pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07456 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.GA

Recognition: unknown

Second-Generation Mass Peak in the Gravitational-Wave Population as a Probe of Globular Clusters

Elizabeth Flanagan, Fabio Antonini, Mark Gieles, Yonadav Barry Ginat

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA
keywords gravitational wavesblack hole mergersglobular clusterspair-instability supernovaedynamical formationmass spectrumsecond-generation mergersmerger rates
0
0 comments X

The pith

If the observed excess of black hole mergers near 35 solar masses arises in globular clusters, a second peak must appear near 70 solar masses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the excess of binary black hole mergers with primary masses near 35 solar masses, when attributed to dynamical formation inside dense stellar systems, combines with the truncation of first-generation black hole masses by pair-instability supernovae to force a second accumulation of merger remnants near 70 solar masses. This higher-mass feature is a direct consequence of the first-generation cutoff being doubled through repeated mergers, with its position staying stable while its height varies with the starting conditions of the clusters. Large suites of cluster population-synthesis models demonstrate that existing gravitational-wave catalogs already limit the birth properties of globular clusters, and that a dominant cluster contribution above the pair-instability scale would require a minimum low-mass merger rate. Detection of the predicted peak would therefore corroborate both a dynamical channel for the lower-mass excess and an upper edge of the pair-instability gap below 50 solar masses.

Core claim

Second-generation mergers of black holes formed in globular clusters inevitably produce a mass peak near 70 solar masses once pair-instability supernovae truncate the first-generation spectrum at a characteristic mass near 35 solar masses. The peak location follows from the doubling of the cutoff mass by mergers, while its amplitude depends on cluster initial conditions. Population-synthesis calculations show that current data already constrain those initial conditions, and that clusters dominating high-mass mergers imply a minimum first-generation merger rate of at least 0.099 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1} at 99 percent . A drop or gap in the secondary-mass spectrum is not a reliable cluster signature,

What carries the argument

The accumulation of second-generation black holes at twice the pair-instability supernova truncation mass through repeated mergers inside globular clusters.

If this is right

  • Current gravitational-wave observations already constrain the birth properties of globular clusters regardless of their total contribution to the merger rate.
  • If clusters dominate mergers above the pair-instability scale, the first-generation merger rate must satisfy R(m1 ≤ 50 M⊙) ≥ 0.099 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1} at 99 percent .
  • A drop or gap in the secondary black hole mass spectrum is not a robust signature of cluster origin for high-mass mergers.
  • A confirmed excess near 70 solar masses would support a dynamical origin for the 35 solar mass feature and place the lower edge of the pair-instability gap at or below 50 solar masses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same doubling mechanism could operate in other dense environments such as nuclear star clusters and produce analogous high-mass features.
  • Higher-sensitivity detectors targeting the 50-100 solar mass range could directly test the minimum rate constraint without requiring full cluster population models.
  • Non-detection of the 70 solar mass peak would favor isolated binary evolution as the dominant channel for the 35 solar mass excess.
  • The location of the peak being largely independent of detailed cluster evolution makes it a clean, testable prediction even with incomplete knowledge of globular cluster formation.

Load-bearing premise

The excess near 35 solar masses must come from dynamical formation in dense stellar systems rather than isolated binaries, and pair-instability supernovae must impose a sharp upper limit on first-generation black hole masses.

What would settle it

Future catalogs showing no excess or peak near 70 solar masses, or a rate of mergers above the pair-instability gap falling below the minimum rate implied by lower-mass observations, would rule out the predicted structure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07456 by Elizabeth Flanagan, Fabio Antonini, Mark Gieles, Yonadav Barry Ginat.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Cluster initial conditions constrained by GW data. Yellow hatching shows regions in which the cluster rate exceeds [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Gravitational-wave observations have revealed an excess of binary black hole mergers with primary masses near $\sim 35\,M_\odot$. We show that if this feature originates from dynamical formation in dense stellar systems, and if the pair-instability supernova truncates the first-generation black hole mass spectrum, then second-generation mergers inevitably produce a second peak near $\sim 70\,M_\odot$. This structure reflects the suppression of first-generation black holes above a characteristic mass and the accumulation of merger remnants near twice that scale. Its location is robust, whereas its amplitude depends strongly on cluster initial conditions. Using a large suite of cluster population-synthesis models, we show that current gravitational-wave data already constrain the birth properties of globular clusters, irrespective of their overall contribution to the observed population. If clusters dominate mergers above the pair-instability scale, these constraints tighten further and imply a minimum first-generation merger rate of $\mathcal{R}(m_1 \leq 50\,M_\odot) \geq 0.099\,\mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$ ($99\%$ confidence). We further show that a drop or gap in the secondary black hole mass spectrum is not a robust signature of a cluster origin for high-mass mergers within the pair-instability mass gap. A confirmed excess near $\sim 70\,M_\odot$ would support a dynamical origin of the $\sim 35\,M_\odot$ feature and provide independent evidence for a pair-instability mass gap with a lower edge at $\lesssim 50M_\odot$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that if the observed excess of binary black hole mergers near 35 solar masses originates from dynamical formation in globular clusters and the pair-instability supernova truncates the first-generation black hole mass spectrum, then second-generation mergers will inevitably produce a second peak near 70 solar masses. Using a large suite of cluster population-synthesis models, the authors demonstrate that the peak location remains stable across initial conditions while its amplitude varies, allowing current gravitational-wave data to constrain globular cluster birth properties irrespective of overall contribution to the merger population. Under the additional assumption that clusters dominate above the pair-instability scale, they derive a lower bound on the first-generation merger rate of 0.099 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1} at 99% confidence. They further show that a drop or gap in the secondary black hole mass spectrum is not a robust signature of a cluster origin for high-mass mergers.

Significance. If the conditional assumptions hold, this provides a falsifiable prediction that could confirm a dynamical origin for the 35 solar mass feature and offer independent evidence for the pair-instability mass gap with a lower edge at or below 50 solar masses. The work's strength is the extensive population-synthesis modeling that quantifies robustness of the peak location and derives data-driven constraints on cluster initial conditions, yielding reproducible predictions for future observations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Results section on rate constraints] The section deriving the rate lower bound: the minimum first-generation merger rate of 0.099 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1} (99% confidence) is obtained under the assumption that clusters dominate mergers above the pair-instability scale, but the manuscript does not explicitly show how this dominance assumption is tested for consistency with the constraints on cluster initial conditions (which control the amplitude of the second peak).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract provides no quantitative details on the explored ranges of cluster initial conditions (mass, density, metallicity) or the statistical method (e.g., likelihood or posterior construction) used to derive the rate bound from non-detection; these should be summarized briefly for clarity.
  2. [Discussion] The claim that a gap in the secondary mass spectrum is not robust would be strengthened by an explicit side-by-side comparison to predictions from isolated binary evolution models in the same mass range.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and recommendation for minor revision. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results section on rate constraints] The section deriving the rate lower bound: the minimum first-generation merger rate of 0.099 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1} (99% confidence) is obtained under the assumption that clusters dominate mergers above the pair-instability scale, but the manuscript does not explicitly show how this dominance assumption is tested for consistency with the constraints on cluster initial conditions (which control the amplitude of the second peak).

    Authors: We agree that an explicit consistency check would improve clarity. The constraints on cluster initial conditions are obtained by requiring that the amplitude of the second-generation peak (controlled by those conditions) does not overproduce the observed high-mass mergers or violate current upper limits. Under the separate dominance assumption, the same initial-condition range then sets the minimum first-generation rate needed to explain any high-mass events as second-generation mergers. In the revised manuscript we will add a short paragraph to the rate-constraints section that explicitly verifies this link, showing that the 99% lower bound corresponds to the edge of the allowed initial-condition parameter space where the predicted second-peak amplitude remains compatible with existing data under dominance. This addition will confirm that the two parts of the analysis are internally consistent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is conditional and self-contained

full rationale

The paper's core logic is explicitly conditional: if the ~35 M⊙ excess is dynamical and PISN truncates the first-generation spectrum, then a second peak near 70 M⊙ follows from mass segregation and remnant accumulation. Population-synthesis runs explore initial conditions independently, showing peak location stability while amplitude varies; rate lower bounds are derived only under the stated assumption that clusters dominate above the PISN scale, using non-detection as input rather than fitting the target feature itself. No equation or claim reduces by construction to a self-citation, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or self-definitional loop. The chain relies on external GW data and standard cluster modeling without importing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes from the authors' prior work as load-bearing.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard assumption that pair-instability supernovae impose a sharp upper mass cutoff on first-generation black holes and on the modeling choice that dynamical encounters in clusters dominate the high-mass end of the observed population. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • cluster initial conditions (mass, density, metallicity distribution)
    These parameters control the amplitude of the second peak and are constrained by fitting to current gravitational-wave data.
  • fraction of mergers contributed by clusters above the pair-instability scale
    Used to derive the minimum first-generation merger rate bound of 0.099 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption pair-instability supernovae truncate the first-generation black-hole mass spectrum at a characteristic mass
    Invoked in the abstract as the mechanism that suppresses first-generation black holes above ~35 solar masses.
  • domain assumption the observed excess near 35 solar masses originates from dynamical formation in dense stellar systems
    Conditional premise required for the second-peak prediction to apply.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5601 in / 1522 out tokens · 59872 ms · 2026-05-10T17:37:45.029393+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Secondary-Mass Features improve Spectral-Siren $H_0$ Constraints

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new model emphasizing secondary mass features and pairing transitions improves spectral siren H0 constraints by ~30% using 142 GW events from GWTC-4.0.

  2. Emergent structure in the binary black hole mass distribution and implications for population-based cosmology

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    B-spline agnostic reconstruction of binary black hole masses from GWTC-4.0 reveals multiple features and a logarithmic hierarchy that impacts Hubble constant measurements, with a low-mass subpopulation isolation metho...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collab- oration, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari,et al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Ob- servation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016)

    2016

  2. [2]

    Abbott, T

    R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, N. Adhikari, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt, D. Agarwal,et al.(LIGO Scientific Collab- oration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collabora- tion), Gwtc-3: Compact binary coalescences observed by ligo and virgo during the second part of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023)

    2023

  3. [3]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Col- laboration, the KAGRA Collaboration, A. G. Abac, I. Abouelfettouh, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adam- cewicz, S. Adhicary, D. Adhikari, N. Adhikari, R. X. Adhikari, V. K. Adkins,et al., GWTC-4.0: Popula- tion Properties of Merging Compact Binaries, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2508.18083 (2025), arXiv:2508.18083 [...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collabo- ration, and the KAGRA Collaboration, Gwtc-4: Com- pact binary coalescences observed by ligo and virgo dur- ing the o3b observing run (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    The Emergence of Structure in the Binary Black Hole Mass Distribution,

    V. Tiwari and S. Fairhurst, The Emergence of Structure in the Binary Black Hole Mass Distribution, ApJL913, L19 (2021), arXiv:2011.04502 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Ev- idence for Three Subpopulations of Merging Binary Black Holes at Different Primary Masses,

    S. Banagiri, E. Thrane, and P. D. Lasky, Evidence for Three Subpopulations of Merging Binary Black Holes at Different Primary Masses, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2509.15646 (2025), arXiv:2509.15646 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    A. M. Farah, M. Fishbach, and D. E. Holz, Two of a Kind: Comparing Big and Small Black Holes in Bi- naries with Gravitational Waves, ApJ962, 69 (2024), arXiv:2308.05102 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Stevenson, M

    S. Stevenson, M. Sampson, J. Powell, A. Vigna- G´ omez, C. J. Neijssel, D. Sz´ ecsi, and I. Mandel, The Impact of Pair-instability Mass Loss on the Binary Black Hole Mass Distribution, ApJ882, 121 (2019), arXiv:1904.02821 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    M. M. Briel, H. F. Stevance, and J. J. Eldridge, Un- derstanding the high-mass binary black hole popula- tion from stable mass transfer and super-Eddington accretion in BPASS, MNRAS520, 5724 (2023), arXiv:2206.13842 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Kishore Roy, L

    S. Kishore Roy, L. A. C. van Son, and W. M. Farr, A mid-thirties crisis: dissecting the properties of grav- itational wave sources near the 35 solar mass peak, Classical and Quantum Gravity42, 225008 (2025), arXiv:2507.01086 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Antonini, M

    F. Antonini, M. Gieles, F. Dosopoulou, and D. Chat- topadhyay, Coalescing black hole binaries from globular clusters: mass distributions and comparison to gravi- tational wave data from GWTC-3, MNRAS522, 466 (2023), arXiv:2208.01081 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    D. C. Heggie, Binary evolution in stellar dynamics., MNRAS173, 729 (1975)

    1975

  13. [13]

    Hut and J

    P. Hut and J. N. Bahcall, Binary-single star scattering. I - Numerical experiments for equal masses, ApJ268, 319 (1983)

    1983

  14. [14]

    J. J. Monaghan, A statistical theory of the disruption of three-body systems - I. Low angular momentum., MN- RAS176, 63 (1976)

    1976

  15. [15]

    J. J. Monaghan, A statistical theory of the disruption of three-body systems - II. High angular momentum., MNRAS177, 583 (1976)

    1976

  16. [16]

    Z. P. Anosova and V. V. Orlov, Dynamical Evolution of Equal-Mass Triple Systems in Three Dimensions, So- viet Ast.30, 380 (1986)

    1986

  17. [17]

    Mikkola, A Numerical Exploration of the Phase- Space Structure of Chaotic Three-Body Scattering, MN- RAS269, 127 (1994)

    S. Mikkola, A Numerical Exploration of the Phase- Space Structure of Chaotic Three-Body Scattering, MN- RAS269, 127 (1994)

    1994

  18. [18]

    Valtonen and H

    M. Valtonen and H. Karttunen,The Three-Body Prob- lem(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006)

    2006

  19. [19]

    Samsing, M

    J. Samsing, M. MacLeod, and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, Forma- tion of Tidal Captures and Gravitational Wave Inspi- rals in Binary-single Interactions, ApJ846, 36 (2017), arXiv:1609.09114 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Samsing, Phys

    J. Samsing, Eccentric black hole mergers forming in globular clusters, Phys. Rev. D97, 103014 (2018), arXiv:1711.07452 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    N. C. Stone and N. W. C. Leigh, A statistical solution to the chaotic, non-hierarchical three-body problem, Na- ture576, 406 (2019)

    2019

  22. [22]

    Y. B. Ginat and H. B. Perets, Analytical, Statistical Approximate Solution of Dissipative and Nondissipa- tive Binary-Single Stellar Encounters, Phys. Rev. X11, 031020 (2021), arXiv:2011.00010 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Kol, Flux-based statistical prediction of three-body outcomes, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astron- omy133, 17 (2021), arXiv:2002.11496 [gr-qc]

    B. Kol, Flux-based statistical prediction of three-body outcomes, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astron- omy133, 17 (2021), arXiv:2002.11496 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    A. A. Trani, N. W. C. Leigh, T. C. N. Boekholt, and S. Portegies Zwart, Isles of regularity in a sea of chaos amid the gravitational three-body problem, A&A689, A24 (2024), arXiv:2403.03247 [astro-ph.EP]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Mar´ ın Pina and M

    D. Mar´ ın Pina and M. Gieles, Demographics of three- body binary black holes in star clusters: implications for gravitational waves, MNRAS527, 8369 (2024), arXiv:2308.10318 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Rando Forastier, D

    B. Rando Forastier, D. Mar´ ın Pina, M. Gieles, S. Porte- gies Zwart, and F. Antonini, Binary-single interactions with different mass ratios: Implications for gravitational waves from globular clusters, A&A697, A118 (2025), arXiv:2405.16999 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Mar´ ın Pina, M

    D. Mar´ ın Pina, M. Gieles, T. Andrade, and A. A. Trani, Interactions among binary black holes in star clusters: Eccentric gravitational wave captures and triple forma- tion, A&A698, A229 (2025), arXiv:2501.02907 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Heggie and P

    D. Heggie and P. Hut,The Gravitational Million–Body Problem: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Star Clus- ter Dynamics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003)

    2003

  29. [29]

    P. G. Breen and D. C. Heggie, Dynamical evolution of black hole subsystems in idealized star clusters, MNRAS 432, 2779 (2013), arXiv:1304.3401 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2013

  30. [30]

    Pavl´ ık, T

    V. Pavl´ ık, T. Jeˇ r´ abkov´ a, P. Kroupa, and H. Baumgardt, The black hole retention fraction in star clusters, A&A 617, A69 (2018), arXiv:1806.05192 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    N. C. Weatherford, S. Chatterjee, K. Kremer, and F. A. Rasio, A Dynamical Survey of Stellar-mass Black Holes in 50 Milky Way Globular Clusters, ApJ898, 162 (2020), arXiv:1911.09125 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    Arca Sedda, A

    M. Arca Sedda, A. W. H. Kamlah, R. Spurzem, M. Giersz, P. Berczik, S. Rastello, G. Iorio, M. Mapelli, M. Gatto, and E. K. Grebel, The DRAGON-II simula- tions - I. Evolution of single and binary compact objects in star clusters with up to 1 million stars, MNRAS528, 5119 (2024), arXiv:2307.04805 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Ishchenko, P

    M. Ishchenko, P. Berczik, T. Panamarev, D. Kuvatova, M. Kalambay, A. Gluchshenko, O. Veles, M. Sobolenko, O. Sobodar, and C. Omarov, Dynamical evolution of Milky Way globular clusters on the cosmological timescale: I. Mass loss and interaction with the nuclear star cluster, A&A689, A178 (2024), arXiv:2406.18987 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Sridhar, A

    O. Sridhar, A. Ray, and V. Kalogera, Characterizing Binary Black Hole Subpopulations in GWTC-4 with Binned Gaussian Processes: On the Origins of the 35M⊙ Peak, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2511.22093 (2025), arXiv:2511.22093 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    W. A. Fowler and F. Hoyle, Neutrino Processes and Pair Formation in Massive Stars and Supernovae., ApJS9, 201 (1964)

    1964

  36. [36]

    Rakavy and G

    G. Rakavy and G. Shaviv, Instabilities in Highly Evolved Stellar Models, ApJ148, 803 (1967)

    1967

  37. [37]

    Barkat, G

    Z. Barkat, G. Rakavy, and N. Sack, Dynamics of 7 Supernova Explosion Resulting from Pair Formation, Phys. Rev. Lett.18, 379 (1967)

    1967

  38. [38]

    G. S. Fraley, Supernovae Explosions Induced by Pair- Production Instability, Astrophysics and Space Science 2, 96 (1968)

    1968

  39. [39]

    C. L. Fryer, S. E. Woosley, and A. Heger, Pair-instability supernovae, gravity waves, and gamma-ray transients, ApJ550, 372 (2001)

    2001

  40. [40]

    S. E. Woosley, Pulsational Pair-instability Supernovae, ApJ836, 244 (2017)

    2017

  41. [41]

    S. E. Woosley and A. Heger, The Pair-instability Mass Gap for Black Holes, ApJL912, L31 (2021), arXiv:2103.07933 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    Farrell, J

    E. Farrell, J. H. Groh, R. Hirschi, L. Murphy, E. Kaiser, S. Ekstr¨ om, C. Georgy, and G. Meynet, Is GW190521 the merger of black holes from the first stellar gen- erations?, MNRAS502, L40 (2021), arXiv:2009.06585 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Belczynski, R

    K. Belczynski, R. Hirschi, E. A. Kaiser, J. Liu, J. Casares, Y. Lu, R. O’Shaughnessy, A. Heger, S. Justham, and R. Soria, The Formation of a 70 M ⊙ Black Hole at High Metallicity, ApJ890, 113 (2020), arXiv:1911.12357 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Spera and M

    M. Spera and M. Mapelli, Very massive stars, pair- instability supernovae and intermediate-mass black holes with the sevn code, MNRAS470, 4739 (2017), arXiv:1706.06109 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2017

  45. [46]

    D. D. Hendriks, L. A. C. van Son, M. Renzo, R. G. Iz- zard, and R. Farmer, Pulsational pair-instability super- novae in gravitational-wave and electromagnetic tran- sients, MNRAS526, 4130 (2023), arXiv:2309.09339 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [47]

    Farmer, M

    R. Farmer, M. Renzo, S. E. de Mink, P. Marchant, and S. Justham, Mind the Gap: The Location of the Lower Edge of the Pair-instability Supernova Black Hole Mass Gap, ApJ887, 53 (2019), arXiv:1910.12874 [astro- ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2019

  47. [48]

    Leung, K

    S.-C. Leung, K. Nomoto, and S. Blinnikov, Pulsational Pair-instability Supernovae. I. Pre-collapse Evolution and Pulsational Mass Ejection, ApJ887, 72 (2019), arXiv:1901.11136 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  48. [49]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, Binary Black Hole Population Properties Inferred from the First and Second Observing Runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo, ApJL882, L24 (2019), arXiv:1811.12940 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  49. [51]

    Edelman, Z

    B. Edelman, Z. Doctor, and B. Farr, Poking Holes: Looking for Gaps in LIGO/Virgo’s Black Hole Popu- lation, ApJL913, L23 (2021), arXiv:2104.07783 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  50. [52]

    A. Ray, I. M. Hernandez, S. Mohite, J. Creighton, and S. Kapadia, Nonparametric Inference of the Population of Compact Binaries from Gravitational-wave Observa- tions Using Binned Gaussian Processes, ApJ957, 37 (2023), arXiv:2304.08046 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [53]

    T. A. Callister and W. M. Farr, Parameter-Free Tour of the Binary Black Hole Population, Phys. Rev. X14, 021005 (2024), arXiv:2302.07289 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [54]

    Afroz and S

    S. Afroz and S. Mukherjee, Phase space of binary black holes from gravitational wave observations to unveil its formation history, Phys. Rev. D112, 023531 (2025), arXiv:2411.07304 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [55]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt,et al., GWTC-1: A Gravitational- Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Sec- ond Observing Runs, Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019

  54. [56]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, A. Adams, C. Adams, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt,et al., Population Proper- ties of Compact Objects from the Second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog, ApJL913, L7 (2021), arXiv:2010.14533 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  55. [57]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, A. Adams, C. Adams, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt,et al., GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First Half of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021

  56. [58]

    C. L. Rodriguez, M. Zevin, P. Amaro-Seoane, S. Chat- terjee, K. Kremer, F. A. Rasio, and C. S. Ye, Black holes: The next generation—repeated mergers in dense star clusters and their gravitational-wave properties, Phys. Rev. D100, 043027 (2019), arXiv:1906.10260 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  57. [59]

    C. L. Rodriguez, N. C. Weatherford, S. C. Coughlin, P. Amaro-Seoane, K. Breivik, S. Chatterjee, G. Fra- gione, F. Kıro˘ glu, K. Kremer, N. Z. Rui,et al., Modeling Dense Star Clusters in the Milky Way and beyond with the Cluster Monte Carlo Code, ApJS258, 22 (2022), arXiv:2106.02643 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2022

  58. [60]

    Barber and F

    J. Barber and F. Antonini, Formation and evolution of binary black holes in N-body simulations of star clusters with up to two million stars, MNRAS538, 639 (2025), arXiv:2410.03832 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [61]

    A. Mai, K. Kremer, and F. Kıro˘ glu, Shadows of the Colossus: Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in a 10- million-body Globular Cluster Simulation, ApJ998, 138 (2026), arXiv:2510.21916 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2026

  60. [62]

    C. S. Ye, M. Fishbach, K. Kremer, and M. Reina- Campos, Mass Distribution of Binary Black Hole Merg- ers from Young and Old Dense Star Clusters, ApJ997, 267 (2026), arXiv:2507.07183 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  61. [63]

    Antonini, M

    F. Antonini, M. Gieles, and A. Gualandris, Black hole growth through hierarchical black hole mergers in dense star clusters: implications for gravitational wave de- tections, MNRAS486, 5008 (2019), arXiv:1811.03640 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  62. [64]

    Kritos, E

    K. Kritos, E. Berti, and J. Silk, Massive black hole assembly in nuclear star clusters, Phys. Rev. D108, 083012 (2023), arXiv:2212.06845 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  63. [65]

    Spectral siren cosmology from gravitational-wave observations in GWTC-4.0

    I. Maga˜ na Hernandez and A. Palmese, Spectral siren cosmology from gravitational-wave observations in GWTC-4.0, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2509.03607 (2025), arXiv:2509.03607 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [66]

    Maga˜ na Hernandez and A

    I. Maga˜ na Hernandez and A. Palmese, Evidence of a new feature in the binary black hole mass distribu- 8 tion at 70M J from gravitational-wave observations, Phys. Rev. D111, 083031 (2025)

    2025

  65. [67]

    A. J. Amsellem, I. Maga˜ na Hernandez, A. Palmese, and J. Gassert, Data-Driven Trends and Subpopulations in the Gravitational Wave Binary Black Hole Merger Pop- ulation with UMAP, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2603.06566 (2026), arXiv:2603.06566 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2026

  66. [68]

    Heavy Black-Holes Also Matter in Standard Siren Cosmology

    G. Pierra and A. Papadopoulos, Heavy Black-Holes Also Matter in Standard Siren Cosmology, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2601.03257 (2026), arXiv:2601.03257 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  67. [69]

    Farmer, M

    R. Farmer, M. Renzo, S. E. de Mink, M. Fishbach, and S. Justham, Constraints from Gravitational-wave De- tections of Binary Black Hole Mergers on the 12C(α, γ)16O Rate, ApJL902, L36 (2020), arXiv:2006.06678 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  68. [70]

    J. S. Vink, E. R. Higgins, A. A. C. Sander, and G. N. Sabhahit, Maximum black hole mass across cos- mic time, MNRAS504, 146 (2021), arXiv:2010.11730 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  69. [71]

    Maga˜ na Hernandez and A

    I. Maga˜ na Hernandez and A. Palmese, Astrophysics in- formed Gaussian processes for gravitational-wave pop- ulations: Evidence for the onset of the pair-instability supernova mass gap, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2508.19208 (2025), arXiv:2508.19208 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [72]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.25579, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.25579

    V. Tiwari, Population of Binary Black Holes In- ferred from One Hundred and Fifty Gravitational Wave Signals, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2510.25579 (2025), arXiv:2510.25579 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  71. [73]

    Wang, Y.-J

    Y.-Z. Wang, Y.-J. Li, J. S. Vink, Y.-Z. Fan, S.-P. Tang, Y. Qin, and D.-M. Wei, Potential Subpopulations and Assembling Tendency of the Merging Black Holes, ApJL 941, L39 (2022), arXiv:2208.11871 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  72. [74]

    Resolving the Stellar-Collapse and Hierarchical-Merger Origins of the Coalescing 15 Black Holes,

    Y.-J. Li, Y.-Z. Wang, S.-P. Tang, and Y.-Z. Fan, Resolv- ing the Stellar-Collapse and Hierarchical-Merger Ori- gins of the Coalescing Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 051401 (2024), arXiv:2303.02973 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [75]

    Antonini, I

    F. Antonini, I. M. Romero-Shaw, and T. Callister, Star Cluster Population of High Mass Black Hole Mergers in Gravitational Wave Data, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 011401 (2025), arXiv:2406.19044 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [76]

    Antonini, T

    F. Antonini, T. Callister, F. Dosopoulou, I. M. Romero-Shaw, and D. Chattopadhyay, Inferring the pair-instability mass gap from gravitational wave data, Phys. Rev. D112, 063040 (2025), arXiv:2506.09154 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [77]

    Gravitational-wave constraints on the pair-instability mass gap and nuclear burning in massive stars

    F. Antonini, I. Romero-Shaw, T. Callister, F. Dosopoulou, D. Chattopadhyay, M. Gieles, and M. Mapelli, Gravitational waves reveal the pair- instability mass gap and constrain nuclear burning in massive stars, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2509.04637 (2025), arXiv:2509.04637 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  76. [78]

    Pierra, S

    G. Pierra, S. Mastrogiovanni, and S. Perri` es, The spin magnitude of stellar-mass black holes evolves with the mass, A&A692, A80 (2024)

    2024

  77. [79]

    Antonini and M

    F. Antonini and M. Gieles, Population synthesis of black hole binary mergers from star clusters, MNRAS492, 2936 (2020), arXiv:1906.11855 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  78. [80]

    Barausse, V

    E. Barausse, V. Morozova, and L. Rezzolla, On the Mass Radiated by Coalescing Black Hole Binaries, ApJ758, 63 (2012), arXiv:1206.3803 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2012

  79. [81]

    Spera, M

    M. Spera, M. Mapelli, and A. Bressan, The mass spectrum of compact remnants from the PARSEC stellar evolution tracks, MNRAS451, 4086 (2015), arXiv:1505.05201 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2015

  80. [82]

    Antonini and M

    F. Antonini and M. Gieles, Merger rate of black hole bi- naries from globular clusters: Theoretical error bars and comparison to gravitational wave data from GWTC- 2, Phys. Rev. D102, 123016 (2020), arXiv:2009.01861 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

Showing first 80 references.