- mal modes in kink excitations and kink–antikink in- teractions: a toy model,” Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020) no.5, 352 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7856-3 [arXiv:1905.00835 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7856-3 2020

  49. [49]

    Scat- tering of Kinks in Coreless Potentials,

    O. N. Karp´ ıˇ sek, L. Rafaj and F. Blaschke, “Scat- tering of Kinks in Coreless Potentials,” PTEP 2024(2024) no.11, 113A01 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptae151 [arXiv:2407.14313 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptae151 2024

  50. [50]

    Mechanization of scalar field theory in 1+1 dimensions,

    F. Blaschke and O. N. Karp´ ıˇ sek, “Mechanization of scalar field theory in 1+1 dimensions,” PTEP 2022(2022) no.10, 103A01 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac104 [arXiv:2202.05675 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac104 2022

  51. [51]

    Relativistic moduli space for kink collisions,

    C. Adam, N. S. Manton, K. Oles, T. Romanczukiewicz and A. Wereszczynski, “Relativistic moduli space for kink collisions,” Phys. Rev. D105(2022) no.6, 065012 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.065012 [arXiv:2111.06790 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.065012 2022

  52. [52]

    Confining kinks. ζ-regularized one-loop kink mass shifts in exotic field the- ories,

    L. Inzunza, J. M. Guilarte and P. Pais, “Confining kinks. ζ-regularized one-loop kink mass shifts in exotic field the- ories,” [arXiv:2506.20440 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    PARENT POTEN- TIALS FOR AN INFINITE CLASS OF REFLECTION- LESS KINKS,

    S. E. Trullinger and R. J. Flesch, “PARENT POTEN- TIALS FOR AN INFINITE CLASS OF REFLECTION- LESS KINKS,” J. Math. Phys.28(1987), 1683-1690 doi:10.1063/1.527476

    work page doi:10.1063/1.527476 1987